Scott Duncan

Jun 29, 2013 11:16 PM
...but keep in mind. http://youtu.be/0ghIU_tlX0k


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2013 11:16 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 29, 2013 11:36 PM
LIKE IT OR NOT... You are a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far... http://youtu.be/dK3O6KYPmEw


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2013 11:36 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 29, 2013 11:37 PM
http://youtu.be/IFRnd-UugUg


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2013 11:37 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2013 3:06 AM
The Morgan Freeman thing, is just because Morgan Freeman is cool :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 3:06 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Dwaine Carrillo

Jun 30, 2013 4:36 AM
The Holy Bible and "Jesus" are 100% man written and thought bullshit to control society. Jesus' so called ministry campaign is 100% totally dependant on the military campaign of Titus Flavius. The New Testament is the literary version of the Arch of Titus, which still stands in Rome today. Educate yourselves and stop with the imaginary friend bullshit. You people are a danger to society. Why do you think there is a book of Titus in the NT? That is God (Vespasian) instructing his son (Titus) on how to deal with & treat their newly acquired slaves- those unruly Jews thet defeated in the Roman-Jewish War, that lasted seven years from 66CE to 73CE. http://www.caesarsmessiah.com


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 4:36 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Dwaine Carrillo

Jun 30, 2013 4:40 AM
Do you REALLY think the Torah Jews during a bloody seven year with the Romans would have ushered in a pacifistic-tax paying messiah who believed it was okay to "give unto Caesar" and "Turn the other cheek"? Wake the fuck up!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 4:40 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Jun 30, 2013 4:54 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ATcainiaHg


