The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Oct 31, 2013 12:29 AM

Chris Evan

Last Monday, I swore out an Affidavit with an Exhibit A (Notice of Mistake) and Exhibit B (Birth Certificate) and entered it into the court file. When it was "my turn", the Judge looked at me and said "Do you have anything to add to this motion?" I said "It is sworn testimony in the form of an Affidavit, it is not a motion." He said "I am treating it as a motion." I said "Then you would be treating it wrong." He said "Motion denied."

Scott, what would you have done in this situation?

Read Comments

Chris Evan

The full story...Monday I got a call from a "potential client" and scheduled an appointment, when I showed up , the "potential customer" identified himself as an agent of the State Police and said he was exercising a warrant. I went Tuesday to enforce what I noticed because I want to be left alone

Chris Evan

The Officer was executing an Arrest Warrant for Failure to Appear in the matter in which I issued already issued an Affidavit with Exhibit A Notice of Mistake and Exhibit B, Birth Certificate.

Then subsequently, he charged me with Operating after Suspension

Kirsten Carlstrom

I have a couple of questions. I may be in the same situation as Chris and I'd like some suggestions on how to respond. If the courts have received my NoM, affidavit and bc, but the warrant is still out their for my arrest, what should I do now? How should I respond if the police come after me again? How should I respond if I'm in public , at the airport, or on the side of the road and the police are attempting to handcuff me even though these documents have been submitted into the courts but the account has not been settled? Is there something else I should do to settle this matter without appearing in court?

Anibal Jose Baez

Thanks Beverly! I sure missed that particular subject. If there is a link, or notes, for that thread you want to share, I will appreciate it. Thanks!

I know "friends of the court" INFORM.

What if a "friend of the court" has seen PROOF, that a living man is been MISTAKEN for a NAME? I would think is a DUTY to INFORM the court, perhaps via SWORN NOTICE in form of an Affidavit, of such terrible MISTAKE.

Is this a real possibility, Scott Duncan, or should I put all that back into my ass?

Stuart Stone

IF law is about intent, then how can a third party determine the intent of your affidavit/motion Chris Evan?

As Dean C mentioned previously....repeatedly...the author is the sole authority able to determine intent.

With that in mind, is this a reasonable question to pose?

'Mr Supernumerary, by what authority do you presume to be able to read my mind & determine my intent when it states clearly at the top of the document the document's intent? Or are you volunteering to act as surety in this matter?'

Pete Daoust

Hey, Justice so and so,

I would like to point out that YOU decided to administrate the person CHRIS SCHULTE on that "date", and I have good reasons to believe you've done it WITHOUT authorization, in FACT, I am the Sole Authorized Administrator for CHRIS.....

That leads me to believe that you fully accepted SURETY in this matter, so as the BENEFICIARY, I will wait for my check, and let you do the administration, until this matter is completed.

:P

Blake Gardner

Also consider telling him criminal charges MAY be filed for fiduciary misconduct, dereliction of duty, partiality, abuse of authority and fraud with the police and relevant ombudsman. We do that over here in dk because of the liening barriers, not that the system does anything about it, however the person in question does not like having such reports officially filed in the system with the name attached and to avoid any possible repercussions of said report disappear the case ect...

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

I dunno Chris, I think of Dean's videos and the fact that there is a TRUST relationship actually going on. I seem to be less disregarded when I reinforce the fact that I only understand that �not that I have much experience in a court. I would keep asking questions because the only thing you understand is that you are beneficiary in this matter... Just don't stop asking questions and DO NOT allow ANY of them be unanswered.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

How are my exhibits considered "motions"? � Can you define "motion" so I might UNDERSTAND where you derived this from? � Is that YOUR determination of what I have put fourth?

ie. Any statement that pops up in your head, turn it into a question :D

Anibal Jose Baez

My question about "friend of the court" came as an idea (from deep within my rectum) to compliment the NoM, when "they" seem to ignore it.

I thought that if a "friend of the court" is WITNESS to "fraud upon the court", by letting the court know that he/she has PROOF (a certified copy of the previous documents filed on the record, Affidavit with NoM and BC as Exhibits) that surety, and the legal name derived from public documents are been MISTAKENLY applied to a MAN, perhaps Chris, or others in the same situation, could get more meat on their side to have "them" OBEY the RULE OF LAW.

