The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Oct 08, 2013 4:26 PM

Derek Moran spoke a couple weeks ago before the Toronto Police Services Board at City Hall regarding the future/increased use of Tasers, Derek's portion is at 176:40 ...spoiler alert, he doesn't talk about Tasers http://www.rogerstv.com/page.aspx?lid=237&rid=16&sid=3431&gid=118526

Read Comments

Robert Cormier

While Scott Duncan, as per RULE # 1 is ALWAYS RIGHT, and it is truly futile to appeal to your rapist; I must admit that I am always heartened to see any instance of truth being revealed, and the "lumber" required to serve us all so generously provided. Kudos to Derek for investing his time to learn, share, and instruct those who seek/strive to realize an empowered life. :)

Robert Cormier

I agree Gail Marie. While so many of us appear as "shaved monkeys", so completely vacuous as to possibly force the universe to collapse in upon itself, I see merit in Malcom Gladwell's "tipping point" argument, previously referred to as the "100th monkey syndrome".

Pete Daoust

You know what Chris Evan, Derek is a nice guy, he is a MELANCOLIC type, he focus on details.

I like Derek, but I am the opposite....but having a guy like him in my entourage, can HELP me a lot, for all these boring things I can't do myself....

Perhaps, I could never do what he did in this place, first, it STINKS in these place, second, I will fall asleep, third, I will fuck up this meeting big time, fourth, I might embarrass some enough that I will be kicked out of that place....

:D

Stuart Stone

I'm glad there's someone who will do the detail work...I find statutes a wonderful cure for insomnia & a lot of the time I don't know where to begin looking.

It's important to have someone who will dig through the clubhouse rules to show these fools that they may be able to fool most of the people most of the time, but they can't fool ALL of the people ALL of the time.

As for the chick in the hat, she reminded me of Ray Liotta in this clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx_hlStCL7g

Pete Daoust

See what you've just said Aladdin Sane ???

Derek spoke WELL to those USEFUL idiots :D

What the fuck is worth to speak WELL to useful idiots ?

Speaking well to useful idiots is the SAME as speaking well to useful pluwoods :(

Pete Daoust

To Gail Marie...

but what about the hundreds that were there to listen

What hundreds ? :/

Ha, you mean these hundreds MELANCOLICS ? :D

They won't change fuck all, too busy in details :P

What we need is a bunch of fucked-up coleric rebels, that will start a rebellion and do the RIGHT something to stop these fuckers from sucking our blood.

:D :D

Derek Moran

At the end of the night, while he was outside walking to the parking-garage, i asked Deputy Chief Michael Frederico what he had thought of what i had to say. He pensively looked at the ground and told me- "What you had to say tonight.....it really got me thinking. In terms of the legal system, relative to the Constitution, in regards to the law, and the way things were MEANT to be"...then he didnt really encourage me, but more suggested to me i make a DEPUTATION to expand upon what i had said at the next upcoming Toronto Police Services Board meeting

Funny thing...there is NO definition for DEPUTATION in The Dictionary of Canadian Law OR Black's Law 9th! :/

August le Blanc

deputation d?pj??te??(?)n/ noun 1. a group of people appointed to undertake a mission or take part in a formal process on behalf of a larger group. "he had been a member of a deputation to Napoleon III" synonyms: delegation, delegacy, legation, commission, committee, (diplomatic) mission; More http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/tmmis/have-your-say.htm

Derek Moran

In hindsight- i kinda kicked myself, i shoulda got up there and made a DEPUTATION allright, and APPOINTED myself the common law-SHERIFF for Toronto...who would i have been arrested for PERSONATING- Mike Harris supposedly got rid of them during his reign, who would've OBJECTED?? :D

August le Blanc

All of the drones(sheeple), would go to high alert... the programming would kick in... and you would be labeled one of them free dumpers.... gone for psychiatric assessment and had the little blue pills... :-D

Derek Moran

My goal was to bring some logical-saneness to a night where everybody was mostly speaking from pure EMOTION...my intent was to try and educate some people and make them think and question some things they had never occurred to them before, and people told me afterwards i had done just that

Derek Moran

Oh- and David your question about the term INDIVIDUAL, Settled Estates v. Minister of National Revenue 1961 i think, on CanLII, towards the very bottom of the ruling is where they define it as 'trust/estate'

Derek Moran

I should add- while i 'was away for a bit,' i made a concerted-effort to track this stuff down...i asked the City-Clerk's office about these Bonds, they punted to the Ombudsman's office, they punted to '311' (the general answer-line, like THEY would know), 311 said they were told i have to send a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

Derek Moran

RISK MANAGEMENT

More and more, municipalities are adopting risk management strategies to address public liability. Generally, risk management strategies seek to minimize the effects and costs of public liability suits against a municipality. This involves identifying potential hazards and implementing the appropriate measures to reduce or eliminate them in your community. You may find that the biggest areas for potential liability are public works or parks and recreational services. Risk management initiatives therefore tend to concentrate on these service areas.

http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=4965

Derek Moran

CLAIM NOTICE

You've harmed me. So let this NOTICE serve as INTENT, that i INTEND, to CLAIM your Bond, Lien your Bond, and Liquidate your Bond.....fuckers.

..i wonder how often someone from the City of Toronto opens up THAT envelope? ;)

Robert Cormier

ChiefRock Sino General asked me to get some advise here at TTFL on how to draft a NOTICE OF CLAIM against a person who is not a government employee. < At least not officially and on the record as having/occupying an OFFICE. He's helped me start the process, but says in order to perfect my lien against an "individual" I have to send a NOTICE OF CLAIM. Do I inform them that I will LIEN their PERSON, or their LEGAL NAME. or them, as in, I will lien you JOE BLOW?

August le Blanc

You have established grounds for a claim. You PPSA their ass ( Name and all accounts associated with) and notify thru Public Notice once Lien is filed. The Public Notice is a Tender, they have violated that tender. It perfects the lien and then you will be contacted by the underwriter of the accounts. Send them Pubic Notice via registered Mail... put a Stamp on the top right hand corner...

August le Blanc

Affidavits are simply recognized by court, from my understanding, I have seen these other so called long wordy affidavits and wonder what is the point? I mean... If The affidavit is recognized, if one attaches exhibits of already existing Notices and certified copies of every step of the administrative process it perfects the claim. So to me, It is just a simple statement, that the following is true to the best of my Knowledge.. and the see attached exhibits with a directory/appendix and short one liner of the content of each exhibit.. exhibits- including a statement and all relevant documentation.

August le Blanc

I am not always right. I do understand the process. The Chief is very wise as is the Admiral. i am relaying what I have learned. If it is incorrect, I am sure I will know, right away. In the meantime, I really do not know how to assist you anymore.

August le Blanc

If you are going to court to sue them then their civl process, yes .. You give Notice of Claim. If you have done a administrative process and established grounds for a claim, an alternative claim is a lien, without court. I never made any such claims to the following quote taken from your above post. "Are you claiming you know more than the Chief? " that being said. bye.

Robert Cormier

No harm no foul - Bobis Youruncle. :) It's obvious that I had falsely assumed you had read the entire thread and therefore my post about how I was under direct instruction (on this particular matter/point) by the Chief, and, that my statement about my need to establish a NOTICE OF CLAIM came directly from him. (If such a claim seems too ludicrous and just too plain dumb to accept, feel free to verify my assertions with him - if it pleases you.)

That's why I found it so funny when I got your numerous frustrated responses, one of which ended with FUCK and OUT, as if to indicate I (or in this case the Chief) am/is just plain thick and obviously can't, or, are unwilling to understand that a notice of claim is not required. Or perhaps, that I, which INCLUDES/MEANS the Chief in this case, doesn't have a clue what he's speaking about, and witness you sign off in frustration and hostility.

As I said, sometimes, it's almost too funny in here.

August le Blanc

a notice is required... your warped peceptions aside... I never ever said or assumed or anything about the Chief your assumptions in that regard are simply wrong. Do what you want. I have the utmost respect for the gentlemen you continually try to pull in here. Fucktard.

