The Tender For Law

Volume 3

Jul 07, 2013 7:20 AM

Derek Hill

Notice of Mistake Strikes AGAIN!!!!

6 Charges of possession of weed and 2 charges for disturbance of the peace with a charge of uttering a death threat to a "cop", a contempt for a restraining order, all charges were withdrawn.

So what did I do exactly?

Well, since i value my weed and I don't really care about cops, what better opportunity to test my understanding of the Notice than now?

Yup, got arrested quicker than a black man trying to get into their own car(no racial slur intended). Helps when you light a fat one right at the police head quarters.

So blah blah got charged was thrown in the slammer for a night. Morning comes and I file the notice with me(cops were kind enough to retain my effects and allow me to file it in the record).

Got thrown in before a JUSTICE.

First thing i said before prosecutor tried to say anything was "I reserve all rights presented, does anyone object?"

JUSTICE and prosecutor didn't deny. Said stupid shit like "whatever rights those are".

Me "fantastic, let the record show that no objection were made".

"Did the prosecutor get my notice of mistake?"

Prosecutor "Yes, but I do not understand your language or intention"

Me "Good. Have you answered the questioned I posed in that to in order for me to UNDERSTAND the NATURE of the PROCEEDINGS".

Prosecutor "Your honor, i request a short recess to review the documents that Mr DEREK HILL has served unto us"

JUSTICE "Granted, how long do you need"

Prosecutor "I believe 1 hour should be sufficient"

Shit gets adjourned.

I get back in there. I restate all rights reserved.

Prosecutor "I have been given time to review the notice of mistake that was submitted by Mr. DEREK HILL, and it is the position of the crown to reprimand him for the time being as .....(i didn't pay attention to it was distracted by the officer right beside me making threatening movements)."

When my attention restored back to the matter..."I'm sorry but your officer is making threatening gestures,.I REQUIRE the crown to repeat that.".

prosecutor begins to repeat it.

Me "Point of order, there is questions before the court, this must be addressed. I MUST have these questions answered before I can understand the nature of the proceedings, does questioning not negate understanding?"

JUSTICE "He has a point, crown what will you do?"

Prosecutor "At this time I do not have sufficient evidence to be able to answer those questions."

JUSTICE "Well since the crown is unable to answer the questions you posed, what would you like to do?"

Me "Get the fuck out of here."

JUSTICE "Release him immediately. I am staying these proceedings for the time being."

I was released and simply walked out.

A week later i got a call from the crown attorney office(how they got my number i dont know). They wanted to let me know that the crown is withdrawing ALL charges(was 16 counts of possession)

This was my first time doing it with my new understanding from Notice of Mistake.

I requested a transcript for the hearing, They said that they do not have the records. I didn't bother pursuing it. I knew I got them nervous.

Now for the next few times, all of it was very similar to the above. Had to face the same prosecutor several times. Clearly this guy wanted my ass. Every time I stood by it. Every time I filed my notice of mistake.

IF anyone is wondering, to file your notice you must have made a simple affidavit, attach the notice as exhibit "A" in your affidavit just put in "See attached exhibit "A"". Serve it on the crown, get it notarized and commissioned. I was

in jail so everything got done quick. You can make your own if you choose. Substance over form.

Last time was for the restraining order contempt. This was about a month ago. Cops were called was arrested blah blah. Was thrown in the slammer for 2 days. Finally went into the court. JUSTICE Nolan(total bitch 100%) was presiding.

Me "I reserve all ---".

JUSTICE "Shut up I don't want to hear it".

Me "How bout you suck dick? I still reserve all rights is there any objections?"

No objections.

Me "Let the record show that no objections were made and all rights has been reserved."

Prosecutor "This matter has been brought to my attention this morning. The individual before the court claims that he is not Mr. DEREK HILL"

Me "Objection, have you answered my questions. If so, i do not see any response or any response made or any similar instruments."

Prosecutor "Your honor, i do not understand what the accused is trying to say, I ask that ---"

Me "Objection, by what authority does the crown have to address me as the ACCUSED?"

Prosecutor "Your honor, clearly the accused ---"

Me "Objection, by what authority does the crown have to address me as the ACCUSED?"

JUSTICE "Look, listen I am trying to get this done so we can release you."

Me "Objection AND Point of Order, questions are before the court. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS".

