The Tender For Law

Volume 3

Jul 24, 2013 7:13 PM

Tim�thy C?mmins

A TREATISE ON COMMERCIAL LAW

All crimes are commercial. See "Title 27 C.F.R. 72.11." All "crimes are commercial" and as such a violation of "statute." If you trace that word back to its origins you will find that it is a "statutory" or "performance bond," a "bid bond." A "bid bond" which becomes a "lien;" or "debt obligation:" which is a "commercial asset traded on the stock exchange." That is where the bit about contract law comes into play. Because all "crimes are commercial," it is thru a trick of law called "admiralty" that they convict YOU, a "living man" for a crime owed a "statutory obligation" or "bid bond;" a "lien." That means it is all a voluntary system.

The "legal name," in all capital letters, is commercial property of the federal government. It conveys a loss of "God given" or "unalienable" rights under this law structure; based on Roman Civil Law. That is why that name is "berthed" into commerce upon "delivery" of the child from the "mother's berth canal/womb" or "waterway." And the mother is given a "certificate" in exchange for the true "title" to her baby. She is given a BIRTH CERTIFICATE see BERTH, which is like a "Bill of Laden." The "Dockter" "berthed" commercial property and in exchange all the mother gets is a "certificate of title." While the true or alloidial title is retained by the State via one of the many "blind adhesions" in the Birth Certificate contract. The world has come under a dark cloud and that cloud is "international maritime law" or "admiralty" upon which all "citizens" of the Earth are subject(s). "Resident/citizens" are "14th amendment" creations "of and by the federal government." The "14th amendment" was the first time the word "person" was ever mentioned in any law of this land. And that is because a "person" is not a "people." A "citizen" is not a "Citizen." A "person" is "a creation for and by the United States and one who shall immediately fall under its jurisdiction." See the book Black's Law 4th ed. or earlier for help defining the word "person."

Furthermore if you read the postal reorganization act of 1970, you will see that the use of "zip codes" places you within a "federal district, territory or possession." If you have ever read the constitution for the United states of America 1787/1789. You would know the original constitutional federal government only has jurisdiction "within the ten square miles known as Washington D.C., and all other "federal" territories and possessions." To put all that together for you: Residents of the United States, which is "a corporation;" see 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)A, are employees of the federal government. Whom have signed blind adhesion contracts in "admiralty" that conspire collectively to turn "people" into "persons" and to deprive them of all constitutional due process and rights. Making them completely a statutory "person," endowed with nothing other than what the creator/father-god/government wants for its "children." Don't be misled, all "residents" are "children" of the federal government; commercial property given a bond number in commerce, traded on international markets. That number on the back of your S.S. card (should be in red or blue) is a "cusip." Know what that is? By signing these contracts you place yourself into the "commercial and territorial waters" of the "State of California," for instance; which is a "commercial and territorial possession" of the "District of Colombia." The "State of California" belongs to the Federal government. And all of its "residents/citizens" are "chattel property" of the "State." We are and have been under a state of Martial Law since Abraham Lincoln declared it so in 1863. See "the enrollment Act of 1863." The whole Nation has been turned into one giant corporation, see the "District of Colombia Organic Act of 1870," floating in "international waters." Whereby all of its "citizens" are its "commercial property" and can be taken in as "surety" every time they "offend" "code or statute" and have a "lien" placed on their physical body. Though that "lien" can be discharged just "for entertainment purposes only." See GSA form OF-90 and 91.

The purpose for the document was to establish with the powers that be that we "inhabit" the "physical place/ space/ time" known as the "California Republic" or "California" state. Not in a state, but "on the land." Not in a "state of confusion," not in the "commercial and territorial waters of D.C." "Located on the physical land mass, not in a state or territorial possession of the federal government." "I am not on the citizen(s)ship." I am "One of the People," which incidentally makes me a state's Citizen under the de jure "common law." A man endowed with "unalienable" rights not "inalienable" privileges. "I am a state's Citizen from the Common Law Republic of Georgia state," an independent and Sovereign territory and possession of "We the People." One of the Several states which first attempted to form that "most perfect Union." A "Citizen of the federal Republican Union between the Several states," and "One from the Several state's United." See the "Postal Authorization Act of 1792," for help in understanding all the subtle use of language and its true meaning. Because we are and always have been a Constitutional Republic under all mighty God whereby all the "people" of this land are "endowed with unalienable rights that neither man nor institutions of government can abrogate." "A state's Citizen; One of the People from the Several states mentioned in the Constitution for the United states, 1787/1789.."

