The Tender For Law

Volume 3

Aug 22, 2013 4:26 PM

David Vilaca

A week ago Friday I was assaulted by two Clown, erm Crown Corporate entities in uniform. My love and I were out posturing for a yard sale. We left the house on her e bike, she had a helmet on I did not. We came to our first intersection to poster and I noticed the pigs in the turn lane, as we crossed the street the Clown entities pulled to the curb lane and the female entity informed me that I was breaking the law by not wearing a helmet, I laughed and stated that I am an adult and quite capable of making my own decisions. I then asked if I was free to go.

The sow answered no and asked if she could see my ID to which I stated, for what purpose? Do you intend on causing me harm. At this point the rather large cannibal in uniform ( I could smell bacon on his breath) and the sow exited the cruiser with obvious intent to extort a name via threat, coercion or intimidation. He claimed to have witnessed me cross the walk with pedestrians riding the e bike and me not wearing a helmet is a violation of the hwy trafficking act and that I had to produce identification.

I asked the clown entity what law states I had to produce government issued id as I was not carrying any and that I had no problem giving them my name. The sow then asked for my name to which I stated David. She then asked for a surname to which I stated I could not give that which did not belong to me, I could give the given but not that which belongs to my family. The sow stated that she needed my name and that I would be placed under arrest and so I orated the family name. She then asked my dob and i asked by who's authority do you ask for private information.

The cannibal, standing in silent rage instantly lost his contenace and shit on me and my rights with his violent nature and ego, he grabed me with force, twisted my arms around back and placed me in bondage telling me I was under arrest and that I was going to the station for finger printing. He was very hostile and bound my left wrist so tightly that I felt a nerve being pinched. I knew this was to throw me off my standing and place in mental duress but I remembered to state I do not consent to any searches before ordering him to loosen the left cuff.

As a matter course he squeezed the cuff tighter and stated that I had no choice I was under arrest. His cloven hand dived right into my pockets. I stated loud and clear that I did not consent to any violation of my rights that he was causing me harm and was to loosen the left cuff.

The sow stated they needed to identify me while bacon breath worked me into a frenzy of pain by twisting the binding while lifting me into the air , at this point I began shouting that they were peace officers and that they were causing me harm.

At this point I began making more mistakes by shouting at them and not retaining my calm, I was in pain and my first concern was the damage being caused. I lost focus and started calling them little more than animals, brutish criminals enacting violence for consent.

I told the cannibal I was no longer corresponding till the binding was loosened. The piece of stinking shit pretended to loosen the binding while causing me to shout out in pain. He claimed I was resisting. He then opened the cruiser door, pushed a button on the side of the cage, informed me I was being recorded and placed me inside.

They turned to speak to my partner but she's super smart, she left the keys to her e bike and helmet and stood in the shadows across the street.

The pigs looked confused, they knew they lost track of more information. When they oinked their way into the bacon mobile the first question was where did my friend go. I replied that I will choose what questions I answer.

Next question was do I have a drivers licence? Same reply

I'm a little fuzzy on what the exact order of questioning was. I will get the video and post it here.

I think I asked wether they were peace officers and if their intention was to collect a tribute for HER MAJESTY. The sow replied with. " have you ever had mental health issues. Standard answers was I will choose what questions I will answer.

At this point the cannibal drew her attention to the computer and she asked if my address was bla bla bla. Standard answer. Again they looked perplexed. My license came up with no picture and no criminal history of which there is plenty (many years ago). They talked about how little info was in there system and then the sow asked if I had a criminal history. I replied with a firm yes. Seemed to me the dipshit swine were even more perplexed.

The claim now was they would release me with a fine if I provided them with an address they could confirm. The address on the licence is a private sanctuary so just to fuck with them I gave them my P.O box so they could not correspond the two together.

Knowing the camera was on I ranted for a little while about peace officers playing policy enforcer, how peace officers have a duty to not cause harm in the community and how shooter Forcillo was enacting the policy of shoot center mass when his duty was to section 7 and 10(c) of the charter.

