The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Nov 09, 2013 10:59 AM

Stuart Stone

Marcus of www.servantking.info has been mentioned in various threads at different times...

If the Admiral allows it, here's an update via email:

'Hi: I told you I would reply when I decided. Unraveled Programs will be online in just a few days. Check Daily. Due to the many kind comments I have received, I have decided to give my work to you. All I ask is for you to create as many links as you can to www.servantking.info, all around the world. Not for my benefit, but for the benefit of others. I will also provide on the website the You-tube, Embed Code for all of the videos. Please place both the Confusion and Unraveled Videos on as many websites as you can. This will be your investment. "For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that." Till then ..... my name is Marcus'

Servant King

servantking.info

Read Comments

Scott Duncan

Take the fucking GOD shit out! Fuck! That serves the same people.

The ONLY time I EVER see "Gurus" suddenly "become free-as-in-free-beer" is because they wish to "reach out" to me.

EVERY TIME in the past 30 years, that has been the case. I'm not saying it is the case NOW, but that has been my experience.

He is CLOSE, but notice THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER never comes up, and no mention of the "everybody knows", costing a shitload of currency with a tender for law attached.

*SPOILER ALERT* Nobility invented "GOD" in the 1500's

Stuart Stone

The God shit is pretty heavy & tiresome. I was not aware of the extent of this prior to posting this thread & beginning to listen to the program. However, he arrives at some of the same conclusions:

You are the Creator.

You can't serve their 'laws' & your own.

I don't know if he is a hardcore theist (sounds that way on the surface) but he makes an interesting premise: It doesn't matter whether you believe (there's that word again) in 'God' or not, it is what their system is based around, so use their systems to your own advantage. (this may be an example of highly flawed thinking on my part)

You can't serve two masters (ie: their laws & your own).

By claiming what is not yours (he hasn't said it (yet), but I'm guessing he is referring to the name and/or BC), you caused/created your own problems/slavery.

I am listening through this program for 4 main reasons:

1. To develop my critical thinking & reasoning (eg: to see if I can recognise errors of omission wrapped up in truths/half truths) 2. To determine if there are any useful practical applications 3. To find out if this is an opt out (defensive) approach, and/or a lien the fuck out of it approach (strong defence mixed with a strong offence). 4. To determine if this is (another) example of me thinking wrong & valuing the wrong things.

General invitation: Feel free to pull apart & expose the holes in my thinking (I realise that there is a strong possibility that I DON'T think :P ). This is a learning process & sometime the biggest lessons are learnt from mistakes.

Stuart Stone

Thank you.

The 'Why' probably falls into the category of my previously listening to 'gurus', without using a constructive/critical approach:

eg: Rob Menard initially...to paraphrase: You're free you're free, the system is evil, but give me some cash & let's drink some beer.

I knew something wasn't quite right but couldn't work it out for myself: ie: a lack of understanding of what 'this note is legal tender' means & the consequences of still being tied to the dependence on legal tender (I'm out of the system but I still rely on it...which translates as I'm not really out of the system after all).

Good intent but harmful outcomes/results.

Dean Clifford: trying to fix the system from within, by relying upon their own rules & assuming they will act with honour & integrity. I'm finally beginning to grasp the concept of the system being broken beyond repair & I greatly appreciate the way Dean acts in honour & his integrity in trying to help change the system for the better.

However, when they don't adhere to their own rules, we've got no chance and can't do much if we're in a cage. So, although he has a big set of balls, the divestment approach & starving the hand that beats us probably has a lot more merit to it...until they get (more) desperate.

There is no disrespect intended toward either of these men (actually a great deal of respect & admiration) as I have learnt from both in comprehending what they teach & from observing some of the results.

Then there's the remove myself from Commerce & pity the dumb bastard that tries to cause me harm approach. I realise this is only the tip of the iceberg, but my comprehension is expanding.

This has caused a huge paradigm shift for me: To opt out & remove myself means becoming self reliant (or having a network that is interdependent & self reliant), for energy, food & currency just to name a few.

To learn how to use the 'tools' of protection effectively (liening the name, corporate & trust structure etc) as well as extract value from the pirates, and how to navigate in the system while getting organised & prepared to get out.

The biggest part of this shift is learning how to think effectively. The 'You all think wrong & value the wrong things' quote couldn't be more true.

I am currently in the situation of recovering the 'value' from the original notes of indebtedness I signed in relation to a couple of mortgages. Consequently, I need to have some comprehension of 'clubhouse rules' & procedure. The other party is in default & have not responded to my affidavit. I'm in the process of getting a default judgement (UK).

My main concern is how to ensure that the court adheres to its own procedures so that I achieve the result I require...and what to do if I don't get my desired result.

This is largely why listening to lessons from those that still interact within that system (or are more familiar with that system) is useful to me.

Scott Duncan

...and remember; this isn't a cult. I ENCOURAGE critical thinking. Cults NEVER do that. They can't.

Cults need followers. I don't.

