2 things. People must UNDERSTAND WHO is SURETY for your LEGAL TITLE/NAME. Look very hard for it. MONEY OF ACCOUNT is what government can seize control and take. MONEY OF EXCHANGE they cannot. Hence why MONEY OF EXCHANGE is the way to go if you must use it.

Does this have anything to do with us RESTORING ourselves as an ALLY to The Queen, instead of the presumed SUBJECT we SUB-jugated ourselves to be, when we signed-up for a 'SIN' that unwittingly relegated us to that of an employee of the BRITISH CROWN TRUST HOLDING COMPANY/CORPORATION?

I fucking hate facebook because i will not post what i want to say on this thread and many others because of prying eyes.

Bro this is private now.

Only to those that don't matter.

Not that what i was going to say was all that epic but would have ramifications on me. While this group is private to your average snooper nothing posted here is private to government.

Scott Duncan I remember now you were the one that planted seeds in my head 20 years ago

BANK = TOTTEN TRUST

TOTTEN TRUST = YOUR account...YOUR Deposits...YOUR Deposits from your LABOUR, but.....YOU'RE, not the BENEFICIARY Signed, All-those-'people'-in-Cyprus-who-got-Blindsided-by-their-Banks-recently

I'v tried to tell people what happened in Cyprus was just a test to withdraw their money of course I'm paranoid but we'l see.:D

OK. "LIKE" THIS ARTICLE if you aren't a Cop and/or a Government worker.

Maybe the NOTICE OF MISTAKE would work on the Queen- "Hey, the only reason i got a SIN-card was because i thought it would be fun workin' at the CNE one summer, but they told me they wouldnt hire me until i got 'the Card.' What the hell did i know- i was only 14!" :P

A Cop and/or a Government worker will have no trouble NOT "Liking" this. They probably don't anyway.

WHOA. Okay, sending her it is one thing. But would The Queen ACCEPT it? And would one start off small by sending it to the Lieutenant-Governor first, then the Governor General?

Nope. This is between AQUILAE and Elizabeth Windsor. None of those other dudes have anything to do with it.

Have you ever actually MET The Queen?

Nope. I hope I never do. That would mean I have a LARGE account to settle, and I don't have the time.

She IS aware though, that you are over here in Canada fightin'-the-good-fight for her?

I AM LICENSED by the Queen, and have executed tasks several times.

That's the difference between Privateer and Pirate.

A fucking Licence.

Are you the only one of your ILK here in Canada? Or is there a Scott Duncan-equivalent over in Vancouver and/or PEI working towards the same goal of restoring the Monarchy? Or are you the ONLY Noble of your kind in Canada?

There are 400 in the commonwealth. That's all you need to know.

...OK to Reboot the system with the above in mind. What would be the specific terms.. To one who is not opposed to you.

Restoration of RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT <--look that up. Through executive order, the government gets overhauled. Worthless paper-pushers would be audited for every penny the signed for. The worst cases will be questioned on state television, and tossed to the angry mob afterward. Those that survive the purges would be trained in their new mandate, using the harshest methods available... Yes. Chinese Primary School Teachers will be training them... The term is for FIVE YEARS, and then the Monarch returns to the CURRENT status. The mandate of the Provost Marshall will be expanded, and the office will provide armed soldiers with shoot-to-kill orders for anyone who might find themselves holding the public trust, but chooses NOT to act in the public's interest. Government workers will be a lot more focused if they have to worry about getting a bullet put in their heads on the way to question period, if they take that $50,000 kickback from RBC.

What need to be done to make this happen?

As usual, awesome note Scott, thank you ....just to clarify for my comprehension, we are, by accepting that we are the PERSON (we are being fraudulent) and as a result, falling into all their legal traps (that deceives us into giving up our own personal responsibility and the freedom that holds), and traps us, by our own action, into a chained filled existence? It's now makes sense when you say the Queen isn't able to do anything, because our actions tell a different story then our words/requests to her.

It's pretty simple when you ACTUALLY look at it. ;)

So our `tarded neighbours to the south don't feel left out... http://youtu.be/1rwmD4c_NxI

I see a grey line still beside my comment(20 mins later)...looks like it's being read by some outside the group?

Scott, what can you do when that kind of shit goes down?

I liked it because otherwise I am presumed GOVERNMENT AGENT and/or COP ..However I have to walk this very slow, its seriously hot here 30 degrees Celsius in the sun. I am more confused than qualified to post anything just yet . Thanks for another bombshell Scott

Ok I want to do a status post, but want to make sure that all info is accurate, Scott Duncan REAL TALK: We are contributing to the creation/progression of our own slavery. We call out to Queen Elizabeth to help, but OUR actions have tied her hands. WE buy into fraud daily by accepting we are the PERSON our birth certificate represents. Our signature is not on our Birth Certificate, therefore we do NOT own it. The name on the Birth Certificate represents the PERSON, not us the flesh bearing man and woman. Every piece of legislation, law and statute all relates to the PERSON, not the flesh bearing man and woman. By accepting we are the PERSON, we are disabling any opportunity which may be available to us through the keeper of our trust Queen Elizabeth II of Windsor. Queen Elizabeth II in Right of Canada is a PERSON, not the flesh bearing woman, to accept this created fiction is encouraging fraud on our part .

after Ireland was made a free-state, "northern" ireland asked the king to be re-instated(forgive my language here please) which he couldn't refuse, so those of us in the "republic" can do the same? as much as the english monarch sticks in my throat.... thats just my belief based on my education... Is this the path you are suggesting for "ALL" of us scott?

Thank you Scott. This clarifies some deep meditations that I have had over the past year with none other than QEII.

Quite Ironic S�il Eile that the woman we've been taught to hate since birth becomes part of the solution. Further proof we think wrong if we didn't already have enough ;)

sorry carl still coking on my own beliefs here :p hahaha

Belief what's that mate :P They're getting shattered one by one ha

So we give back our allegiance as subjects to the Queen, instead of allegiance as citizens to the Government. My thoughts.

I should have said that better but I am not up to par with others here on words.

we purge ourselves of the fraud of identifying as the person (state) from what i can grasp so far chad

I wonder if we do not give our allegiance to the queen can they come and bomb us?

I do not like using words that are two-faced. I have a mental block which is a real pain. I try to put things into Simple Stupid.(then I can understand them) So I see it as simple as by using the Government "TITLES" and just simple doing what they tell us to do is just BECOMING one of them. So...just stop doing it and put the allegiance back where it can do good as a SUBJECT instead of a CITIZEN. Or am I really fucked in the head?

Here this is what happened yesterday I was chatting away with this very attractive lady from Ghana and she invited me to come to her village in Ghana where she initiates the process of making me a King....well unfortunate for me she did not say that because of my good looks and general awesomeness no...she did that to close me in a ridiculous amount of GOLD so much in fact that it would be impossible to walk without the help of my servants....Apparently this is the only way to transport GOLD through international airspace without customs and revenue coming after you.....Delete this post if it is off topic just wanted to share this interesting piece of info

Still have an issue with the whole DIVINE right to rule thing.... Responsible government. Everything Scott has posted upon

fuck... where is the edit delete? FB format changed...

It is a two way street, subjects are well...subject to her. On the other side of the road if she goes to far with something then the uh. Guillotine comes out of storage. Just a give AND take.

Edit delete and general usefulness of mobile FB is gone.

cont'd.... I do not doubt what you are telling us Scott Duncan. Everything you have posted in regards to LAW has been to the best of my Knowledge verifiable and true. Crown corporations are to the best of my knowledge part of the HOUSE OF WINDSOR. Does not imply collusion?

corrected>>> Does not that imply collusion between The Queen Her Majesty Elizabeth II of the House Of WIndsor, The Queen and her right of province... etc. and the entities that have corrupted our irresponsible government? And If so Why Should I TRUST That? fool me once shame on you... Fool me twice..

the crown is not the Queen the lady, Maa Nathltaapaan posted last week exactly who/what the crown is, I'm just looking for it

http://circleof13.blogspot.ca/2011/11/what-is-british-crown.html

Question, Would you pledge allegiance to the Queen to uphold the Commonwealth or pledge allegiance to uphold the Commonwealth in right of the Queen? Or something entirely different?