The dipshit swine then began to have second thoughts when I asked for a business card and the information of the their underwriter and bond holder. Both claimed not to be carrying business card and played clueless to public hazard bonding. I asked if they thought they could operate with impunity, if they actually believed they held no liability in the community.

Dead silent.

The sow asked me for my angels #, she claimed that if I could get her to come back to identify my name they would release me. I noticed 2 bicycle cops showed up and I thought to negotiate by telling the sow the bike cop could call her and give her the options. To my surprise they agreed on camera that the bike cop would phone and tell her she was in no trouble and that the purpose was only to identify the name. I gave the sow her digits and she gave the deets to the bike cop to call. He did and my angel agreed to return on condition.

When she arrived, the cannibal exited the bacon mobile and asked her what my name is. Her first statement was that she is not involved in their or my affairs. The cannibal stated that they just need to confirm my name and address. My angel stated she did not understand the question and she did not want to be involved. The pig said he just wanted to corroborate my name and asked if I was David. She said yes I was david he then asked my last name and she said she was not involved. He asked if my surname started with a V. She said yes, he then asked if my last name was Vbla bla. And she stated yes.

The cannibal informed the sow that my angel corroborated my name and that I could be released from my bondage with a ticket. The dipshit pigs released me from the bacon mobile and offered me the ticket, I took the ticket and told the sow I was going to correct the controversy by seeking her public information being the bond, business card and underwriter information.

I will be going to 55 division today to demand from the desk Sargent the information I need to correct the controversy.

Read Comments

Derek Moran

104. Bicyclists to wear helmet

(2.1) Subject to subsection 103.1 (2), no person shall ride on or operate a bicycle on a highway unless the person is wearing a bicycle helmet that complies with the regulations and the chin strap of the helmet is securely fastened under the chin.

..interestingly enough- there is NO definition for PERSON in the Highway Traffic Act.....but there is in the Legislation Act, 2006 ;)

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h08_e.htm#BK167

David Vilaca

Chris Schulte tell me about it. I just went to 55 division to demand these two Clown entities produce a business card and bonding information. the duty and desk sargents both refused to provide these pigs information thus bringing themselves into the controversy via The Police Services Act section 81. 2 and ,3 Withholding services

(2) No member of a police force shall withhold his or her services. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.

Offence

(3) A person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2) is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than one year, or to both. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.

Pete Daoust

They've PRESUMED you, being an employee of that city where they've stopped you....Justa say, I DON'T WORK neither with, and/or for YOU.

I am NOT an employee of that corporation you work for Mister....

And keep repeating that shit until they beat you with a baton :D ....or teaser you, or shoot you... :D

Michael Af Sj�lland

Good on ya. I'm noticing a trend, through the years, wereby the standards for accepting individuals into law enforcement have been tightened, and that to make it through the eye of the needle only the select few combining under-average IQ and a need-to-hurt. In the old days they would've been locked up. Now they're selected for police and security work. these characters are now out there thinking it's ok to asault people fr not wearing helmets. Show'em their place :)

David Vilaca

A sack of shit can be useful unlike the private bar. A sack of shit can be burnt on the doorstep of a lawyer and the door bell rung, a lawyer just needs his bell rung. I asked the justice department once who wrote the statutes and the reply was outside lawyers so there is no conflict of interest

Derek Moran

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE FINANCIAL CONTROL � 71-13. Deposits with Chief Financial Officer. [Amended 2005-04-14 by By-law No. 331-2005] Duly executed copies of all agreements, including all insurance and certificates thereof, all contracts, bonds, letters of credit and other security for the due performance thereof, and all other documents executed by or on behalf of the City shall be delivered to the Chief Financial Officer for safekeeping.