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 4:54 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jun 30, 2013 6:17 AM
which is pretty funny considering I regularly have proven to me that a higher authority watches out/over for me. twice today as a matter of fact. only have the belief because i am provided proof regularly, proof you wouldnt typically recognize without knowing what/how it presents itself. I was just drunk traveling home on my 1600cc scooter, stopped at the train depot the next town over to light up a smoke. not a minute passes when a truck officer comes around the bend and asks if everything is ok. yep, fine, just stopping to light a smoke. he said 'thats a nice bike, and i said, well yes and that is a nice truck.' then he turned around and went back. must be a camera in the station, because the police station isnt more than a few hundred feet, but down a hill around the bend. he couldnt have known i stopped in there otherwise unless he was hiding stealthily in the shadows. didnt ask me for an id or any papers. young kid too....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 6:17 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2013 3:41 PM
David Johansen I really hope that was a failed attempt at a joke. If that's all it takes for you to think "sky-daddy", then you are far too stupid to be here. You DON'T have a "guardian angel". The events you describe have nothing to do with "invisible sky daddies" , and your conclusion represent a profound inability to critically think. ...so there's NOTHING "pretty funny" about that. If you think that "proved" that an invisible sky-daddy is watching out for you, then you need to step out of this group and never come back, because the only thing that will possibly happen, is that you leave shit-stains on my forum. The profound stupidity necessary to reach the conclusion that "sky daddy" is the most reasonable explanation could only come from the brain-damaged processor, that is the infection of the noble lie. You need to start from scratch. You have NO critical thinking ability. The LEAST likely answer is what YOU think is the default position. Do you see the problem here?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 3:41 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jun 30, 2013 4:18 PM
my ability to think and the way I think has been altered greatly since interacting with you, and that has been greatly positive. i also know that the act of thinking itself imparts energy. if one looks for a particle where they think it is supposed to be at any given moment, the thought itself imparts enough energy upon the particle to physically move it so that it is nolonger where you think it should be, but only insomuch of the fact that such a particle is of a mass to be sensitive to display such a reaction. I know that within the tender for law realm, there is no room or place for a 'belief', not based or founded on a proveable fact, but that basis has to also include that other realms may be evident, just that they are not includeable, and that i am capable of keeping those realms seperable from interacting sofar as to prevent one from clouding the judgement of the other even thou the perception of realms may overlap. now i dont think 'sky daddy', but i do think outside influences.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 4:18 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2013 4:21 PM
I consume 4000 calories a day. I weigh 180 lbs. I don't exercise ( i should) and those calories are being burnt up by something, and thought is the bulk of what I do. Yes, it consumes energy. A lot of it.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 4:21 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jun 30, 2013 4:44 PM
I see that there could be a problem, yet proper handling of any event can lead to certain conclusive outcomes which can be either positive or negative relative toward other events. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking I do know that the incident that occured last night was mostly within my control to affect a specific outcome based on my capacity to interact with the other party. his intent was to gauge his actions upon my revealing capacity, and that as soon as i spoke he knew somehow that talking to me would lead to his belief being challenged to a point which he could not defend. my belief is only within the realm that everyone has the right to accept their own belief, and that substituting an alternate belief without questioning is the fault that lie(s) within a belief renders such a belief to be open to the interpretation of others. my belief is only based and founded on those conclusions of outcomes which are founded on my own personal observations through a scientific point of view insomuch that everything that happens has to have some form of energy imparted upon it. otherwise a stone can not move on it's own as it has no will, and inorder for that stone to move some outside force has to interact with it, and since the stone has no eye to see, it must conclude that their is the presence of an outside force. as that is the only logical conclusion nomatter how illogical such a conclusion may be. spock once said, when all logical options are considered and found not to be true, then that which is illogical must be logical. this was proven to me, when one time i was reassembling a dashboard and dropped a screw which i could not find but i knew it had to be there somewhere, it could not have vanished but still it was nowhere to be found, so i dropped another screw to see what would happen, it only reaserted my belief that the illogical must be logical because it had little to no rebound off the carpeting and therfore the first screw mush be there somewhere. i did eventually find it lodged within the seat track above where it had fallen, outside of being viewable, but only after i had concluded that was where it must be, in an illogical position.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 4:44 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2013 4:54 PM
You want to read/view MICHAEL SHERMER (Ph.D.) for thoughts/methods/understanding on critical thinking. http://www.michaelshermer.com/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 4:54 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jun 30, 2013 5:05 PM
earlier yesterday in the persute of trading work for exchangeable value i neglected to check the camera mount. the day before i washed the front half of the bike and had removed it. half a mile down the highway something bounced off my right toe and the camera was nolonger on it's perch, i THOUGHT i watched it bounce as i traveled away and the oncoming traffic would take care of it. in any event, i looped around and retraced that step without even so much as locating it. i continued and stopped some 15 miles down the road for a pack of butts and while i was looking for a match i noticed the camera lodged between the rear brake lever and the front exhaust pipe. totally unscathed, intact and functioning ailbet somewhat warm! the fact is that if i had tried to put it there and then traveled 80mph for 15 minutes down the bumpy highway it would have been impossible for it to have remained on it's own and not simply vibrated loose because at 80mph my bike shakes like the dickens. it was just sitting there loose with the correct end against the exhaust pipe (not the rubber lens covering) and lying between the brake cylinder bolt and the thin foot lever actuator. if it had turned 90* it would have fallen through. the only logical conclusion however illogical must atleast be considered as an available option. the affect upon me would have only been the cost to replace the item, which would have made me need more money to spend that i do not readily have at my disposal, and therfore the resulting situation saved me from having to continue to go along with the belief that i dont have enough money to afford to possess those things i want. IMHO it is not the belief's as we all have a certain ammount of them based upon different experiences, it is the putting those beliefs within the improper realm of where they belong, and/or do not belong. I believe that i am only along on the train for a ride and not the conductor, but that is also limited within a specific realm, because when i am traveling upon the bike, its handling is totally within my control, and that it is what becomes placed or presented within my path of traveling that is outside of my control requiring the ability to recognize and avoid such things and prevent the chain of events that can cause them to occur within the realm of that which i am in control of. it is not a belief, but simply something i have learned to accept.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 5:05 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2013 5:08 PM
Your point eludes me.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 5:08 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jun 30, 2013 5:45 PM
i do not think that there is anything wrong with that. your level of knowledge is far superior to my capacity to pen. I will read that with an open mind, thankyou. i do agree that there is no God, but there has to be somthing, for if there were nothing there would not be anything. my belief lies within the questioning of newtons law of motion, that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. and that an atom at rest requires an outside force to be applied inorder for it to split because it has no potential to do such a thing on its own, otherwise it might just aswell be a rock. coupling that with E= creates the conclusion that something equal to the total energy output of the universe may have been converted from one form into another as matter can not be created or destroyed only changed in its form. such a thing requires a form of energy, and that energy was used in a specific manner requiring conscious thought otherwise it would have simply remained dormant like a rock.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 5:45 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2013 11:15 PM
"...God, but there has to be somthing" - Based on what? Your ADMITTEDLY limited comprehension of the universe? Really? You don't see a problem with that sweeping declaration, based on ignorance? WHY do you think "There must be Something"?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 11:15 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2013 11:17 PM
Seriously. WHAT thought process do you rely on, to reach that conclusion?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2013 11:17 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Icbeonne Senama

Jul 01, 2013 1:56 AM
Here's a thought. Everything is made up of "energy". Energy always has it's source. Either you KNOW the source or it remains hidden. So either you are the source itself or something you DON'T KNOW is. Making shit up to explain something you don't understand or taking someone else's words as an explanation for something that is unknown adds no VALUE to yourself and only adds to the confusion that is used to keep man in the DARK. :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2013 1:56 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jul 01, 2013 2:02 AM
...and here in reality, energy is just a measure of work. Look it up :P Emphasis on the word MEASURE. If it can't be measured, IT'S NOT REAL!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2013 2:02 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: