Oct 06, 2013 11:19 PM

To make record there are none.

Thank you.

when we reserve all rights we reserve the right of all the trustees. their power to contract.

each and every body only has one and one right only the right to not contract are to contract

this gives you standing in court.

There may be a SOVEREIGN about, with an objection. You must always give the CHANCE.

...Liz will be busy, when you ask. I can GUARANTEE it.

The lady has NINE DOGS, so she's got no time to deal with your rights and the reservation thereof. ;)

Corgis ?

Nine Corgis? ?

Scott, if the army/cops here avoid licence/insurance/test/tax with an act worded to the effect of "driving at his majesty's pleasure" if one was to take an oath to lizzy.... could you also claim that right for your "fleet" of vehicles??

as long as they were serving the House of Windsor, I don't see why not. You'd better be ready to drive shit around, if she wishes, or it's prison for you! :D

i could be loyal but unsavoury.... they say that about us no doubt :p

Her Majesty's WISHES were communicated in 1997, to me. I have not been called since. I'm supposed to be retired. :(

retired? as in relieved of burden?

Yes... yet here I am, commanding a fleet. The commonwealth is dead. No retirement for me.

COMMONWEALTH, government. A commonwealth is properly a free state, or republic, having a popular or representative government. The term has been, applied to the government of Great Britain. It is not applicable to absolute governments. The states composing the United States are, properly, so many commonwealths. 2. It is a settled principle, that no sovereign power is amenable to answer suits, either in its own courts or in those of a foreign country, unless by its own consent.

The United Kingdom responded to the Republic of Ireland Act by enacting the Ireland Act 1949. This Act formally recognised that the Irish state had ceased to be a member of the Commonwealth, but provided that Irish citizens would not be treated as aliens under British nationality law. This, in effect, granted them a status similar to the citizens of Commonwealth countries.

Retired from what?

1933 and the Queen's speech ... the what the fuck is it now... shit.. The British parliament and the Act of New Westminster I think..

Scott Duncan - What killed the commonwealth?

it ties in with the new money system/income tax/social care that was introduced??

What an EXCELLENT question! I'm gonna make you work for it. :D

It died in 1997.

Look back to then. It was my first year as an admiral.

WTF 1997?

What happened in 1997?

I don't fucking know.. lots... a hint where to look please?

Actually VERY LITTLE happened, really.

Hong Kong is the most OBVIOUS Commonwealth event...

Seriously, you are gonna have to work for it. It happened right in front of you,and you didn't even notice.

Ok... fuck.

The Vengaboys changed the face of music... :p

Yes they did indeed! They made it suck, just a little more.

:D

I didn't notice a lot back then... was working in the movies.. 12-18 hr days... not much time or awraeness at that time... :-(

You Irish HAVE to stop chanting "Bieber or Die"... it's embarrassing! :P

top US Treasury officials secretly conspired with a small cabal of banker big-shots to rip apart financial regulation across the planet.

That's pretty close, really :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_Heads_of_Government_Meeting_1997

^^ Guess # 1

That was funny to read.

The Queen showing up was a "novelty" (She was there to dissolve her authority) huh? :D

From the link of my last post.... "the creation of a Trade and Investment Access Facility to help globalisation adjustment"

so similar to events of 1933 when everything went to the human resource system?

Not even close.

This was a garage sale to pay debt from that.

Oh... fuck, why is this so important?

2nd Guess. Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997 (CAC Act) Bodies

CAC Act bodies are entities that are subject to the CAC Act. These are:

Commonwealth authorities [External Site] - a statutory authority (ie a body created by legislation) that is a separate legal entity from the Commonwealth and which has the power to hold money on its own account

Can I rescind/retract this guess. I'm now thinking that this was a byproduct of what happened. :(

Is Mister P.E. Trudeau has something to do in this Scott Duncan ? :/

I guess not :(

Hong-Kong became a special administrative ZONE in 1997

Of China ? :/

Conveyance from British to Chinese sovereignty, July 1st, 1997

Conveyance

The transfer of ownership or interest in real property from one person to another by a document, such as a deed, lease, or mortgage.

You're doing fine, Robert. Keep going...

was 1997 the year in which the formal transfer of wealth to China started?

I'm not sure that this is it, but interesting none the less http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1778/contents/made

Children/wards of the Queen were no longer her concern.

Am I still on the right path Scott Duncan? Warmer/colder? 1997 Kruger v Commonwealth - AKA The Stolen Generations Case RE: Aboriginals Ordinance 1918 (NT) and its subsequent amendments in 1939 and 1953. ....The Court also considered whether the Ordinance interfered with an implied right of due process in the exercise of the judicial power of the Commonwealth under Chapter III of the Constitution. One aspect of this argument was that THE ORDINANCE PURPORTED TO CONFER JUDICIAL POWER ON PERSONS OTHER THAN CHAPTER III COURTS. http://www.answers.com/topic/kruger-v-commonwealth

Financial Administration and Accountability Act?

Repeal of the Glass -Steagall Legislation?

ALL of these things are connected.

hmm the debt owed is not owned by the countries themselves but owned by outsiders?....does it have anything to do with the pressures from the central bank for countries to sell their gold ?