David Johansen

NOTICE TO COUNTY CLERK _____________________________________ The minute you receive any affidavit, it is recorded. Should you refuse to record My affidavits, once deposited with you, you are committing a crime against justice under Statutes at Large Sec. 5403 and it is punishable by up to a $2000 fine and 3 years imprisonment. If your county attorney told you not to file any documents like mine, you are still responsible, as I do not accept any third party interveners. Any attorney, district attorney, or anyone from the lawyering craft are all third parties and do not have a license to make a legal determination in this matter as they do not represent Me and you, the county clerk, do not have the authority to represent Me. Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying, &c., public records.) SEC. 5403. Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with intent to steal or destroy, takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of justice, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of such court, or any paper, or document, or record filed or deposited in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer, shall, without reference to the value of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so taken, pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at hard labor, not more than three years, or both: [See � � 5408,5411,5412.1] Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws.) SEC. 5407. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of such persons shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more thanfive thousand dollars, or by imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not less than six months normore than six years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. See � � 1977-1991, 20042010, 5506-5510.1 Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying record by officer in charge.) SEC. 5408.Every officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding specified in section fifty-four hundred and three,who fraudulently takes away, or withdraws, or destroys any such record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his office or deposited with him or in his custody, shall pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment at hard labor not more than three years, or both-, and shall, moreover, forfeit his office and be forever afterward disqualified from holding any office under the Government of the United States.

David Vilaca

PLEASE NOTE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT, THE ACCESS AND PRIVACY SECTION HAS 30 DAYS TO COMPLY UPON RECEIPT OF YOUR REQUEST.

Types of requests

The following is a list of the most common types of requests processed through the Toronto Police Services� Access and Privacy Section:

� Records of Arrest � General Occurrences; Incident Reports � Memorandum Book Notes � Witness statements or contact information � Police related 9-1-1 Emergency calls Next step is HQ for arrest record, incident report, memorandum book notes, bonding info and business cards from PC Metzger, PC Vega and the two (duty officer in video and his sargent) who by choice entered the controversy by not providing the required service.

Pete Daoust

PLEASE NOTE: We are TRAINED, since we are little kids, TO OBEY, BREAK and take our hole.....We are NOT suppose to disobey, unbreak and stay outside the hole.....So now, these cops will be ALL FUCKED UP with you David Smile :D .....we are presumed being UNDER their authority, we are presumed being an EMPLOYEE, and we have to stick with the EMPLOYEE's rules

Unless we DECIDE otherwise :D

David Vilaca

Risk Management Unit phone #416-808-7731 let's all call and find out. Or fax 416-808-8024. Mandate: The purpose of the Professional Standards-Risk Management Unit is to contribute to the achievement of the Toronto Police Service's mandate and priorities by: providing an effective and efficient support service ensuring that the prescribed Service standards concerning the administration, promotion and support of professionalism, which includes the practices, conduct, appearance, ethics and integrity of its members, strengthens public confidence and co-operation within the community. Who's community?

Pete Daoust

This PLURALISTIC stuff sounds BELIEFS to me, ...... I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW :D

Pete Daoust

If he keeps talking you continue with.....

I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW

Pete Daoust

plu�ral�ism (plr-lzm) n. 1. The condition of being multiple or plural. 2. a. A condition in which numerous distinct ethnic, religious, or cultural groups are present and tolerated within a society. b. The belief that such a condition is desirable or socially beneficial. 3. Ecclesiastical The holding by one person of two or more positions or offices, especially two or more ecclesiastical benefices, at the same time. 4. Philosophy a. The doctrine that reality is composed of many ultimate substances. b. The belief that no single explanatory system or view of reality can account for all the phenomena of life.

pluralism [?pl??r??l?z?m] n 1. (Christianity / Ecclesiastical Terms) the holding by a single person of more than one ecclesiastical benefice or office 2. (Sociology) Sociol a theory of society as several autonomous but interdependent groups which either share power or continuously compete for power 3. (Sociology) the existence in a society of groups having distinctive ethnic origin, cultural forms, religions, etc. 4. (Business / Industrial Relations & HR Terms) a theory that views the power of employers as being balanced by the power of trade unions in industrial relations such that the interests of both sides can be catered for 5. (Philosophy) Philosophy a. the metaphysical doctrine that reality consists of more than two basic types of substance Compare monism [1] dualism [2] b. the metaphysical doctrine that reality consists of independent entities rather than one unchanging whole Compare monism [1] absolutism [2b] pluralist n & adj pluralistic adj

Pete Daoust

To me.....

