Breach of Trust. Nail em.

What is a worse crime, A) Breach of Trust? Or B) Identity Theft?

well from a law perspective Breach of trust...from a flesh man/woman both are equally dispicable

He said: �I believe the public do understand the necessity for police and others to do things like this to protect against a much greater harm. �It was never intended or foreseen that any of the identities used would become public, or that any family would suffer hurt as a result.�

From a Law perspective if some one went down to the local constabulary and laid charges against the publicly admitted crime of 42 Officers, How would that be accomplishes.?

�It was never intended or foreseen that any of the identities used would become public, or that any family would suffer hurt as a result.� <---You need to prove THAT is untrue, and you can't.

they choose their words carefully

does the fact that they used the PERSON have a bearing on it as well from a law perspective?

maybe in the sense that what they did is not illegal because they were given the name by the owners of the PERSON...and the law is not about right and wrong, but about legal and illegal?

It does. It has NOTHING TO DO with the parents or anyone else for that matter. It's THEIR PERSON... No different from a police car, or a snow-plow. It's Government property.

Thank you that was the whole point of the post!

Pfft... You know how to express "gratitude". :P Talk's cheap, honey :P

<3 <3

http://youtu.be/rkWy8nRWPGk

Scott Duncan: It does. It has NOTHING TO DO with the parents or anyone else for that matter. It's THEIR PERSON... No different from a police car, or a snow-plow. It's Government property.