Does not the authority of the throne reside in the crown?

In or with? The Crown.

I like the meaning of the word 'Allegiance' It is *All*egiance one way or the other but never in the tween shall they meet.

Something that just clicked in my head. I know, I am slow. The concept of Being a "FREE Man" is basically saying that you are on your own. There is NO ALLEGIANCE with another for the sake of protection from forces coming at you. Now that I think about it I would prefer to have some obligation to another to help assist me in protecting what is mine. It just becomes a matter of CHOOSING the right ALLEGIANCE.

I'm tired sorry I'll stop spamming .

Yes "with" would more accurately reflect the question I sought to ask.

Hardly Spam Chad Brodgesell.

Would we not make a formidable force if everyone here forsake the Government and pledged allegiance to the Queen? Would we not be able to form HIGHER courts here and hold the Government to account?

Is that the end goal of The Tender For Law? Scott Duncan? (Sht, or is that the first goal with more to follow?)

Now. Stop. Think of what I have said so far. Bitcoin. Crappy Alpha-test code has/had a BILLION DOLLAR MARKET CAP...DEBT FREE! We need to teach people what MONEY IS. You'll know you can stop teaching when you hear a banker say "Using Crypto-Currencies is UN-AMERICAN"!

...which would be the point, really. :P

I recall mention they are already claiming it is a threat to the stability of the markets or something along those lines, damn oldtimers. LOL Wish I could recall which link it was I posted about it over a month ago.

I teach everybody that I can about bitcoin

Sorry I do not like bitcoin, The idea, sure but not the current system. The client (miner I think ) just crashes my tower. Have no idea why and it is probably my system to begin with. I still do not like the current bitcoin though.

yes but the concept is proven

http://rt.com/op-edge/bitcoin-threat-bank-lost-433/

http://www.euromoney.com/Article/3211672/Bitcoin-a-threat-to-the-transaction-banking-industry.html

http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/02/why-bitcoin-is-the-banking-industrys-newest-biggest-threat/

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-05/bitcoin-really-is-an-existential-threat-to-the-modern-liberal-state.html

ARGH... According to the article Gail Blackman posted above The royals and the various persons thereof are subservient to The Crown. Yet The queen holds our TRUST. That to me reeks of collusion. The NOBLE LIE, the divine right to rule.... and the beliefs that go with that... to me are false pretences. Bitcoin takes us out of the legal tender current... Yes. But then we are still subject to... Sorry everyone, I am trying to wrap my head around this. Scott is a privateer for The House of Windsor, to gather vessels.... which i don't have a problem with. The 5 year thing is all well and good. So my question still stands. Why Should one TRUST That? Serious

those in the know, are aware just how big a threat crypto-currencies really are to their system.

I hear you it's just shitty code is all I am saying. If I wrote M as badly as that the machines would destroy themselves after a day of operation. I am NOT a competent programmer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Sy9c0bQRsU

It's ALPHA TEST code! It wasn't meant to DO all this! Yes. Crap code! http://youtu.be/gQoykhNoBbY

"Tell me about DUNCAN...why does he live on a BOAT?!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlTfQ7e8C_k

is this a coincidence this article posted today?....which if i comprehend correctly is muddying the waters of understanding in relation to the queen and her true role, not the created fiction. http://globalnews.ca/news/711395/would-be-canadians-challenge-mandatory-oath-to-queen-as-discriminatory/

I have been st the TFL for quite a while now and rule number one if I don't understand or something is contradicting Scott is always right. 5 years is what I don't understand ..

derek, until we walk and live on land, and not on vessels on the sea of commerce, we ALL are on a BOAT/sea vessel ....

Good find Gail Blackman gives an interesting pov on it.

There are 400 in the commonwealth. That's all you need to know. :D

WOULD-BE Canadians ALREADY have Constitutional-RIGHTS.....? :/ Signed, cart-before-horse AND/OR Terms-and-Conditions

I have re read the post again.... I am all for a reboot.... however I am hung up on being subject to. If Scott Duncan wants to use the surplus from our value, put out 300 judges and train us to have as diverse a skill set as himself, great. It sounds better, I know I require ALLIES. I would really like to UNDERSTAND, Fuck... Have we had total full disclosure?

LOL....:D

Scott's already said the magic-words in regards to this- WRITS, and, PRAECIPE. A writ is one thing. Not EVERYBODY is qualified to issue a PRAECIPE, including me. However..... The WRITS-and-PRAECIPES thread, is the one thread that i am looking more forward to than 'The Justice League' movie... ;)

Jason F. LeBlanc, There are 400 in the commonwealth. That's all you need to know, That's the difference between Privateer and Pirate, A fucking Licence, I AM LICENSED by the Queen, and have executed tasks several times. :D :D :D It gets exciting :D

It is aggravating to not be able to put all the pieces together into a form you can understand. I get the puzzle and the interlocking of the pieces it is just that the picture is always.....fuzzy and a bit fluid still.

I hope I have enough ATTRIBUTES and SKILLS for the ride :D

Reminds me of dnd

dnd ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_%26_Dragons

LOL.... :D

Daniel J Wentz: Scott wrote Praecipe's in yhe 90's that fucked a LOT of people up. He IS the best source for this. at 4:53pm Scott Duncan: ...Yes.

Daniel J Wentz Oh crap. Scott's makeing a drone army I see. Oh well. I hear AQUILAE trustees always end up doing pretty well for themselves, so no worries. Things must be going to shit if `Liz has let you off her leash, Scott Duncan! March 11 at 5:12pm � Like � 1

Scott Duncan Pierre, when someone addresses you as "SIR" you are being addressed from a subordinate. ALL my trustees in a duty capacity MUST call me "sir". Ever notice that when a COP doesn't know your name he calls you SIR, and when they HAVE your name they Call you "MISTER Daust"? March 11 at 5:21pm � Like � 2

Daniel J Wentz Only those I have fealty to, may call me "Mister Wenttz"

Scott Duncan Re:"what does MOTION equal?" It means, "BEND OVER AND TAKE IT DRY, BECAUSE YOU LITERALLY ASKED FOR IT! JOINDER, BABY"!

Scott Duncan Only public servants can MOTION. Even then, only as a PARTY. I would have locked him up for contempt.

Scott Duncan Criminal. I would have witnessed FRAUD against the petitioner. Dean claimed he was not the name, but by MOTIONING he was acting as a PARTY, and was INTERFERING WITH THE LEGAL COMMERCIAL INTERESTS of the petitioner. You are either a PARTY or you are NOT. You don't get to say you are NOT a party, and than ACT as one. It's FRAUD

Amazing! Absolutely &*^*^% amazing! I am so pissed at myself for being asleep at the wheel for so long. I got caught up in ALL THAT JAZZ. I'm so grateful to Scott for informing me that my thinking is killing me. It's not an easy ride though. Thanks for being you Scott! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbLSGYd-Ohc

: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : OF ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : : : NO. : : : PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF SUMMONS TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Issue writ of summons in the above case. Writ of Summons shall be issued and forwarded to Attorney / Sheriff. (Please circle choice) ?Date: ________________ ____________________________________ Signature of Attorney Print Name: _________________________ Address: ____________________________ ____________________________________ Telephone: __________________________ Supreme Court ID No. _________________

: OF ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : : NO. : : : PRAECIPE AND RULE TO FILE A COMPLAINT TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Issue rule on ____________________________ to file a Complaint in the above case within twenty (20) days after service of the rule or the Prothonotary, upon praecipe, shall enter a judgment of non pros. ?Date: ______________ Signature: _________________________________ Print Name: _______________________________ Attorney for: _______________________________ Address: __________________________________ _________________________________________ Telephone: ________________________________ Supreme Court ID No.: ______________________ NOW, ______________________ , _________, RULE ISSUED AS ABOVE. _________________________________________ Prothonotary By_______________________________________ Deputy

Scott Duncan : How any of you are kicking yourselves because you didn't know what THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER means? My new name might as well be Bruised Shins.

Perhaps, the biggest joke of all is that although we have happily signed up for this INSURANCE, when you read the FINE PRINT, we FIND OURSELVES liable. Signed...Bruised Shins PS Remind me to cancel that cheque.

