Aug 16, 2013 5:20 PM

Oral, surely. We communicate orally not verbally :-)

I will take oral any day over verbal :P

"Umm...and who do these charges APPLY to exactly?.....OH- 'The Social Contract,' PROOF-OF-CLAIM! Can i actually see a COPY of that where i signed it with my signature agreeing to act as the SURETY for it?...i forget just exactly WHEN i did that"

"Do you take Judicial Notice of the fact your Justice, that i am NEITHER Her Majesty AND, since there is only one of me here, an ORGANIZATION?

Fuck- it just came to me, in that position, where they're just trying to push forward with these CHARGES that apply ONLY to Her Majesty AND an organization: call for VOIRE DIRE - 'a trial within a trial,' ask and find out who has made the LAWFUL DETERMINATION so far to that point that i am apparently supposed to BOTH Her Majesty AND an organization AT THE SAME TIME?

"What evidence do YOU HAVE........" ;)

A l'impossible nul n'est tenu: No one is bound to do what is impossible.

I like it when you post French stuff Derek Moran... :D

just keep in mind, contracts are dynamic, which means they move on you when you least expect it. So, when you are speaking best know what contracts offers your giving and what you take by not reubutting or accepting their offer on conditions. Or you might be hooped, keep in mind majority of arguments dont mean shit, they dont care what impossible, cant prove anything there are no facts, only contracts being agreed upon by silence or inaction.

ChiefRock, why does Scott fully endorse you, but not Menard?

I think its because one understands 'Tender of Performance,' and one, does not...

Because ChiefRock Sino General don't seems to want to fuck around with the SURETY.... :D (Value the wrong thing and Think wrong)......

This would be a question for Scott Duncan to answer

Scott, why do you fully endorse ChiefRock and not Menard?

Well, ChiefRock Sino General, we can guess stuff :D

Pete, we spend a lot of time guessing stuff

Not me :D

You did :D

Who is "you"?

LOL - a nice, DIRECT question Chris- i like it!

I am just starting the guessing game.....I guess I will reach IMMUNITY very soon.. :D

Sino doesn't think wrong. Nor does he value the wrong things.

Robert Menard hides his lies with omission, has an imaginary friend, and "just wants a few bucks for his time", because lies of omission are expensive.

Sky daddies are funny

The guy running the show (th Your Honour) said @~9:35 "We all have a social contract, you are bound by it whether you agree or not" [my paraphrase]. That is very interesting!

A PRESUMPTION-OF-LAW if ive ever heard one that needs REBUTTING...

Should like to see/hear the evidence of that contract.

"If I'm bound by a Social Contract, then you will have no problem PRODUCING that contract. Or can I presume contracts too? We're all equals under the law, and there is a secret 'social contract' which says your daughter must choke on my cock, whether she agrees to or not".

"What? It's good enough for me, but not for your daughter"?

SOCIAL CONTRACT? For which society?

L, M, F, A, O - THATS IT, competition OVER!...best-line delivered by Scott Duncan EVER - time for everybody to go home now..... ;)

I was just trying to answer the statement. It looks like I added too much awesome. Sorry.

..The LAW Society of Upper Canada - of course, when do i get called to the B.A.R. to become a part of it?

Sorry?...you only say "sorry" when you're guilty, Scott :/

Exactly! And deliveredin Scott's usual subtle style :)

SUBTLE: in your FUCKING FACE

Black's Law Dictionary TENTH-edition ;)

Secret contracts, Christ on a bike! There's the manipulation/bamboozling in a nutshell

I don't like to use too much awesome, when I have so much to spare.

When you have as much awesome as I do, it's really pretentious to just go flaunting it like that... It makes everyone else seem dumb...

...don't get me wrong. They ARE dumb, but they don't like it proven to them.

TL;DR Sorry I'm awesome.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPxidRjKjlE

Heh-he BLD 10th is way cool

Derek: yes vulgar...you're a sick man :)

:D

@16 mnutes: marijuana??? oh come on!!! THAT's what this about? I can't decode the boomy audio but I did catch that bit abt weed. Don't get how adults will play this pretend game

Just give me ONE proof that I am dumb.....just ONE :P

Good luck !!!! :D

I will GLADLY sign a TRUE affidavit stating you are Dumb, Pierre. :D

Well guess what, I would probably have no problem signing one too....and I'm sure I would aVOID a lots of trouble by doing so.... :P

No. no Pete! You gotta rebut it or it will stand as fact in commerce!!

I LOVE doing dumb business :D

Thinking of this thread....:Its all verbal contracting in court.....I spoke for a good 4 hours last time I've been to court :/

Maybe they just think I am dumb, so they don't even bother sending me a judgement :D

Well,from the vid it's plain they don't take kindly to folks muscling in on their turf (eg. drug running). If you're the competition they may not afford you the luxury of informing you.

Dont matter what you got in writing once you step inside their domain, you will be under their house rules and oral contracting is king as per this audio. If he had not contracted in a way that didnt rebut their presumptions he would have been duped. He asked and he made offers back to judge. Even if they threaten you, stand on your square, if you dare :p

I dare !!! :D

ChiefRock I like "Stand on your square" :) n my neck o' the woods the 'authorities' appear to hold to the creed "if hey go for it, use it" . This is most likely true al places. Holding ones ground is then *really* important. A little sentence you can remember in times of trouble is good, and life is full of trouble. 'Stand on your Square ' is good. :)