August le Blanc

its not about being right for me, it is about the process to establish the claim. If you have done all of this... you would have better comprehension... the only conclusion I can draw is the Pete is right and you're a cop... which I don't care.. it just means you will be too stupid to figure this out... if not a cop, then a private security contractor perhaps... Do not Call me to any thread again...ever.

Robert Cormier

Now I'm really laughing.

I can almost piss myself laughing when I entertain the "fact" that Pete is so very SURE that his SPIDY SENSE is always 100% accurate and yet doesn�t seem to realize the obvious: his statement is based ENTIRELY ON BELIEF.

FYI For those that give a hoot, my son and I have been fortunate enough to learn from and spend a number of hours in person with the Chief - not to mention time spent on the phone. I�ve even been fortunate enough to help him succeed with his legal pursuits on one occasion. I am confident that the Chief's "SPIDY SENSE" of us will reveal, should he be asked, that he doesn�t think my 10 year old and I are some kind of cop duo tag team. BELIEVE AS YOU WISH. I do find your and Pete's BELIEFS so very entertaining.

Pete Daoust

Which SHILL Dean Otf Kory ?

shill [shil] Show IPA Slang. noun 1. a person who poses as a customer in order to decoy others into participating, as at a gambling house, auction, confidence game, etc. 2. a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty. verb (used without object) 3. to work as a shill: He shills for a large casino. verb (used with object) 4. to advertise or promote (a product) as or in the manner of a huckster; hustle: He was hired to shill a new TV show.

August le Blanc

No, it isn't but fuck, your being a fucktard. Pete has some valid points about you getting to heart of the matter then going off on some emotional bullshit... it does look like that from here. i do not care to invest anymore time in bullshit.. Blowing steam off, aside. I see provocation to get me to spar with you, you draw in Names of people who are busy, when your questions have been asked and answered> if you met the Admiral good for you, he probably doesn't care if your a cop, as long as it serves his agenda, and its not my business.. so what ever. Leave me alone and talk to Bev, she seems to get you.

Robert Cormier

...and it looks like a few (very few here), based on their beliefs, want to burn another witch. Halloween is coming and tensions in Salem are rising. Let's find a witch! (Me, I'm going to study some more when I stop laughing).

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Well, there are many factors which point towards your PERSON. We have, as of late, acknowledged that our BC is a security of the PERSON, you have a PERSON and are responsible for it (else you might land up like Leigh), the PERSON is an account and new PERSONs seem to get created often, ie., bank accounts, credit cards, traffic tickets, etc. The LEGAL TENDERization upon this PERSON (for commercial use only) keeps you running around trying desperately to stay out of some form of "troubles". The fact that your signature creates "money" for ME to benefit from as Authorized Rep for this PERSON (for accounting purposes only)...

You start thinking almost TOO MUCH to try to purify it all to only ONE entity regarding all this information in your head.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

if that freaking piece of paper would need to freaking eat... i'm SURE it would be FOR that PERSON... but, with full knowledge that the piece of paper does NOT need to eat... I highly doubt it benefits that PERSON...

Pete Daoust

I did NOT ask for that person, I did NOT SIGNED as surety for it......

I see 3 options...

1). I will LEGALLY administrate that person the way I see fit. 2). Its creator will take it back from me legally, which is an impossibility. 3). Its creator will ADMIT that I am one of his SLAVEs and send the neck chains via registered mail

I can't see anything else :D

Pete Daoust

And these NEW persons they are creating OVER and OVER, where do they PRESUMED having the RIGHT to create them ?

THE SURETY, it's all about SURETY and ACCOUNTING......well that SURETY is hooked to THAT person I happen to have in my pocket.....they are ASSUMING that they can fuck around with the SURETY, because I am suppose to be an IGNORANT fucker.....

David Vilaca

I know you are not wrong. I'm wrong for now but I study now before I open my jib. I know it's not my person, I just need some mail to administrate via your teaching. Should about a 4-500 in fines coming in soon plus the info I demanded from TPS.

Robert Cormier

David Smile, I just watched a few of your video's on youtube. I particularly liked your comment on the one where you served noticed to the police, where you commented: "Shine the light of truth, cockroach scatter". So true and funny! Many hate the truth. But that is to be expected as anger is one of the stages of the ego dying and trying to protect itself in defense of it's bullshit and "non truthing" ways. BTW Great Park performance. Did you put that together?

David Vilaca

Robert Cormier, yes wrote the notice up in 10 mins. I was doing a free school seminar in the park when I saw several cops waiting to try to stop me from teaching people how to deal with the cops. They don't like me much ( 52 division) I will look for the notice and share it with you.

Derek Moran

So Councillor Karen Stintz says the officer who gave her a ticket admitted there was actually NO Stop-sign for the ticket he initially gave her- so what does she do after he admits to fabricating/falsifying a ticket, she CAVES IN?.....am i reading this right, Scott?.....and SHE is running for MAYOR next year? - LOL

�The officer admitted in a written statement that there was no stop sign at the intersection where he gave me the ticket but he claimed that he had evidence that showed me going through two additional stop signs,� Stintz told the Sun on Tuesday.

�The prosecutor that they hired from Vaughan � they brought in an outside prosecutor � threatened to withdraw the ticket that they issued (for) Duplex and Berwick and issue me two new tickets that I would then have had to get a new (court) date, hire a lawyer, defend myself and again taxpayers� money would have had the outside prosecutor come back from Vaughan to fight it."

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/22/ttc-chair-karen-stintz-pleads-guilty-to-cycling-traffic-ticket

Derek Moran

To put this into perspective, Pierre- if I WERE the Councillor for this area, and i found out from a Constituent that the City was depriving someone of their right to 'Due Process'/Fair-and-Impartial hearing, id march into Mayor Ford's office and start breakin' shit til someone told me they'd make sure it got rectified

Derek Moran

Yeah- THAT, and the fact that i dont feel serving an organization that operates TRYING to keep the people under Admiralty-Maritime Law!.....id actually try to explain to as many as would listen how By-Laws are a scam, the other Councillors would all gang-up on me, id become miserable - NO THANKS, ill just wait with 'eager anticipation' on Scott's TRUST POWER article :D :D :D

Derek Moran

Ta-DA!

�71-13. Deposits with Chief Financial Officer. [Amended 2005-04-14 by By-law No. 331-2005]

Duly executed copies of all agreements, including all insurance and certificates thereof, all contracts, BONDS, letters of credit and other SECURITY for the DUE PERFORMANCE thereof, and all other documents executed by or on behalf of the City shall be delivered to the Chief Financial Officer for safekeeping.

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/municode/1184_071.pdf

Derek: Police Officers are one thing Scott, but would EVERY City of Toronto-employee also have a Performance/Hazard/Surety/Risk Bond whatever they exactly call it, say for instance- even a Librarian?

Scott Duncan: Yes. ALL government employees do.

Pete Daoust: And when a government employee is lying to me, and I can prove it, does that put him/her in a HAZARDIOUS location ?

Scott Duncan: No. If you claim (their bond), and then lien their bond, they can't work for the government anymore.

Derek Moran: RISK MANAGEMENT

More and more, municipalities are adopting risk management strategies to address public liability. Generally, risk management strategies seek to minimize the effects and costs of public liability suits against a municipality. This involves identifying potential hazards and implementing the appropriate measures to reduce or eliminate them in your community. You may find that the biggest areas for potential liability are public works or parks and recreational services. Risk management initiatives therefore tend to concentrate on these service areas.

http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=4965

Robert Cormier: How do we claim their bond? Through default and estoppel by way of a NOTICE concerning an infraction of clubhouse rules, and/or damage/injury to us by attributing a PUBLIC name to ME? (SCOTT CLICKED LIKE on this)

Derek Moran: CLAIM NOTICE

You've harmed me. So let this NOTICE serve as INTENT, that i INTEND, to CLAIM your Bond, Lien your Bond, and Liquidate your Bond.....fuckers.

..i wonder how often someone from the City of Toronto opens up THAT envelope?

Derek Moran

Scott, as you've probably heard, there is another 'Town Hall-meeting' coming up at City Hall. This time about 'carding'/street-checks by the police, making these 'contact-forms' with people they do ID checks with out of the blue. Something tells me that somehow-someway, they are able to turn-a-buck out of this for themself. Are the police able to somehow generate revenue for themselves by conducting these 'carding' practices?

