Sino General

Sep 12, 2013 12:15 AM
Hmmm, if you need insight than, could we assume your not the true master of the person PIERRE DAOUST? :-P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2013 12:15 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 12, 2013 12:21 AM
Insights...WHERE would be the WISE choice to move it, is there ANY wise places to move it.... The INTENT is: I want NOTHING that has to do with business in MY HOUSE :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2013 12:21 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 12, 2013 12:28 AM
And NO you can NOT assume ChiefRock Sino General :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2013 12:28 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Eamonn O Brien

Sep 12, 2013 9:49 AM
My understanding was the person is resident and man is domiciled... When a man re-sides he is then acting as person...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2013 9:49 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Rick Carne

Sep 12, 2013 1:16 PM
You are not the m�ster of the person..you are the usufructuary of it...the STATE IS THE MASTER OF THE PERSON.. the person is a fiction/citizen created by the STATE...if you claim to be M�ster of the person then you have pledged tour self as surety for the person and the Person is always governed by thier statutes and codes, the person only has legislated rights..


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2013 1:16 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Sep 12, 2013 6:36 PM
�in being� means living or conceived; �issue� means issue of a person, whether born within or outside marriage, subject to sections 158 and 159 of the Child and Family Services Act. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90p09_e.htm


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2013 6:36 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 14, 2013 1:41 PM
Usufruct A Civil Law term referring to the right of one individual to use and enjoy the property of another, provided its substance is neither impaired nor altered. For example, a usufructuary right would be the right to use water from a stream in order to generate electrical power. Such a right is distinguishable from a claim of legal ownership of the water itself.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 1:41 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Phillip Prater

Sep 14, 2013 2:48 PM
That usufruct made me think.. dear public servant, what property of the "public" do i use? Is everything public property? Please list these things not owned by the public in America. Thank you in advance.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 2:48 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 14, 2013 3:17 PM
Me too, very hard :-D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 3:17 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Tom Davies

Sep 14, 2013 5:49 PM
Where should you move the "person" to ??? How about straight up Stephen Harper's ass....after you've lit it on fire. :p


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 5:49 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Sep 14, 2013 6:38 PM
Stephen Harper has NOTHING to do with it. Learn how Parliament works.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 6:38 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Sep 14, 2013 6:38 PM
http://youtu.be/3vqyfY7cZPk


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 6:38 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Sep 14, 2013 7:33 PM
Scott, its occurred to me- you've mentioned that "You think wrong, and value the wrong things" to us so many times...mmm, is there a 'message' in there that you've CODEFIED for us to figure out?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 7:33 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Cara Small

Sep 14, 2013 7:49 PM
I love the bit Rick did on the ZENN car. They aren't sold here why? I haven't seen one in BC yet but apparently they are "allowed" to be sold here.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 7:49 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Tom Davies

Sep 14, 2013 11:08 PM
Ha Ha...Scott Duncan. Harper was a snide suggestion of mine. You must know my attitude by now ? Nothing literal intended. Every one of them can share a hotseat...lol.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 11:08 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Tom Davies

Sep 14, 2013 11:13 PM
Isn't Poutine the PM of Canada ??


