Is not wearing a helmet-while-bicycling a Provincial Offences Act offence, or a City of Toronto by-law violation?

section 104.(2.1) HWY Traffic act.

104. Bicyclists to wear helmet (2.1) Subject to subsection 103.1 (2), no person shall ride on or operate a bicycle on a highway unless the person is wearing a bicycle helmet that complies with the regulations and the chin strap of the helmet is securely fastened under the chin. ..interestingly enough- there is NO definition for PERSON in the Highway Traffic Act.....but there is in the Legislation Act, 2006 ;) http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h08_e.htm#BK167

In this reguard. It would be the interpretations act that would applh

Nope. Ontario Interpretation Act has been repealed.

ok, I thought it was a Federal enactment

Note: This Act was repealed on July 25, 2007. See: 2006, c. 21, Sched. F, ss. 134, 143 (1). http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/repealedstatutes/english/elaws_rep_statutes_90i11_e.htm

looking it up as we speak.

I am thoroughly sick of this shit. Who are these people?

Derek Moran the act you refer to only has 100 sections.

Chris Schulte tell me about it. I just went to 55 division to demand these two Clown entities produce a business card and bonding information. the duty and desk sargents both refused to provide these pigs information thus bringing themselves into the controversy via The Police Services Act section 81. 2 and ,3 Withholding services (2) No member of a police force shall withhold his or her services. 2007, c. 5, s. 10. Offence (3) A person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2) is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than one year, or to both. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.

Write to the Ombudsman of Toronto for the info, Fiona Crean: Ombuds <ombuds@toronto.ca>;

thank you my unseen friend. I will do that right now.

..better yet- something in the Police Services Act regarding CONCEALING INFORMATION, would be best

Whats an Ombudsman in the States?

from the ombudman page The Ombudsman cannot consider complaints about: Policing

State Representative?

No....seems like an Attorney General....

You're not COMPLAINING about anything...you are SEEKING information

thats what i told the police, i was not there to make a complaint, i was there to get services.

Derek Moran I just called and the police are not in the mandate, they cannot help me.

Definition of person in criminal code under interpretations. Referenced from Legalese for Idiots here. Best post ever.

Councillor Michael Thompson is the Vice-President i think of the Police Services Board...

OH...call 311, the City's information-service

I think Scott Duncan would agree- this is a textbook-example of ON/OFF...notice- no arguing, no escalation, no controversy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi6scLZLrMw&list=TLhNcotZREmrQ

Government enforcement CYCLE HELMETS? Seriously??? Psychopathy meets Monty Python.

I wish it was a python skit, they caused nerve damage to my wrist. I suffered greatly at work all week. IM now off as I cannot perform my duties

Not trying to trivialise your injury David, just seems so insane and macabre Sorry for your hurt mate.

Mik, I never took it that way. It's kinda funny really, these mental cases believe they are in the right. IM gaining the wherewithall to correct these crimes against humanity and my individual self

They've PRESUMED you, being an employee of that city where they've stopped you....Justa say, I DON'T WORK neither with, and/or for YOU. I am NOT an employee of that corporation you work for Mister.... And keep repeating that shit until they beat you with a baton :D ....or teaser you, or shoot you... :D

Pete Daoust, That's coming, I've pissed off a lot of swine lately.

Good on ya. I'm noticing a trend, through the years, wereby the standards for accepting individuals into law enforcement have been tightened, and that to make it through the eye of the needle only the select few combining under-average IQ and a need-to-hurt. In the old days they would've been locked up. Now they're selected for police and security work. these characters are now out there thinking it's ok to asault people fr not wearing helmets. Show'em their place :)

breaking the law by not wearing a helmet....this LAW is a corporation rule....same as if you work for coke.....Are you working for coke David Smile ??

A bunch of sack of shit sat together in Toronto, and decided that they will charge their employees if they catch them on a bycicle with no helmet....that's all....

A sack of shit can be useful unlike the private bar. A sack of shit can be burnt on the doorstep of a lawyer and the door bell rung, a lawyer just needs his bell rung. I asked the justice department once who wrote the statutes and the reply was outside lawyers so there is no conflict of interest

Put all that in an affidavit requesting damages, send to head of police services (I think) then when no reply, lay charges Queens Bench.

