The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Oct 28, 2013 3:58 PM

Pete Daoust

Traffic Ticket Bill of Exchange No.1

January the 10th, 2013, while I was administrating a steering wheel, and a gaz pedal, and a brake pedal, for the person I happen to have in my pocket, which is named PIERRE DAOUST, a private contractor stopped me, he has a gun on him :(

So I asked him if I was OBLIGE to give him the person�s name, he said YES. So since he had a gun, and I don�t, I gave him the name of the person I happen to have in my pocket.

The fuck up in all this is that �me�, as a Man, I don�t get to be recognize in ALL this shit, these guys are looking for PERSONS��so hey, I have one :) So he proceed with the preparation of a Bill of Exchange for PIERRE DAOUST, yes traffic tickets ARE bill of exchange.

I took it, since I am the SOLE authorized administrator for PIERRE DAOUST, and brought it in my office. After verifying all this, I could not find any CONTRACT hooked between PIERRE DAOUST, and the city of montreal.

So I sent back this BoE written NO CONTRACT on it.

Beginning of July 2013, I received a NOTICE from the city of Montreal, with a Bill of Exchange of $295.00 :D

On that NOTICE, it says that PIERRE DAOUST has been found GUILTY of something, and PIERRE DAOUST has been JUDGE for something :/ .

So I simply discharged that debt for PIERRE DAOUST, and sent a request to City of Montreal with 2 simple questions, for my OWN curiosity.

Please send me the NAME, ADDRESS and inscription number of the PERSON who decided to enter a plea for PIERRE DAOUST, and the NAME, ADDRESS and inscription number of the PERSON who judge PIERRE DAOUST�..nothing fancy, just 2 simple questions.

They�ve replied that I had to CALL them to have answer on these questions, and that if I don�t call them, They will not follow up with this matter.

So I called :D �..and of course, record that call, the lady named LISE who spoke with me on the phone, was trying to scares me with ALL that would happen if I don�t PAY the tickets, I stopped her several time during the conversation and ask her to LISTEN to me�.so I had to raise my voice a bit��and I told her to FOCUS on the 2 questions, I told her that I don�t give a shit about ANYTHING else�..

She finally answered :D �.and confirmed that a computer system entered a plea on PIERRE DAOUST, and a computer system JUDGE PIERRE DAOUST. I said THANK YOU and hung up :D

So I have wrote a nice NOTICE, you guys knows how good of an ADMINISTRATOR I am :D saying that the BoE was discharged, unless they can prove otherwise, the Bank of Canada accept it, unless they can prove otherwise, There was no DEFECT on the instrument, unless they can prove otherwise, The city of Montreal did not REFUSED the administration process so far, unless they can prove otherwise.

And PIERRE DAOUST has been judge by a computer system, and a plea has been entered for PIERRE DAOUST by a computer system, I can email the audio recording to you for your file :D

I gave them 10 days to REFUSE the administration process used concerning that BoE, and an affidavit to prove ANY of the points above.

So, 10 days after, I received a very small letter from them CONFIRMING the Name of the �Justice� who pleaded for PIERRE DAOUST, and judged PIERRE DAOUST. :D That�s it that�s all��

My thinking is that THEY just could NOT leave that computer system thing open, they were fucked with this�.and that was October the 8th, 2013. I have NOT received anything regarding a refusal concerning the administration process used to discharged that debt. Maybe Scott can say something about this ?

I will come back with Traffic Ticket Bill of Exchange No.2 Shortly, which is very interesting as well :D

Again�..my INTENTS are to get the TRUTH from these PUBLIC SERVANTS, if I amd a SLAVE, I need to know, and want the chains that goes with the title, I want these chains via REGISTERED mail :P

Thanks Pete

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

Idunno, but it constitute that they ACCEPT the administrating process, I have BEGGED for them to refuse it, and did have NOT, and still NOT.....so fuck, I have no other choices to consider this shit over, unless they still want to go over some controversy and confusion, stuff I am very well prepaired to face anytime :D

Scott Duncan

Rough times ahead for the Admiral. My time here is nearly finished. Pete Daoust made this a worthy venture. This is what Robert Mentard COULD have been.

It's not possible to say, without sounding condescending, but I'm proud of you Pierre. :)

David Vilaca

Hope you stick it out Pete Daoust, your frenchness makes learning this stuff fun and easy. If the Admiral leaves us (on the hard) then I thank him for this legacy. never have I pieced together such potent work. I may never gain value in the Admirals eyes but I sure do thank him for giving us his time.

Pete Daoust

Oh, I will stick in here for sure......I just started all this :D

It's just a begining my friend :D .....I feel like when I ACHIEVED the first bycicle ride, you remember thAT ?....fun stuff ahead, you have NO IDEA everything I have done with a bike....seriously :D

Pete Daoust

Administration is NOT work and/or job, it is a DUTY......as a TRUSTEE.....when I do administrate that person, I have the TRUSTEE hat......but ONLY then :P

That is the BEST spot for a TRUSTEE.....because no other person can do ANYTHING about it, other then DECLARING on the record, that I am a SLAVE, and don't forget the fucking chains, I want my chains if I am a SLAVE :P

Pete Daoust

Derek Moran

Have you ever played-dumb: Yes, often :D without knowing it :D

"How can i be the TRUSTEE in this equation- i thought i was the BENEFICIARY??....no because I did NOT asked to have that person in my pocket, I have NOT signed as surety for it......so it really dosen't matter.....lots of hats to use, for different circumstances.....

The MOST important thing to me, is I have a person, I have the right to its LIFE, I have the right to its LIBERTY, and I have the right to its SURETY......so as a Man, with a person in my pocket, I am at ease, well for now !!! :/

The WHOLE thing goes around the FACT that NO ONE ever ASKED me first if I want that person or not, I never signed or AGREED to its creation....this is where we need to focus on.....think about it

Let say I end up with a $20 bill in my pocket at age 16, because the Government decided to put it there, for some reasons that has NOTHING to do with me, but with some shit that they don't even take the time to EXPLAINE to me......who will do whatever he wants to do with this $20 ?....who will makes the call for it ?,

If they are not Happy the way I ADMINISTRATE that $20 bill, well just come and take it back ? ..NO ???

If they are not happy the way I administrate that person, well guess what :D They will have to come and take it back LEGALLY ?, how in the world they will do that ?....tell me .....Unless I commit a CRIME, I mean a REAL crime......what can they do ???

What are they going to do ?....

With bill of exchange I wear the TRUSTEE hat, with administrative court matters, I wear the Sole Authorized Administrator for the person, or, If they want, for some reasons, to take over the administration in a UNauthorized manner, well, I will sit down as a beneficiary and wait for my check !

But why would I end up in court ?......I have commited NO crimes ?

I could go on and on.....but I am a Man, and I have a person.....Marcus is a Man, without a person. Period.

:D

Pete Daoust

Go read my thread about Hydro-Quebec....the KEY element in that process is: I ASKED, I ASKED 3 times......you see ?....Respect, Honor, Dignity and Integrity....

There DUTY was to come back to me and say: No Sir, you have to use Bank Notes to take care of that debt, that is the ONLY option Sir

Thank You

Pete Daoust

The left side of my brain says: come on Pierre, don't be a SMUCK, like Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma called me here one time, and the RIGHT side of my brain says: Well Pierre, you need to know !!, if you don't KNOW, how will you EVOLVE ?? :/

Derek Moran

Dont forget Pete, what it says early on in OUR Trust Law book:

"...for the BENEFIT of persons (called Beneficiaries or, in old cases, CESTUIS QUE TRUST), of whom he may HIMSELF be one, and any one of whom may ENFORCE the OBLIGATION."