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 14, 2013 11:13 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 2:01 AM
Residence Personal presence at some place of abode. Although the domicile and residence of a person are usually in the same place, and the two terms are frequently used as if they have the same meaning, they are not synonymous. A person can have two places of residence, such as one in the city and one in the country, but only one domicile. Residence means living in a particular locality, but domicile means living in that locality with the intent to make it a fixed and permanent home. Residence merely requires bodily presence as an inhabitant in a given place, whereas domicile requires bodily presence in that place and also an intention to make it one's permanent home. This distinction is relevant for members of the military, who may move frequently during the course of a typical career; college students, whose state of domicile may affect whether they are eligible for scholarships and grants from a state university; and retired individuals, whose domicile will determine where they pay taxes. Domicile determines where a person votes and where a person's driver's license is issued.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 2:01 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 2:01 AM
domicile n. the place where a person has his/her permanent principal home to which he/she returns or intends to return. This becomes significant in determining in what state a probate of a dead person's estate is filed, what state can assess income or inheritance taxes, where a party can begin divorce proceedings, or whether there is "diversity of citizenship" between two parties which may give federal courts jurisdiction over a lawsuit. Where a person has several "residences" it may be a matter of proof as to which is the state of domicile. A business has its domicile in the state where its headquarters is located.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 2:01 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 2:16 AM
Just checked the legal definition of the word crime, and I feel guilty now :( CRIME. A crime is an offence against a public law. This word, in its most general signification, comprehends all offences but, in its limited sense, it is confined to felony. 1 Chitty, Gen. Pr. 14. 2. The term misdemeanor includes every offence inferior to felony, but punishable by indictment or by particular prescribed proceedings. 3. The term offence, also, may be considered as, having the same meaning, but is usually, by itself, understood to be a crime not indictable but punishable, summarily, or by the forfeiture of, a penalty. Burn's Just. Misdemeanor. 4. Crimes are defined and punished by statutes and by the common law. Most common law offences are as well known, and as precisely ascertained, as those which are defined by statutes; yet, from the difficulty of exactly defining and describing every act which ought to be punished, the vital and preserving principle has been adopted, that all immoral acts which tend to the prejudice of the community are punishable by courts of justice. 2 Swift's Dig. 5. Crimes are mala in se, or bad in themselves; and these include. all offences against the moral law; or they are mala prohibita, bad because prohibited, as being against sound policy; which, unless prohibited, would be innocent or indifferent. Crimes may be classed into such as affect: 6.-1. Religion and public worship: viz. blasphemy, disturbing public worship. 7.-2. The sovereign power: treason, misprision of treason. 8.-3. The current coin: as counterfeiting or impairing it. 9.-4. Public justice: 1. Bribery of judges or jurors, or receiving the bribe. 2. Perjury. 3. Prison breaking. 4. Rescue. 5. Barratry. 6. Maintenance. 7. Champerty. 8. Compounding felonies. 9. Misprision of felonies. 10. Oppression. 11. Extortion. 12. Suppressing evidence. 13. Negligence or misconduct in inferior officers. 14. Obstructing legal process. 15. Embracery. 10.-5. Public peace. 1. Challenges to fight a duel. 2. Riots, routs and unlawful assemblies. 3. Affrays. 4. Libels. 11.-6. Public trade. 1. Cheats. 2. Forestalling. S. Regrating. 4. Engrossing. 5. Monopolies. 12.-7. Chastity. 1. Sodomy. 2. Adultery. 3. Incest. 4. Bigamy. 5. Fornication. 13.-8. Decency and morality. 1. Public indecency. 2. Drunkenness. 3. Violating the grave. 14.-9. Public police and economy. 1. Common nuisances. 2. Keeping disorderly houses and bawdy houses. 3. Idleness, vagrancy, and beggary. 15.-10. Public. policy. 1. Gambling. 2. Illegal lotteries. 16.-11. Individuals. 1. Homicide, which is justifiable, excusable or felonious. 2. Mayhem. 3. Rape. 4. Poisoning, with intent to murder. 5. Administering drugs to a woman quick with child to cause, miscarriage. 6. Concealing death of bastard child. 7. Assault and battery, which is either simple or with intent to commit some other crime. 8. kidnapping. 9. False imprisonment. 10. Abduction. 17.-12. Private property. 1. Burglary. 2. Arson. 3. Robbery. 4., Forgery. Counterfeiting. 6. Larceny. 7. Receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen, or theft-bote. 8. Malicious mischief. 18.-13. The public, individuals, or their property, according to the intent of the criminal. 1. Conspiracy.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 2:16 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 2:16 AM