Pete Daoust http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZNAFuRV51s&feature=youtu.be

Sorry to say that but you look a bit belligerent :D

this is war

IT,s pretty calm on my side......for now :/

Wow useless is and understatement.

she knew where i was going, thats why she got off the phone so quick

i have a video from 55 division but my phone wont upload it to youtube

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE FINANCIAL CONTROL � 71-13. Deposits with Chief Financial Officer. [Amended 2005-04-14 by By-law No. 331-2005] Duly executed copies of all agreements, including all insurance and certificates thereof, all contracts, bonds, letters of credit and other security for the due performance thereof, and all other documents executed by or on behalf of the City shall be delivered to the Chief Financial Officer for safekeeping.

I like black girls- and YOU THINK WRONG, AND VALUE THE WRONG THINGS...not to mention, you just gave me an ORDER Pierre- can i borrow your VOID-stamp...and your SHOWER *yeesh*

My VOID stamp is in French : ANNUL� And my SHOWER ???....:/

Ombudsman: I can't answer that question Me: Can you put me through to someone who can?

no because our function is to find out what you're complaining about and to take your wind out of your sails

NOTICE TO COUNTY CLERK _____________________________________ The minute you receive any affidavit, it is recorded. Should you refuse to record My affidavits, once deposited with you, you are committing a crime against justice under Statutes at Large Sec. 5403 and it is punishable by up to a $2000 fine and 3 years imprisonment. If your county attorney told you not to file any documents like mine, you are still responsible, as I do not accept any third party interveners. Any attorney, district attorney, or anyone from the lawyering craft are all third parties and do not have a license to make a legal determination in this matter as they do not represent Me and you, the county clerk, do not have the authority to represent Me. Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying, &c., public records.) SEC. 5403. Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with intent to steal or destroy, takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of justice, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of such court, or any paper, or document, or record filed or deposited in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer, shall, without reference to the value of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so taken, pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at hard labor, not more than three years, or both: [See � � 5408,5411,5412.1] Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws.) SEC. 5407. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of such persons shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more thanfive thousand dollars, or by imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not less than six months normore than six years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. See � � 1977-1991, 20042010, 5506-5510.1 Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying record by officer in charge.) SEC. 5408.Every officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding specified in section fifty-four hundred and three,who fraudulently takes away, or withdraws, or destroys any such record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his office or deposited with him or in his custody, shall pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment at hard labor not more than three years, or both-, and shall, moreover, forfeit his office and be forever afterward disqualified from holding any office under the Government of the United States.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq14MM1t7f8&feature=youtu.be

"let me get a supervisor" to confer on how best to get rid of you probably... Any further outcome?

Oh yes.....keep it up David Smile, you're DOING what you have to do.....this is something only a FEW are doing.....keep it up Man...!!! :D

The less people that have to do these things the better, isn't that the whole point Pete? :)

The WHOLE point to me, is REALITY, and here in reality, it's all fucked up :)

Cops seems to think that they are some sort of SUPREME humans that can beat the shit out of you, if they feel like it.....

All I can think of is Nazi Germany. IDENTIFY YOURSELF or we'll beat the living piss out of you.

Norah, will you be my Boat Bunny? :D

No Scott. No. I don't need any more creeper cred than what I have already. :)

http://www.moi.gov.cy/moi/crmd/crmd.nsf/All/FDCE95D760B1426AC22578E30035D4F5?OpenDocument

There's a link to civil registry legislation there but it pops up in Cypriot I presume... You should be able to find the act relating to it there...

does anyone know the other benefits from the name change act waiver. and how it can be applied in other areas of life?

http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/aps/

PLEASE NOTE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT, THE ACCESS AND PRIVACY SECTION HAS 30 DAYS TO COMPLY UPON RECEIPT OF YOUR REQUEST. Types of requests The following is a list of the most common types of requests processed through the Toronto Police Services� Access and Privacy Section: � Records of Arrest � General Occurrences; Incident Reports � Memorandum Book Notes � Witness statements or contact information � Police related 9-1-1 Emergency calls Next step is HQ for arrest record, incident report, memorandum book notes, bonding info and business cards from PC Metzger, PC Vega and the two (duty officer in video and his sargent) who by choice entered the controversy by not providing the required service.