Derek Moran

"The police internal review delayed an independent assessment of carding by the city�s AUDITOR GENERAL, which many advocates felt would give weight to the Star�s findings and create a benchmark going forward."

The MOMENT i saw them mention the AUDITOR GENERAL, i automatically thought- "It's ALL about SURETY, and ACCOUNTING," and that somehow-someway, they are generating REVENUE from off these ID-street checks/'carding' as they call it...i just dont know what their angle is

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2013/10/07/toronto_police_board_asks_for_public_input_on_carding.html

Robert Cormier

With Derek Moran's statement about Common law on the back (@ 181:17) which I will read after they have given me 4 pieces of ID, including their business card. <---wait I might REQUIRE 19 pieces of ID. Hmmm

Robert Cormier

We probably have the RIGHT to ask for 19 pieces of ID. Isn't it all about accounting and surety anyways. I can give my own tenders just as you mentioned at 181:17. :) Learning is a unique process for all of us. Some ideas seem so clear for me, while other concepts are relentlessly vague. It's a strange thing, this learning process. My learning curve has always been riddled with peaks and valleys. It's so obviously a unique experience for us all.

Robert Cormier

"Approximately 1.5 million Ontarians aged 16 years and over do not have a valid driver's licence." <--I wonder what their angle is here? I'm off to study more. Happyface Sid and I have some homework to do.

Derek Moran

When he was a Councillor, he would go on the John Oakley Show on AM640 every Thursday morning here in Toronto, and basically spill-his-guts to the people about EVERY example of ridiculous wasteful-spending that he found out was going on at City Hall under Mayor David Miller......they've had the knives out for him ever since

Derek Moran

"Municipal bonding is intended for accidental misuse of power: bonding is not intended to protect officials in the deliberate misuse of power, that is, the commission of criminal acts."

http://www.civilrightsfreedom.com/node/19

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: Toronto was dissolved in 1997 and replaced with administrative zones as defined in the CITY OF TORONTO ACT. It is no longer a municipality nor is it a city, legally. It is a commercial administrative zone. You have NO rights there, and nobody even noticed.

Gayle, I take it back. I didn't know you were studying to harm strangers for a living through fraud.

For the record, I was called to the bar and responded "Why"?

You are entering a life of fraud and are beneath contempt. Derek can't construct a coherent sentence, but he can look at himself in the mirror.

How do you do it?

August le Blanc

This perfects it:

PUBLIC NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the VESSEL known as JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC/Jason Fredrick Le Blanc is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of a PRIVATE TRUST per the wishes of the CREATOR and GRANTOR.

Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING FEBRUARY 27, 2013, THE VESSEL KNOWN AS JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC And Jason Fredrick Le Blanc MUST BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE VESSEL WITH NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO USE JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC/ Jason Fredrick Le Blanc FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES MAY BE FINED AT THE RATE OF TWO HUNDRED And FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER DAY ($250,000.00 PER DAY) OR ANY PART THEREOF, FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE. ALL properties, titles and Cargo derived from said names are forfeit to the Duly Authorized Trustee Corporation

Let it be Known: That the vessel with one sole on board known as: Jason Fredrick Le Blanc has relinquished that Title to be held in Trust.

The vessel has Taken the name BoB Uncle and waives all benefits under the Alberta, Change of Name Act.

All matters are PRIVATE.

All property and titles may be used at the discretion of the Board of directors as set out in PRIVATE Charter as per the PRIVATE Trust Covenant.

Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to the DULY AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE CORPORATION, [ 1732964 ALBERTA LTD.] at and by the following method only:

We Reserve All Rights for all transactions unless otherwise expressly presented in writing.

All Correspondence must be received through registered mail addressed exactly as follows:

BOB UNCLE LTD. Attention: Accounting Dept. PMB 206 204-1440-52 ST, NE Calgary, Alberta T2A-4T8

Authorized By: Bob Uncle, President, Duly Authorized Trustee Corporate Seal. [1732964 ALBERTA LTD.] All RIGHTS RESERVED BOB UNCLE LTD