Hmm... so, WTO, IMF, IPU, and money tie in some how so the accountants did something with a G something meeting, Kadaffi starts his own currency , is attacked under the guise of terrorism as a result... recently, 1997, Lizzy says bye to her kids.. so the kids are not alright having being sold a bill of goods they have know/no idea what the fuck to do with... Shit Piss Fuck.

... oh look there's some lumber...

In 1995 the Commonwealth Private Investment Initiative was begun to channel investment capital through regional funds. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/commonwealth

http://thecommonwealth.org/project/commonwealth-private-investment-initiative-delivers-tangible-growth-and-diversification

^^ Hence, the Nobles were without "work" = Prorogued. IE: Their duties were deferred to heads of state(s)?

Does the Edinburgh Declaration have anything to do with it?

Scott Duncan - Could Dianna have been killed due to her willingness to "reveal all"? < Sorry if this sounds like the statement of a conspiracy nut. Just trying to fit pieces together.

SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 � Scotland votes to create its own Parliament after 290 years of union with England.

this may be a stretch, but does it involve immigration?

Quebec did that in 1968 :D, They've called it The Assembl� NATIONAL du Qu�bec :D

And the Quebec Police changed their name for Suret� du Qu�bec, instead of Police PROVINCIAL du Qu�bec. :D

What's weird is on ALL court file it says:

CANADA PROVINCE DU QU�BEC

? :/

1859 - USA is Bankrupt - Bankers give a few years to arrange payment - Civil War is an excuse to pledge more land by gaining the southern states into the UNION - International Law provides 70 years for countries to pay debt - 1929 - Debt is due again! - US pledges citizens as collateral to pay debt - this is resolved by 1933 - 1997 - Debt is due again! This time there is nothing else to pledge. A few years later US invades Iraq. <---This from Winston Shrout.

a restructuring of the bankruptcy?

Commonwealth Association for Corporate Governance

How do you reserve rights that you don't have, nor exist in a limited jurisdiction?

You don't. You RESERVE ALL RIGHTS. ALL of them.

...not just the ones in the "limited jurisdiction".

Statutory Court is limited to statutory authority, statutes do not recognize non statutory sources of authority, and most certainly do not respect human rights. It's contract law, why are people trying to reserve human freedoms in a court of contract where they have signed agreements to perform under a certain authority? :P Non statutory right are irrelevant in a statutory jurisdiction. Of course they're all reserved. That's not what is going on there. You are well aware of the fact that there are more relevant things that can be brought up in statutory court, Scott. :P

Oh fuck, I'd NEVER go into one of those. That's just stupid.

December 11 � The Kyoto Protocol is adopted by a United Nations committee.

"If one 'reserves all rights' in court", I'm presuming, most likely correctly, that this question was posed as the defendant, or accused, to a statutory offense while representing JOHN DOE? Because I highly doubt that 99% of people here are the Plaintiff in a properly filed claim in a court of equity. hahahaha

That' why an executive of the Trust administer's the affair prior to court, never needing to go to court and reserving and all rights anyways... Administrative process... As-king. Yes No?

Good point in regard to Plaintiff /Defendant currently am both :-D

There was a time you could rely on the rules. No more. I'm just waiting for rebellion, and I'll start taking out my targets.

It's all fraud now. The day I got that forged transcript, was the day it became OK to kill them.

Well, they certainly demonstrated that they are, in fact, completely illegitimate if they must tamper with court files to keep their con going. That's what dishonourable pieces of shit do.

"...in a properly filed claim in a court of equity"

That actually sounds like a great topic...could you go through that in one of your by the window-Vimeo chat-videos in the future, Dean? :)

@Dean. Yes, the question was that of being in the position of an accused/defendant. We recall quite a long time back that Scott strongly advised to present that question to the bench as quickly as possible. We assume that was to prevent prosecution, or anybody else, from reserving all rights ... is that a correct assumption?

The Plumber's Society summoned a plumber associated to their organization to assess a fine for violations of their "Plumbing Association" rules and regulations. You are certified and recognized in their system when doing plumbing work under that registered name. That's the rules/jurisdiction the court operates under, and they have a mandate to operate, absent being able to demonstrate to the contrary, that the claims of the Plaintiff are accurate, and made in good faith.

If Scott agrees with that, then there are several suggestions for how to proceed to remove the "presumptions" they are required by law to operate under. :)

This is getting interesting :D

When Scott is interested in something, the people in his "Kingdom" (tender for law) should pay attention, as that scenario was REPLETE with a "tender for law", on MANY angles. They like to be thorough.

I also like to be thorough, and hand out a thorough ass fucking to these bastards when they trespass on MY jurisdiction. You think their rules are ridiculous? Wait until you trespass in MY jurisdiction. :P

Thanks, Dean :-)

The same is true in either direction. If Dean Clifford is interested in something I say, PAY ATTENTION. If you are a Christian, get a FUNCTIONING adult to read it to you.

Roflmfao :-)

So, while I'm still using poor judgement and investing my time here, who can field where a good place to start might be, for those foolish enough to show up for the hearing instead of declining the offer.

*Hint* Plumbers do not have the right to create new rules and regulations and plumb any way they want when representing the "Plumber's Society" and operating under a name registered with them for those purposes. So reserving the "Right" to plumb any way you want......is not something you can reserve in that jurisdiction.

There is an "unless" I can add to that, but if anyone can figure that one out, you won't need a translator anymore. :P

Special Appearance.

FRIENDS of the court INFORM.

Fun Fact: Police NEVER testify as WITNESSES. They are INFORMANTS

Just like our parents when they filled out the Statement of Live BIRTH.

As lawful holder in due course ( liened Name) as acting pres... to deal with the affairs of a Private TRUST thru the proxy of the trustee administrator the CORP....

The ONLY reason you would be at the "Plumber's Society" is to determine if you owe a debt/undertaking, and/or if there has been a MISTAKE.

Otherwise, what the fuck do they have to do with me? I just want to get that drain un-clogged for you.

I should clarify, the offer to field solutions had the condition attached that all fielded solutions must be well thought out and not stupid. Meaning no throwing shit out there hoping it was correct, upon penalty of a kick to the junk, being the liability.

How many people do you think get what we are saying, Dean?

Offer to field Solutions: Tender for Law The law: All solutions must be well thought out and not stupid. Penalty for violations: Kick in the junk Judge of violations: Me, I'm the author.

off to sports store to by can.... Just in case there is a mistake. :-D

I really hope there are even one or two Scott. Most people think we are at odds because they have no fucking clue what we are talking about. People simply cannot understand "capacity".

i HAVE A HUGE HAT COLLECTION. :p

Your first kick goes to....

Dean: Judge of violations: Me, I'm the author.

Further clarification for the ninnies. Only I knew my intent when I drafted the legislation, and since I'm the author only I can determine its meaning. For those people out there that think anyone gives a flying fuck about your interpretation of the copyrighted Acts and Statutes of Canada.

That may just be the most valuable thing you have EVER typed, Dean Clifford!

...goood ...good.

the plumbers society isn't my club rules ...I'd rather stay within Gail's club rules and invite them to experience my club rules

"For those people out there that think anyone gives a flying fuck about your interpretation of the copyrighted Acts and Statutes of Canada."

No matter what dictionary definition you use. Always check with the author, as his intent is the absolute authority.

How many pearls did I cast today Scott? There better be some non swine out there today, or I just made a VERY bad investment, and that makes me very moody.

P.S. I'll be out there from the 14th to the 23rd ish. Supper with Tara? We have some waitresses to harass and cause to blush.....

http://youtu.be/2kmfDeasuoA

never heard of ninnies... nanny's now that's something else... Hmmm new adult franchise... NILF'S On FIRE

If people can pick out the most important thing about those posts, I will grant a prize of my choosing. *hint* It was in the last two posts.

I don't get fuck all of what you're saying.....but I have my bullet proof vest on :P

You can crash here or at the Downtown location... You DID paint it.

Write your own fucking laws. :-)

Contract = Law

what we think doesnt matter...they interpret and use it how they will and it's beyond our control...step into their game, play by their rules

As THE Creator You Rule...

Oh, I did that Chris :D.....6 times so far :D

Thanks Dean Clifford. That was of great value. :)

THE creator.

EVERYBODY GET THAT?

Copy that...

Nope :/

But I do create lots of fucking stuff these days :D

Dean and Scott in the same restaurant.....I wonder if there will be any agents around there...???

Oh, there will definitly be a ROUND fucking table in that restaurant :D

oy... valuing the wrong things ... most important shit has been covered in the last bit...

THE Creator has the SUPREME law. YOU are THE creator. "God" is an invention by the nobility to FILL that "THE CREATOR" spot, so you will think you aren't entitled.

Lead yourself or follow..those are the choices

I get it.... :D

Actually, Scott, while the shaved monkeys decipher all of that. I was thinking I need to come check out the harem of "Boat Bunnies", I was led to believe existed. :P

YOU are THE CREATOR. Want God? Try a mirror.

And I knew it, just could not explaine it :/

Hey where is my fucking prize Dean Clifford? :-D

Quote: Dean: Judge of violations: Me, I'm the author.

"Further clarification for the ninnies. Only I knew my intent when I drafted the legislation, and since I'm the author only I can determine its meaning. For those people out there that think anyone gives a flying fuck about your interpretation of the copyrighted Acts and Statutes of Canada."

So, I bet those judges who are qualified to interpret the intent of Acts and Statutes are really interested in what you have to say. So, now what are you going to do in one of those hearings?

Let them know that a MISTAKE has been made as to the identity of the accused!

Jay Le B: "Hey where is my fucking prize Dean Clifford?" Actually, I'm still waiting for someone to post the words I wrote, not parrot what Scott said. There is one sentence that has them both in it, and will hopefully change the way you look at the world. And if it does not, then I will point out why people are morons.

"interpretation and copyrighted" ?

*Sniff* they grow up so fast.

"interpretation and copyrighted" ? No.

....aaaaaand it's gone.

We were on such a roll too.

Public Notice... Notice of Mistake... Registered mail... with invoice.. prior to Kuntaroo Court date.. Dean Clifford 1 not a parrot... I have created many things in my life so I get it... Your vids helped me comprehend... 2 reviewing to get it...