Do you think they will comply ? :D

PLEASE NOTE: We are TRAINED, since we are little kids, TO OBEY, BREAK and take our hole.....We are NOT suppose to disobey, unbreak and stay outside the hole.....So now, these cops will be ALL FUCKED UP with you David Smile :D .....we are presumed being UNDER their authority, we are presumed being an EMPLOYEE, and we have to stick with the EMPLOYEE's rules Unless we DECIDE otherwise :D

Risk Management Unit phone #416-808-7731 let's all call and find out. Or fax 416-808-8024. Mandate: The purpose of the Professional Standards-Risk Management Unit is to contribute to the achievement of the Toronto Police Service's mandate and priorities by: providing an effective and efficient support service ensuring that the prescribed Service standards concerning the administration, promotion and support of professionalism, which includes the practices, conduct, appearance, ethics and integrity of its members, strengthens public confidence and co-operation within the community. Who's community?

:D http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/community

6. In another sense, community is the right which all men have, according to the laws of nature, to use all things. Wolff, Inst. Sec. 186.

MUNICIPALITY. The body of officers, taken collectively, belonging to a city, who are appointed to manage its affairs and defend its interests.

Hey OFFICER David Smile, put your fucking helmet on :D

And shut up, or I'll kick your ass... :D (sounds a bit Taliban :/ )

The ADVANTAGE I have over all of you English speaking dude, is I have to check ALL legal definitions of words... :D I have no choice :D

They must have respect for the pluralistic nature of Canadian society. Pluralistic!

This PLURALISTIC stuff sounds BELIEFS to me, ...... I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW :D

If he keeps talking you continue with..... I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW

the "tout-de-fucking-suite" quote belongs to Kate Butler....just saying... :D

The pluralistic nature of society dispels beliefs. Look it up in blacks

plu�ral�ism (plr-lzm) n. 1. The condition of being multiple or plural. 2. a. A condition in which numerous distinct ethnic, religious, or cultural groups are present and tolerated within a society. b. The belief that such a condition is desirable or socially beneficial. 3. Ecclesiastical The holding by one person of two or more positions or offices, especially two or more ecclesiastical benefices, at the same time. 4. Philosophy a. The doctrine that reality is composed of many ultimate substances. b. The belief that no single explanatory system or view of reality can account for all the phenomena of life. pluralism [?pl??r??l?z?m] n 1. (Christianity / Ecclesiastical Terms) the holding by a single person of more than one ecclesiastical benefice or office 2. (Sociology) Sociol a theory of society as several autonomous but interdependent groups which either share power or continuously compete for power 3. (Sociology) the existence in a society of groups having distinctive ethnic origin, cultural forms, religions, etc. 4. (Business / Industrial Relations & HR Terms) a theory that views the power of employers as being balanced by the power of trade unions in industrial relations such that the interests of both sides can be catered for 5. (Philosophy) Philosophy a. the metaphysical doctrine that reality consists of more than two basic types of substance Compare monism [1] dualism [2] b. the metaphysical doctrine that reality consists of independent entities rather than one unchanging whole Compare monism [1] absolutism [2b] pluralist n & adj pluralistic adj

To me..... I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW Is more simple, and really EASY to UNDERSTAND :D

...and the Tout-sier the Sweeter...

What ? :D

Say it out loud.

Fuck... It's " Lou Manottii" all over again...

I said it out loud....NOTHING :(

Hey, remember that whole, "I'm your superior" thing I mentioned a post or 2 back? Let that sink in.

Are you telling me EVERYONE EXCEPT the Token French Guy, got that?

Tout-sier the Sweeter....what's that ?....what does that mean ? :D

*sigh*

Tout De fucking Sweet in action.... dumbass

Well, fuck off I just don't get it....dumbass

the quicker the better...

I do a french phonetic joke, and the french guy drops the ball. ...after declaring I'm NOT his superior in every measurable way. I'll just leave it at that. It's a microcosm of who you ALL are.

Ho...that was a french phonetic joke ?... :D

superior in EVERY measurable way ? :D

I think you've driven my point home... with excessive force.

haha serious stuff and funny stuff all in one place, who could ask for anything more :)

Ok, I quit, you are my superior Scott Duncan 8-|

Yes.. Intellect... Check. Knowledge...Yup, beat you there too... Acquired skills... HELL yes... Has line of women who want to have sex with him... Yup... (OOO there's Gail...) I win again. Those factors give me a distinct advantage over...well.. everybody... especially you, Pierre :P

:D

It was so boring 5 minutes ago, now it's fucking fun :D

So hit those books, Tout Suite! And the Tout-sier, the sweeter!

