Stuart Stone
Adam comes across as aggressive & abusive at times, but being a fellow Aussie, I know plenty of guys like this, right or wrong, they are passionate & well meaning, probably just a bit overzealous...
They're the first to challenge your commitment & Aussies are brutal at taking the piss out of each other & give you a kicking...but they're also the first to have your back when the shit hits the fan too.
My only two questions that have come out of this are:
1. Does he have malicious intent? I don't think so, but then it's not my call.
2. Does he add value? Potentially, absolutely. Out of 400+ 'members' he was at least an active participant.
People who make changes in this world generally have big/strong personalities & there are bound to be clashes from time to time.
If he can maybe tone down the personality a bit, and be a bit clearer in his communication (less kunts n faps), then he could definitely add value, especially on his pet subject, the buck-o-five.
I for one would love to see a logical, backed up validation of this process & where the claims originate from. That's my 2 cents anyway.