Another hint, Scott? What sayest thou? Are the chimps deserving of it? ;)

"Only I knew my intent when I drafted the legislation, and since I'm the author only I can determine its meaning. "

I smell some terms and conditions in here....but fuck do I have a hard time to follow :(

I have been saying the same thing over and over it is my contract that they're violating and I know the intent of contract

Sorry. Just face-palming

identify yourself as the creator and interpret for them ?

Jay Le B is on the scent..........

...mostly.

" identify yourself as the creator and interpret for them ?" You drafted their acts and statutes Gail? You're going to educate them on their intent and applicability within their jurisdiction?

I will CREATE my own definitions of anything I please...as well as interpretations. I can't touch their stuff. It's not mine and I don't have the copywrite to their rants.

Since we're using allegories, can anyone tell me who the supreme authority on all Harry Potter trivia is? Which fan is the most knowledgeable and is considered the authority on the topic?

The AUTHOR.

no recognition, nor is one qualified to interpret their hocus pocus...

Ok, Gail Marie. I THE CREATOR of the SUPREME MOTHERFUCKING LAW OF THE UNIVERSE (I think big) DECREE THAT YOU MUST CONSUME A LITRE OF MY SEMEN EACH YEAR>

GET ON IT! You are PROPERTY now.

OK, How seriously do you take that?

Honestly. Do you think that has ANY merit?

Can anyone have more knowledge that the author on the topic they authored?

I am deleting irrelevant comments.

Gail Marie, answer the question.

If they agree to your terms and accept that tender for law.

I'm doing a massive lead up to the obvious here.........

Me, I only tell them who I am, and who I am NOT, I explaine clearly what I am doing and WHY

I swing that envelop registered mail to them

And tell them that IF they have any objections, or simply want to refuse this, to let me know by writing, I give them 30 days.

If I don�t hear ANYTHING form them, I send them a notice saying THANK YOU for ACCEPTING my shit.

So far, so good :D

Sorry for this little contribution, if it's in fact, a contribution :/

point taken, I was unsuccessfully attempting to come from the perspective of their interpretation is irrelevant if I do not fall within their jurisdiction

EXACTLY! They have NO RIGHT TO ATTORN!

i putting the fuckin law society on Notice :p

...interpretations no longer fit for purpose :D

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH ANY NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT, TO ME?

THAT is ALL you should be thinking about.

What happens if I do prove to the author that their ruling was not consistent with previous rulings, or that there is other inconsistencies with their story, or legislation. If I prove to J.K. Rowling that something in her story does not makes sense, or add up, or that all the quotes from her book that I presented tend to support my claim. What happens when I am right, in Caesar's Court?

I think about that every minute Scott Duncan :D

Stay on topic shaven monkeys......

They ignore you and proceed anyway

Let's take Dean Clifford's scenario further.

THE LAW SOCIETY vs. ME.

Given the choice, Dean, would you wish to hire ME or a LAWYER for legal matters?

OOH

challenging them in their court, would give them jurisdiction even if you are doing it to prove them wrong?

"They ignore you and proceed anyway", and why?

They don't NEED you there, you are ONLY SURETY

They can settle it themselves!!!

They just entertain you so you will pay

The "Author", the "Divine Creator" of the Harry Potter books can rewrite, change, or add to the story at ANY TIME to prove the point of the AUTHOR, that is THEIR WORLD!!!!

Even when you are right in Caesar's Court, you are STILL WRONG....because he will just CHANGE THE FUCKING RULES to suit his needs.

Author = Authority AUTHOR - ITY

Author = Authority AUTHOR - ITY

I can do that ! :D

Well, I am doing it :/

Caesar does as they wish...

Prove Star Trek wrong, and the writers will write a new episode where they go back in time and cause a temporal anomaly that explains the inconsistencies with the script.

Author and intent

Any point of view really can be backed by its author, if they have the vocabulary and the balls.

It's THEIR FUCKING WORLD, you CANNOT BE RIGHT THERE.....EVER!!!!!! Unless you pay Caesar enough bribe money to rule in your favour.

Appealing to your rapist, does not make you their girlfriend. :P

You have now heard it from BOTH of us. APPEALING TO YOUR RAPIST IS A WASTE OF TIME.

Finally...

VOID

Now, if you happen to be a registered plumber to do work in the realm of the "Plumbing Society" is that all that you are? Does that mean that EVERY TIME you do plumbing it is under that registered name which is governed by the Plumbing Society? Is that now ALL that you are? Or is that maybe a presumption by the Plumbing Society, to gain control over EVERY plumbing job you do?

Acting As... Not Operating Under...

If I chose to do business...

Now I feel dirty, I might have to go shower and scrub with Borax.

Are YOU talking to ME?

I don't know, Dean! Should I ask my rapist?

...or do you fucking chowder-deads get the point?

Generally speaking....

By what authority do You adress me as YOU?

Actually Robert, a better question would be "What ME are you speaking to?"

Borax is good shit!!!!!

Because I can have several CAPACITIES/ HATS. Got it. :)

I think the challenge most have is that many are so entrenched in the system and can't imagine not being part of it, which is where the Corp/trust idea is so valuable. You can ease yourself out, while still having the protection of the limited liability and the privacy and opportunity to create via the trust

If I am a man....they can't speak to me...they can't even see ME.

