Answer to question of this thread--Yes. Now, can you point me to the thread that mentions the effect of this cause. ie, they come and get you and drag you kicking and screaming to jail and more court. Presume Notice of Mistake was ignored.
It depends in what capacity you attend the court eg: amicus curiae or sui juris etc...
If you stand your ground & continually make it very clear that you are unable to understand the nature & cause of proceedings until the questions in the notice of mistake are answered, then how can you be dragged away if you are merely seeking answers and asking questions ie: remaining honourable?...
If, by your assertion you are still ignored & dragged away, then you have probably been kidnapped, so a writ of habeus corpus probably needs to be filed on your behalf...
Dean Kory's final court appearance audio discusses the notice of mistake & the thread re Dean Clifford's arrest & detainment discusses the notice of mistake & habeus corpus in the body of the comments in that thread (I think)...happy reading
that's the trick. basically your telling them unless they read the notice, to answer it's questions, which is a deception to get them to read it proving they got the notice, now its part of the record!
brillient!
they will do anything to keep from doing that once they realize how it catches them at their own game. which wont take long, they'll be sure and distribute a pamphlet warning all justices.
i get a cookie now?
As far as I know, you can go if you have a "security interest" in the estate/trust/legal person/entity that they are "charging". Just gotta make sure that they know that that entity is NOT you, the man/woman. You the man/woman are not the surety.
To "discharge", settle and close the accounting on the event. You don't HAVE to go. It depends on if you have control over, or an interest in, the legal person. If you remain outside the legal realm, and do not claim any control over your transmitting utility, fine. Let them do their thing.