A girl just read this post and said that Scott is so much sexier than Elvis. :)

Really? Because I look in the mirror and I'm pretty sure any beauty you see, is purely accidental. :D

Cameras and I are at odds.

I just happen to be an Elvis fan...and I have to say I totally agree with your gal-pal, Robert Cormier!

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION : : : : : File No. _____________________________________ : : : : PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS TO THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF SAID COURT: Enter Judgment of Non Pros against the above-named Plaintiff(s): ______________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No. 237.1, I certify that written notice of the intention to file this praecipe was mailed or delivered to the party against whom judgment is to be entered and to his or her Attorney of Record, if any, after the default occurred and at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the filing of this praecipe and a copy of the notice is attached. I verify that I have researched the records in this matter, and a complaint has not been filed within twenty (20) days following the service of the Rule in this matter. I further verify that the statements made in this Praecipe are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. � 4904 relating to Unsworn Falsification to Authorities. ?DATE: ______________________ Signature: ______________________________________ Print Name: _____________________________________ Attorney for: ____________________________________ Address: ________________________________________ ________________________________________ Telephone: ______________________________________ Supreme Court ID No.: ___________________________ M-3F-1 (Rev. 9/00)

3rd time Why should one TRUST that?

James Baal, appologies for missing your question. 5 years is so EVERY world leader serves at least one term in office whilst the monarchy has executive authority.

http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/HowtheMonarchyworks/History%20and%20background.aspx

I'm sure there at least 10 people here that can do a better site than that. :D

Scott is striking in person - the camera thing is not a lie though.

Ron Jeremy is widely regarded as a "Sex God". Let's avoid that look :D

Tara please stop it you're making me cry

He sells pills that will make my penis bigger! :D Should I get some?

Do you have proof of his claim?

Ron Jeremy wouldn't lie.

Let's not go down that road again. I don't want another episode of women lining up outside the door!

I've tried it and a apple tree grown in my ass

Size DOES matter! :P

I had very thinny cute hemoroids, and now I'm stuck with these apple size hemoroids :(

Is this a preferred direction Tara Duncan ^^

Hey, just to make sure you guys don't get me wrong...THAT WAS A FUCKING JOKE....

Tiny, cute hemoriods? No. Penis enlargement - a world of NO!

Hey Chris Schulte, have you read this thread ? :D

Because Pierre commented on it. Haven't you guys figured this out yet? The most recently ACTIVE thread is at the top, NOT the most recently POSTED thread.

Yes I did, :D , I know it may surprise some, but I did figured this out in last March 2013 :D

ZOMBIE THREAD! :D

This thread won't stay dead. It keeps on rising. :)

Scott Duncan - I took this oath at 17 when I joined the CAF: "I, [name], do swear (or solemnly affirm) that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her heirs and successors according to law, in the Canadian Forces until lawfully released, that I will resist Her Majesty's enemies and cause Her Majesty's peace to be kept and maintained and that I will, in all matters pertaining to my service, faithfully discharge my duty. So help me God" It seems to me that this oath is still in effect for me as the wording says that I will serve her in the CAF, but, it doesn't say I could stop serving her after I left the military. Am I correct in my understanding in this? If so, it seems I am bound to help you and have no other choice as your plan is the best one presented to me regarding serving the lady with the funny hats. :)

Well, there it is then.

I try to be my best. :D

:)

I'm going to train you all up to a level where you can think in a useful manner :D When does this training starts ?? :D HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!!!

The only way to LEGALLY and LAWFULLY do what I propose is to restore EXECUTIVE POWER to the Monarchy

Noted: IN agreement with Pierre..

The only way to LEGALLY and LAWFULLY do what I propose is to restore EXECUTIVE POWER to the Monarchy

What Scott Duncan proposed ? :D

I'm in the US, but Yes.... I have been IN & OUT of the TTFL since the start...

And what Scott Duncan proposed ? 8|

I filed the lien against my PERSON last summer, created a couple of CORPORATIONS and Lodged my Trust here... Sticked my head back into the group a few days ago... been 6-9 months.. etc..

