The Tender For Law

Volume 3

Sep 12, 2013 7:52 PM

Pete Daoust

Hey, this PIERRE DAOUST person got ANOTHER speeding tickets from the City of Montreal :D

So, I, as the most responsible administrator in town, took that bill of exchange addressed to the PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, and accepted by:,signed it, dated it, put the PIERRE DAOUST�s account number on it, put the Bill of Exchange Act as a reference, included a one page letter to EXPLANE what I am doing, and sent that bill of exchange to the Bank of Canada to discharged that debt addressed to PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX.

Of course I photocopied everything and sent all of it to the the City of Montreal to let them know that Bank of Canada has been informed to send them a payment.

And Yesterday, I�ve picked up this in the mail box :/

Notice to continue proceedings IMPORTANT NOTICE

We wish to inform you that the explanations you have provided with your plea of not guilty give rise to a matter that ought to be brought before the court. (I NEVER ENTERED a non-guilty plea ?....I paid, through the surety of the PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX.)

The Municipal Court of Ville de Montreal, will soon send you a notice, indicating the different manners by which your file may be put on the roll for a hearing before a Municipal Court Judge. You may present your defence at that time. The judge. After hearing the parties involved, will render a judgement. It is important that you advise us of any change of address. (What defence ? , what file ?.... I have NO DEFENCE, and NO file with them� I have paid )

If you wish to change your plea and no longer contest the infraction, you can pay the amount indicated in the item entitled *amount due* before the due date. Upon reception of your full payment your file will be closed. Certain infractions do carry the consequence of an inscription of demerit points on your file with the Socit� de l�assurance automobile du Quebec (SAAQ) (Change WHAT plea ?....I have NOT entered a plea fuck :D)

I NEVER ENTERED a non-guilty plea ?....I discharged the debt, through the surety of the PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX.

I have NO DEFENCE, and NO file with them�

I did NOT gave any explanation on any possible defence�.I just explained HOW I discharged that debt through the Bank of Canada, where the surety of PIERRE DAOUST is�..

Why they just don�t tell me that they are NOT accepting the payment ?

Seriously Scott Duncan, Why they just don�t tell me that they are NOT accepting the payment ?

FUCK !!! :D

Read Comments

Stuart Stone

Who is the 'you' that you are referring to?

I did not enter a plea, did 'you'? If so, what evidence do you have that 'you' entered a plea?

It is my understanding that only a defendant can enter a plea. Are you claiming that 'you' are the defendant? :D

Mick Parker

they have just interpreted what they have seen as you wanting to plead not guilty?..... tell them they've made a mistake & that was not your intention.... is this the counter offer again??.... they're offering you a deluxe administration?

Pete Daoust

Jeff Roggers http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/refln/U13L1a.cfm 19 ao�t, � 02:01 � J�aime � 1 Jeff Roggers I said eyes are similar to that not the same as. 19 ao�t, � 02:03 � Modifi� � J�aime Jay Hank � Ami(e) avec Adam Thomas et 1 autre how's that block working for you??

Pete Daoust

Fuck I have a new NAME :/

ROBERT DAOUST, I received another communication from the city of Montreal.....

The letter inside the envelop is addressed to ROBERT DAOUST, with a different address than PIERRE DAOUST's address.... :/

But on the envelop, it's HAND written (weird) PIERRE DAOUST and the right PIERRE DAOUST's address

Why this letter is NOT address to PIERRE DAOUST, and has a similar address, but different than PIERRE DAOUST's address

Fuck is this thing is getting weird... :/

Chris Evan

HAHA....yeah, it seems like they FISH! I got a letter that said I could not request a hearing because it was a criminal matter....threw that unsigned bill aside. Then I got one for the same "offence" that says I can request a hearing by a certain day!!!! WTF?

Pete Daoust

They are fucked-up with this payment method, they just don't know what to do.......I don't care, if I have to go to court to say...Hey, it's paid, here is the proofs... :D, they will have to say they don't accept it ?....at one point :D

Chris Evan

It was a "allowing an unlic operator" ticket. Addressed to CHRIS SCHULTE, when the OWNER of the vehicle is SGMI. CHRIS SCHULTE had nothing to do with the vehicle in question.....they made it up on the side of the road!!!!!!

Gail Marie

It is illegal for them to not accept BOE.... so when you send them a remittance and they call and say we can't take it...I should just say, please put that in writing to me? I've heard of people having their service cut off for trying to use a BOE, in a case like that would you take them to court or an administrative process and lien them?

David Johansen

"Pete Daoust David Johansen, I ask the cop if I was OBLIGE to give him PIERRE DAOUST's driver's license, he said YES. and he had a gun and a baton....."

why ask him that question rather than rebutting his presumption?

Stuart Stone

because he has a gun & a baton...and is obviously mistaking me (Pete in this case) for someone else, so he's either confused or mentally deficient...why argue, just take the crazy person's bit of paper, clean up the shitstain later....much better than getting hit with the gun and/or shot with the baton :D

Blake Gardner

Pete Daoust - you are being offered a controversy, plain and simple. If it were I, I may consider completing the administrative process with a counter offer to their controversy.

Like; Your offer of adjudication is conditionally accepted upon proof of claim that, 1) the account is not already discharged by your acceptance of my tender, 2) did bank of Canada officially dishonor my instrument, 3) did bank of Canada officially deny discharge and 3) is there a notice of defect in the instrument?

Please provide either one or all of the appropriate evidences in affidavit form under penalty of perjury within 10 days so other arrangements can be made or it will be agreed between the parties that the matter is hereby setoff, settled and closed.

Then a notice of default / foreign summary judgement.

Just an option, at least then when your taken to court you have a record of a complete process of discharge, offer to cure and default to hang onto in aid of denying any judge the right to subject matter jurisdiction - while they verbally push and pull at you to take their offer and reality.

I myself am facing the exact same situation on behalf of someone else I'm helping at the moment.

I did a proof of claim request instead of a discharge this time, asking for the speed camera model and make, the calibration reports, the officers operation certificate and affidavit, affidavit of injured party and or witnesses, evidence of damages, ect...they of course defaulted and my friend got summoned. So I will do a show cause order, including an affidavit of negative averment from the defendant, and then tell the court; i will be simply conditionally attending the hearing for the exclusive purpose of being showed cause why the hearing should not be dismissed in accordance with the private agreement of discharge via default between the parties evidence by an administrative process via third party presenter registered post?

Then I will attempt to hold that claim calmly amidst their verbal court room assaults:-) Peace.

Blake Gardner

Chris Schulte Jeff Roggers Pete Daoust

Not the same one as last time but same model...hang on to it:/)

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Affiant, John Henry Doe, hereinafter �Affiant�, does solemnly swear, declare and state as follows: 1.Affiant is competent to state the matters set forth herein. 2.Affiant has knowledge of the facts stated herein. 3.All the facts herein are true, correct and complete, admissible as evidence and if called upon as a witness, Affiant will testify to their veracity. Plain Statement of Facts 4.There is no evidence that JOHN H DOE, hereinafter �Taxpayer�, has taken a position identified as frivolous under I.R.C. �6702(c) and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. 5.There is no evidence that the Taxpayer�s 2008 IRS Form 1040 reflects a desire to delay or impede the administration of federal tax laws and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. 6.There is no evidence of a defect in the 2008 IRS Form 1040 submitted to the Internal Revenue Service on or about March 18, 2009 for the Taxpayer and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. 7.There is no evidence of a defect in the 2008 IRS Forms 1099-OID submitted to the Internal Revenue Service on or about March 18, 2009 for the Taxpayer and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand and seal on this 29th day of June, 2009 and hereby certify all the statements made above are true, correct and complete. Date: __________________ Signed: _______________________________ John Henry Doe

Pete Daoust

That should be it....in French :D

Mirabel, le 15 Septembre 2013.