I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW

Is more simple, and really EASY to UNDERSTAND :D

Scott Duncan

Yes..

Intellect... Check. Knowledge...Yup, beat you there too... Acquired skills... HELL yes...

Has line of women who want to have sex with him... Yup... (OOO there's Gail...) I win again.

Those factors give me a distinct advantage over...well.. everybody... especially you, Pierre :P

David Vilaca

My intent is to lien the 2 peace officers. I would like keep this thread to the process of lienning public officers. I need to gather this public record so I have evidence of a breach of the trust. When I do collect this evidence, I'll file a lien and send copies w/affidavit to the underwriter. I will be claiming $6000.00 in damages from each officers bond as per my bill of exchange/fee schedule. Is this even possible ? I have no desire to make a claim in the court as there is no remedy or relief in that venue.

Pete Daoust

So, Scott Duncan, correct me if I am wrong.....

You will have to send each of these contractor, that forces you to do business with, an INVOICE, and then an ACCOUNT STATEMENT, and then, a NOTICE, and then, a FINAL NOTICE (because you are a nice guy) and then a DEFAULT NOTICE......and then LIEN them :D

Is that is ? :D

David Vilaca

Thank you Pete Daoust, this is the process I had in mind. Notice with bill/invoice attached. The bill is for using torture to extort the private name (I produced no slave id). Then the opportunity to cure with outstanding bill/account invoice, then notice of default. Place all evidence together and register the lien, send copies of everything to the underwriter.

David Vilaca

good question Jeff Roggers, and part of the answers I seek. As I have been allocated Federal Court File (T-1395-12) the title of Private Individual, sui juris man, at no cost, it will be the private man who places the lien. correct me if I'm wrong

August le Blanc

the corp created is Trustee corporation... holder of the Trust and administrator thereof... as proxy to me.. it handles all affairs of the legal person name lien by the trustee corp as a person... who is lawful holder in due course... I trust my corp....

August le Blanc

David Smile you need someone you trust, perhaps your own creation by proxy which is what the corp does... your corp is accountable to you as sole share holder and the executives of the corp administers the trust established by the trust agreement you as grantor create to entrust the corp to administer your affaires... including but not limited to liens... The corp is seen as a person by the system...

August le Blanc

read my above posts... its boiled down.. it is there... The corp is considered a person.. to detach from surety you have the corp handle the names affairs all of them... you.. you can do it with the name but joinder and surety become attached to that particular case... and the fresh entity created by the state each time you are charged with something... the lien process is best, to my knowledge, administered by the corp of which, in my instance. I am acting pres. and sole shareholder accountable to me..

Pete Daoust

1). Two clowns wants to do business with the person I have in my pocket.

2). I say NO.

3). They decide to FORCE that business on the person I have in my pocket.

4). I continu to say no, but these clowns have guns, and proceed with this business anyway.

5). When they FINALLY release me from kidnapping I go home, with the person I have in my pocket.

6). I sit at the fucking kitchen table and start the ADMINISTRATING process, for the person I have in my pocket, because I am the Sole fucking authorized administrator for this fucking person.

7). I make an invoice, of course the invoice will show the NAME of the person I have in my pocket, and send registered mail that fucking invoice to these two clowns.

8). The terms are PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT.

9). I wait 4 or 5 days, and then I send a fucking account statement.

10). I wait another 4 to 5 days and then I send a NOTICE, to notify these 2 clowns that I have NOT received the payment.

