The Tender For Law

Volume 3

Aug 26, 2013 3:28 PM

Brenda Larson

Here is what has been happening to me lately. I was in family court last Tuesday and Wednesday. On Tuesday after court started I told the justice that I didn't think that the court order was valid because I had voided it and I couldn't get a true certified copy of it. That I was told that the document was tampered. That when I looked up the word tampered it meant void. So the justice told me that there was (conveniently) a certified copy in the courtroom. The justice and the clerk hunted high and low and "found" a copy. The Sheriff handed it to me and when I checked the back page, I told him that this wasn't a true certified copy. His response was "I say it is". I also figured out another lie that the social worker made up and used in some of the documents to get the kid back. So my next step is to take it to the Attorney General?

Read Comments

Ceit Butler

Or perhaps she is just busy with life AWAY from the computer and has not seen your questions yet.

You cannot honestly expect people to spend day and night tethered to their keyboards, awaiting your comments with baited breath.

Lose the attitude and learn some patience.

Brenda Larson

Black's law 4th edition, TAMPER. To meddle so as to alter a thing, especially to make corrupting or perverting changes; CORRUPT. Spoiled; tainted; vitiated VITIATE. To impair; to make void or voidable; to cause to fail of force or effect;

Brenda Larson

No. I wrote it right on the original at the court house, it went back in their court file, I went back a few days later and asked for a true certified copy 3x and they would not give it to me other then trying to offer me a true certified copy of a a previously copied order, without the void on it.

Jeff Roggers

hello Kate I use the talk to text application it does not show me the whole message so I have to import it and then correct that I'm sorry I have dyslexia yes you have the right to Tamper but you also have to follow the procedures because nobody's above the law

Scott Duncan

"Black's law 4th edition".

Seriously. Fuck off with that shit. Black's 9th is the current one, and I have warned repeatedly about quoting from your grandparent's time. It is 2013. Use the stuff from this FUCKING CENTURY. I warned about this before, so your will feel a sharp tingling sensation, followed by...

BANNED!

That said, there seems to be a concerted effort to MISS THE FUCKING POINT. You listen to me, and grasp this shit, or I simply ban you. No more wasting time on idiots who won't listen.

TAMPERING VOIDS. PERIOD. VOIDING VOIDS. PERIOD.

END RESULT HERE IN FUCKING REALITY = VOID.

If they say it's ILLEGAL, who do they charge? The LEGAL NAME? ...well maybe, as long as that LEGAL NAME ISN'T ON THE ALLEGEDLY TAMPERED DOCUMENT. IT"S NOT ILLEGAL FOR A NAMED PARTY TO VOID AND/OR AMEND ANY DOCUMENT WITH THEIR NAME ON IT. IT WILL ALWAYS STAND AS LEGALLY VOID.

WATCH THE MECHANICS OF THE PROCESS! ONLY A PERSON CAN BE CHARGED WITH "TAMPERING", but THAT LEGAL PERSON HAS THE ENTITLEMENT (UNALIENABLE RIGHT) TO VOID ANYTHING WITH THEIR NAME ON IT!

Scott Duncan

IN SHORT: TAMPERING (VOIDING) ISN'T ILLEGAL, IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT. THEY CANNOT CHARGE A NAMED PARTY ON THE DOCUMENT WITH ANY ILLEGAL ACT REGARDING SUCH A DOCUMENT, BECAUSE IT CANNOT BE ILLEGAL.

IT'S ALL ACCOUNTING AND SURETY... OFF TO BAN!

...idiots.

David Johansen

you were handed a slider, and neglected to VOID it too?

Hi ALL! well first i read this post, and my comment above was pre reading throu the comments made previously. then i see the two posts immediately before this. seems i was on the right track. like shoulda hadah V8, shouldah whipped out a pen or that void stamp, and (like emeril) POW!

Stuart Stone

Theoretical exercise here, using the principle that questioning negates understanding:

'The Sheriff handed it to me and when I checked the back page, I told him that this wasn't a true certified copy. His response was "I say it is".'

Responses (to the sheriff): Are you claiming to be a party to this document, as I cannot see your name on it?

By what authority are you claiming that this is a true certified copy?

What evidence do you have to support your claim that this is a true certified copy?

Are you offering legal advice? Are you qualified to be providing legal advice? Are you a licensed lawyer?

...Am I on the right track with this line approach or am I just pissing in the wind?

Pete Daoust

Sherriff in Canada.

Canada

Various jurisdictions in Canada on provincial and sub-provincial levels operate sheriff's departments primarily concerned with court bailiff services such as courtroom security, post-arrest prisoner transfer, serving legal processes, and executing civil judgements. Sheriffs are defined under Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada as "peace officers". In other parts of Canada not covered by a sheriff's agency, bailiff functions are handled directly by the local provincial police or by Royal Canadian Mounted Police as appropriate.