JUSTICE "Shut up or I will hold you in contempt"

Me "IF its civil, where is the breach? If its criminal who is complaining?"

JUSTICE "I am adjourning this matter to give you some time to think about what you are saying".

Of course, I go back at the end of the day last case to be heard.

Me "I reserve all rights, is there any objections?"

No objections. JUSTICE has a different tone.

Prosecutor "It is the position of the crown and for the best interest of the public and JUSTICE that the charges be stayed for the time being"

JUSTICE "Do I understand you correct that the crown wishes to stay the proceedings?"

Prosecutor "Yes, your honor."

JUSTICE was clearly gritting her teeth at what was going on.

JUSTICE "Granted. Officer release him and give his belongings."

I was released. It was the same prosecutor who was trying to nail me several times. HE was not HAPPY not one bit. He was clearly red and squishing his lips.

There was a reporter, asked to interview me, I said no.

SO now that you got a gist of it, i will explain it the best i can.

JUSTICE and crown prosecutor is from the same club house. If you look up JUSTICE at dunn and brad company listing, you will see JUSTICE is operating as OF ONTARIO, PROVINCE. Its omitted now but you used to be able to see it.

All officers carries out the bidding of the company. The BC is owned by the province, that is what the crown is after. The thing is, they try to ding you as surety. By you failing to rebut any names they use such as ACCUSED, that means you accept SURETY. That is what compels you to perform. Remember something very important. Contract = Law. You are not surety. The signature on that BC is the surety. let them deal with it. The province holds the legal title for the name also, so therefor again they are liable not you. You also cannot forget that they did not inform you of what you were doing.

Another thing i would like to add. MISTAKE. MISTAKE is very powerful in itself. The reason is that if you read into the Rules of Civil Procedure Ontario Annual Practice, they MUST accept your mistake and correct it/adjust it from the beginning. Note the adjust. It's just accounting. The JUSTICE and the Crown have a vested interest to prosecute you. They make money by prosecuting you. They both work at the same company.

You do not understand the company rules, therefor you best not take part in it. Like Scott Duncan said, you are not in the club.

The dialog is from my memory. I retained the majority of the meaning on how it went. And yes, all those cases seems to...vanish from record....convenient.

Read Comments

Derek Moran

Clear. Concise. To the point, with no clutter. After reading this, other than Scott, i dont think anybody is qualified on this page to belittle you again Derek...and id tell'im if they did > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4GoalAVE7I

Derek Hill

liening the case file isnt required, but your objections become infinately more "heavy" as when you object no one has the authority to say anything since you liened the case file and hold all the value.

that is why when you lien the file and object, their options are VERY LIMITED.

Derek Hill

a proceeding can only continue if surety is present in order to proceed.

Questioning negates understanding.

not understanding negates any possibility of surety.

No surety = no proceeding.

Court CANNOT proceed until a surety is attached to the case file. You REQUIRE them to answer your questions.

Scott Duncan

Derek Hill, could I get your feedback, on another post made in a different thread?

You see an adult with an imaginary friend said the following: "Do you have any of those ? There is nothing here that can't be read or heard elsewhere and repeating to the uninformed might make you feel superior but it doesn't establish that position for you in my perspective."

In your experience, have you found this to be the case? :D

Scott Duncan

...and he claims I have no "original thought" too. Too stupid to see the irony of being programmed and claiming he has "original thought" :D

Sorry, still raging against the stupidity.

Nice work, Derek Hill. You ACTUALLY LISTENED. It almost makes this shit detail worthwhile.

Almost.

Eamonn O Brien

Fair play Derek... The notice clearly negates any possibility of the matter proceeding without first having the questions therein answered...

Quick question... Do you operate through your SIN number for employment?

If you did, would that be sufficient evidence for a prosecutor?

I play music for a living and simply agree a fee with bar owners for which there is no record so no taxes etc... I'd imagine I'm pretty safe? Might as well ask....

