"The PERSON never received notices after NOTICING the MISTAKE, but their website say they did." - You DID point out that the PERSON was in their custody. It has nothing to do with you. Perhaps the PERSON is in the file, and thus deemed served. ;)
That is EXACTLY what I had concurred. It is not MY NAME, is in THEIR custody, I AM not SURETY of HIM and I splashed evidence all over them, is not my place, is NOT OF MY FUCKING BUSINESS what do after that.
But I wanted to bring this question up, because as part of our "programming" WE LOVE TO BE ATTACHED to that fucking NAME! And I have found myself sometimes, and seen some friends here at TTLF, still lingering for some kind of magical "approval" from our rapist, after correcting a MISTAKE.
Perhaps not the best analogy but, I think of it as this:
One receives a letter in ones mailbox, for our next door neighbor (which happen to be a government employee), Oops! Thats a MISTAKE, thats not intended for ME. So I kindly RETURN that offer to open someone elses CORRESPONDENCE, and and give it back to the REAL party with surety, for its not for ME.
Now, would it not be DELUSIONAL to, after returning a correspondence that is not for YOU, still wander, and wander about what the fuck that letter said/was for? :D
Thanks for answering my question Scott! I'm sure a couple of smart ones will appreciate what you just clarified.
Yes, Pete. I made this disclaimer before my analogy:
<<Perhaps not the best analogy but, I think of it as this:>>
The important thing is to GET the point brought. Merci, Pete!
Scott Duncan, my apologies for the confusion, my question really was this: <<Does that means they settled the accounting and closed it, as per the NoM, or does that mean the PERSON better cough-up the "money" quickly because they railroaded HIM? It's seems they still PROCEEDED.>>
But you answered my question already with your comment. Thanks.