I mention this because that is the latest label I've been given. I thought I'd kill it with a bitch-slap of reality. :D

August le Blanc

I stumbled upon Robert Menard, Dean Clifford doing research into the legal process. To take care of myself. I have lived without credit and by trade, barter, contract most of my life.. along with ventures into those things called "jobs" which don't fit me... Went to work in film where discipline is tight on set... just like a ship :-D Having immersed myself in DE-programming myself once I figured out I was being lied to... My whole life, by misinformed, misguided and well intentioned individuals, who valued wrong... It was just at the tip of things... I still had a hankering something wasn't right and it eluded me until the Admiral's Bitch slapped me on Dean's page and then I asked some questions and was invited here. The rest has been like described so well by Stuart Stone. I too am engaged in critical thinking and investigating shit to see where the flaws and the nuggets are, cause some sources have lies sandwiched between truths and none of these fuckers talk about the legal tender...

Dean Kory

This is no longer like watching your baby take it's first steps...more like listening to them read that book they have read a million times and now actually contemplating the story line and asking all the right questions and even finding some answers! Brings a tear to my eye!

Anibal Jose Baez

Ok, I just finished watching all of the "unraveled" video series. I had to smoke a ton of weed, and have good unprotected sex to detox from all the God/Bible "program" he uses.

Marcus REALLY believes in God, Jesus, Satan, satanist running the nations of men, and the Bible. He also believes the Bible is the word of God himself, the ROYAL LAW that we must follow/agree with, and contains in itself the solution to regain our Birthright, and be free from the bondage to Satan/Nations/States, by way of asking God for forgiveness and going back to his covenant, having a "civil death," "burning" all contracts with the State, and not use their copyrighted name. Thus, regaining DOMINION over God's inheritance, our right to property, and other good stuff. (But he advises to look for a good copy translation of the Bible... you don't want to get even one word wrong... one word can change the whole meaning... I guess he really trust publishers...) He also hates the theory of Evolution, for it's main purpose is to bury God, and bury the knowledge that we are entitled to land, and our Birthright.

How can anyone have so many things right, but for the wrong reasons?

He knows the idea of government by men is delusional, he says believe is a bad thing and does not stand to knowledge, he is right about paying attention to words, about AUTHOR, INTENT, CAPACITY while in court, avoiding contracts with these criminal enterprises, not acting as the name, the we are "the face of God" (we are supreme) and many other things that are true, but for the wrong reasons.

It's a somehow disappointing feeling.

Gail Marie

I watched the first 7 then jumped to the last one. By the end of the last one, it felt like the whole thing was an elaborate recruiting effort to get people born again in a religious sense :/.

As I comprehend it according to his 'program', we are slaves period, the question is 'who is your master'

Derek Moran

I just started part 7. The ONLY way i got this far was from going through old-threads on here with actual USEFUL content. And if he mentions GOD one more time.........oh fuck...he just did

*goes to find some Heroin to 'Mainline'*

Scott Duncan

There is NO FILTERING. You think you are the first to try?

Ok, let me shit on your next meal and tell you to eat it, because it still hast the same nutrition/value. You can "filter out" the shit i plopped on top!

CHOW DOWN! You only have to eat the shit you didn't pick out! YUMMY!

SO, if you TRULY think "filtering out" the "GOD crap" works, I will happily drop by and shit on your next meal :D

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

I tend to look for the underlying agenda with these folks. He not only mentions nothing of LEGAL TENDER, but also neglects any reference about TRUSTS. For a guy previously representing the BAR, and seemingly annoyed because he recently lost his chickens... My best guess is he wants to become a MINISTER. :D

...and then collect some MONEY OF EXCHANGE

Derek Moran

In his video- 'The Determiner,' Marcus starts making relevance:

"WILL do, is a PROMISE...and a PROMISE can be DEMANDED in LAW, someone PROMISES you something you can DEMAND IT and you can ENFORCE IT, so you gotta be VERY careful what you say you will PROMISE, cuz thats based on your WILL, it 'will' BACKFIRE on you if you dont wanna do it/that...remember- the WILL is the LAW"

Pete Daoust

OK, maybe I should add in my letters.....Tell me that there are NO other administrative methods to administrate this debt, other then BUYING back the debt, and I WILL PAY for it. :D

What do you think ? would that be considered GOOD FAITH ? :/

Derek Moran

You figured-out something UNDER SEAL is PROOF that someone intended to keep a PROMISE?

..does the Birth Certificate you have, have a SEAL on it?

Signed, "Where there is a WILL (or Trust Deed, Dean Clifford)- there is a WAY!" :D

Derek Moran

Gail Marie For those that may have missed it

Scott Duncan THE Creator has the SUPREME law. YOU are THE creator. "God" is an invention by the nobility to FILL that "THE CREATOR" spot, so you will think you aren't entitled.

Chip Douglas

You've mentioned Scott of the simplicity in what you teach, and, if it's hard you're doing it wrong. Marcus here from 'Servant-King' has popped-up again about some future Webinars he'll be putting on, and i was just re-reading some of his stuff. On his page, he states:

" And of course, you will obtain your reward....if...you can renew your mind.

The Reward: What you lost.....is restored by default."

Whatever he had restored "by default," Scott.....did it happen after he POSTED, his PROPER NOTICE, into the PUBLIC RECORD?

Stuart Stone

I didn't bother with Marcus' email update....there is nothing there that I require...but maybe the $20 is to purchase casino chips at the Fortress of remand casino...he may be attempting to beat the 2 Deans' records :P

Tom Davies

The original "person", I happened to have, was laminated, but was lost one day while I was out fishing. Probably in good condition still. The next "person" was some shitty banknote paper, the same kind they used to make the old "gun licenses" with....slowly disintegrated over the years. The new one ts that new plastic shit you cant even wipe your ass with...lol.