Nov 22, 2013 1:15 PM

Remember. EVERY CENT a Government worker makes, was taken by force, from somebody else.

When they raise children, they feed those children with food paid for with money that was taken by force from someone else.

They KNOW this because they push all the paper that turns extortion into "legal" money they can spend.

They "spend" it by making new rules to enforce, for your "safety".

...and if any get charged, they get off, or they get a slap on the wrist.

Kill the child of a lawyer or a fake "sheriff" or any other stranger acting under "authority" a few times, and see how much of a price they are willing top pay personally to have this "authority".

NONE of you chose this, but they act like you did. They PRESUME you did. They think its their RIGHT to harm you.

...so THEREFORE you can kill their children under the same "authority". After all, we're all equal under the law.

As their child bleeds out in front of them, be sure to offer them comforting words like "I'm just doing my job", "there was a court order", "it's all perfectly legal", and of course "That's what you get for ignoring authority".

The Nuremberg defence...

"just following orders" doesn't fly. If they are knowingly doing this, then the intent is harmful... Believing they are right in system that teaches people to believe/ think a certain way or not to think; Are they not victims too? It is like blaming the dog for biting when in fact it has been trained to what it thinks it needs to protect. But once dogs go around the bend, they are a danger to others.... I am trying to grasp this. It is foreign to me.

So it would be appealing to the rapist: to have any intelligent discourse on possible solutions... I get it, but it seems drastic... Its like a pre-emptive strike against thought crime... Making me a as big of a threat to them as they are to me. And the 2 wrongs do not make a right thing is going off in my head...

I am struggling with this.

Every atrocity that was comitted by the "authorized" employees of Hitler, Mao, Polpot,Stalin, and all the U.S.Presidents was done under the quise of it all being legal... True justice has no standing in legal land. Atrocities are committed by their employees everyday upon the populace and that same populace would seem to be suffering from Stockholm syndrome, as they, like the populace under those same dictators Hitler, Mao,etc.etc.are all condoning it because its legal. " these slaves seem to revere the chains that bind them"

If you choose to use a hatchet on their children, be sure to say "I'm just following orders" to the beat of your blows.

Now I know there are some government prudes reading this and thinking "I don't care how much we fucked you over, you don't target kids"!

Well you don't care how much you fucked me over NOW, so I don't care if you are begging for your child's life. I just don't.

If we're going to be treated like violent criminals, we might as well get the benefit of being violent criminals!

I'm not one of you freeloaders who don't want to pay their mortgage.

I'm not one of these people who don't pay their taxes.

I'm someone a scuzzball lawyer stole from and the courts and cops protected.

Martin Sutton witnessed this happening. He even got the fake transcripts to my case and compared them to the video footage! I even showed where to go to press charges...

Nothing. Nothing gets done. You all talk a pretty tale, and cling to bullshit.

SO, from this day forward, when you ask what to do, my answer is: Pick a lawyer. Kill their child. Pick a cop. Kill their child. Pick a Government worker (Corrections officers are a good worthy choice, being zookeepers/kidnappers, and all). Kill their kid.

If you could video it for me, I'd REALLY appreciate it.

...

I wonder if Defective Poutine is reading this?

If you DO this sort of thing (and I can't DISCOURAGE it in good conscience) be sure you tell them the Admiral says "Hi"...and that he's really sorry to hear about the horrible things that happened to their children. ;)

Fucking stockholm syndrome... When put into the context of the above ( Stalin, Polpot, Hitler), then life is at stake, mine. I will defend it. So in reality , my life is at risk for even learning this stuff, I am threat to the state as it stands. But to slaughter innocents who were born into something they had no choice over before they can make decisions for them selves makes me one of them... (that being said the Jesuits love to recruit children and the origins of the word infantry- infant- child soldiers) Whether I take one life or many, it makes me like them... That is what is causing me a problem. I am not like them. However I have killed a living creature and those memories are not pleasant. My mind is breaking.

The previous is for entertainment purposes only.

I'd be really entertained to see one of Dougie's loved ones die in front of him, so CLEARLY it's for entertainment purposes. :D

Clearly... :-P

I don't like ambiguity. Hence the disclaimers.