PIERRE DAOUST PLEASE !!

Which one

I love doing this :D

Well, I just did it on the phone a few times now, and it is the most fun stuff on the phone I've done so far......well, if we don't count this Natasha girl :/

I am me ... Who the fuck are YOU... By What Authorita do you fuck with moi.

depends what capacity/office that "man" is fulfilling i suppose Robert..... joinder?

No Jay Le B, I have so many hats, it's fucking unbelievable :D

Joinder??? No thank you!!! Acting! Yes, I am always acting!

No Joinder. Ordered a ham and swiss instead much better results... :-D

Robert Cormier: "If I am a man....they can't speak to me...they can't even see ME."

What business does the Plumber's Society have with a man? They only deal with Certificated Plumbers.

Ya but the other one is more fun... Pete Daoust

CEO of this, CEO of that, Administrator of PIERRE DAOUST, daddy, babe....it's just crazy !!!

If they give ME (the private guy) an order, I can tell them how much that will cost them for me to fulfill their order.

so how many of you want to become an author of your own laws?

And when I sit on the toilet, Well then, I am a man, and I feel god big time :D

if you advertise your license, gain work through their plumbers society, that would create an imposable presumption of liability upon you?

Don't get off topic shaven monkey brethren.

imposable presumption of liability = SURETY

Who is this fucking shaven monkey brethren ? :/

yeah if you are promoting their license you act as surety for their rules... yes?

No way...I have no idea what this thing is, I can't be that thing :P

I am going to require facts and evidences of your claim Dean

Jeff Roggers: "so how many of you want to become an author of your own laws?"

Your laws, equally, don't mean shit to them. You also spent a lifetime creating joinder to the Plumber's Society of infantile and ignorant morons who interpret law like they're the Author.

its reasonable for a customer to presume you'll abide by the society's rules unless otherwise stated?

Oh, Jeff is here :/ ?....this thread will be a fucking mess ! :(

flings poo...

We better send a PROPER NOTCE along with a NOTICE OF MISTAKE to clarify things...and say please FORGIVE me if I lead you to believe otherwise.. :)

"You also spent a lifetime creating joinder to the Plumber's Society of infantile and ignorant morons who interpret law like they're the Author."

Notice of Mistake to EVERYONE?

Yeah...I may have made a lifetime of mistakes! But I am correcting them now!

S�il Eile: "its reasonable for a customer to presume you'll abide by the society's rules unless otherwise stated?"

ESPECIALLY if you promote yourself as a member of that society to get the work, and even produce an ID card to prove your association.

Please forgive me

Put the BC into the Justices file. He can talk to it all day long. It isn't mine.

oops how the fuck did that happen... forgive me... but I have this lien and I think you have a notice in your thingy that states it so... here is the invoice, terms and conditions ... your name again Mister..

then the special beatings... cause that is appealing to the rapist so... VOID.

My Jurisdiction.....hmmmm.......I need to finish defining this. This is important. Pete, I think this is what the TRUST is!!! Its MY JURISDICTION. Yes Dean Clifford?

Robert Cormier: "Put the BC into the Justices file. He can talk to it all day long. It isn't mine."

If you ever used it as ID, even once, for a benefit then you have consented to be associated under terms and conditions. They are the author of those terms and conditions, and none of you EVER counter offered, or even attempted to re-negotiate the association to get better terms at your Minimum Wage Tim Horton's job. So you are STUCK.

I used it for a Drivers License and a Passport. What else?

this reminds me of americas dumbest criminals, the guy with the balaclava robbing a bank, they show him the footage of the hooded man & use his stupidity to create joinder... he gives in....

"Do you take Judicial Notice of the fact Judge Ball-Kicker, that i am NOT a Plumber?"

They got your full consent to be associated under their terms and conditions with ZERO of your own. You are a negotiators wet dream. If you were a nation, you were conquered in .01 seconds with no negotiations.

forming a trust and liening the legal title name and getting rid of the surety is what I was talking about dean. And the bylaws of the corporation that holds the trust.

Now, since I love being told how wrong I am, I'll open the floor up.

I'm confused Dean Clifford, a wise man once said... Just because I worked at THE PLUMBER SHOP before, doesn't mean I'm working there now, or I was working there when I was having a beer while off duty? :(

Dean, can you give us an example please?

Dean, do not give him an example. You've done FAR more than you need to.

:-P

This is a SOLID thread :D

Maybe Dean's offer was ONLY to be told he was wrong.... :-P

Two thumbs up for Dean visiting us. (y) (y)

Robert Cormier: "I'm confused Dean Clifford, a wise man once said... Just because I worked at THE PLUMBER SHOP before, doesn't mean I'm working there now, or I was working there when I was having a beer while off duty?"

Exactly. I gave everyone their remedy. All they had to do was demonstrate otherwise in the face of mountains of joinder by presumption. So, now people can figure out how to defeat Statutory Court with ease.

No worries Scott, I wasn't planning on it. A little critical thinking and deductive reasoning will do them wonders. After all, where do people think I get my answers, the law fairy?

PRAISE FREEMAN JESUS! :D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"Forced Compliance is Acceptance of my Terms-and-Conditions"

Dan is going to carve this group up like a roast.