11). I wait another 4 to 5 days, and I send a FINAL NOTICE to these 2 clowns saying I have NOT received the payment, and it�s the FINAL chance they have to pay.

12). I wait 4 to 5 days and then I send a fucking DEFAULT NOTICE to these cocksuckers, saying that they are in default regarding that fucking invoice.

13). I wait 4 to 5 days, and then I LIEN THEIR FUCKING HOUSE, and their fucking BOND.

The End :D

Welcome in the wonderful world of BUSINESS... :D

Robert Cormier

Pete Daoust - You might want to be careful about providing only 4 or 5 days for the party to respond to you. While you may be right legally, it may be difficult to get a court to support such summary judgements as it may appear to them as being the workings of someone who isn't fair. I have had ChiefRock Sino General 's help with some of this stuff. I pushed for 4 to 5 day responses too and he suggested 30 days to show good will. For one of my NOTICES, he recommends giving 90 days to demonstrate that i'm an extremely accommodating person in law who is more than fair. In summary 4 to 5 days = unfair, mean spirited guy. 30 days = nice guy who puts some real effort to be fair and accommodating. 90 days= unarguably fair and just man bending backward to give every chance possible to a slime ball

Pete Daoust

Terms are DUE UPON RECEIPT, Invoice has been sent REGISTERED MAIL, they receive the invoice the day after I sent it....

I don't see ANY problems with a 4 or 5 days.....I am NOT asking for a RESPONSE, I am asking for a payment.....I am not ASKING questions, I send an invoice

I do this every day with the business I happen to be the CEO of....

Invoice are sent everyday here, and terms need to be respected...

This is BUSINESS Robert Cormier, nothing else...

Robert Cormier

What if they don't agree and determine they now have a need to put together a counterclaim, or a written response. What if they left their papers at the cottage and have to wait till the weekend to return to the cottage to get them because they have to work for a living etc.:) I'm not trying to be belligerent Pete. Just passing on some words of advice given to me by a wise man. Apparently there is a fair bit of case law about this out there.

Robert Cormier

If you stuck your dick in your zipper you would have to go to the hospital and might have to stay a few days, giving you a valid reason not to respond to such a short window of opportunity. :) Claims made against you may be thrown out. :(

Robert Cormier

In "normal" business there is a PO or a signed invoice etc accepting all your terms of contract. This seems a little different in my mind. Did the cops sign something with David Smile that they agree to any and all terms that he might wish to impose upon him at a future date? Maybe I'm confused. Maybe I've missed something. I'm here to learn. I'm just thinking it may not be as simple as a typical business transaction with a signed invoice etc. :(

Robert Cormier

I see your point. I truly do Pete Daoust. I'm just hesitant to outright dismiss what the Chief says. I know that I've read Scott Duncan claiming ChiefRock Sino General is absolutely right and knows his stuff, or something to that effect. Just me trying to be helpful here. :)

Pete Daoust

I am NOT trying to be right here Robert Cormier, I am not trying to WIN a point....I just apply what's logical regarding BUSINESS.....If I have NOT comitted ANY crimes, what's left ?....I can only see BUSINESS :/

Robert Cormier

While your time may be valuable to you...the courts don't give a rats ass about you, they only care about PETE DAOUST. As I understand it, the only thing you have of value is your signature, or your actions, which can turn the SURETY game tables against "you" in a heartbeat.

Pete Daoust

Robert Cormier, As I understand it, the only thing you have of value is your signature, or your actions, which can turn the SURETY game tables against "you" in a heartbeat.

I never said that ? :/.....I just wrote "TIME"

Robert Cormier

I see two courts potentially involved. The first court i see is the one he creates when he asserts a summary judgement. That summary judgement of his can be challenged in one of their courts. If the determination of his court is challenged in their court, he may be asked to prove that his court was equitable.

Robert Cormier

He may say to their court "I don't give a rat's ass about their policies, that's their business, I only am concerned with my business and my policies." The court might say "Good point! We'll apply that line of thinking right now. In the name of equity, logic and fairness, lets apply your argument to your business as well. Why should their business give a rat's ass about your business and it's policies?"

Gail Marie

starting an administrative process is equivalent to a contract offer. it's a 3 step process, each step of the process the other party is given time to counter offer the original offer...the public court isn't there to decide if the one party made a good contract or not...its there to enforce the summary judgement.

If the cops sue David, that is a whole different separate matter?

Pete Daoust

It's not David's fault if these clowns are NOT trained well enough to do business with respect, honor, dignity and integrity.....on the other end, David need to FOLLOW UP, with the administrative process, with RESPECT, HONOR, DIGNITY & INTEGRITY....if he do that, he will win........OR......he is DEFINITLY one of their slaves.....NO ?

Robert Cormier

While that may be true, EQUITY and EQUITABLE TREATMENT (or non-equitable treatment) may have something to do with the outcome here in reality. For example; even some of the "gurus' such as Dean who's been at this for 17 or so years for example, may be 100% right (although using different tactics). As much as Dean is "right" beyond a shadow of a doubt, so to speak, here in reality he has had two or three trucks taken from him, spent 20 something days in jail, doesn't get his 2 or 3 vehicles back and in the end considers it a BIG WIN when they drop the charges and don't compensate him. While he may secure summary judgements worth ELEVENTY BILLION dollars, in reality, according to Scott (if I understand correctly), he will never see a dime and will never get the justice he so very much is deserves.

Robert Cormier

As I understand it, for the reasons mentioned in my previous post, as per ChiefRock Sino General, you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy, always bending over backwards (not forwards) to prove what a super nice guy you really are. :)

David Vilaca

Both of you are right, I use a 30 day reply date, a 10 day opportunity to cure, 5 day notice of fault followed by notice of default. Its business, not my problem the shit stains have no understanding. Being a good administrator, I will give reasonable response time so as not to be a vexatious litigator

Robert Cormier

So they can never say that they didn't have enough time to gather records, think about their choices, shop for a lawyer, hire one, give the lawyer time to consider the legal merits of a defense, study relevant case law , etc. I agree they won't put Dean in jail again for that confrontation, but, in reality, was it really a big win? Did he really get the upperhand?

Pete Daoust

Robert, I have managed NOT being surety for the person named PIERRE DAOUST, that I happen to have in my pocket, for 7 different matters so far, to me, that is a big fucking win, but maybe for others that is NOTHING.....but who cares, really ?

David Vilaca

the plain and simply reality is I was forced into intercourse while being held in bondage. The language must express the reality. I will never use the terms handcuffed or forced into contact, not in my affidavit anyway

Robert Cormier

Things are kind of cute, fuzzy and warm in business when doing BoE stuff if you know what you are doing. Start liening people posing as Judges (JUSTICES), or men posing as PEACE KEEPERS (POLICY ENFORCES) and things can escalate very quickly. In fact, just publicly asserting you have a right to travel down the road in a car can get you in a heap of stink.

Robert Cormier

Scott Duncan is reading this thread. He is weighing in. I just got a like on: Robert Cormier As I understand it, for the reasons mentioned in my previous post, as per ChiefRock Sino General, you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy, always bending over backwards (not forwards) to prove what a super nice guy you really are.

Pete Daoust

If Scott Duncan would have been a soft gentil no hurt feelings $19.95 per month type of guy, I would not be here......I have NO time, I am 47, and need to learn quick (I know this sounds funny :D) and harder I get hit, quicker I learn, that is "ME"....so if I spread bullshit...please hit, and hit hard, I can take it....no big deal :)

Robert Cormier

Pete Daoust Well, they are NOT success stories, they are ADMINISTRATIVE boring fucking shit matters.... Not BORING to me. I can read and learn about this all day and night. Sometimes I miss taking a shower and consider pissing in a jar just to stay focused and not miss anything.