You can live with victimization if you like. I have a bookkeeping system. You victimize me, you get billed. I have no court of competent jurisdiction to use, so you'd better pay your bills as if your child's life depends on it...

...because it does.

Simple rules. Requires no interpretation.

...and the child would grow up at the expense of YOU. Food taken from YOUR MOUTH goes to feed these breeding parasites.

There are too many people, and while there are children starving, the children of government workers don't actually have a right to life. They are "proceeds of crime".

...unless they weren't registered. I wouldn't kill an unregistered child.

PROCEEDS OF CRIME

It is a foreign way of thinking at this point. My journey out of victimization led me here. I have these instilled ideas of all children being innocent. The proceeds of crime makes perfect sense, that they are the product of fraud. We are taught all life is sacred in one moment, the next a helicopter gun ship takes out a bunch of people at a funeral... The governments do not value the sanctity of life.. I do, they have monetized our value and stolen it all.. Legally... It is a harsh reality. Time to be a great white instead of a seal... It is a challenge to even stretch to thinking about this... My empathy is at times harmful to myself... I am the guy who helps people... Out of misplaced kindness, that is what is fucking with me, my compassionate nature.

They don't care. They think it's their RIGHT to kidnap children and put them in the hands of paedophiles. Killing their children is COMPASSION.

Very true

... then they are the next generation who thinks it their right... Much like a religious thing where they believe. So it would be like cutting out cancer... Taking a life is no small thing to me. Children can be weaponized as well... L.R.A. - Lords resistance Army, roaming the area around Uganda, Rwanda the southern Sudan... Constantly kidnapping children... weaponizing them, so if they are little effective weapons... We have a nation done south, who cannot live with out the hope of Jesus... There is no reasoning with a believer... OK, I get it... don't like it, but I get it.

The only difference between them and me is 44 years of looking for reality. Not conforming, being victimized by said paedophile's, As well as the consequences of having the shit kicked out of me numerous times by the club. If I draw on that ( seething rage below surface), It is not so hard. Just goes against everything I believe... ( I know :-( ) Which is not a bases for any rational thought. Thinking wrong and valuing wrong, really does get in the way.

I really have fuck all to do !! :D

On one level I'm getting this...

If a liened person held within a private trust gets harmed by a/any public servant(s) or have been harmed by any public servant(s), remedy may be sought by causing them a civil death...lien the person into the private trust...lien their chattel property (children) as well, because they are, at least in the state's eyes/clubhouse rules, a product of the person/parent entity...it would be a duty of the trustee(s) of a private trust to secure remedy against any entity causing harm or extracting value/making a false claim against trust property...so factually, the trustee is absolutely 'just doing my job'. :D

By doing so, money of account has been created to the value of the lien(s) and can be marked in the asset column of the corporation holding the private trust.

That book value/money of account may then be deposited/transferred onto Roguesupport Inc's books, or some other corporate entity, for their use of say, creating a bank or other such business activity, which is none of my business, in much the same way as it's none of my business what any bank does with the funds once they are deposited.

The only requirement being that the book value of the deposited assets is available to be returned, upon request, at some mutually agreed future date.

...wow!! :D ...but for entertainment purposes only, of course...

What difference there is between a liened person kept in private trust, or simply a person ?

In regards to: gets harmed by a/any public servant(s) or have been harmed by any public servant(s),

? :/

If PIERRE DAOUST gets harmed by a public servant let say....as the Sole authorized administrator for that said person that has been harmed.......what's preventing "ME" of starting an administration process on this ?

1). Sending an AFFIDAVIT on the facts. 2). Sending an INVOICE with a price list regarding PIERRE DAOUST's cost for whatever the cause these harms has.... 3). Sending a statement 4). sending a NOTICE saying Hey, you gotta pay :D 5). Sending a Final Notice saying Hey, next time I will default you 6). sending a default notice saying Hey, I gave you ALL the opportunities to fix this matter and you did not, this is the last 10 days you have before I register a LIEN on your person's stuff 7). Register a lien.

Thanks Pete.

In some ways it depends what you want to do with the Lien Pete Daoust...

If you want to collect on it, then it probably doesn't matter whether you do it in your personal capacity or through a corporation.