But again, that is something I pulled out of my ass, I have no idea if it's possible, or even appropriate.

Chris Evan

NOTICE FOR CLARICICATION 11/1/13 To: Presiding Justice, Honorable Robert A Brennan From: Chris

Certified Mail #

Hello Mister Brennan,

An Affidavit was submitted into a Court File for a Case in which you were presiding over. You declared that the Affidavit was a Motion and treated it as such.

Definitions

Affidavit: A written or printed declaration or statement of facts, made voluntarily, and confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the party making it, taken before an officer having authority to administer such oath. (From: Law Dictionary: http://thelawdictionary.org/affidavit/#ixzz2jPWgzIoG)

Motion: In practice. An occasional application to a court by the parties or their counsel, in order to obtain some rule or order, which becomes necessary either in the progress of a cause, or summarily and wholly unconnected with plenary proceedings. (From: Law Dictionary: http://thelawdictionary.org/motion/#ixzz2jPX1HqfR

Need for further Clarification:

It seems that if a declaration of facts is submitted into the care of one who has been bestowed the high and honorable title of JUSTICE as well as being a DISINTERESTED third party mediator, then said person should exercise the utmost care and concern when FACTS are declared upon him. It seems that what you did was took a statement of FACTS and converted it into an APPLICATION.

1. Therefore, can you please clarify what your intentions were at the time you made this decision? 2. Can you please indicate how your decision conforms to Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct (which may be found here: http://www.mass.gov/cjc/code.pdf)? 3. Can you please explain why your behavior was appropriate and in the best interests of Justice? 4. All of your answers MUST be under your FULL commercial liability AND under the pains of penalty and perjury. Chris can only accept Registered Mail for this communication. All other forms of mail SHALL be disregarded.

Failure to respond shall not end the matter. The matter will be escalated until a FULL resolution and explanation has taken place. You have 10 days to answer these questions, or you will be in DEFAULT.

Thank you, Chris

Pete Daoust

Hey, Justice so and so,

I would like to point out that YOU decided to administrate the person CHRIS SCHULTE on that "date", and I have good reasons to believe you've done it WITHOUT authorization, in FACT, I am the Sole Authorized Administrator for CHRIS.....

That leads me to believe that you fully accepted SURETY in this matter, so as the BENEFICIARY, I will wait for my check, and let you do the administration, until this matter is completed.

Pete Daoust

That would be a good thing to add to your letter Chris Evan

So dear JUSTICE, I suspect and have all the good reasons to believe, that you guys seems to want to fuck around the the person I happen to have in MY pocket is SURETY :P

Pete Daoust

The TRUTH in your OWN words .....IT FUCKING SCARES ME TO DEATH what you are ATTEMPTING on "ME" and the person I happen to have in my pocket.......what's wrong with SAYING and WRITING it ?

I AM NOT A FUCKING SLAVE......what's wrong with saying it and WRITING it ?

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Chris, you are "authorized representative" for Chris... In anything you write, be sure to differentiate that these two are different. I would bring up the TRUST and that you acknowledge his "oath of office" too... just for good measure.

Pete Daoust

I know that if I would be DOING this to people, and one of them would send doccument to me with these words on it SLAVE, SCARES, SURETY FUCKING AROUND etc....I would begin to think a little bit, and maybe feel some tingglings :D

Chris Evan

Modified:

NOTICE AND DEMAND 11/1/13 To: Presiding Justice, Honorable Robert A Brennan From: Chris

Certified Mail #

Hello Mister Brennan,

On October 22, 2013, an Affidavit was submitted into a Court File for a Case in involving CHRISTOHER EVAN SCHULTE. I would like to point out that YOU decided to administrate the person CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE by turning an Affidavit into a Motion, thereby took a statement of FACTS and converted it into an APPLICATION. I have good reasons to believe that you have done so WITHOUT authorization. In FACT, I am the Sole Authorized Administrator for CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE. I didn�t create it, I never asked for it, but somehow I became the lawful holder in due course of it, so I am doing my best.

IT SCARES ME TO DEATH to think that you have the power to change the INTENT of MY CREATION in an effort to corner ME into playing the role of SURETY! I, a living man, created a declaration of facts and you changed it! What is going on here? Am I some kind of a SLAVE? Why should I bother stepping into a courtroom ever again if you are going to FUCK around with my FREEDOMS? I can only presume that my SWORN TESTIMONY and intent are not valid in your courtroom, thereby, I, the man, MUST have no business there.

