The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Oct 27, 2013 8:43 AM

Robert Cormier

I�m not sure if I�ve had somewhat of an epiphany, or, if the following is a shit stain that will never get posted. Here it goes:

If I understand this correctly, from my new TTFL perspective, it is important that I understand that in a system which uses money of ACCOUNT, "money" concerning the Security Instrument in my wallet, can ALSO be realized/created WITHOUT my signature.

An accountant for example, can magically �create� a negative amount of money by registering a NEW ACCOUNT in a ledger, and by identifying the SECURITY INTEREST I have in my pocket/wallet, they are investing in a gamble that I will be willing to become the SURETY for the NEGATIVE amount of money they created. They are hoping that I won�t choose to discharge/set-off the debt, and, that they can trick me into providing them with money of EXCHANGE.

If I don�t provide them either my signature (which accepts SURETY), or MONEY of EXCHANGE, the ACCOUNTANT who �signed off� on the ledger entry, and, or, the UNDERWRITERS who BONDED the actions of the PUBLIC SERVANT PERSON who "signed off" on the requisition/order to the accountant to make the entry, will surely be held ACCOUNTABLE. If the accountant entered/created a large enough negative number, AND they don�t get ME to act as SURETY for the PERSON they recently CREATED in their new ledger entry - jobs will be lost, vessels will be sunk, as BONDS become LIQUIDATED to settle the account.

AND, if I have been smart enough to follow Scott�s advice, and have previously liened the name of the SECURITY INTEREST in my pocket/wallet, the credit applied (and intended to balance out the account), is mine to claim and enjoy through the TRUST which is handled by my corporation. Once I claim it, they have to create/source even more money to settle the account.

Such a scenario therefore, serves not only my financial interests, but it also servers my AGENDA (and perhaps Scott�s agenda) in that it undermines every institution which chooses to operate and act in such a manner. It punishes them for their complicity in this global fraud.

**************

Scott, I recall you saying something about half of all math and the number zero. Were you referring to the fact that in a ledger dealing with MONEY OF ACCOUNT, half of all the numbers entered will be negative (on one side of zero), while the other half of all numbers entered will be POSITIVE (on the other side of zero) in order to balance the books (get them to RETURN TO ZERO)?

Am I way off track with this train of thought? Tips, corrections, and constructive advice/criticism is welcome as usual.

Read Comments

Cara Small

I keep telling a friend of mine that just because some one phones you or sends you a piece of paper with a number on it doesn't mean you just send them money. Some people are so easily sucked into that scam it's no wonder they believe the piece of paper or phone call from the "Oso Powerful Government". I've been there. They just happen to have a lot of stupid bullies that work for them. Seems asking questions makes a lot of these pieces of paper somehow just vanish.

Robert Cormier

Oh, the good old '80s. What do you do now for fun Scott Duncan? Send them Judgements from your Court for trying to screw around with your TRUST? BTW I realize as I type this and before I press send that this may be a really dumb question as I anticipate the answer might quite likely be: "Weed and Hookers" but, my curiosity compels me to press send anyways. :D I can barely wait for the upcoming trust post.

Robert Cormier

Is there a repository where every instance of the PERSON is recorded and kept?. Can I access the info, or do I not bother worrying because it's not really my business unless they try to force me onto the seas of commerce. My thought is that it might be prudent of me to manage the affairs of my estate and address every account concerning the NEGOTIABLE security interest in my wallet. <-- I'm also wondering this because, if I liened "my" PERSON, I want to be sure the TRUST is getting paid from every account with "my" PERSONS name on it. This also relates to my role as Executor of an estate. I need to find every existing account to determine the value of the estate before I can settle it. Obviously, I can't send registered mail to every business in the world where there may be an account.

Robert Cormier

oops ...my very bad...I'm cursing myself. Really. Just as too many think of the "father, son, and holy ghost as one entity" ready to serve them, i have a hard time, far too often, breaking up the identities of the person, trust and corporation as I think of them (in the back of my mind at least) as "me" (or there to serve me) which I repeatedly realize is wrong, hence your earlier warning of my need to be absolutely accurate, lest I screw myself royally. I should have said... if THE TRUST liens ("my") the Person, I want to be sure the TRUST is getting paid... Sorry. :(

Robert Cormier

I have a legal obligation as Executor to locate all the Bills concerning my mothers estate, and, all the Accounts. If I fail to do this fully/accurately, the beneficiaries can rightfully claim damages as far as I understand. Hmmm where to find a repository of accounts? I'm thinking there is no such animal. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152133039526055&set=a.131263581054.135775.600741054&type=1&theater