If the person you keep in your pocket or in your truck is held/been liened into the private trust held by the corporation you are the sole shareholder of, then the trustee would be making a claim on behalf of the trust...because the person is now trust property.

As soon as the lien is perfected, the value of the lien is an asset in the corporation you are sole shareholder of.

For example, you lien the person in your pocket (into the private trust) for $2.5 Million...the value of the trust has increased in value by $2.5 Million...this goes into the asset column of the corporation holding the trust & hey presto, the book value of the corporation has just increased by $2.5 Million.

The corporation can now show the company books to say, a bank & borrow maybe $250 000.00 against the asset value ($2.5 Million) of the corporation.

You now have $250 000.00 in money of exchange that you can use to do business with, by converting money of account into money of exchange, pretty much out of thin air.

You can return the loaned funds at some future time or just surrender the $2.5 Million lien as collateral for the loan & keep the $250 000 cash...(but you would probably want to keep and control the lien of the person in your pocket).

However, IF you have a perfected lien against say, a public servant that attempted to harm/cause damage to trust property, and you surrendered the lien to a bank, you keep the cash, the bank can onsell the lien OR collect on it because they are the holder in due course...and they can wield a lot more power & cause a lot more damage to the person than you, and you have the benefit of converting the money of exchange into bitcoins for Fucks the Puppy's wallet :D

Please feel free to correct any errors Scott Duncan, either in principle or terminology, for entertainment purposes only...

Yep, I get ALL that...... :)

Just need to ESTABLISH a fucking trust :D

This kind of stuff can end up in some HUGE business fuck ups ... :D

That's what accountants are for...

Thanks Stuart Stone... I have a default around the word kill... I get it once again ,.. :-D

fucking programming...

It just resonates with the conversation from yesterday...same principles...and an opportunity to do what the banks do...create money of exchange from money of account, using the principles of surety & accounting :D

Have you established a TRUST Stuart Stone ?

Yes it does... perfectly, I am still working on knee jerk reactions to a life long program... This old dog is learning some new tricks. However previous owner was abusive and dangerous... So reboot... and it helps cement the epiphany.. again.. it is almost like having it twice... you were right about it taking a couple of days...

None of your business Pete Daoust :D

:(

Pete Daoust, Just some stuff I found on a letterhead in my office :D ...Established in XXXX in XXXX, the XXXXXXXXXXXX Trust is a private trust, enjoying a rich history of administering the affairs of its exclusive clientele from all corners of the globe. Its exemplary record speaks for itself, with its Board of Trustees bound by a strict code of ethics and conduct.

Anyone inquiring or attempting to claim against assets held in trust usually back off rather quickly (or at least proceed a lot more warily) after receiving a letter from the board of trustees

O.o

Fuck me !!! O.o

...I'm glad SOMEBODY'S paying attention. Thank you Stuart! :D

Don't get me wrong, I still think Government workers all need a hatchet to the face... but that's just me.

Paying attention, paying attention....that's all I do fuck :(

Yes... my switch seems to be faulty... lesson learned. Stuart Stone helped with reset... so we can kill them all. It was the children thing that threw me. Saving kids by Killing the person... makes perfect sense... Plus I have a spare hatchet... :-D

PROCEEDS OF CRIME

In case you missed it: PROCEEDS OF CRIME

Thank YOU Scott Duncan...seriously...I came in here knowing something was wrong, a lot of things, but had no idea how to begin to put things right.

To put it mildly, there was a lot of impotent fury...now the lights are coming on, which is not only empowering, but very doable & opens up so many possibilities...for entertainment purposes only, of course :D

I promised LEGALLY AND LAWFULLY.

I looked it up, failed to make the connection. No right to proceeds from crime, So I am a litte tarded... ALL MY POSTS ARE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. here here to Stuart Stone's comment...

I am just fucking lost !! :(

Proceeds of crime = Forfeiture of property. Loss of title. Duh... :-D

Products of the crime, and stuff confiscated ?

Am I close ? :/

I don't break my promises. Though I'd really appreciate it if some of you saw fit to put an axe in Doug Levitt's face, you'd really be helping a lot of people out.

Which one the artist, or >the lawyer< ... who is this guy?

PROCEEDS OF CRIME.