David Vilaca

Pete Daoust, you say send the invoice first, on what grounds. Should I not send the invoice with the notice. Sending an invoice without notice as to the cause, could that not see me charged with threatening a justice system participants

David Vilaca

I have a fee schedule in place with the justice department and the attorney general, so the bill is 1000.00 per hr or any portion thereof for intercourse and and 5000.00 per hr to be held in bondage. That's 6000.00 from each shit stain

Robert Cormier

First you send a PROPER NOTICE. When they indicate that they want to do business with you (accept your contract) by agreeing to your terms, then you can send an invoice and you're off to the races a la Pete Daoust. You can't send an invoice to someone who refuses to contract with you. < As far as I understand.

David Vilaca

Pete Daoust, says send invoice first, Robert Cormier says send proper notice first then invoice. I think I will send proper notice w/invoice and affidavit. That leaves the final two steps and the understanding that I am operating at my full and proper capacity.

Robert Cormier

Hmmm. I always thought a contract requires at least two parties who are in agreement on the terms, conditions and services/products provided. I can see legal joinder/obligation, but I don't see a contract. :(

Robert Cormier

Pete Daoust If i get mad at you and knife your tire, causing it to go flat, what was the amount I agreed to be liable for Pete? $15.00 because it's an old tire? $5,000.00 because it's your favourite tire. Or, maybe I contracted to owe you $5,000,000.00 because I am now bound to pay you any price you ARBITRARILY decide to put on it? :(

David Vilaca

They did indeed use force as I asked many times, am I free to go. The shit stains infact used extortion. By threatening me with more force to acquire my finger prints if I failed to comply with their order to produce a name. I did produce the name in viva voce, not by state ID. By who's authority do you demand private information was the question before being forced into bondage. I don't mind fuzzy cuffs if I'm feeling kinky, cold steel just don't cut it for me

David Vilaca

I tried to inform our friends here that your input would consist of a Scottism, it's all accounting and surety, I'm the accountant and the pigs are surety via public hazard bonding, police services act and a bill.

David Vilaca

When I say I'm the accountant I mean to say I am sole beneficiary of the person and the only one who can hold them to account. Ok so I am inept, more input please. How have I failed in my understanding. Pete Daoust says the man cannot lien the pig, my corporation can, is this the only way to succeed?

Robert Cormier

arbitrary, adj. (I5c) 1. Depending on individual discretion; speci�., determined by a judge rather than by fixed rules, procedures, or law. 2. (Of a judicial decision) founded on prejudice or preference rather than on reason or fact. _ This type of decision is often termed arbitrary and capricious. Cf. CAPRICIOUS. Black's Law 9th edition

David Vilaca

The pigs have arbitrary authority, they could have chose to let me go rather than force me into contract. I am free from arbitrary interference in my home and correspondence. I stated several times that I am free from arbitrary interference, am I free to go. The pigs chose to arbitrarally detain me to extort a name, they witnessed no crime, no breach of the peace, a polite peace officer would inform that I could get injured by not wearing a helmet and send on my way. But we are not dealing with peace officers, we are dealing with her Majesties arms, whom each hold arbitrary power.

Robert Cormier

So in this scenario David Smile is treated badly, he sends proper notice which includes his hourly rate of eleventy billion dollars per hour along with an invoice for eleventy billion. Because they recieved his notice and hourly rate, the TPS have to pay him eleventy billion? Sorry Scott...i don't mean to be thick. I've been thinking of David Smile's situation.

Robert Cormier

How did the cops accept that damaging David Smile would cost eleventy billion? Or $6,000.00 or $6.95?. When did David tell them his fee schedule before they wronged him? As far as I know, he never gave them a price to which they could choose to proceed, and wrong him, or not proceed and drive away. They wronged him (stole his Big Mac). So now the people who injured him (stole his big mac) get an invoice claiming the big mac is worth eleventy billion, or $6000.00, or any other price they choose, even though David's Burger Shack never posted any prices on their board so that the cops could know the value of what they were stealing? Fuck I'm confused.

Robert Cormier

I did, and Scott Duncan said said you were VERY wrong (you can't just send an invoice), and I was VERY wrong (they don't get to haggle the price). I still don't get how I was wrong (FEELING LIKE A DUMBO) and how the restaurant just gets to put any price on their burger if it wasn't advertized. :(

David Vilaca

You never inform them of your rates, the arbitrary power invested in the individual public officer means he has to use his head at all times or be held to account by those who know how purposefully they have been kept ignorant. Eleventy billion would be frivolous and vexatious. My time is precious not frivolous. Time is money. Scott Duncan, I totally understand the McDonalds metaphor, it a choice they made to eat the shit I'm serving, ignorance of the law is no excuse, statutory, commerce or any other law for that matter.

Robert Cormier

Scott Duncan No, give notice that HENCEFORTH the rates are as follows for your time... and... Scott Duncan Sure. Notice + invoice will at least cover proper notice in the FUTURE (my all caps). I understand that to mean that you can send them an invoice/bill if they do it again in the FUTURE because once you serve them a proper notice with your hourly rates included, HENCEFORTH (not back dating for stuff that happened in the PAST) but HENCEFORTH (from that point forward), IF they cause harm again you can send them an invoice/bill for your previously stated/advertised hourly rate.

Robert Cormier

If I understand, Scott is saying that if we have enough smarts, we can send a PROPER NOTICE and an invoice to the police with our hourly rates. If we are smart we do this BEFORE we are injured. Once they receive this notice complete with our rates, if they damage us from that point in time forward, not the past, but HENCEFORTH, any time in the FUTURE (after that) that they hurt us we can send them a bill.

August le Blanc

cryptic scypthic... i do not think I am... unauthorized use stated in a public notice does not need the other parties consent if they engage without permission in the case of a lien being put on a name.. or a boe sent in the mail.. after one has been engaged against their will..

August le Blanc

you walk into the macdonalds you chose to eat... public notice is the fucking macdonalds menu.. drive thru menu.. if they do not know of the public notice.. ignorance is no excuse.. historical record and all that.

Robert Cormier

I think I get it now. The cops walk up to David Smile and cause him damage. They think they can because David hasn't given them PROPER NOTICE with HOURLY RATES for Dealing with such matters. David just can't send them a bill for what happened in the past and declare an ARBITRARY rate for what has happened to him in the PAST. If he wants to send them a bill for doing such things in the FUTURE, he needs to send them a PROPER NOTICE through the POST with his HOURLY RATES. Once there is PROOF (RECEIPT confirmation from the POST), from that point in time (HENCEFORTH) and from that point in time forward (FUTURE) he can now bill for his stated HOURLY RATES. :)

David Vilaca

I have in fact given proper notice, to the justice department and the attorn/y general. That is why no criminal record shows up in cpic and no photo shows up when they punch in my drivers licence. The general did his duty to protect the trust.

David Vilaca

According to a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in a case called R. v. Mann, the police have no right or power to stop you unless they have reasonable grounds to believe you may have been involved in a criminal offence. So, The shit stains had zero right to stop me and force me to accept their contract. List of charges 1. Forceable Confinement 2. Battery and aggravated assault 3. Criminal Breach of the Trust 4. Extortion. The bill will be larger that the 6000.00 closer to 30.000.

David Vilaca

Question, the Offence Notice, the business in hand, is my evidence of forced contract (along with memorandum book notes, arrest record and video if I ever get them), what should I do with it? include copy, void it and return with invoice? or notice of mistake + henceforth any future intercourse is payable on demand upon presentment + list of Hourly rate for forcible confinement, et al

David Vilaca

Follow up, the meat starts at 1:26. Still trying to find individual listing on D&B for TPS divisions, If I'm doing business with, I want to be thorough=extremely attentive to accuracy and detail=executed without negligence or omissions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phVELPI6OqY