I'm usually around, reading and weeping, no worries. From time to time a bout of madness overcomes me, I am overcome by the spirit of "Freeman Jesus", and descend from the heavens to fuck a new asshole into the sinners from on high.

The Mexican Gardener is a freeman?

*sniff* THat's beautiful :)

WHY ME ?....any other French fucked-up Quebecers in here ?? :(

I can write my own book of parables, if people would prefer, attempting to teach law to the shaven monkeys, and I could even make up WAY cooler stories and fables, to include lots of boobs, a boat, some boat bunnies and way cool shit where I do FAR more than just beat the Money Changers with bulrushes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1xrNaTO1bI

Want to collaborate on a book, Scott? :D Hahahahahaha

We'd get caricatures and shit done up, like bad assed ones, like "Menga Jesus". It would be fucking EPIC!

http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.5036949810514161&w=250&h=155&c=7&rs=1&pid=1.7

Hey...that is Scott ? :/

No. Scott wouldn't wear THAT hat.

^^ Guessing

No, but I get the confusion :D

Now, who wants to be the first to compel me to provide an Act or Statute to back up any of that? You get a free ticket to Hamilton so I can kick you in the fucking junk so hard your next life will be sterile.

lol

kick you in the fucking junk: I hate being kicked there ...it hurts :(

My LEGAL BALLS haven't descended yet.

weed and hookers after to kiss it better?

I went to the store... :-D

Dean Clifford, I am sorry but I have to ask :(

Do you HAVE a person ?

If yes, WHO is surety for that person ?

Do you get to administrate it once in a while ?

Thanks

At least, if I get kick in the junk, I will have plenty for the price PAID :P

Would the person have any value without you as surety? That would be like walking up to a poker table and putting no chips down. It only has value because you are the surety. Then, they just enforce false security agreements against it, if you know why they're false then you win. If you're a little smarter yet, you seek remedy.

I heard you once use the analogy on some show Dean, about going-out to dinner with a group of 10 people- do you wanna get screwed on the cheque at the end of the night cuz a couple people snuck-off or didnt put enough in, or, do you wanna tell the waitress from the get-go- "Separate cheque for me, please"....you wanna establish your standing BEFORE you ever walk into that court - "establishing roles up-front," as you put it

that is why nobody would want to buy it for a hundred million dollars either

oouuuffff !!!!!!!!!!! :(

Ah, the dulcet stylings of Dean Clifford - always a pleasure!

Would the person have any value without you as surety: WHO THE FUCK CARES ?....is this should be MY problem ?

Maybe that's WHY they've backed it up with THEIR signature, in case I decide to fuck up the poker game :D

What the hell... Count me in, Dean.

I won't go then :P

Damn you Tara Duncan! I had to look up a word for the first time in several months because of you! Dulcet.....who the hell uses that anyways! :P

Just for that, I shall punish Scott's ears....... and his tenuously remaining sanity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFT1l50CgHo

Dude, after the rebellion, you and I are going to war. YOU KNOW the law!

There is a comprehensive ban on Sass Jordan, and ANYTHING she's had a hand in...

...that covers most Canadian content, except Bryan Adams, The Rankins, Anne Murray, and Gordon Lightfoot.... and Rush.

I know I had to look it up to. but for different reasons Thank You Tara

That song makes me want to vomit. It truly does.

Fuck yeah...

He's been torturing me with this crap for years... No really... Years.

Everyone shits on the Admiral :(

"There is a comprehensive ban on Sass Jordan, and ANYTHING she's had a hand in..."

I do believe I negotiated my own special status within your realm. I reserved that right, and Tara ratified by providing me with a data stick containing the anthology, or literary works, of "The Box".

I have a liability waiver by operation of law. :P

You are correct. :(

Fuck you.

That just makes it personal.

Sass Jordan is a Harpie.

Why would you sic a harpie on me?

LMFAO! "Queen of the Harpie's!!!!" I forgot about that shit. Hahahaha!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxT5ApUti1M

Yes, like that. :P

OK...I'll go wash the dishes while you guys are smoking a cigar, in the cigar lounge........tout est correct, inquiete to� pas.. :P

Hellos?

As for my Boat Bunnies(tm)/crew... you don't want to mess with them, trust me.

At least ONE of them wants to sacrifice you to a Ladder God she just invented.

Define "mess with"

For the record Ann Murray is easily in the top 10 worst things to happen to music EVER :P

Anne Murray was a dirty little slut with a "clean" image. That's what makes her awesome.

I was tortured with her for long enough she holds a special place in the list of musicians I would like to strangle :D

Sluts are 10 a penny so she doesn't get a pass :P

You just don't appreciate sluts like I do.

Oh I do but the fact they're everywhere means I just don't treasure them like you do :D

for clarity... is this what we're discussing ??? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oUAnGcT--A&playnext=1&list=AL94UKMTqg-9BoYBpRxbrutl6mGx1_h_aK

ow...

Yu just had to take away the preview didn't you Mick this is clearly a conspiracy against me :(

Tissue.. ask Pete Daoust I think he has some... :-D

What the fuck do I have to do in this ?