This has given ME good reasons to believe that you fully accepted SURETY in this matter, so as the BENEFICIARY (which is really the only role I can possibly be), I will wait for my check, and let you do the administration, until this matter is completed.

Oh, and for good measure, you can also find the Affidavit in this communication along with 2 EXHIBITS.

Chris can only accept Registered Mail for this communication.

Failure to respond within 5 days to the questions contained in this communication and rebut ANYTHING that isn�t a FACT shall indicate acquiescence of ALL the terms and conditions indicated within the communication.

Thank you,

Chris PS�..I, the living man, am not SURETY for this Account. Would you care to swear under the pains of penalty and perjury that I am???

Anibal Jose Baez

This is probably known by most, but remember AFFIDAVITS may contain ONLY FACTS, no opinions, allegued violations, or bullshit. Just FACTS.

Take his daughter, if he is a "believer". The Bible/Torah says you can PAY with your daughters. :D

Pete Daoust

I would retract this.... Why should I bother stepping into a courtroom ever again if you are going to FUCK around with my FREEDOMS?

I, the man, MUST have no business there. : Man don't do business idiot :D

Chris can only ADMINISTRATE Registered Mail for this communication.

PS�..I, the Sole authorized ADMINISTRATOR, am not SURETY for this Account

You talk like these stupid freeman on the land sometimes Chris :D

Chris Evan

Updated...Please offer feedback.

NOTICE 11/4/13 To: Presiding Justice, Honorable Robert A Brennan From: Chris

Registered Mail #7012 1640 0001 1491 8232

Docket # Nothing has been served as of November 4, 2013

Hello Mister Brennan,

Take NOTICE�.On October 22, 2013, an Affidavit was submitted into a Court File for a Case involving CHRISTOHER EVAN SCHULTE. Take NOTICE that YOU administrated the person, CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE, by accepting an Affidavit as a Motion in open Court, and thereby took a statement of FACTS and used it as an APPLICATION. IT SCARES ME TO DEATH to think that you think you have the power to change the INTENT of MY CREATION (the BENEFICIARY) in a Public Venue with the apparent intent to corner ME into playing the role of SURETY! This gives ME good reasons to believe that you administrated this WITHOUT authorization. In FACT, I am the Sole BENEFICIARY for CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE and I have NOT given you any AUTHORIZATION. Witnessing that act gives me good reasons to believe that you are the SURETY and TRUSTEE in this matter.

Are you trying to commit FRAUD by cornering me into a fraudulent usufructory agreement under the threat of false arrest and false imprisonment under the Color of Law?

Thank you for acting as TRUSTEE, SURETY, and ADMINISTRATOR in this matter.

Chris BENEFICIARY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NON NEGOTIABLE

PS�..If ANYTHING stated is not true, you may send a sworn statement of FACTS under the pains of penalty and perjury via registered mail to Chris at 300 Andover Street, Suite 120, Peabody, Massachusetts within 5 days. All statements not rebutted shall be considered FACT.

Pete Daoust

You can't use the word trustee Chris Evan.....who appointed this no body as a trustee ?.....if there is a trustee in all this, it has to be these idiots that brought this matter in this place.....not this Unauthorized administrator.....it just dosen't make sense....

Steve Lemieux

You MADE statements in court=YOU ARE A SLAVE arguing/in dishonor IN OPEN PUBLIC COURT

FOR FUCK SAKES � STOP MAKING STATEMENTS AND/OR ANSWERING QUESTIONS WHEN SPEAKING TO THE PUBLIC SCUMBAGS, reserve what you wanna assert for your affidavits/notices

As for your notice - you will get no response, for several reasons. You can send whatever you want - just be prepared to STAND behind what you choose to send.

STAND=ASKING FOR PROOF OF CLAIM THAT WHATEVER YOU ASSERT IS NOT SO - incidentally, while making NO statements, answering NO questions and ONLY ASKING questions.

Personally, I�d file the notice/affidavit and go about my life as usual. Fuck those clowns, these �public servants� are only there to fuck you in the ass and refuse to acknowledge anything that wasn�t written by �one of the club�. If they arrest you, just remember you�re the beneficiary of the trust/secured party creditor for the defendant, whatever.. Is the birth certificate NOT a security? Is it not MY security? Is the security/birth certificate not PROOF of the FACT that I AM the beneficiary? Are you not a public servant and thus a public TRUSTEE? What would the minister of justice think of your fraudulent actions? Anyway, you are NOT the trustee/defendant so they cannot hold you forever. Keep asking for proof of claim with questions. Are you suggesting that using a driver�s license turns ME into a fictional character? Is the juristic person NOT a fictional character created by the government? Can you please explain what the fuck, YOU, a PUBLIC TRUSTEE, is doing perpetrating fraud against an honest to goodness beneficiary like me?...

For those of you who insist on making statements in court/questioning/taking to cops/other agents � remember: Depose: The term is usually applied to the deprivation of ALL authority of a sovereign.

Ok, I�m done now� ;)

Derek Moran

Here's a question Scott- because we've ALL been in Chris' position and pulled-over by the police at one-point-or-another while TRAVELLING in a car we just happened to have-our-hands-on-the-steering-wheel-of.....where does it even SAY that we have to pull-over for these guys just because they are following BEHIND us with their EMERGENCY-LIGHTS on? :/

Derek Moran

*police officer-to-Derek* "Do you know why i pulled-you-over?"

*Derek-to-police officer* "Hello peace officer- how are you? Actually- i noticed you were tail-gating me and pulled-over on my own, for the sake of BOTH of our SAFETY. But now that you bring-it-up, where EXACTLY as Scott Duncan would say in your "Clubhouse Rules" DOES it say, that i have to pull-over for you because you were following way too closely behind me with your Emergency-Lights on by the way?" :D

Chris Evan

What do you mean Rick? I sent Affidavit/Notice of Mistake/Birth Certificate. They issued an Arrest warrant. I issued another Notice of Mistake in response to the Arrest Warrant. They executed the Arrest Warrant. I went to court in cuffs that afternoon and started asking who the Surety was. They locked me up, stifled me, proceeded, etc. What did I do wrong? Why wouldn't they just do this all over again if I, the man, don't go?

I am thinking going there as BENEFICIARY and standing up to them is the best idea, but please.....offer a better idea. I NEVER tried to deal with these idiots on the side of the road, I NEVER answered to the NAME!

Rick Carne

� 3-402. SIGNATURE BY REPRESENTATIVE.

(a) If a person acting, or purporting to act, as a representative signs an instrument by signing either the name of the represented person or the name of the signer, the represented person is bound by the signature to the same extent the represented person would be bound if the signature were on a simple contract. If the represented person is bound, the signature of the representative is the "authorized signature of the represented person" and the represented person is liable on the instrument, whether or not identified in the instrument.

Scott Duncan

I don't want to be here either... but I am... and I ain't signing anything... because I'm not a pussy.

You "affirmed" that you were a "Person" so they would "allow" you to leave...

...do you see a coward when you look in the mirror? I know I would.

Scott Duncan

Silence is Golden.

Do not answer to the name.

You are a kidnap victim. Act like one. Don't co-operate. say nothing. If you are in a bullpen, and they call your name, DON'T ANSWER.

The only thing you say is "I am here against my will, and I wish to leave", not "Ok, I'll be your bitch and assume surety if you let me go".

Derek Moran

I kept on getting asked for the NAME on one occasion last year, albeit by a government-security-guard, and every time he did, i would just keep repeating this: "Ummm...are you asking me for the name of the MAN, or, are you asking me for the name of the PERSON?".....he didnt know what the hell i was talking about, but the receptionist at the desk couldnt help but start laughing, cuz she conceded that she knew what i was talking about when i asked her and half-winked at me ;)

Steve Lemieux

Road side cop talk is a waste of time. The last time I was pulled over, I asked 3 or 4 questions only to have the pig reply "Sounds like you wanna argue" I just replied "I'm not gonna argue with some guy packin' a 9mm strapped to his fuckin' hip, do whatcha gotta do" then I shut the fuck up and jumped in the tow truck towing my car away. Point of the story is, pick your battles wisely. These fucking programmed clowns think they have all kinds of authority and it's a waste of time even trying to communicate with them. Save that shit for your paperwork.