Me and Books, are like Cameras and you :(

Fair enough...

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tushy

*sigh*

Well well, the shit tard pigs never sent the info, a clear breach of the Police Services Act and the public trust. The info I requested is public, they think they can keep it private, we'll see about that.

they had 30 days to send the memorandum book notes, video, arrest record and bonding info.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bplx3Q5nWc4&feature=youtu.be

My intent is to lien the 2 peace officers. I would like keep this thread to the process of lienning public officers. I need to gather this public record so I have evidence of a breach of the trust. When I do collect this evidence, I'll file a lien and send copies w/affidavit to the underwriter. I will be claiming $6000.00 in damages from each officers bond as per my bill of exchange/fee schedule. Is this even possible ? I have no desire to make a claim in the court as there is no remedy or relief in that venue.

So, Scott Duncan, correct me if I am wrong..... You will have to send each of these contractor, that forces you to do business with, an INVOICE, and then an ACCOUNT STATEMENT, and then, a NOTICE, and then, a FINAL NOTICE (because you are a nice guy) and then a DEFAULT NOTICE......and then LIEN them :D Is that is ? :D

"Is that is????" Say it outloud :-)

Thank you Pete Daoust, this is the process I had in mind. Notice with bill/invoice attached. The bill is for using torture to extort the private name (I produced no slave id). Then the opportunity to cure with outstanding bill/account invoice, then notice of default. Place all evidence together and register the lien, send copies of everything to the underwriter.

I'm doing similar with a bank David Smile. I'm at the lien part and having a challenge as to where to find the Directors and Officers liability insurance information, they do give it up easily lol

Notice to agent is notice to principal... notice to principle is notice to agent...

your bill of exchange and your commercial liens on officers bond are two separate issues

Jeffsbee has a valid point. ;-)

what entity is going to run the lien on the two officers bonds?

if you don't win in court against officers bonds you may forfeit the whole of your assets because if you try suing the officers instead of your corporation doing it you are liable

good question Jeff Roggers, and part of the answers I seek. As I have been allocated Federal Court File (T-1395-12) the title of Private Individual, sui juris man, at no cost, it will be the private man who places the lien. correct me if I'm wrong

Gail Marie ? :/ .....do you guys ALL have an identity crises ? :D

why would i use the court for anything other than summery judgement?

How in the world a MAN can lien something ??

lol it's my version of putting the person in my pocket Pete Daoust ;)

so I need to get my ducks in a row by creating the trust, finding a trustee, creating the corp to protect the trust and send in the hound (trustee) to execute the lien?

:)

No David Smile, you need to STOP complicating shit :D

Pierre, I mean Pete, what do you mean?

All of you are changing TAKEN names :D

Why do you guys are talking about trust, trustee, trustette and all that shit.......that has nothing to do with David Smile is case here ? :/

Yeah, and I TOOK another one. Is there a law against that?

No....but you look like someone who have an identity crises :P

a forien summary judgment is given by a notary public which is not overturned by any judge

So do you!!!!

:-)

Oh yes, "ME" I went through a solid one.....as Scott :D

I have DEMOLISHED a whole thread during that crises :D

no Gail a trustee is someone you trust it will not be you you are the shareholder

I had to buy a new laptop when everything was over

my best friend is the trustee my wife is the secretary I'm acting president and my friend is also acting treasure

Are you refering to the "Fucks the Puppy" thread?

the corp created is Trustee corporation... holder of the Trust and administrator thereof... as proxy to me.. it handles all affairs of the legal person name lien by the trustee corp as a person... who is lawful holder in due course... I trust my corp....

Of course I am, what other threads you think I was talking about.......have you seen that thread Chris Evan ? :D

true Jason there's many way(s) that you can setup your corporation

I saw it briefly... then it was gone... Pete Daoust It was epic if I recall.

The way I did it was taught here.

No, everyone talks about it, but somehow I missed it.

I was just laid out of basic format for easy understanding

you missed it, it's "ME" who messed it :D

Now, just to clarify this Original thread.... David Smile encountered 2 clowns who FORCED David Smile's person he has in his pocket, to contract with them....is that was it is ?

