They are NOT in PEOPLE'S business, and they are NOT in YOURSELF'S and/or MYSELF'S business :D

I've said this how many times? The creation of the legal person was an EVENT! Pete.....how many times have I said this???

At least two :D, well now three

event noun adventure, affair, development, episode, exitus, experience, factum, hap, happening, incident, marked occurrence, milestone, occasion, occurrence, transaction Associated concepts: contingent event, fortuitous event, fuuure event, person interested in the event, unforseen event, witness to an event Foreign phrases: Casus fortuitus non est sperandus, et nemo tenetur devinare.A fortuitous event is not to be forseen, and no one is bound to expect it. Casus fortuitus non est supponendus. A fortuitous happening is not to be presumed.

why is my Mother an Informant????

:D

What was the original question posed?

I assume that the question was: Hey ORG, apparently I AM registered with you. Hey ORG, apparently you are liable for MY debts :D :D

ORG: Nope, we do NOT register PEOPLE ORG: Nope, we are not liable for YOUR debts :D

I was talking to this guy recently who purports to know the 'Answer To Everything,' and he threw-out the comment- "...your parents sold you into slavery, when they registered you for a Birth Certificate." Now maybe i have just heard that claim so many times that where once i knew what was meant by that, ive just become NUMB now to what that really means- and it just occurred to me...what does that statement REALLY mean? Scott Duncan, what does that ACTUALLY mean when someone makes the statement- "Your parents sold you into SLAVERY, when they registered you for a Birth Certificate?" :/

You thought the name was YOURS, didn't you? Seriously, there's no shortage of info on the subject. A DEBT was attached to you. DEBT=SLAVERY You STILL don't get that?

.your parents sold you into slavery, when they registered you for a Birth Certificate. NO ONE registered "ME" :D

Immaculate Conception????;)

My parents seems to have gave authorisation to the govrenment to CREATE a PERSON, that's all.....and the government sent "ME" that Person to benefit from it :D

I still don't understand why we would use a creation of the STATE for any benefits when we have the knowledge and power to create our own PERSON held in PRIVATE TRUST......OUR PRIVATE TRUST

I don't understand why we would use a creation of the state and ACCEPT surety for it......but if you use it, with surety at the RIGHT place, that could be a complete different story ? ...NO ?...

I see your point...COMPLETELY! But why bother with that when it is STILL THEIR creation?

It's all come back to the same thing Who is "ME", and WHO is accountable for SURETY....

I just don't understand....

Why Bother ?....I don't bother, and the system is built that way, it's NOT my fault !!!...:D

We are in a LEGAL system....what can we do about it ?

do you Know anyone who has tapped into their TDA account????

What is a TDA account ?

A debt is attached to the PERSON, and the state would like "ME" to be surety for it......is that what it is ?..... The PERSON's account, with the state, seems to have a NEGATIVE balance... :D, is this "MY" fault ?

treasury direct account linked to your B.C

Oh....that NEGATIVE account ? :D ....

"treasury direct account linked to your B.C" - No. Let me say that again: No, there is NO TREASURY ACCOUNT LINKED TO YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE. It's a BOND, so it IS an account.

do you know who has accessed it??? any Freeman!

VERY TINGLY!!!!!

I believe Roger Elvick did!

:D

Seriously, I can't stand this Freeman stuff anymore, it drives me nuts, which is not a good thing :D ......and it's NOT MY FUCKING FAULT :D :D

Did he "Access Jesus" too? Jesus doesn't exist either.

THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A BOND, NO DIFFERENT THAN FIAT CURRENCY. IT IS AN ACCOUNT THAT ALLOWS THE GOVERNMENT TO LEGALLY SPEND MONEY INTO EXISTENCE WITH THE OWNER BEING SURETY. THERE IS NO FUCKING ACCOUNT. NOBODY HAS EVER "ACCESSED THEIR ACCOUNT" AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS IN FACT LYING.

^ Thats pretty easy to comprehend!

serenity NOW!!!!!! ;)

BONDS are available in two forms: REGISTERED BONDS: are recorded on the books of the ISSUER by the TRUSTEE, and, INTEREST is paid-by-mail to the HOLDER of RECORD. BEARER BONDS: are NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS that must be SAFEGUARDED by the OWNER to prevent loss. INTEREST is paid by COUPON REDEMPTIONS. [Barron's Law Dictionary]

Security [BOND]: essentially, a LOAN AGREEMENT representing a DEBT. In return for the CAPITAL given to a corporation or a GOVERNMENT ENTITY, the bondholder gets a promise of repayment of of PRINCIPAL and INTEREST overtime, instead of ownership rights. Since the HOLDER of a BOND is a CREDITOR instead of an owner, his CLAIMS against the assets of a corporation are satisfied first in case of a failure of the business venture. Most bonds are secured by some kind of COLLATERAL, so that in case of default, the debt might still be satisfied. Consequently, bonds are generally a lower risk investment. Bonds raise money commonly known as DEBT CAPITAL.

So is the RECEIVER'S CERTIFICATE the REGISTERED BOND mentioned above, Scott?

I remember watching 'Heat,' and even 'Beverly Hills Cop' let alone other movies over the years, asking myself- "Why do they leave the MONEY alone, and always go after these BEARER BONDS??" :/ ;)

"A DEBT was attached to you. DEBT=SLAVERY. You STILL don't get that?" I know- that comes off as a boneheaded-comment on my part. Only though, because i dont view the Birth Certificate as a Debt-Obligation for us FIRST. I see it as a GRATUITOUS PROMISE made by the Registrar General of Ontario at the time to me, FIRST. But because i have never really INVESTIGATED what the Birth Certificate truly represents, and that my continued possession of it makes me viewed in their eyes as the TRUSTEE, SAFEGUARDING this BOND still, this what then, makes it still a DEBT-OBLIGATION i am DEEMED SURETY FOR in the meanwhile.

BOND: 1. written instrument with SURETIES, guaranteeing faithful performance of acts or duties contemplated 2. evidence of a debt 3. a binding agreement, a COVENANT between two or more persons, or an instrument UNDER SEAL by which the MAKER BINDS HIMSELF, and usually also his heirs, executors, and administrators or, if a corporation, their successors, to do or not to do a specified act 4. may be the OBLIGATION of a STATE, its subdivision, or a private corporation, represented by CERTIFICATE FOR PRINCIPAL, and by DETACHABLE COUPONS for current INTEREST 5. includes all INTEREST-BEARING OBLIGATIONS of persons, firms, and corporations 6. Bond debt is secured or guaranteed primarily by the ability of the ISSUER/BORROWER, to pay the INTEREST when due, and to repay the principal at maturity 7. CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS

...cuz i know people have asked about this- BUMP

Oh yeah, that makes it so OBVIOUS :D .....the creation of a PERSON is an "EVENT" And debts created by "YOURSELF" will have to be fix by YOURSELF :D HAHAHAHAHA!!!!...... But debts created by the GOVERNMENT, sent to this PERSON, that has been created by the government, which has been REGISTERED as an EVENT, has NOTHING to do with this "YOURSELF" guy.... :D Muhahahahaha!!!! :D

Please define "YOURSELF" :D I have to add this in Pete's Law Dictionary :D

your�self (yr-slf, y�r-, yr-, yr-) pron. 1. That one identical with you: :/

Fuck, that can be confusing !!! :(

So, "YOURSELF = ME" :-o

ME= A MAN with a Penis......so If "ME" contract a debt, it has to be very PRIVATE, and without interest hooked to it.......because MEN can't be charge with Interest, it's against the law.....ONLY PERSONS can be charge with interests. So of course I will have to take care of that debt for fuck sakes.... :D

Example of a PRIVATE debt, involving 2 of these "YOURSELF" :D I borrow a cup of sugar to my neighbor, I now have a debt over that MAN. :P

It must be different in there. Here I they register PEOPLE. I called and vital records told me so.

Ho Phillip Theprisonersix, give me a call, you will be amazed about what I can tell you on the phone !! :-D In writing, that's another story though....

They said that?? Fuck it must be true

yes. I even gave her an "out" and she said no its for keeping track of people's birth.

It's just a clever counter offer, you, you're, yourself ect are all surety inferences related to persons. It's bait and switch attempting to shift the burden of proof and shift the focus from the obvious.