Scott Duncan
"Black's law 4th edition".
Seriously. Fuck off with that shit. Black's 9th is the current one, and I have warned repeatedly about quoting from your grandparent's time. It is 2013. Use the stuff from this FUCKING CENTURY. I warned about this before, so your will feel a sharp tingling sensation, followed by...
BANNED!
That said, there seems to be a concerted effort to MISS THE FUCKING POINT. You listen to me, and grasp this shit, or I simply ban you. No more wasting time on idiots who won't listen.
TAMPERING VOIDS. PERIOD. VOIDING VOIDS. PERIOD.
END RESULT HERE IN FUCKING REALITY = VOID.
If they say it's ILLEGAL, who do they charge? The LEGAL NAME? ...well maybe, as long as that LEGAL NAME ISN'T ON THE ALLEGEDLY TAMPERED DOCUMENT. IT"S NOT ILLEGAL FOR A NAMED PARTY TO VOID AND/OR AMEND ANY DOCUMENT WITH THEIR NAME ON IT. IT WILL ALWAYS STAND AS LEGALLY VOID.
WATCH THE MECHANICS OF THE PROCESS! ONLY A PERSON CAN BE CHARGED WITH "TAMPERING", but THAT LEGAL PERSON HAS THE ENTITLEMENT (UNALIENABLE RIGHT) TO VOID ANYTHING WITH THEIR NAME ON IT!