And what Scott Duncan proposed ? :/

Rule of Law Rule according to law; rule under law; or rule according to a higher law. The rule of law is an ambiguous term that can mean different things in different contexts. In one context the term means rule according to law. No individual can be ordered by the government to pay civil damages or suffer criminal punishment except in strict accordance with well-established and clearly defined laws and procedures. In a second context the term means rule under law. No branch of government is above the law, and no public official may act arbitrarily or unilaterally outside the law. In a third context the term means rule according to a higher law. No written law may be enforced by the government unless it conforms with certain unwritten, universal principles of fairness, morality, and justice that transcend human legal systems.

YEP.. IN AGREEMENT

well there is another A unfinished post, and B, another post i deem to have either missed or got lost halfway through and forgot about it... can you scott get back to adding to it the rest?

Fuck Scott, this has got to be your best post. It says everything... :D

<<Of all the clubhouse rules, the bible in any form, should be avoided at all costs. It should be fought at every possible opportunity, and should be met with all the ridicule and contempt you can throw at it...>>

<<My INSURANCE is real. It exists in the real world, and the more astute among you will see that I am pushing it all into a universe of virtual worlds.>> NOW, I understand this statement.

Holy-mother-of-goats-Scott. That is by far the greatest presentment I believe I have ever read &/ or been priviledged in the fact of actually knowing the Author. This is ...*Jaw shattered* *Smash*

"By appointment of Gail Blackman". I don't understand this. What does this mean?

She asked Scott to write about insurance.

Ohhhh christ-mother-of-Mary's-tits.....I'm too busy going "Fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap".......till I turn blue or I just go O_o

Adam Thomas, do you not see the DATE on this? It's a Zombie thread

Miki Verse....front & center

Scott, how many times have I been in n out of this group ?? I've a heap o catching up to do dude...Mmmmkkaayy :-D

Well, one thing we have to give to Adam is that, for a Mongoloid, he has come a long way. And to think just a few months back he was just a little Australopithecus. Sniff...

Thanks for the compliments Mackximus Minimus man.....I too am on a mission & it's a global mission & the queen has to start doing her part for us all. The buck - o - fuck does just that. The proof is my balls. My word is my oath. I bleed for everyone. ......except banker kunts & stupid pig kunts.....

Oh & Nazi kunts masquerading as "Christians".....I really LoVe to hate all those deluded fucks.....I cry for them the most as it's tears of pain caused by their stupidity & ignorance. I AM in Fact & Reality an Economic hitman. A bringer of justice. A free-lance-gun-for-hire. A terrorist against all oppression & governance in all forms. A voice for & of the oppressed. I am the buck - o - five & I AM MAN.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAND, HE'S BANNED!

:-D busy guy :-D

Buck-o-Ban..... :-D

It almost feels like a reunion...

"Another PERSON assumes SURETY for your actions." [insert] NOTICE of MISTAKE. (i might not know who exactly the surety is, but it certainly is not ME) [apparently I am NOT responsible for the actions of that person sinse sombody else signed for that pleasure] your who? does it have a S.A.G. card? (the B.A.R. card for movie actors) no worse, he has an Admiral Duncan.

Maybe he was SUMMONED back....

Adam Thomas is ALL over facebook saying how Scott is wrong, so he disapeared from my view.....just saying :-P

Like he has some kind of fucking record of credibility. Contempt for such toxic characters! Fuck Adam Thomas! :D Wasting everyone's time with his "no-content Australopithecus gibberish". Admiral Scott, please no more Hominids in the group. That should be a rule. Well, at least an axiom.

"Everything in the nobility is executed by APPOINTMENT...executed with the presumption that they are in compliance with the Sovereign's wishes, and notice is given on the product itself that it was created by APPOINTMENT, by the entity who appointed it." :D

This was my favourite part.....i'm just mere-ly ap-pointing this out- more 'power' to us

Bumping these to the top for the newbies.

:)

This just reminds me how glad I am that Adam Thomas cannot post ANYWHERE I write.

:D

2 words, Derek Moron :P

Derek is just an idiot who won't listen. Adam Thomas is toxic.