I never heard of this Anne Murray slut before....first time I see that shit...I am NOT impress.....at all :/

Who is the tissue for me or Scott she seems to give us the exact opposite reaction :D

You are a lucky man Pete Daoust

Fuck YESSSS.... you tell me !!!!

Everything I touch turns to GOLD :D

Whom ever requires one... if not ignore... :-D

I claim collateral damages too my ears that's twice I've been assaulted

She is the unfortunate by-product of having a Canadian sister in law and I have it on good authority she thinks wrong and values the wrong things :D

Not so long ago, Scott Duncan mentionned the word MULE in this place, guess what happened ?

I touched one, and it turned into GOLD :D

I LOVE MULES !!!!....HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! :P

HELLOOSSSSS!!!!!! :D :D

Idiots like "ME", just dosen't EXIST.....no where you will find one like "ME"

TRUST "ME" on that :D

LOL. Lovely to talk with you too, as ever (no words over two syllables).

Hein ? :/

Peteresque !!...three syllables :P

(But I am sure that was not meant to me...)

Take your notes, before this thread disappears. Gold! Thanks Dean Clifford, and Scott Duncan!

Oh, we don't need to do that no more Maximus Minimus P�rezera, some members in here do this for us, screen everything, and then re-post all this with ONLY the gold nuggets :D

Collective brain, and mine is still BRAND spanking new :D

Are you sure you didn't leave it in the car :-D

No, the car is for the PERSON.....not "ME"

did you check under your pillow? :-D

I know it's not easy for you to get all of this.....it's TOKEN stuff, and you are NOT a token...too bad for you :D

I am Token all the time :-D

My TOKEN position in here gives me a HUGE advantage on ALL of you, but you can't see it.... :D

My token is green Helps me with your Token ... :-D

You THINK it helps you, but in reality it does not :P

Everyone has an opinion...

It just gives you a buzzzzzzzzz!!!!!...

"ME", I buzzz 24/7.....like Obelix :D

Not A buzz more like a hum...

it stops the dreams...

Then you are confused :(

Nope... That is a good thing :-)

Tara Duncan calls Dean Clifford, Dean "Where's My Fucking Ladder" Clifford.

The ladder God that at least one Boat Bunny intends to sacrifice Dean to, is unrelated :D

One boat bunny....hmm...how many bunnies on board ?

Permission to call Dory Alexander, in here too please Cap'n

Oh man, I can't wait! I've always wanted to be sacrificed to a pagan God! :D

1 just left the group wonder who it was?

Meanwhile in Quebec, Pauline Marois announce a 2 Billion dollar investment into the Quebec economy that will supposely creates 43,000 jobs

Where in the fuck she will find this 2 billions dollars ?

Maybe she is reading this group, and knows about my 2013 income tax return of 600 billions dollars that I will file for PIERRE DAOUST this next january :D

Hey Dean, you never thought about filing an income tax return of 600 billions dollars ? :D ......to HELP the economy ? :D

Hahahahahahahahahaha. .keep fucking with them kunts pierre baby.....fuck em up :-D

I volunteer to be sacrificed. ...to the titty god...

Oh, I just do the administration shit me Adam....ALL RIGHTS RESERVED :D

hahahaahaha!!!!!

And it's NOT my fault :P

:-D

Saskatchewan will ROCK :D , anyone from Saskatchewan in here ?

think you've been shot down Adam lol.... >>>> watch until end :) >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsF3HspQY6A

No....she's teasing to pleasing me Mick....playing hard to ....aahhh....uummm..

Tissue?

Arabesque....hmm...sounds like a disparaging RACIST comment

Allah akbar mofos

A great read first thing in the morning :-)

Pete Daoust, born and raised in Saskatchewan.

Well, that place will rock big time, commencing NOW :D

Dammit...I hate it when I walk in late on these threads...only one question for Dean Clifford:

If we are ever roped & hogtied & dragged into one of their clubhouses out of some misguided presumption that we belong there, do we request an exhumation order to bring the original author of their statutes to the stand, in order to interpret their intent at the time of authoring those statutes?

Without the interpretation of the original author, aren't ALL of those statutes effectively null & void? :D

ok, that's 2 questions...

I see 2 and a half question there Stuart :D

You freaking enginners :D HAHAHAHA!!!!

:D

morning fellas :-D

Here's the rub.... The Government is a TRUST. NO ONE to exhume...

NO ONE to STAND for it...

NO Kidding ;-)

:-D

time to make the doughnuts...

& coffee. ..who's rolling up a fat niggeresque ine ??

I know a guy...

He is Niggeresque in stature...

cones

oh shit a crazy Canadian a crazy Australian a crazy American

All here ;-)

No crazy here.... more like eccentric... ;-)

No Canadian either.... That would imply joinder..

�

I see Jason is on his toes,

No toes.. that would imply feet... :-D feet = leg = man = no standing, unrecognizable in their creation...

and its JAY...

Jason is property of the TRUST and any use is unauthorized, Only Authorized by expressed written permission. When in communication with me. Consider yourself Notified :-D One wil not answer to that moniker ever more.

Now to create... "Fucks the Puppy".. nope, spoken for... Sir Jay of Lac La Biche has a ring to it... Naw too fucking nutty... Jay of the jungle... Hmmm... Sir Smokes like a Chimney... Sir Whack a Lot.... Captain? Hmmm.. Pondering...