I'm sure I,ve must commited a crime somehow :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 2:16 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 2:18 AM
Ha....I feel better now, I am sure I must have received a pusnishment or two somehow :D Punishment The imposition of hardship in response to misconduct. Punishments authorized in modern U.S. law include community service, monetary fines, Forfeiture of property, restitution to victims, confinement in jail or prison, and death. Some civil sanctions are punitive in nature. The primary aim, though, in most civil cases is to compensate the victim. However, a judge or jury may assess Punitive Damages against a party in a civil case if that party's conduct was especially wicked. Punitive damages are intended to punish a party or set an example for similar wrongdoers. Though onerous, punitive damages in a civil case do not carry with them the same stigma attached to criminal punishment. Human transgressions have been punished in various ways throughout history. The standard punishments in ancient Greek and Roman societies were death, Slavery, mutilation (Corporal Punishment), imprisonment, or Banishment. Some punishments were especially creative. In ancient Rome, for example, a person who murdered a close relative was enclosed in a sack with a cock, a viper, a dog, and a monkey, and then cast into the sea. The ancient punishments were brought to England. Until the nineteenth century, the death penalty, or Capital Punishment, was imposed in England for more than 200 different crimes. Most of these crimes were petty violations, such as pick-pocketing or swindling. A defendant could be hanged, burned at the stake, or beheaded. In some cases the process of death was drawn out. A person found guilty of Treason, for example, was placed on a rack and stretched, hanged until not quite dead, then disemboweled, beheaded, and quartered (cut into four pieces). Until the nineteenth century, corporal punishment in England could consist of whipping, branding, or the cutting off of a body part. Noses, ears, hands, fingers, toes, and feet were all subject to removal for criminal acts. Often the body part sliced off was the part thought responsible for the act. A pickpocket, for example, might have a hand cut off, and a spy might lose an ear, tongue, or eye. Corporal punishment could be inflicted in addition to other punishments, such as banishment, forced labor, or short-term incarceration. The American colonies adopted and cultivated the traditional punishments of England. The most common punishments were corporal and capital. Petty criminals were often sentenced to a combination of corporal punishment and incarceration in jail for several months. The punishment for more serious crimes was usually death. Punishment was the most comprehensive and severe in colonies founded on religious principles. In Massachusetts, controlled by the Puritans, a woman who committed Adultery could be forced to wear the letter A in public as a punishing reminder of her conduct. Men who committed adultery were put to death, as were those who engaged in bestiality. The witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts, illustrated the inventiveness of punishment in some of the colonies. In 1692, 19 people were executed after children claimed that several women were practicing witchcraft. One of the alleged witnesses, who refused to participate in the trials, was slowly pressed to death under the weight of heavy rocks.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 2:18 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 2:19 AM
hairstyle [?h???sta?l] n (Clothing, Personal Arts & Crafts / Hairdressing & Grooming) a particular mode of arranging, cutting, or setting the hair hairstylist n


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 2:19 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Sep 15, 2013 3:10 AM
Tom Davies, Prime Minister Jean Poutine was the PREVIOUS Prime Minister. Try to keep up :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 3:10 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Tom Davies

Sep 15, 2013 3:11 AM
My bad !


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 3:11 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 3:25 AM
You forget this guy in between....what's his name ??..mmmhhhh...OH YEAH, Canada Steamship Lines :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 3:25 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


ZJ Free

Sep 15, 2013 3:26 AM
Pete Daoust, the Living soul has a domicile, (which you gave the definition for above) the PERSON has a residence. Because a Living soul has Free Will, he is free to determine his domicile. No one may force you to claim a certain place as your domicile, but you may only claim one (1). Residence is a LEGAL TERM, while domicile is not.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 3:26 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Sep 15, 2013 11:25 PM
Well, so far ZJ Free, PIERRE DAOUST has a legal domicile, and for Pierre Daoust, it's none anyone's business.... That's how I see it so far... :)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Sep 15, 2013 11:25 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: