Blake Gardner, do I miss something in here ?....so far, the only thing I can think of, is WAIT.... :) .....but I am NOT really habit with WAIT, I am more into ACT than WAIT type of thing :D
I am conscious of underlying meanings, layers of understanding, language as a tool for deception and truth... I am relaying information with that in mind.
I do my best to help you comprehend and to explain things...
I get it, that some things are lost in translation...
I like your legal definition approach and way you express your thoughts... so I am doing my best to assist.
I know Jason, I know, but if I would have WAITING, just in case of NOT making a mistake, I would NOT be where I am today, not that I am that far, but with what I RECEIVED, I have made it not too bad.......I know this "not to bad" can be seen as RELATIVE and compared to what, but I know what I have done, and I know I have done it by DOING stuff, not WAITING stuff....that was my thought on this, I don't care to make MISTAKES, because I KNOW, I can correct them, been there done that SO MANY TIMES :)
But I can ASSURE you one thing Jason, mistakes will be done in very rare occasions today, because I GET IT......I get what Scott is saying, one day at a time :D
No mistakes mean you are doing fuck all, and I hear them PERFECT citizen everyday, I should have done this, I should have done that and bla bla bla, this guy done this, that lady done that.....all a fucking pile of public records, I mean bullshit :D
Anyway Bobis Youruncle, I just made that one for you....because I LOVE you :D
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMsiu_POOC4&feature=youtu.be
:P
Here we go, using setoff against the BC with the IRS: minute 28 is where it gets interesting...and he asks how to do it with other collections agencies: worth a listen...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02sJAePKuT8
So while the methodology in the above vid is accurate.
He also states " the Name is a corporation created at birth"
That is not accurate, the BC is an account as is the SIN number...
Plus I know not of this straw man terminology and stuff... :-D
Your on a roll Pete...great you got a smooth process first time out of the gate - it don't always play out that way but the deal is the same...That second option isn't conducive to us family men...
What impressed me was that he rang, asked the questions, stuck to his guns & got a result...the key part for me was the acknowledgement from the IRS employee that:
1. it's possible,
2. this is how to do it &
3. contact each other group/department as to how to do it according to their own internal procedures...
Regardless of mistakes, he got what he set out to do...in other words, it's all about intent :D
That is an insult to the beauty of Niggeresque, and shows your delusional state of mind
:-D
Someone might have to lock you up for your own protection...
if you ask the question; is that a bill of exchange, and the party can not answer the question, then refuse its acceptance from them. (so yes that is both a statement and a question).
The first BoE I have discharged, a lady working for the beneficiary of that BoE, called me and ASK me what could she do with this
I said do whatever you have to do with it
She said: well, I don't know what to do with it.
I said: OK, do like me, study the BoE act :D
She said, I have read it, but do not comprhend it :D
I said: ok :D
She said: WHY DON'T YOU DO LIKE EVERYONE ELSE AND SEND A CHEK.
I said: HAHAHAHAHA!!!
She said: WHY DO YOU COMPLICATE ALL THIS.....
I said: HAHAHAHA....
And she hung up, that was last 9th of July, never heard about them, I emailed her the AUDIO RECORDING.....:D :D
Oh, I told her, hey, I am recording all this for training purpose.....she said, I don't believe you, how can you record calls from a cell phone :D :D :D
That was HILARIOUS !!!!!
I am sure she felt out her chair when she received the email, with the audio attached.... :D
Pete Daoust-AWESOME Post!!!!! This is why I joined TTFL!!!!!!! You are a good teacher,Thanks again! Kuddos to Scott Duncan Adam Thomas and the other Mentors in TTFL!!!!