That's a CHECK MATE

Think about the value of detaching from an identity... Jeffsbee.. may be on to something ;-) and the power of the question: Who the FUCK are you?

I absolutely agree with " Jeff" and the "ditching a NAME" (as Scott put it) and using a new one!

So about 1997.......

The conveyance of HK's sovereignty to China must be for the repayment of a debt. I know shortly before this, the US started to privatize Trust responsibilities, but through what I 've read here, it sounds like Her Majesty was doing the same. But that was 1992 here...executive Order 12803.

I am pretty sure Bill Clinton got a BJ in the Oval Office in 1997

From the Queen? oh that is so Wrong...

So, Scott was a Duke who's position got prorogued, so he became an Admiral in 1997. But he is a Privateer. He is teaching us to take back OUR portion of the Public Trust in order to starve those who have breached the Trust. He also seems to go by a different code of conduct than we do, perhaps a Noble Code....?

ADMIRAL, officer. In some countries is the commander in chief of the naval forces. This office does not exist in the United States.

The code of Nobility and Oaths of fealty and such... in trust law... Licensed by the House of Windsor... Which our Trust is Not = Pirate Descendent of the Bankers who came up with this shit... and 1997 ... I do not know. A set of international agreements that have global ramifications on a number of levels is what I can figure so far.... but as to the specifics hmmm

Well for what I read about Hong Kong is the 99 year lease to Britain was up and they didnt renew it. Not sure what that implies though.

Its more than that... that is part of it.

There is something about the renewal or dissolution of a Trust and I think it is in 99 yr increments....is that correct?

I figured that Jay, just don't know what that "more" is.

and that is where its at for us..

Fuck.

Did anything happen in Canada in 1997?

Dean Otf Kory have your read this thread?

several times...I know how to keep them from gaining jurisdiction and reserve all rights...I stand my ground well now,it's just been a shit show up to this point so I could get recordings and transcripts showing there corruption!lol!

showing the corrupted that they are corrupted is like walking up the down escalator....

much like a protest me thinks...

You limp into the fight to let your adversary see that your hurt and weak...once the bell goes off...you stand tall and strong and kick the fuckin shit out of them!

Seriously, I hope it goes your way... they just do not play by the rules...

"ME", I am in ADMINISTRATION :D

But some years ago, I was in football, hockey and pop corn business :(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDZklb3GbmQ

Pete Daoust you should have carded that guy, he's way over the legal limit for popcorn

BTW, this thread is the meat, thank you Dean Clifford and Scott Duncan. Meat for strong men, milk for babies, as the saying goes.

Wow! I was just reading the voluminous thread here and I realized that Dean Clifford has "Rick Rolled" me into breaking the comprehensive ban on The Box. Damn YOU, Dean.

Dean Otf Kory has MASTERED misusing there and your. He managed to get BOTH wrong, and he's not even from the U.S.

Christmas is when all this comes to a head.

...then I push back...

@ Tara. Mwwwuuaaahhhhhhhhh hahahahahahahhahahaha! Good........goooood.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j45x9ranFH0

:-)

Give me enough time, and I'll get anyone to violate their own laws. :P

Poor Dean Clifford. He's at the end. Soon others will awaken and I will build my navy. The mandate will be "leave us alone, because if you don't, we'll hurt you and take your shit".

I'll have a boat by Spring, a very large one, the Navy is not far off......

That's the best part about ALL of this... I'm no less right than I was in 1982. All I have to do i wait.

"All I have to do i wait.", that's actually the worst part.

I think if we are going to be treated like violent criminals, then we should BE violent criminals to those who treat us as such. Very "Golden Rule". They are treating us the way they CLEARLY want to be treated.

...you people aren't ready to stomach my "and their children" part, but I just have to wait for that too.

Apparently, back in the day, as they say, there could be a gunfight between JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2, and if these people contracted to enter into a gunfight realizing they accepted all LIABILITY for the outcome, even the SHERIFF couldn't stop them. Is that true Scott Duncan, or just a "shit stain" created by Hollywood?

Is common law dead and buried, or merely buried alive?

I recall Winston Shrout emphasizing that common law essentially died in 1933. I'm occasionally so confused by all of this, and think so hard, sometimes, I can almost smell smoke. :( I hope it's not the wood burning.

PS Still researching 1997. I don't want to guess anymore. :)

I think I heard about the duel from Jordan Maxwell Robert. People weren't citizens up until the establishment of the U.S. so men could "call each other out" without any interference. Could be just a story though...

<<Always check with the author, as his intent is the absolute authority.>> Dean Clifford

:D

So what exactly caused the Commonwealth to die in 1997?

AUTHOR... INTENT... CAPACITY...

So basically, the "CROWN/STATE" has to to provide PROOF that the MAN was operating under the TITLE/LEGAL NAME as trustee/agent for the government at the moment of the alleged offense.

If the presumption that one, at the moment of the offense, was operating as a trustee/agent for the government is rebutted by affidavit, (and also, perhaps throwing in a certified/notarized copy of the Life Birth Registration as an Exhibit, as well) their statutory world will crumble down.

Dean Clifford, and/or Scott Duncan, kick my in the nuts if I am wrong!