With "persons" like yourself trying to teach people falsely, this once great "Republic" has become nothing more than a "democratic oligarchy" ruled by fat cats and despots. Anyone out there tired of getting stepped on. Educate yourself as to the nature of this beast. Because it is all simply "commercial maritime law" under "admiralty" which turns "people" into "persons." See "Title 8 Section 7 U.S.C.:" all "citizens are vessels, and as such commercial maritime property." To get back to what I was saying. I am a "Citizen" and a "National." Of the "Nation" known as "America." Not of the corporate "United States." Notice the difference between "Citizen/National" and "Resident/citizen." A "National is not a citizen." A "National" is One of the "People." A "citizen" is a "person created by and for the Federal government." Which is now a corrupt "de facto" bent on world domination.

The reason for putting it into the journal; it is the local paper of record. We put our affidavits into the "commercial arena" via the "local paper of record." We then wait 30 days and it becomes a matter of "public record," a matter of "public law" or "statute." One final thought, I know that "U.C.C. 1-308" does not provide for remedy other than to let the other party know that you are signing "in propria persona." "With a full retention of all your constitutional rights still intact." Don't you see that every contract we sign with the federal government is unconstitutional.. Because they use those contracts to take away your rights from God and give you only "civil rights" or "privileges" granted from the government. So as the "living man:" as "a living soul," not as the "strawman" or "stramineus homo." And that is what "U.C.C. 1-308" is truly for; "signing contracts and retaining all unalienable rights and liberties while doing so." You are confusing "remedies," the "remedy" you are looking for is found under "U.C.C. 2-209." Which states in brief that "a party subject to a contract has ten days to "rescind" that offer." As well, if you are still with me, see "California Civil Code 1689(B)1;" which states in brief that when "an offer is forced ''under-duress,'' ''coercion,'' 'threat of loss to real time property,'' ''threat of enslavement,'' or ''mistaken identity'' etc., that offer can be "rescinded" unilaterally for all time." Returning all parties to the "status quo ante."

Finally because "all crimes are commercial" anything you put into the "commercial arena" can be turned into a "crime; or offense of code, a debt obligation owed." It is always best to "reserve your rights" when making "deposits" into "commerce." ... All rights reserved. Without Prejudice. "U.C.C. 1-308."

Read Comments

Tim�thy C?mmins

Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/72.11

Scott Duncan

It's all Accounting and Surety. These are just what lead to the current system. The goal is to remove MONEY from them.

Swearing an affidavit, acknowledges THEIR "Authority", no matter how true the content may be. You are seeing what is TRUE, but you focus on the wrong things.

I've demonstrated Cryptographic Currencies WORK. I'm building a SCALABLE, GLOBAL currency.

I'm just going to starve them. My money is simply BETTER. Once deployed it will be out of my hands (Or anyone's for that matter) and MONEY'S FUNCTION will be separated from the TENDER FOR LAW, thus rendering your whole post moot. :P

This is one of the MANY things I am doing with MY life...

...what the fuck have YOU done lately?

Crying to strangers that you have a "status", is simply begging for the wrong kind of attention, from people who see your declaration as an invitation to ENFORCE.

These are the clubhouse rules of a club that YOU AREN'T IN. Stop wasting your life on it. Read more of this forum. I'm showing you the PROPER way to extract yourself and not starve.

Tim�thy C?mmins

First of all, what have I done is not worth of response. Second I am not starving and own my own home free and clear on 3 acres that I built. Third, I am already known being that I got over 10 years of charges dismissed in my activist career, which you don't know about that included escape and 3 resisting arrests. And my currency is better than yours and is organic. I already done starved them since 1990 when I refused to pay the IRS (an agency of the IMF) 10 grand for taxes on an inheritance. But you wouldn't know about that either. Or making the DEA return a mini-14 back in 2001 a friend got seized without due process. You wouldn't know about the 3+ traffic tickets I refused for fraud pursuant to FRCP 9 b since 2000 either I bet. Or how I don't have or need permits for the last two homes I built while you were probably still living in your mom's basement. LMAO. You have no idea who I am or my record. Christ dude, I just did a few weeks for contempt. Tried to arrest a judge in open court! Go play some XBoox 360 and get out of the legal consultation because you suck boy.