Proceeds of crime = Any property that is in ones possession as a direct result of a crime committed. Ill gotten gains... Benefiting from ripping of your fellow man. The Ill gotten property in this case would be children of Govt employees.. Who have profited off of the fraud that is government. While I was sleeping...

or the chattel property of Government employees :D

Because of my past dealings with accountants, I just dont understand what they do for this....maybe Ive just hired the wrong ones, I dont know...

"Suggestions that a trustee is the settlor's agent are out of line with traditional understanding of the trustee's obligation to the public. A trustee does not lose his personal identity by assuming his fiduciary office. He is neither an agent of the settlor nor of the trust estate. Thus his torts and contracts are his own, and his liability must be met initially out of his own pocket. That he is acting pursuant to the trust terms or that the settlor attempted to excuse his conduct in advance is no defense against an innocent outsider, even though both are arguments to be made in his action for reimbursement out of the trust estate. Although the rule of personal liability originated in the refusal of the law courts to admit a trust's existence, its modern continuance has been justified as the fairest procedure for allocating responsibility. The law recognizes that no trust is self-executing. It exists only through the acts of living persons who must assume responsibility for those acts. A few statutory alterations of the rule have been made, but they are designed for the most part, to augment the claimant's remedies and not to relieve the trustee of liability."

Elias Clark, Charitable Trusts, The Fourteenth Amendment and the Will of Stephen Girard, 66 Yale Law Journal 979 (1954) at 988.

Hmmm.

Chris Evan if it's all about accounting and surety and you know zip about accounting, How are you going to Benefit? The irony of Scott's killing comments all through out this Forum. Has just hit me... When the Admiral speaks, One does his best to listen. ( speaks = articles, comments, observations, banning and or other means, always, unless not, a metaphor for these means of communication) I would like to draw your ( not scott and or others more advanced) attention to a couple of things that have affected me. Understanding has been slow for me. Contrary to popular belief, I am not really a bumbler... i am prudent in this area of my life. I went out and did a couple things straight off when I got here. I formed a corp, liened the ALL CAPS name and then tended to my vessel. I have seen first hand some scary shit. One thing always bothered me, nagged at me, Mr.Frisbey expressed it one of the posts about killing children... Got to admit, I stayed quiet, I knew I was missing the point, somehow... I carried on with my life. It is a very clever tool. It has taught me about layers and multiple levels of meaning in even the simplest of terms, especially the simplest. It has made me one who rebuts almost everything that is not correct about my circumstances. It also cemented, what I think is the first small part of the foundation to which this is leading. I am creative so it is an adventure after all. Now to finance it. Words to convey the enormity of this gift ( free) elude me.

This is a good thread. I approve :D

Permission to share with the Irish? :-D ( cut and paste whole thread )

Out of respect to The Admiral of course.

Bobis Youruncle: Proceeds of crime = Forfeiture of property. Loss of title.

Just musing out loud on this principle, but this sounds like the way we became liable...we claimed the name was us/our property without providing proper notice (ie: something that didn't belong to us)...consequently, any property held in the name is/became stolen property and/or proceeds of crime, or at least negligence on our part, a gross negligence & subsequently fraud...crime.

Similarly, using the debt notes/currency of a foreign entity, we are again taking what is not ours & using it for our benefit & consequently must accept their terms of use (statutes etc).

Either way, in our ignorance (ignorance of the law being no excuse) we consequently run the risk of forfeiture of all property to the creator of the person & becoming subject to arrest and/or detention for these actions...what a stitch up, Machiavelli would be impressed!

Instead of seizing ALL the property (proceeds of crime) & detaining all of the criminals, which would be very expensive for the state...we become subject to various episodes of bloodletting (fines, taxes, licence fees etc), much in the same way a farmer milks a cow.

I have always wondered why identity theft is not considered, in and of itself, a crime...because when we claim an identity (that we did not create and did not provide proper notice), we are in effect committing identity theft.

Thankfully, this is a two way process, for example, when a promissory note is accepted in exchange for a loan & the promissory note is then claimed by the 'lender' as their own, they have just claimed property that is not theirs, for their own benefit & we have the right to claim the value of the note back.