Derek Moran

NOTICE OF MISTAKE = ON/OFF

ON, once you answer these questions. . . . .until then, these proceedings will continue to remain OFF

The rub is of course- these are questions they never had any intention WHATSOEVER in answering on the Public Record to begin with, or else their JIG would be up.....in a sense, the Notice of Mistake has pre-determined that any proceedings were always destined to remain in OFF

..theres always the- "acting arbitrary/not following their own rules"-factor though, i suppose

Pete Daoust

WOW!!!....what a good wake up this morning :D, Thank you Derek Hill, thank you very much for sharing, I never made a tantrum on you in here because I KNEW you had great potential :D :D, and I was looking at all these people in here being hard on you, and I said HA HA, one day they will have to APOLOGIZE :D

Great stuff Man....( you guys never sleep or it's me that sleeps to much :/ )

Eamonn O Brien

Carl, you mentioned in the thread regarding the Guards stopping you but eventually letting you go that you had everything "up to date"... Wouldn't your license be considered an activity through the person?

Stuart Stone

Eamonn O Brien, Re licences etc. I have struggled with this issue of acting through the person while learning how to better defend myself in 'legal land'.

It is a mistake to use these documents as they are not mine. However, the guy at the side of the road holding a gun, a big stick and a shiny badge probably doesn't comprehend that he is not king dingaling & I'm not his bitch (nor are my loved ones who may be with me at the time)

In my experience to date, it is sometimes more prudent to just do as the crazy man with the gun says (under duress or as Authorised Representative) & then correct the mistake administratively later.

As I get better at dealing with these people, then my approach will evolve as well

Stuart Stone

Damn, I showed the guy with the gun at the side of the road my work permit...and then I remembered, holy crap, it's my day off today! That would be a 'mistake', but guns make me nervous & I was flustered, so please forward the time sheets if I was on duty ;-)

Eamonn O Brien

I know from experience that there's nothing you can say to these people that will prevent them from detaining you if one is driving illegally and thus in their eyes, breaking the law...

I've gone over possible conversations with these people in my head hundreds of times in preparation :p

If there's no breach of the peace then I don't understand their intent. Let them know that. They have to do what they have to do and vice versa... Notice of mistake can do the talking after that :D

Carl Dunne

The licence one is a hard one for me at present as i need it and am not qualified to drive not using it yet. I also have to take into consideration the fact i cannot be getting pulled out of it every and having it impounded daily as i am somebodies full time carer and spend allot of time back and forward to hospitals with him so my car is up to date and it's the only interaction i have with them. I have yet to be in court over any driving except no insurance but as i did have it the case was thrown out. Thats the thing i don't mind paying insurance if it's my choice to do so, i am not looking for a way to live for free and get out of paying my bills with all this i just simply cannot be a slave to them for no other reason than i will not live my life on my knees for any man.

Sirwade Firsbey

what I get now but I didn't see before was you don't have to get rid of your drivers license and ID and stuff the notice a mistake will take care of it in the courtroom because they can't get past the notice of mistake

Kelleran Holman

Congrats Derek Hill,... I was served Friday, for court on Monday, (not much time to send in paperwork) so my notice of mistake will be my weapon of choice, though it won't be notarized, I'm thinking a witnessed affidavit with attached "exhibit A" will suffice??

Kelleran Holman

lol, the kids left the gate open by accident for roughly 60 seconds, dog got ran out to greet two dogs and their owner, the "greeting" was not well received, and there was some altercation between his dogs and my dog, that lasted less than 30 seconds...so guy didn't want to talk to me or accept any apologies, just went off cursing, and swearing...a few days later animal control wants me to get a "licence" for the dog, I declined that offer....this was "on or about june 2"...I had all but forgotten about it till the cops came banging on the door...funny they would wait till 3 days before the court date, I would have registered mailed it back to them but I know it won't get there in time, so....

Derek Hill

ive been getting messages about family court and how i would approach it.

Im still working on a plan. Scott Duncan, if you be so kind to hit me up in skype for a bit?

Yes i know you said i cant do anything, but you did give tips such as lien the child and something else. But my memory fails me at the moment.

Scott Duncan

Yes. he follows my example. NO SECRETS. This isn't a fucking law firm. This is for EDUCATION, not for your personal problems.

Those that try to do shit "behind the scenes" help nobody but themselves.

You also did not listen to me when I said LOSE THE CAPS.

SO...

You will feel a tingling sensation, followed by...

BANNED! :D

Brenda Larson

Derek Moran I am still working on this. I have not given up. I must say that I understand this process a whole lot better today then I did when I tried it the first time. I will probably try it again shortly. One of my problems is that I don't have birth ceritificate for the notice of mistake, and according to Quebec vital statistic I never had.

