..oh wait a second - is that a CANLII -tab, i see opened-up on your screen?? Have you been looking-up 'CASE-LAW, Scott!?
Clubhouse-RULES...and you did say- "WHY?" to the BAR, Scott ;)
I just assumed you idiots would actually THINK and CHECK FOR YOURSELVES. I should have known better. I mentioned a long time ago...as I recall I was discussing the difference between a JUDGE and a JUSTICE.
They are cleaning the evidence up, the government of Ireland , the court service of Ireland are all listed on it better get screenshots before they vanish also
"Do you take Judicial Notice of the fact your Justice, that the GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO is currently 'Operating AS' Justice?"
..how did you refer to that again as, Scott- the 'Conflict of OATHS Doctrine?'
http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ReportSelectionCmd?dunsNumber=0&busName=THE%20GOVERNMENT%20OF%20IRELAND&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&address=GOVERNMENT%20BLDGS%2C%20UPR%20MERRION%20ST&city=DUBLIN&state=&zip=2&country=IE
That's something that throws me a bit Scott... D&B have THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND listed yet as you said the Government is not a corporation and not recognised as a Person... If you could shed some light on my confusion regarding this it would be a great help...
so since they remove or omitted province of Ontario listing, what other way to get it shown that JUSTICE operating as the PROVINCE OF ONTARIO.
This just goes to show that ever case or proceeding is already stacked against you because the crown attorney AND the JUSTICE presiding over the case both have a vested interest to profit and therefor require you to give your time and labour to GET that money to PAY for the FINES that the COURT ORDERED YOU to PAY AND/OR imprison YOU because YOU APPEARED without REBUTTING the JURISDICTION of the COURT.
"Do you take Judicial Notice of the fact your Justice, of the OATH you took to Queen Elizabeth Windsor the Defender-of-the-Faith and the Keeper-of-the-Trust, in the performance of your duties and/or obligations on the Bench and/or presiding over the court here today?"
This is even more obvious that the COURTS do not care what you say most often. Why take the chance and HOPE you can win when you can kill it before it even starts.
That is why it is even more important that everyone understands the NOTICE OF MISTAKE. It always has been just about accounting. Therefor, you already lost(unless you have a fucking amazing clear cut case against the crown).
Don't waste your time dealing with clubhouse rules(with very few exceptions) as the reasons are:
1. You are not part of the club.
2. You are not qualified
3. You are not surety unless you consent and agree with FULL knowledge
4. You do not know or have understanding of ALL of THEIR LAWS.
5. Contract = Law. This is important. Notice of Mistake rebuts all presumptions that contracts has been made past present and future.
OK, I admit it. I didn't see this one coming... :D
Derek Hill, you are the LAST one I'd expect to truly demonstrate UNDERSTANDING of NOTICE OF MISTAKE.
...yet here you are.
Scott Duncan, I used it so much that I beaten the thing into my head. 6 times I used it alone for "possession of marijuana" charges. ALL withdrawn(didn't bother liening).
I also used it for 2 charges of uttering a death threat to cops. 1 was flipping the bird. The other I told the cop to "die".
The last marijuana charge I didn't have time to get a notice of mistake but I had it drilled in my head, so I told them that I must make an affidavit orally. My affidavit was the same shit in the notice. Sufficient to say the charge was dropped.
Now I smoke weed around cops and I am left alone.
lets take it further. This notice of mistake applies to ALL COURTS. Including restraining orders, Child Support Payments and other similar things that you may encounter.
When I was talking to Scott Duncan, he said to lien the case file so you can claim all the equity(right term?) in that case file. I didn't quite understand it at the time, but now that I see that a court file number is just a business account number for the province of Ontario, it HAS YOUR NAME. CLAIM THE FILE NUMBER and EVERYTHING IN IT.
You can then direct it how you see fit.
Since you claimed all the value of the case file number, who is going to object to you putting your stuff in there?
This comment is speculative So maybe some direction from Scott Duncan would help.
..im guessing THEIR corporation-number would be somewhere on this link? ;)
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000074615&owner=exclude&count=40&hidefilings=0
Clearfield Doctrine
"Governments descend to the Level of a mere private corporation,
and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where
private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and
securities [checks] is concerned. ... For purposes of suit,
such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities
entirely separate from government." -
Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942)
What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private
commercial paper is used by corporate government, then
Government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no
different than a mere private corporation.
As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and
laws that govern private corporations which means that if they
intend to compel an individual to some specific performance
based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then
the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-
in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement
between it and the one upon whom demands for specific
performance are made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract
or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get to
the court to enforce its demands, called statutes.
This case is very important because it is a 1942 case after the
Erie RR v. Tomkins 304 U.S. 64, (1938) case in which the
Legislatures and Judiciary changed from legislating under
"Public Law", which was in consonance with the CONstitution,
to legislating under "Public Policy" according to the wishes
of the "Creditors of the US Corporation".
Steve Lemieux, you won't have to do it much longer.
I have to finish the OpenID parts (because fuck registrations) and http://thetenderforlaw.com is done.
thetenderforlaw.com will be its OWN OpenID node too, in case you don't want to associate it with any account...plus you can CREATE Facebook and Google accounts BASED on your Tender for law ID.
Yes it will be that fucking cool. :D