Cour Municipale de la Ville de Montreal Case Postale 11045 Succursale Centre Ville Montreal (Qu�bec) H3C 4Y1 cc : Banque du Canada

Objet : num�ro de dossier 803 926 141 Lettre de Change

TOUS DROITS R�SERV�S / SANS PR�JUDICE

Monsieur / Madame,

1). Entendu et nous convenons que, Je suis le seule administrateur autoris� pour la personne nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST ayant le num�ro d�inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX. A moins que vous puissiez produire une �vidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

2). Entendu et nous convenons que, j�ai compl�t� la lettre de change que VOUS avez fait parvenir � la personne nomm� PIERRE DAOUST ayant le num�ro d�inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX, et l�ai envoy�e � la Banque du Canada pour paiement. A moins que vous puissiez produire une �vidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit que la Banque du Canada a officiellement d�shonor�e cette lettre de change compl�t�e, ou qu�un avis de d�fectuosit� concernant cette lettre de change existe.

3). Entendu et nous convenons que, la preuve du paiement est jointe a cette communication.

4). Entendu et nous convenons que, je n�ai donn� aucune explications pour aucune d�fense dans aucun dossier portant le num�ro 803 926 141. A moins que vous puissiez produire une �vidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

5). Entendu et nous convenons que, je n�ai PAS plaid� non-coupable et/ou coupable, pour la personne nomm� PIERRE DAOUST ayant le num�ro d�inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX dans un dossier portant le num�ro 803 926 141. A moins que vous puissiez produire une �vidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

6). Entendu et nous convenons que, VOUS avez plaid� non-coupable pour VOTRE dossier, et que VOUS avez donn� ces explications, donc, J�ai toutes les raisons de croire que VOUS �tes la partie d�fenderesse dans VOTRE dossier, et vous souhaite bonne chance.

7). Entendu et nous convenons que, pour toutes autres minutes de ma vie consacr�es a cette affaire, la personne nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST, facturera � la Ville de Montr�al, $50.00 CDN la minute.

8). Entendu et nous convenons que vous avez �t� pay�, et que VOTRE dossier est clos. A moins que vous puissiez produire une �vidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

Vous avez dix (10) jours pour me faire parvenir un affidavit, sous peine de parjure, d�montrant une ou plusieurs �vidences demand�es ci-haut, si je n�ai pas de r�ponse de vous dans les d�lais prescrit, il sera convenu entre les parties que l'affaire est r�gl� et ferm�.

Par :__________________________ Seul Administrateur Autoris� pour PIERRE DAOUST num�ro d�inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX

:D

David Vilaca

What about notarial protest via a JP. Go to the JPs office and explain a peace officer threatened you to accept the ticket. Tell the JP you accepted the ticket under duress for fear of violence when exercising your right not to contract. Tell the JP the the officer in question was belligerent and had no concept of your right not to accept his offer. I've been meaning to do this but I never get tickets. Is this a valid process?

Pete Daoust

WOW!!!!....just got a call from Hydro Quebec :D

But it was a machine speaking :( Telling that it's important to pay bills on time to avoid additional charges :/

It took them 14 months to do this :D

And this past august the 6th, I ADMINISTRATE the Bill of Exchange received from them, the right way, I haven't bought back the debt, I let PIERRE DAOUST is surety took care of it :D

Mick Parker

maybe remove their implied right to ring you, explain that their behaviour has been so unprofesional to date you prefer to keep a written record, that you dont talk to or take legal advice from machines .... well hardly ever :p

Pete Daoust

As Scott Duncan says, they can not tell me that they don't accept, it's illegal, so if they can't refuse, well they have to accept ? :/

Unless there is another word that I never heard of, that would fit in between ACCEPT and REFUSE ?