So now, David Smile, as the best ADMINISTRATOR in town, has to ADMINISTRATE this fuck up...no ?

what I need really to help all you guys is a fully-equipped office and secretary and then I could show you exactly what I'm talking about

Pete Daoust, yes, my life is complicated and still full of the shit I thought was true.

right now I'm just a worthless eater

Because obviously, David Smile is the PERSON's Sole authorized administrator that was FORCED in some crazy business, right ?

Seemingly at the barrel of a gun....

So the Administator is the one who places the lien?

no gun was used to have capitulate my right not to contract, they used torture via handcuffs

The person you have in your pocket can't do fuckal, it has no hands

David I have a perfected lean process thread its all explained in there how it is done correctly

Did they people who tied you up have a gun on them that you thought could have been used against you??????

Jeff Roggers can you bring up the thread list with a comment so I can find it? also are you in the states and is the process the same

The person you have in your pocket will invoice, notice, final notice, default notice and lien....and you will be the one who will ADMINISTRATE all that shit....

David Smile you need someone you trust, perhaps your own creation by proxy which is what the corp does... your corp is accountable to you as sole share holder and the executives of the corp administers the trust established by the trust agreement you as grantor create to entrust the corp to administer your affaires... including but not limited to liens... The corp is seen as a person by the system...

OK...fuck it.....too many different subject in here....I quit...bye !! :(

pete can i pm you?

I do

have skype that is

Jason we should start a thread on the trust how to format etc cetera

so not qualified to, me.

well please do, i may be inept at this moment, but it sure would help

Chris Evan, yep the shit stains had guns but I gave then no excuse to use them so the cuffs were used to get me into a state of duress

read my above posts... its boiled down.. it is there... The corp is considered a person.. to detach from surety you have the corp handle the names affairs all of them... you.. you can do it with the name but joinder and surety become attached to that particular case... and the fresh entity created by the state each time you are charged with something... the lien process is best, to my knowledge, administered by the corp of which, in my instance. I am acting pres. and sole shareholder accountable to me..

1). Two clowns wants to do business with the person I have in my pocket. 2). I say NO. 3). They decide to FORCE that business on the person I have in my pocket. 4). I continu to say no, but these clowns have guns, and proceed with this business anyway. 5). When they FINALLY release me from kidnapping I go home, with the person I have in my pocket. 6). I sit at the fucking kitchen table and start the ADMINISTRATING process, for the person I have in my pocket, because I am the Sole fucking authorized administrator for this fucking person. 7). I make an invoice, of course the invoice will show the NAME of the person I have in my pocket, and send registered mail that fucking invoice to these two clowns. 8). The terms are PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT. 9). I wait 4 or 5 days, and then I send a fucking account statement. 10). I wait another 4 to 5 days and then I send a NOTICE, to notify these 2 clowns that I have NOT received the payment. 11). I wait another 4 to 5 days, and I send a FINAL NOTICE to these 2 clowns saying I have NOT received the payment, and it�s the FINAL chance they have to pay. 12). I wait 4 to 5 days and then I send a fucking DEFAULT NOTICE to these cocksuckers, saying that they are in default regarding that fucking invoice. 13). I wait 4 to 5 days, and then I LIEN THEIR FUCKING HOUSE, and their fucking BOND. The End :D Welcome in the wonderful world of BUSINESS... :D

There is no trustee, trust, trustette involved in that shit....it is PURE business, as day to day type of business... :D

Pete, when the NAME is liened and held in trust, the TRUSTEE is the corp. But what you and Jay are talking about are 2 different things. ;-)

In fact, you will act as a trustee for the person you have in your pocket during this ADMINISTRATION process......Am I correct here Scott Duncan ??....where is Scott for fuck sakes ? :(

BRB, multitasking

I am talking about this ORIGINAL thread, David Smile asked for help regarding the administrative process on liening these two idiots....that's ALL I am talking about....nothing else... :(

What is this BRB shit ? :/

be right back

It's NOT complicated, it's just very boring, I hate doing administration shit, but hy, gotta do what you gotta do !! :(

When the fuck did you become focused on a thread? WTF?

ALWAYS !!!!

We just using two different focus method :P

Here is my answer to this BRB, ....NRN :P

2 different things... yes. I am talking about a establishing a private trust and as part of that trusts business. Pete is talking about business.