Brenda Larson

Pete Daoust gave me the contact to get my live birth record in Quebec, just haven't gotten around to it yet. Chad Brodgesell I was never in possession of my birth certificate, because it was never issued. In the '60s in Quebec you got baptised along with getting your birth certificate. My mother was an atheist and so all I ever had I think was my live birth record. The RCMP stole all of my personal records and wouldn't return them, so I went and applied to Quebec vital statics for new documents. They told me that I needed my baptismal certificate to get my birth certificate and I could pay another $120.00 to get a birth certificate issued. They couldn�t find where a birth certificate had ever been issued for me. Told them I didn't have such a baptismal certificate, and never did. That all I really wanted was my live birth record. They told me that document was property of the hospital that I was born at. So I said ok tell me what hospital I was born at and I will get it myself. They said they couldn't do that and hung up. So now I have nothing. When I went to school, I started in Germany and I don't know what my mother did there to get me in. And once we moved to the states I got a green card, and again I don't know what my mother did there. I don't remember what info I used to get my driver�s license in the states but once we moved back to Canada I just traded my old driver�s license for one in Calgary.

Chad Brodgesell

That is really weird Brenda Larson and interesting at the same time as it shows that a BC is NOT required. Wonder if the LBR wait...but the BC states that the info IS AN EXTRACT of the LBR. Soooo.. the BC is just the PAPER proof that a security exists meaning the security is created from the LBR to begin with. Or am I wrong?

Brenda Larson

Well twice we got busted for weed and both times they dropped the charges against me. I'm just wondering whether that had anything to do with it? The RCMP just claimed that the old man took the fall for it so, he was the one that ended up with the charges, jail and court fines.

Brenda Larson

I never have had a citizenship card, and I have had passports, my last passport was also taken by the RCMP. Im thinking that everything was a lot less stringent in the past for getting passports and drivers licenses. I know that when I signed up the middle kid for school I never was asked for her birth certificate.

Derek Hill

hey curious Scott Duncan, is a restraining order a financial instrument and/or bond that generates revenue for the PROVINCE OF ONTARIO?

If so, then i guess JUSTICES have an incentive to keep restraining orders in place huh?

Derek Hill

well since i got 27 lawyers and 15 mps to fail to answer, im going to see duty counsil (for no reason other than asking questions) to see their reaction

The best reaction was the "get the fuck out of my office one"

Priceless one. Was in ottawa.

Pete Daoust

In writing seems to be more effective�.here is the way I do it.

I write them that I indeed received their bill of exchange, and I would like to take care of this matter as fast as I can.

As per the bill of exchange Act, you have the OBLIGATION of disclosing ALL methods available to me concerning this bill of exchange.

So, I am ASKING you, and REQUEST from you, all these methods.

Rest assured that I will take care of this matter as soon as I receive your response.

In good faith, with Respect, Honor, Dignity and Integrity

By:________________________ Master of PIERRE DAOUST (account Number: 119XXXXXXX)

Any thoghts would be greatly appreciate :D

Lei Gh

'Birth certificates that are NOT in ALL CAPS and have a BLANK BACK were issued to the Children and Grandchildren of VETRAN OFFICERS of WW2.' Does that entitle me to something more? And why did they not issue the same one when requested, instead of an ALL CAPS name?

Pete Daoust

OK�.just to get it straight,

I receive in MY mailbox a bill of exchange (Lettre de change in French) This thing is addressed to PIERRE DAOUST

I am the Lawful Holder of this thing called PIERRE DAOUST

So I have a duty of ASKING these guys who sent me this thing, on what to do with this thing

And, as per the Bill of Exchange act, these guys have a duty to DISCLOSE all the remittance methods available for me to deal this matter.

Or, maybe I can just re-direct, through Canada Post registered mail, this thing to its owner, which in my case, is Le gouvernement du Quebec ? ( I got this thought after Scott Duncan mentioned something about a nuke being delivered to my person by MISTAKE :/ )

Shall I include a Notice of Waiver if I decide to re-direct the thing to its owner ?

I�m in a process of using the option no. 1 with a specific Bill of Exchange received from Hydro-Quebec, and addressed to PIERRE DAOUST. I have sent my 3rd REQUESTS yesterday, and they keep the silence so far�.It�s been one complete year and NOTHING happened so far, they just keep sending me these bill of exchange, the last one I received was a $3600.00 appx bill of exchange. And, according to them, I have until July the 15th to take care of it, but since they don�t answer me, I can�t take care of it�.. :(

Scott Duncan

Your questions are IRRELEVANT. Derek Hill answered all of your questions (I really just typed that, didn't I?).

The fact that you THINK wrong and VALUE THE WRONG THINGS here, is not my problem.I ALWAYS give the answer. The RIGHT answer.

It does not matter if you are focused on the wrong things. Reality doesn't care.

Derek Moran

" Names on Birth certificates that are NOT in ALL CAPS and have a BLANK BACK were issued to the Children and Grandchildren of VETERAN OFFICERS of WW2."

Holy FUCK- i have to read this whole post but where did THAT observation come from, im sitting here absolutely GOBSMACKED...you just described and/or answered the questions regarding the Birth Certificate i have to a 'T'!

Chad Brodgesell

Leigh oftheHouseof Collins when serving the Notice of Mistake they will try to move past it as already described in this thread and another as well (wish I could paste but I can not). You DO NOT let them talk about ANYTHING else except answering the questions posed in the Notice of Mistake. That is riding out to meet them. Not letting them roam around. The QUESTION of WHO you are IN THEIR system is in question.

Derek Hill

Leigh OftheHouseof Collins

OP = Original Poster = Me.

Leigh I am in the same difficulty as you. I had my child which i love ripped from me without any reason.

Leigh its important to understand that arrest/probation/hearing/motion/form of defence/disclosure/summons/etc are ALL part of process.

Scott Duncan

No, because you SIGNED IT.

Now you get added to the provincial budget roll as a PEACE OFFICER for the fiscal years the ORDER covers.

All probation is: BUDGET PADDING for "Law enforcement". That money comes direct from the consolidated reserve fund.

Derek Hill

JUSTICE "I am making a peace bond for you for 6 months. You are ordered to keep the peace and be on good behaviour"

Me "ok, but i want 1.5mil a day for my services."

JUSTICE "You are out of your mind"

Me "I must be. I cant remain calm when fucktards like you are running the show"

Scott Duncan

ALL threads are written under The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

You can reproduce it and do whatever you like with it, as long as you:

1: Give Credit to the Authors 2:Never Make Money from it.

Scott Duncan

You are doing just fine, Chad Brodgesell. :D

AS AN ASIDE, REGARDING LICENCING: I only say NON COMMERCIAL for what is discussed in threads.

As I said in the OTHER thread by Kent Barrett, you are welcome to make as much money as people are dumb enouh to pay, off of Scott Duncanisms.

Scott Duncan

Knowledge is slipping behind the paywall. Aaron Swartz DIED fighting the Pay For Knowledge mentality people are developing. It truly disgusts me.

But making money FROM knowledge is what I ENCOURAGE! That is your key to liberty.

And those who gain wealth from my knowledge will already be smart enough to know AQUILAE is the ONLY "safe" bank. :D I'll have your money ANYWAY. :P

Scott Duncan

Scott Duncan appears on the PUBLIC RECORD, in yearbooks, "employment", etc.

I leave these markers to "prove" to early students that what I say is true. My "first batch" of "slaves" was a disaster. Scott Duncan only appears when it's most important.

Derek Hill

Scott, i just attempted to hold the original, but they refused to let me hold it and inspect it. Stating that its very valuable. No shit.

How would you go about obtaining the original if only for 5 seconds to void it.

PS. Security was called to have me removed....

Derek Hill

But the order was already made, and i was served with it. It would already be executed but i am probably wrong on this.

There is really no where to sign in, you go to the court clerk(with your number) and ask to see your case file. IT then have everything. The actual orders they must retrieve a special file for it, but they will not give it to me.

this order has been in effect since september, restraining order(if the same for voiding) is not present or that is what the clerk said.

Scott Duncan

Even better. They will scream and shout, and maybe even call the police...except there is a problem: If YOU are DEREK HILL, then it's your RIGHT to void it. Have you been given valuable consideration?

NO WAY!

Is there an INJURED PARTY? IT'S NOT A CRIMINAL CHARGE!

It's a UNILATERAL CONTRACT and it is MOST CERTAINLY your right to void.

Derek Hill

security removed me by force.

babys mama was there laughing...