The worm is turning :D

I am trying to find a river dancing chimp video. :-D Again well played Stuart Stone

The word Be - cause comes to mind...

Be-Cause = Create

This is where it begins to become fun & interesting...

A 'claim' is brought against the name & delivered to me...it is unsubstantiated...my counterclaim may include the following:

1. A conditional acceptance of the claim/charge upon proof of the claim they are bringing. 2. An administrative fee for having to respond & clarify that they have not made an error. 3. A further administrative fee for having to point out the errors & false presumptions they have made when presenting the claim. 4. A hefty administration fee for having to clean up the shitstain of bringing a false claim against my good character.

They used the word 'you', not me :D

After all, I'm an honourable & honest man & take these allegations VERY seriously & an unsubstantiated claim would be an attempt to cause me harm.

Harm for which I mean to seek remedy...on my terms, privately.

The end result is either a lien or a check/cheque into an account that I nominate...not me, me doesn't have an account, so me may nominate the account of another person. (credit to Pete Daoust for the 'me' references :D )

I think I'm learning to be a very good administrator & collect a fee for clearing up administrative errors :D

Well when you say it like that... :-D

A man's word is his bond...I can't tolerate some person creating a charge/shitstain/claim that may cause harm to me...even if it is a case of mistaken identity :D

Good thing I am a good dancer... What? it was a great way to meet girls, in a small town where there were dances almost every saturday night, with buck drinks and a midnight supper... no other guys my age danced.. It worked great.. Make a girl smile and laugh, you get nice things in exchange. Kinda like this dance we are learning.

Now we know why Scott Duncan can claim to get all the best girls...he's been the only one doing this dance for quite some time now...and if this dance were a ballet, he'd probably be Nureyev.

I still feel like this guy...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z0k5flO_gE

:-D

Bitches be like, "SHAKE THAT FAT ASS, ADMIRAL"!

Ya. I could pull it off. ;)

Scott Duncan Remember. EVERY CENT a Government worker makes, was taken by force, from somebody else.

Scott Duncan When they raise children, they feed those children with food paid for with money that was taken by force from someone else.

Scott Duncan They KNOW this because they push all the paper that turns extortion into "legal" money they can spend.

Scott Duncan They "spend" it by making new rules to enforce, for your "safety".

...and if any get charged, they get off, or they get a slap on the wrist.

Kill the child of a lawyer or a fake "sheriff" or any other stranger acting under "authority" a few times, and see how much of a price they are willing top pay personally to have this "authority".

NONE of you chose this, but they act like you did. They PRESUME you did. They think its their RIGHT to harm you.

...so THEREFORE you can kill their children under the same "authority". After all, we're all equal under the law.

As their child bleeds out in front of them, be sure to offer them comforting words like "I'm just doing my job", "there was a court order", "it's all perfectly legal", and of course "That's what you get for ignoring authority".

Bump

Damn!!!! This isn't "gold," but Titanium.

I find a goodie evrry once in a while. :)

"the corporation that liens you is on the public record as doing so for the benefit of the public"

Yes! :D

"Since we're dealing with money of account here, you must abide for the tender for law that money provides" "banks can fractionally reserve 32 times the principle"

Yes. But I think it's a little less on this plantation.

since 2001, the US has had NO limit to how much they can fractionally reserve.

Was this in the Patriot Act?

Yup!

This just in :/

Bank of Canada isn't a real bank, it's a governement organization.

-Justice Pierre LABELLE Superior Court of Quebec.

:/

Here in REALITY the Bank of Canada has NOTHING TO DO WITH GOVERNMENT.

Old faggots in dresses, notwithstanding.

Pete Daoust have you seen enough to know now that you don't want to play in their club anymore?

They make up their own rules as they go along and it doesn't matter one iota if you are following their rules, they will not let you win!

And you have paid for those "rules," codes, statutes and as Scott says you are not getting what you paid for. :(

"It's the law" is only valid if the TRUSTEES do their job properly.

They don't. They think you are property now.

You paid for that "Law" that gives the french faggot in a black dress, the job.

You paid for that law, and you didn't get what you paid for.

#ItsOKtoKillThem

Wow. I'm quoting you this morning.

EXACTLY the topic I brought up with the pirates this morning. Perfect. Timing. :D