Aug 17, 2013 1:00 AM

Do you mean RESIDENCE or DOMICILE?

CHRIS SCHULTE has to be domiciled in Washington DC. CHRIS SCHULTE's residence is in Massachusetts.

domicile (dom-a-sIl), n. (15c) 1. The place at which a person has been physically present and that the person regards as home; a person's true, fixed, principal, and permanent home, to which that person intends to return and remain even though currently residing elsewhere.� A person has a settled connection with his or her domicile for legal purposes, either because that place is home or because the law has so designated that place.

Canada may be diferent on this

The PERSON was created in DC here. It is considered domiciled there. Actually, I wonder if we can move the domicile to one of the states...???

The residence is considered the STATE it is residing in. In Canada where is the PERSON considered domiciled? Where is the residence? Province?

residence. (14c) 1. The act or fact of living in a given place for some time <a year's residence in New Jersey>. Also termed reSidency. 2. The place where one actually lives, as distinguished from a domicile <she made her residence in Oregon>.� Residence usu. just means bodily presence as an inhabitant in a given place; domicile usu. requires bodily presence plus an intention to make the place one's home. A person thus may have more than one residence at a time but only one domicile

I don`t fully comprehend it all yet, but it looks like there are laws related to domicile provincially, I`m still looking for where the person is considered domiciled in Canada....this is interesting, backing up what Scott has previously said related to married women..

Domicile of Choice : Adult men and unmarried women may have a domicile of choice has been defined as...

So my residence is nobody's business, and the person's domicile has to be defined.....so a po box, an office or a virtual office ?

I meant the person's domicile Chris Schulte

wouldn`t Pete Daoust`s residence be his body..and your persons would be where you physically inhabit?

I don't think so Gail Blackman

Private vs public.....residence vs domicile

That's how I get it...

I think they are both public. Man INHABITS a territory. PERSONS are DOMICILED AND RESIDE. Thats how I see it

I can see that, I just noticed they used the word person in the definition of residence

So....where is the best place to move the person ?

An office ? A postal Box & ? A virtual office ? Or .... ?

To a TRUST...

OK Jason F. LeBlanc, but LEGALLY, that person need a domicile no ?

The person becomes trust property... it resides with the TRUST.

The person ALWAYS been a TRUST property, and will ALWAYS be.....Your corp can LIEN the person, but it will STILL be in the government's TRUST.

And LEGALLY, the person needs an ADDRESS.

Scott Duncan please could you ENLIGHTEN me in this :(

so I'll be less dumb tonight :D

Let me re- phrase, the person thru the BC is the Crown's property... you have diverted any actual revenue by the lien... The address of the property would be the same as the Trusts'... thru the corporation that holds the lien in TRUST...

So the person's domicile should be the same as the Corp. domicile ?

One would think...

But maybe ONE's thinking WRONG ? :D

*joke*

Well... :/

It has been known to happen... ;-)

What?

In FL. a natural person is considered a resident if they're registered to vote and/or have a drivers license ...so I don't think I would want to claim residency either?

yup. true. I am thinking Canada may be different

Once the lien is in place and public notice has been given perfecting the lien, any unauthorized use is addressed by The TRUST from it's address... The TRUST administers the affairs of the person (BC)...

LOL.....The TRUST is NOT the person, and the person is NOT the trust.

The TRUST has a domicile.

My question is WHERE should the person be domiciled ?.....what is the BEST domicile for the person ?

:)

* sigh *

Where Pierre Daoust lives, that is nobody's business, since Pierre Daoust is NOT a legal person, why should anybody cares ?

in the care of the TRUST... and it is PRIVATE...

Sorry Jason F. LeBlanc, But There is a corp, there is a trust and there is a PERSON.....that is 3 different things....

Chris Schulte in my affidavit of non-corporate status I can't declare that I'm a resident, domiciled or an inhabitant...Inhabitant is "One who resides actually and permanently in a given place...one is an inhabitant, resident, or citizen at the place where he has his domicile." Black's Law 6th. So what should I declare? That I sleep on private property in the Nation State of Florida?

Why an affidavit of non-corporate status ? :/

I think the declaration of independence uses the term inhabitant. U can use whatever term u want, so long as u define it. Blacks = clubhouse language

To make a distinction between myself and the legal person and that me the natural person is not under admiralty jurisdiction.

They already know that :D

The TRUST is held by the corporation acting like an umbrella, so to speak, All 3 things are different correct but are held in TRUST... which has an address... which is the same for all three.. if the TRUST choose's it to be so... Pete Daoust

And WHAT trust do you think the person is in ?.....even if a corp has a lien on it ?

The TRUST that you create...