Scott Duncan

So constantly fighting...

...well you'd best get back to your pretend property war (you don't own it and you don't know what money is.) but here in reality you will feel a slight tingling sensation, followed by...

BANNED!

...Speaking before listening is a hostile act, `round these parts.

XBox 360? Those things have a 50% failure rate...they are crappy cluster nodes.

Scott Duncan

Derek Hill raises a compelling point. A court MUST accept an affidavit. It's the only way they can "see" a document.

This douche is declaring a "status". I can say MY status is that of DUKE, and it WOULD BE TRUE...

...but so what? What is DUKE to you? It ONLY applies when you want to engage me in contract... in which case you had best know EVERYTHING that the TITLE and STATUS will demand.

...do you see what I am saying here?

Derek Hill

Here is something i said in the past. But applicable to you.

Why do you want to say your honor. It's because when you say it you accept their authority.

Its the same ofr courts, they have no right to use DUKE nor recognize it because they are not allowed to acknowledge it until it interferes with their matters then they must acknowledge it.

Scott Duncan

NOTICE OF MISTAKE is NOT declaring a STATUS. It is giving NOTICE that halts proceedings as there is NO UNDERSTANDING.

That is NOT saying "I AM JOHN DUNCAN the 23rd, DUKE OF AQUILAE AND KEEPER OF THE TRUST"... to which the court will say in the politest way possible, "So fucking what"?

August le Blanc

Status and standing=joinder and surety if not presented in the appropriate fashion in certain circumstances... ie court.. so these pre-emptive strikes to ensure ones standing is up held by the applicable and proper status

Scott Duncan

Just remember where your only ACTUAL answers came from :P

I could fill a library with what you DON'T know. Especially as regards what you have done so far. You are effecting things you don't even know about.

I don't get to choose WHO trusts what I say, and acts on it. I DO know that those that do, are the ones forcing awareness... something banks hate.

August le Blanc

and the notice negates understanding... I get all of that.

So by an affidavit, they can recognize you and exhibits attached ( like the birth certificate) to said affidavit... so they can see the actual entity in front of them ( if it goes that far) take the notice of mistake as the ace card and negate any understanding... a 2 pronged approach..

Catch 22 for the court... in the one with standings favour...fucking brilliant.

Scott Duncan

Yes. I'd like to claim credit, but it is all part of the codified feudalism that is the Noble Lie. Us "bad guys" are taught all this at an early age.

ChiefRock Sino General lives at the edge of the storm. I live at the centre. We both know the same truths. We'll both prevail because neither of us thinks wrong, and values the wrong things.

...none of you can make that claim. No matter how much you THINK you know... I KNOW MORE. ALWAYS remember that, or you will lose your way.

Dean Kory is a good cautionary tale. Keep that in mind. Making the connections and the epiphanies that result, are powerful and intoxicating. Don't act on them. You don't understand enough yet.

Scott Duncan

"I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then I thought, 'wouldn't it be much worse if life *were* fair, and all the terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve them?' So now I take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe." - Marcus Cole, Babylon 5.

David Johansen

he has had sherriffs thrown off the property, they dont go near his place, and wait for him to leave it before they try talking to him. I invited him here because he does have quite a lot that would be reasonably worth contributing to those of us here that are in America. you have to admit althou quite similar, there are many differences between Canada and America.

those of you interested should go have a look through his notes.

Anibal Jose Baez

Timothy is banned, but I wanted to ask some questions I always make to "freeman"/"patriots"/"sovereigns": 1- Do YOU know HOW ANY law applies to YOU? 2- Show me PROOF that the Constitution and/or The Bill of Rights applies to YOU. Another question I ask them is: 3- How can you say you are "above the line", "living in the private", and/or "sovereign," but yet quote UCC and use "legal tender"?

The only "answers" I get come from BELIEVE, and NEVER FACTS. Specially from money hungry/money loving "christians". They sure pull EVERYTHING out of their ass, when it comes to "law". They like to quote the Bible to somehow magically explain their "procedures."

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan NOTICE OF MISTAKE is NOT declaring a STATUS. It is giving NOTICE that halts proceedings as there is NO UNDERSTANDING.

That is NOT saying "I AM JOHN DUNCAN the 23rd, DUKE OF AQUILAE AND KEEPER OF THE TRUST"... to which the court will say in the politest way possible, "So fucking what"?