I understand that its my right to void it, but the clerk wont give it to me to void it. I am just thinking how i can get the fucking thing in my hand for a brief moment.

Kelleran Holman

the tickets from my arrest thread...I voided by hand in red ink, no stamp handy at the time...still waiting to see how that turned out been a month now registered mailed tickets back with witnessed notice of mistake

Pete Daoust

The Civil Code comprises a body of rules which, in all matters within the letter, spirit or object of its provisions, lays down the jus commune, expressly or by implication. In these matters, the Code is the foundation of all other laws, although other laws may complement the Code or make exceptions to it.

Kelleran Holman

...also, to avoid there existing a blank side to my notice of mistake...I wrote in large letters "TURN OVER-----)" on the back side, so there could be no excuses about "all I see is a blank page"...no idea if that could/would happen, but better to have it covered I thought, lol

Sirwade Firsbey

when I was in prison they came and took our red ink pens we filed a lawsuit in the Federal Supreme Court and won because they said we had the right to make contract and they couldn't we couldn't make contract without the red ink pen

Cara Small

I would think, having agreement from 4 out of 5 parties would be pretty indisputable. I and "hubby" agree and I know the witnesses that were present would agree that we ALL had NO IDEA what was REALLY taking place. But what Freezebee said too.

Carl Dunne

Yes you are not declaring yourself as dead. The notice clears up a mistake that you have been identified as surety in whatever matter you have before the court so whoever gave you that advice is lying or ignorant.

Derek Moran

ORDER > BILL OF EXCHANGE > CONTRACT > no CONSIDERATION given to you = your RIGHT then to VOID it

GOVERNMENT not a PERSON > therefore GOVERNMENT not a PARTY > GOVERNMENT not even a TRUST > Government a CROWN-HOLDING-CORPORATION > HOLDING the TRUSTS > the TRUSTS being HELD, by the TRUSTEES > i.e. my TRUSTEE = REGISTRAR GENERAL of ONTARIO

Derek Moran

You actually helped clarify alot. Before i would've said- "GOVERNMENT is NOT a PERSON. GOVERNMENT is a TRUST" - BUT, you clarified that in talking with Scott, that actually:

"Governments are not trusts, they only hold trusts as the trustees..." ( Scott Duncan clicked LIKE on this)

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: EVERYTHING out of a court is revenue. They are all BILLS OF EXCHANGE and is attached to ACCOUNTING by way of a CHARGING INSTRUMENT.

..im guessing they NEED to get YOU to act as SURETY for that charging-instrument TOO, for them to succeed and get that REVENUE? ;)

Chad Brodgesell

Would that not be construed as hearsay, a document of? Also the Digital is derived from the Original. So if the Original is destroyed then all derived from it is of no force or effect. As long as you stand your ground on it. Just thoughts.

Brenda Larson

I'm thinking that you have something there Chad Brodgesell, cause I went into the court house yesterday and requested a true certified copy of the original order that I had voided (they say tampered with). They kept insisting that they give me a previously photocopied one and wanted to certify it as a true original copy. I told them no, I wanted a true certified original copy. Well the clerk said that she went through it and it is a mirror copy of the original. I said no. So I'm thinking that the reason why they don't want to give me the true certified original is because it is no longer valid, and they are not wanting to admit it. Trying to drag this out for as long as possible and hopefully I don't know what I have really done. Next time I go to family court I'm definitely going to have to challenge the validity of that document.

Brenda Larson

I had gone yesterday as well and voided the locate and detain order, and I sent it back by registered mail to the court house. They should have gotten it today. The cops wont come to the house, but instead are going around to the kids' friends homes and scaring the crap out of the parents. Of all things they have told the boyfriend's family that we are into some really bad shit and they're (cops) scared to go there because its dangerous. Now anybody with half a brain would internalize this and say well, if the kid was there and the cops wont go there to detain her, how is that in her best interest? They would leave a kid in a situation that the cops know is bad and not go and rescue her because they are scared to go to a place that is dangerous. What the hell. They wont come here cause they know that I have voided the order and I now what is going on and they would have a hard time taking her. Plus I have a camera set up in the front window.

Sirwade Firsbey

I would state I'm acting as power of attorney and ending the contract that is not answering what you're lying you're making a false statement you know that is a crime to make a false statement and accuse me of a crime that is not a crime