That doesen't make sense Jason F. LeBlanc :(

The person is ALREADY kept in TRUST since its creation.....how in the world can you move that person into ANOTHER trust ?, unless doing what Scott Duncan and Dean Clifford did..?

It is still part of their accounting system, except the TRUST now keeps them at a distance in the place of TRUSTEE, of the person created by them when we were born... it is still part of the TRUST that was created at Birth by the CROWN... we just divert the revenue by the lien, keeping them in the TRUSTEE position with surety of the person maintained by the them...

Liening the person dosen't mean moving it into another trust ?

You Create a Trust by Creating and Granting the Trust assigning the corporation the role of trustee and keeper of the Trust, you then lien the name which is then part of 2 trust's yours and theirs... The TRUST thru the corporation Administrates and Benefits from the person (BC) without surety... They (CROWN) as TRUSTEE's keep surety ...

you then lien the name which is then part of 2 trust's yours and theirs...

That dosen't make sense either :(

A thing CAN NOT be part of 2 different trust

The futur revenu of that thing can be consider trust assets, but the thing stay in his trust...NO ?

It's even The futur ANTICIPATED revenu

A trust was created upon your Birth... BY The CROWN it is Theirs.. You were TRUSTED to carry a Bill Of Lading (BC) as TRUSTEE when you go to court they wnat to pass surety to you... By Creating a TRUST yourself, you use the same thing they are doing against them.... Catch 22 for them.

My current lien is for all debts previous and current.. It includes everything, I am just in the process of doing a skills inventory to attach value to the lien, an assessment of skills so that eventually The TRUST will be my own bank...

OK Jason F. LeBlanc, a TRUST Already existed way before MY birth, not very long after my birth, a PERSON was created for "ME" to do commerce with it, and that person has been put into that ALREADY existing trust....that's how I COMPREHEND all this....the person is NOT a trust....

Correct. The person is a fucking person... a legal fiction.. It would BENEFIT you to create a trust to HOLD the person... ever so gently... ;-)

Now....I THINK (maybe wrongly) that this person named PIERRE DAOUST, SIN NO. 26X-XXX-XXX, should be domiciled somewhere......and I think (maybe wrongly) that its domicile should be AWAY from the corp. and the trust I might establish...

Right or Wrong please Scott Duncan

Put the person in an igloo once you create the trust as it is a PRIVATE matter, you decide where the fuck it is domiciled...

*sigh*.....I need to be sure of this Jason F. LeBlanc, I don't want to do things again and again and again.....I need ACCURATE information so I don't spend my PRECIOUS time to correct errors.... :)

I am FED UP with bullshit I create because of ignorancy....:D

I Hear that,

So I will ask again, just in case someone has an ACCURATE answer :D

Just wondering about the PERSON's domicile

What would be the BEST spot for the person ?

An office ? A postal Box & ? A virtual office ? ...AWAY from the corp or not Away from the trust or not The court house address? The Vital Statistic address ? The government address ?

:D

Trust law is the highest form of law, it came about from nobility to hide asset's legally form the king, for about 500 years now... There is great power and Autonomy by creating one. It is a free as one can be in society as it stands.. The simplicity is hard to wrap your head around ( think). I too am fed up with bullshit I create... TRUST is not Bullshit... It is a vehicle to drive you wherever you want to go..

As per what I've been searching and reading, I came to the conclusion that renting a cheap small office somewhere in Canada would be the best to RESIDE the person in......and funny thing is, I do rent small offices :D

or a post office box...

lol...that's the core of my question :D

Oh boy... the long way home...

When you go to the post office to RENT a box, they want a driver's licence with picture and the person's address.....which is non-sense to me :/

The corporation opens the mailbox...

I told them, no...I want to rent that box to reside this person in it......you should see the look on her face :D

use the corporations address and articles of incorporation as it is a PRIVATE matter as to the assets owned by the corporation, your reason is yours, they do not have to know.

I don't THINK it's a good idea to have the person AND the corporation in the SAME domicile....

It is held in TRUST... ARRRRRGGGGGHHHH

I already have the corp. and it is domiciled very well.......I am looking for a PERFECT domicile for the PERSON

:D :D :D

once you create it... perfect the lien....

The problem is that we process this matter differently in our brain Jason F. LeBlanc.....I run a business for 13 years now, and I have to go with what I SEE in my brain.......but I may be brainless :( ....that is ANOTHER issue :(

Yes we think different... that is the beauty of this. You have to come to your own conclusions....;-)

To me, SFC INC is one thing, 9177-7777 Quebec Inc is anothing thing, PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX is another thing, The BLACKHAWK TRUST is another thing......you see, to me, these are 4 complete different things :)

The TRUST thru the liens of all accounts associated with the person, makes it ONE thing.

