Jul 25, 2013 3:49 AM

Oh ya that was awesome lmao,just love the response when you tore up the old original but why not just void instead?This is the gift that keeps on giving,did they try to force you to pay 30 dollars to have a certified copy of your order?

I was not prepared with a stamper, only a red permanent marker. It stunk so I put it away. ;)

Yup, sounded pissed to me. While listening and mentally reviewing many other discussions text, video and/or audio I still come full circle to the beginning. If the document is NOT yours then how is it possible to be a party to it.? If the document IS yours then you are a party to it having many choices as what to do with it. Question: $30.00 charge for a document that is supposed to be given when asked? (Well it is being used against you) Or am I thinking wrong some where?

http://court.nl.ca/supreme/fees.html

She thought it strange that I come to Family Court House to notarized my affidavit. I had to tell her that Provincial Court isn't that fond of me...so here I am. ;)

If every one did what you do all the public servants wouldn't go into work after awhile. Keep at it. Swing hard, swing fast and always leave them wondering what just happened. :)

anyways i posted your audio, im goin to bed, tired as fuck

Thanks, Derek Hill

Scott, are there repercussions to my action? What does tearing it up really mean? What should I expect next?

if you are asking that question then you do not understand the consequences of your actions..

All my actions have consequences. I am prepared with my Notice of Mistake. Just looking for reaffirmation...never mind.

A new copy that still needs to be voided

there is still the original that needs to be voided when you make a new original and void it , it becomes the new original and is voided

It was the original on the file that I tore up. They can produce another original?

Still sounds like a game to me...void the original...they make a new one...void again....etc.

I would think that tearing it up could be construed as a Damaged document but still in effect. Like accidentally tearing a ten dollar note. A little tape and it is good to go. Now..... a big red void on it makes the INTENT, INTENT....... INTENT, clear and concise.

I was hoping Scott Duncan had some answers, also. Thanks for all your comments.

Scott said if you can get your hands on it tear it up...or something like that. So I did. Thought it would be mightier than the VOID.

or something like that...is very vague.....

i cant quote right now. but he said it. i will find it

The original as well as the current I think would need to be voided as the current is derived from the original. Video of Voiding would be beat as then it can be proven that you did indeed Void it.

Or they can create a new original as it is probably on a digital file somewhere to replace ripped up one. Back to square one. VOID seems simplest.

Yup Scott did say that Leigh.

with new original written in red on top.

hmm well if he said it...

The BURDEN of PROOF of the act/intention could be a simple video and/or WITNESSES.:)

Such as having the Clerk sign a statement saying that you tore up the document. That would be good.

These people are NOT going to play in honour. What they say goes...UNTIL....Proven otherwise. That is our job. That is the jist of everything we learn in law is to prove them wrong.

Scott Duncan The ORIGINAL order MUST be presented as PROOF.

Demand to inspect it.

When you have it in your hand, TEAR IT UP. 9 July at 17:23 � Unlike � 3

So, I did. I listened, Admiral.

Thats the one.

Now I wanna know what it really means!

leigh can you tell me where you foind that?

I lost my window. Its your post with the weed charges.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/533869176649019/

yea i got it i found it. i was wrong.

but now what stops them from just reprinting it.

You are forgiven. :)

It means that this document you've teared up was a MISTAKE...and you've corrected the mistake by shredding the document.....

If they produce another one, send them a notice of mistake again, with a side notice telling them to stop making these stupid mistakes :-D

If the founding document is now of no force nor effect by voiding then how can any derivative of voided document have any force or effect?

Good question Chad Brodgesell, but they seems to NOT answer good questions :-D

If someone keeps making the same mistakes over and over again, I will definitly start to send INVOICES to them......just logic

Worded as a question but is meant as statement. As question to cover my ass in case I am wrong ...but...

More it goes and more I know that my ass is getting pretty well covered :-D

Pete Daoust could also charge them with Fabricating evidence, harassment and/or falsifying documentation regarding your person.

pssh i didnt ask for forgiveness.

Why not ?

A bottle of forgiveness goes a long way.

I have enough enemies. Trying to keep my friends.

I asked the police to forgive me and I would forgive them for assaulting and kidnapping me. They refused. :P

Then Charge them with kidnapping.

I am to work on my statement of claim...but do not know where to really start.

What do you want to CLAIM ?

You tell me.

Lol :-D

You go too fast Leigh Collins

You need to relax.....go play golf !

I have my own club and balls to play with. :) Golf is pointless.

I just need somebody to keep up with me, Pierre. :)

I've played 5 hours of golf today for FREE...priceless :-D

you saying you got a penis leigh?

Pierre have met the most beautiful lady in the world 20 years ago, and she's getting more and more beautiful every day... :-D

Wish I had someone's balls in my hand and I would squeeze real hard...

Pete , your up!

the last three posts read together are hilarious

ill pass, balls are sensitive.

Ummmm....gently?

And she bites.

ok...sign me up!

My name is WOMAN. Hear me ROAR.

That was great Leigh OftheHouseof Collins. Too bad you didn't void it. Now that would have been priceless to see. I know that when I went to the court house I asked to see the original order. The clerk brought the whole file out and started digging out the original, she asked me if I wanted to see the original order or the one of force and effect? And I took a gamble and said that I wanted to see the one in force and effect. I also had sent back to the court house copies of the last order that was in force in effect but not before I made photocopies of the last couple of pages so that I would have a record of what I sent back. So now if they come out with a new last page I have proof that the order was tampered with.

Will I go again and ask for a copy? Or a certified true copy with my $30? But that seems like a waste of my fiat money if I do not know what the current order is. Is it 2011 (if it exists),or 2007?

It is NOT your fiat money.....so what the heck ?

Just looking to see who is paying attention. You are a fart smeller...opps...smart feller. ;)

But I need it!

What about the document, Pierre?

I am gonna trade it for weed, not pay for a document that is mine.

Have you asked WHY it's $30 ?

No. I assume it is their notice with the fees being their terms?

http://court.nl.ca/supreme/fees.html

The document is NOT yours, they just happened to put the PERSON'S name on it, and they THINK, by mistake, that YOU are this PERSON. So you have to void it, because there is a MISTAKE.

yes? no?

Why waste my breath asking?

There is a mistake anyways, as I was not the applicant.

You should see things different, you NEVER waist breath by ASKING QUESTIONS....

So it is court property?

I don't care who own the document, I just want to correct the MISTAKE.

The only answer is a Notice of Mistake via registered mail? Why void? Just NOM it.

To VOID the order

But if it doesn't apply to ME, what do I care? Void or not, it does not apply?

Brenda, Kate, or Bev? Admiral?

Pete?

Due dilligence, you have to TAKE CARE of stuff when someone try to fuck around with "YOU" and/or the surety of the person you have in your pocket

If I go and STEAL something that is in you PERSON's NAME, will you say: ah fuck it it's not mine anyway ?

Until I rebut their document, with NOM, it has MY name on it = MY property. And they( govt) have already been notified of my claim of right since last year.

MY offspring are MY property!

What rights have you claimed ? :D

LOTS. Too many to type. Seven (7) pages PLUS appendices. :)

FUCK YOU!

Cause I can. :)

IT'S ALL ABOUT SURETY AND ACCOUNTING, they NEED you to be ACCOUNTABLE for the SURETY of the PERSON. But you are NOT, if you choose not to be.

But Derek Hill, seems to think I talk shit. ;P

My questions remain unanswered. Stop proceeding.

You seems to mix freedumb stuff with LEGAL stuff....which can lead to some miss understanding sometimes

What question ?

I speak no freedumb stuff. Human Rights. Tens of thousands behind ME. Yes, Pete. I am Catholic. Do not tell Scott!

Human Rights ? :/

You are Catholic ?

I cannot force my beliefs or opinions on anyone.

I did not say I practiced...:P

and I work for the government. Triple fuckin wammy!

Very talented 29 year young.

Oh, now I get it :D

Wouldn't you like the ban button now? lol

And every time I assert my human rights, I end up in jail or the psychiatric hospital, compliments of my bitch GP. :) HAVE A NICE FUCKING DAY!

This is how I picture you now :(

http://image-photos.linternaute.com/image_photo/750/1040485450/1104661.jpg

The TRUTH hurts. Ur hilarious!

The other system that sucks is this welfare. Since I am technically employed but on unpaid sick leave, minus benefits, I have to pay back this pittance I receive and is currently being deducted although the federal govt says it is income the provincial says otherwise. :(

I even know some Morse code. ;)

The clerk said "It is not voided". Another inaccurate statement from a deluded public servant.

That is why you can't believe what they tell you. I just went into the courthouse today and tried again to get another certified copy of my family court order, other clerk tried to hand me the previously copied court order stamped true certified and I told her after looking at the last page that it is not the true certified copy. Any ways I told her if you don't want me to charge you too, then I would not hand it out. She took it back right away.

I can't wait to go back an see what they try to offer me. :P