Pete Daoust - You might want to be careful about providing only 4 or 5 days for the party to respond to you. While you may be right legally, it may be difficult to get a court to support such summary judgements as it may appear to them as being the workings of someone who isn't fair. I have had ChiefRock Sino General 's help with some of this stuff. I pushed for 4 to 5 day responses too and he suggested 30 days to show good will. For one of my NOTICES, he recommends giving 90 days to demonstrate that i'm an extremely accommodating person in law who is more than fair. In summary 4 to 5 days = unfair, mean spirited guy. 30 days = nice guy who puts some real effort to be fair and accommodating. 90 days= unarguably fair and just man bending backward to give every chance possible to a slime ball

Terms are DUE UPON RECEIPT, Invoice has been sent REGISTERED MAIL, they receive the invoice the day after I sent it.... I don't see ANY problems with a 4 or 5 days.....I am NOT asking for a RESPONSE, I am asking for a payment.....I am not ASKING questions, I send an invoice I do this every day with the business I happen to be the CEO of.... Invoice are sent everyday here, and terms need to be respected... This is BUSINESS Robert Cormier, nothing else...

Isn't a payment a response?

Payment seems to be more a payment than anything else :D

What if they don't agree and determine they now have a need to put together a counterclaim, or a written response. What if they left their papers at the cottage and have to wait till the weekend to return to the cottage to get them because they have to work for a living etc.:) I'm not trying to be belligerent Pete. Just passing on some words of advice given to me by a wise man. Apparently there is a fair bit of case law about this out there.

And what if I stuck my dick in my pant's zipper ? :D

Just passing on some words of advice given to me by a wise man....I DO THIS SHIT EVERY DAY :D

David Smile need the proofs that these two morons forces business on the person he happen to have on his pocket.....if he have that, the rest is ONLY administrative shit....

If you stuck your dick in your zipper you would have to go to the hospital and might have to stay a few days, giving you a valid reason not to respond to such a short window of opportunity. :) Claims made against you may be thrown out. :(

In "normal" business there is a PO or a signed invoice etc accepting all your terms of contract. This seems a little different in my mind. Did the cops sign something with David Smile that they agree to any and all terms that he might wish to impose upon him at a future date? Maybe I'm confused. Maybe I've missed something. I'm here to learn. I'm just thinking it may not be as simple as a typical business transaction with a signed invoice etc. :(

Did the cops sign something with David ? No, he did not, but was that really a cop ?, what is a cop exactly ? :/

If you watch David's video, he is asking for a certain amount of info regarding the situation, when he will have these info, he will have his PO. :)

I know PEACE OFFICERS, and POLICE ENFORCERS... These POLICE ENFORCERS, enforces what exactly ?

POLICY ENFORCERS. They ENFORCE POLICIES.

Oh, Thanks Norah Holloway :D And these policies they enforce, can they be considered BUSINESS policies ? :D

Yes Pete, I think you're onto something! IT'S BUSINESS TIME! :D

Does the POLICY ENFORCER even have the authority to respond in 4 or 5 days?

So if these private contractors, enforce BUSINESS on the person I happen to have in my pocket, is it fair for "ME" to administrate this matter and produce an invoice ? :/

You see Robert Cormier, I really don't give a shit about what these thugs can or can not do, My RESPONSIBILITY, is to ADMINISTRATE the person I have in my pocket.....

If they DON'T like the administration process I use, it's NOT my fault...is it ? :/

They ONLY thing I have that has value is ?.... :D

TIME

I agree with Pete here! They forced the first contract, so he forces the second. Why? Because Fuck You thats why!!!!

I see your point. I truly do Pete Daoust. I'm just hesitant to outright dismiss what the Chief says. I know that I've read Scott Duncan claiming ChiefRock Sino General is absolutely right and knows his stuff, or something to that effect. Just me trying to be helpful here. :)

Robert, I come up to you and stick my dick in your mouth at the barrel of a gun, do you then give me 90 days to pay you for your services? 30? Or do you immediately file a charge against me?

It seems pretty cut and dry, they threw the first stone.....

I see your point. I truly do Pete Daoust....It's not MY point, it's this legal system's point....surety and accounting, that's all....

I am NOT trying to be right here Robert Cormier, I am not trying to WIN a point....I just apply what's logical regarding BUSINESS.....If I have NOT comitted ANY crimes, what's left ?....I can only see BUSINESS :/

While your time may be valuable to you...the courts don't give a rats ass about you, they only care about PETE DAOUST. As I understand it, the only thing you have of value is your signature, or your actions, which can turn the SURETY game tables against "you" in a heartbeat.

OK, but what court....there is NO court involved in here ?

You see, David Smile, will have EVERYTHING he needs to performe that lien, if he follows the steps.....do you see ANY court in these steps ?

I know that you are not trying to be right. I appreciate your input and the dialogue so that I can better understand. In my books, you are someone whom I have respect for here at TTFL. :)

I am gonna need WHOLE DISCLOSURE on your books Robert. :-D

It's the same in my book Robert Cormier, I have a lots of respect for Pete Daoust :D

Robert Cormier, As I understand it, the only thing you have of value is your signature, or your actions, which can turn the SURETY game tables against "you" in a heartbeat. I never said that ? :/.....I just wrote "TIME"

If you respect me so much, why do you say things I never said ? :(

I see two courts potentially involved. The first court i see is the one he creates when he asserts a summary judgement. That summary judgement of his can be challenged in one of their courts. If the determination of his court is challenged in their court, he may be asked to prove that his court was equitable.

I know you didn't say that. I did. :)

That summary judgement of his can be challenged in one of their courts: HOW ? :/

If the determination of his court is challenged in their court, he may be asked to prove that his court was equitable.: HE HAS ALL THE PROOFS :D

He may say to their court "I don't give a rat's ass about their policies, that's their business, I only am concerned with my business and my policies." The court might say "Good point! We'll apply that line of thinking right now. In the name of equity, logic and fairness, lets apply your argument to your business as well. Why should their business give a rat's ass about your business and it's policies?"

OK, we will have to go all over again Robert Cormier, WHO FORCED BUSINESS ON WHO ?

He may say to their court.......Why should he say ANYTHING in their court ??

You see Robert Cormier, you are stuck in the maybes....they might, he might, we might.....THERE is no might in this, it's STRICTLY business....

The whole point is SURETY and ACCOUNTING. Thats it!!!

starting an administrative process is equivalent to a contract offer. it's a 3 step process, each step of the process the other party is given time to counter offer the original offer...the public court isn't there to decide if the one party made a good contract or not...its there to enforce the summary judgement. If the cops sue David, that is a whole different separate matter?

Sue David Smile for what ? :/

And the administrative process begun : A week ago Friday I was assaulted by two Clown

It's not David's fault if these clowns are NOT trained well enough to do business with respect, honor, dignity and integrity.....on the other end, David need to FOLLOW UP, with the administrative process, with RESPECT, HONOR, DIGNITY & INTEGRITY....if he do that, he will win........OR......he is DEFINITLY one of their slaves.....NO ?

While that may be true, EQUITY and EQUITABLE TREATMENT (or non-equitable treatment) may have something to do with the outcome here in reality. For example; even some of the "gurus' such as Dean who's been at this for 17 or so years for example, may be 100% right (although using different tactics). As much as Dean is "right" beyond a shadow of a doubt, so to speak, here in reality he has had two or three trucks taken from him, spent 20 something days in jail, doesn't get his 2 or 3 vehicles back and in the end considers it a BIG WIN when they drop the charges and don't compensate him. While he may secure summary judgements worth ELEVENTY BILLION dollars, in reality, according to Scott (if I understand correctly), he will never see a dime and will never get the justice he so very much is deserves.

Popcorn ready....I see a chess match coming. Now if only Scott and Dean would duke it out here for us all to see.......

:D

I'll make another pot of coffee :D

Oh fuck....last time you made coffee you went into this spastic posting mode. I am pretty sure some of it was en Francais....

I'm back, well on the road to slave land

Putting coffee on as well. :)

Charges have not been DROPPED on Dean Clifford if I remember correctly, they had been STAYED.....NO ?? :/

As I understand it, for the reasons mentioned in my previous post, as per ChiefRock Sino General, you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy, always bending over backwards (not forwards) to prove what a super nice guy you really are. :)

So, one day, they will have to do something with these STAYED charges....either dropped them, or follow up with them.... NO ?

Both of you are right, I use a 30 day reply date, a 10 day opportunity to cure, 5 day notice of fault followed by notice of default. Its business, not my problem the shit stains have no understanding. Being a good administrator, I will give reasonable response time so as not to be a vexatious litigator

"you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy" I know a guy who doesn't seem to be so accomodating!

I stand corrected. Which further asserts my point. They didn't even drop the charges. They can still put him in jail again. That's reality here in the real world for you. :)

The end results will be the same....5 days or 30 days.....why would you give net-30-days to two clowns ? :/,

Robert, its all about SURETY. Why can the still put him in jail? Only if HE confesses to being SURETY otherwise, its an INTERNAL issue!!!!

David Smile, Any criminal charges implied in your story ?

If he trips up and grants them permisson to use the NAME, then yes!, he will go to jail. But until that happens, it doesn't concern him

They can still put him in jail again: Wanna bet they won't ? :D

Everyone have there coffee and popcorn.

Pete Daoust, no charges other than the ticket

You see Robert, no charges implied in David Smile's case.....ONLY FUCKING BUSINESS :D

So they can never say that they didn't have enough time to gather records, think about their choices, shop for a lawyer, hire one, give the lawyer time to consider the legal merits of a defense, study relevant case law , etc. I agree they won't put Dean in jail again for that confrontation, but, in reality, was it really a big win? Did he really get the upperhand?

Because I failed to produce state ID the got a little sentimental and loved me up with bondage

I will post all evidence of their forced intercourse

Intercourse is a financial term

Robert Cormier: but, in reality, was it really a big win?....depends on Dean Clifford's reality....I am NOT in his shoes... :/

Chris Evan. In reality, they might take another truck and put him in jail because they don't like his face. They might even shoot him. They are rapists. They simply don't have any respect for law. :(

Robert, I have managed NOT being surety for the person named PIERRE DAOUST, that I happen to have in my pocket, for 7 different matters so far, to me, that is a big fucking win, but maybe for others that is NOTHING.....but who cares, really ?

the plain and simply reality is I was forced into intercourse while being held in bondage. The language must express the reality. I will never use the terms handcuffed or forced into contact, not in my affidavit anyway

It's a big thing to me. I love success stories. :)

Well, they are NOT success stories, they are ADMINISTRATIVE boring fucking shit matters.... :D

And it seems that better I become to administrate, nothing comes in PIERRE DAOUST's fucking mailbox :(

Pete Daoust You see Robert, no charges implied in David Smile's case.....ONLY FUCKING BUSINESS. It's a really TOUGH BUSINESS to be in.

Ohh...business is not easy Robert, trust me on that one :D

Come Scott Duncan, please say something, I know you're out there :D HELLOSSSSSS

Having property stolen is not a success story. Dean likes big trucks, that's 30, 000 a pop, much better that equity sits in trust than an auction block

Things are kind of cute, fuzzy and warm in business when doing BoE stuff if you know what you are doing. Start liening people posing as Judges (JUSTICES), or men posing as PEACE KEEPERS (POLICY ENFORCES) and things can escalate very quickly. In fact, just publicly asserting you have a right to travel down the road in a car can get you in a heap of stink.

Pete DaoustAdjust, we don't need Scott to repeat what we know, its all accounting and surety. He could making porn, yes

I was just thinking about one of those: "I hate you all", or "Why natural selection killing stuff"....nothing too technical you know ? :D

I'd really appreciate it, as I'm sure others would if you made a gold notes, or, document, explaining EVERYTHING you did in detail. I'm sure I could learn from it, and I'm guessing others would as well.

^^ Oops. That was meant for Pete.

I am more interested in slaps, if I spread bullshit....I want ABSOLUTLY to be slap in the face, if I spread bullshit.....that's ALL I want....

Scott Duncan is reading this thread. He is weighing in. I just got a like on: Robert Cormier As I understand it, for the reasons mentioned in my previous post, as per ChiefRock Sino General, you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy, always bending over backwards (not forwards) to prove what a super nice guy you really are.

If Scott Duncan would have been a soft gentil no hurt feelings $19.95 per month type of guy, I would not be here......I have NO time, I am 47, and need to learn quick (I know this sounds funny :D) and harder I get hit, quicker I learn, that is "ME"....so if I spread bullshit...please hit, and hit hard, I can take it....no big deal :)

well, not too hard :D

Hey, those who take care of sending FINAL NOTICE, are freaking nice guys :D

I'm 50 and he called me KID more than once. I like that. :)

I remember the first time in my life I received a final notice, I was maybe 19, my reaction was....YESSSSSS.....it's finished !!!! :D

You are 50 Robert Cormier..?...Are you in the photoshp type business ? :/

On second thought it's sad (at least to me) that I've wasted so much of my life thinking wrong and valuing the wrong things. :(