I can't see it that way Jason F. LeBlanc, not for now... :(

I know... it is difficult because we value wrong and our programming shorts us out sometimes... I don't know how to be clearer...

There is no questions of VALUE in all this domicile stuff....

Perhaps it is focusing on the wrong aspects, You need an address to process stuff... If an asset by lien ( THE NAME ) is part of A TRUST, all things related to The TRUST are sent to 1 address... It is that simple.

Oh....so maybe that is WHY the government has one and ONLY one address where we can send stuff to ? :D

oh fuck wait.....NO....they have HUNDREDS of addresses we can send stuff to :/

ALL the SAME huge TRUST :D

This was a very good talk I just had with you Jason F. LeBlanc, thanks for it buddy !

We all need to get this sooner than later... ;-)

Oh...a thought just crossed that protoplasm up ther ....:/

What if the person is moved in Newfoundland, the Corp. in in Quebec, and the TRUST decide to reside in Ontario ? :/

Stop it... your creating your own headaches. what if's don't count only what is... Reality.

What IF dosen't count ?

Wow !!!!!.... :-D

How do you ACCOUNT for a what if? And it's all ACCOUNTING.....

LOL....well let me ask this... :D

What IF all this shit is being USED against us in a near future ?

HAHAHAHA!!!!! :D

I am protected by the TRUST.

And it is PRIVATE.

My corp takes the heat by proxy.

Which is only ACCOUNTABLE to it's share holders.

Which Is me, Sole Shareholder....

If I get some headaches because of some WHAT IF I create, well so be it....in fact I should have created some WHAT IF a lot more in these past 30 years :D

With me as acting president... and Director of the TRUST.

I am protected by the TRUST: Who is " I " in this affirmation ? :/ , and protecting against WHAT ? :/

Yes, but how much TIME is wasted chasing things that are not of VALUE, I think now before I do something is this right? Am I valuing wrong? How will this Benefit the TRUST? What is my motive? I seek autonomy.

My human beingness... as Acting Director is I... protected from shit being used against me... like court...

LOL..... :D

The TRUST protects It's avenues of commerce...

and insulates me from HARM.

My human beingness...as acting DIRECTOR ? :/ .....another non-sense for me :(

and insulates me from HARM ? :/ .....so next time someone wants to shoot or beat you they will verify if you have established a trust before they act ?

IT'S ALL BUSINESS....nothing to do with HUMANITY....

I have a question....

Just wondering about the PERSON's domicile

What would be the BEST spot for the person ?

An office ? A postal Box & ? A virtual office ?

:D

My human is me, not recognized in law. Acting Director of The TRUST.... Acting President of the corporation, the role, insulates me from surety in all matters before a court and in commerce, which court is, an offer ( tender) to contract ( the charge/invoice), they want to contract with me and really want me to attach myself thru joinder to surety. I really do not want that... So this is the best option available to be master of my domain...

Harm as in being dragged into commerce against my wishes... For the physical stuff, self defence and a big fucking stick...

Pete Daoust The address for my PERSON doesn't have a POSTAL ADDRESS/CODE. MY PERSON is not defending, and, or, working at THEIR POST. Also, I always add "Outside of CANADA" to establish that I am presently outside of THEIR jurisdiction.

LOL....you want to bet that the PERSON you have in your pocket has a COMPLETE address ?.....how much you want to bet on this ? :D

You might precede your address with the word PRIVATE.

They can say I live on the moon for all I care. My response corrects their assumption that I am still located where they last put me. I learned this from Chief Rock. I don't have to stand where they want me. :P

You are mixing that person with YOURSELF Robert Cormier.....The person is NOT "ME"......they care less about "ME" .....but they want to know where to send OFFERS and/or bill of exchange to the person they've created......this person have a DOMICILE, it has to be .....

And it's ok with me.....no big deal, I just want to know WHERE this person should be moved for its domicile....

Did you read my paperwork that I posted sometime back it was constructed with the direct/in person help (he did all the work) of Chief Rock and a Notary. I don't think there was a comment or even a like on that thread. Nevertheless it is filled with gems of info crafted by someone who Scott Duncan regularly endorses. Scott's approval of the ChiefRock Sino General gives me enough bravado on this point to suggest I may be right. (Until such time as I am corrected) :)

My point is it can be at your home Pete. Just leave out the postal code and add Outside of Canada.

That's my two cents. I'll leave it to others much more knowledgeable than me to confirm or deny my previous statements.

Robert Cormier and ROBERT CORMIER only defends that post when I allow them.

My home is my castle....No persons are allowed, and no business is allowed in it.....now, I have to go for a nap....this protoplasm is not used to work that much :-D

Since The Tender for Law, I need to sleep more....at least 10 hours a week more....and funny enough, I don't view it as a waiste of time....