Derek Moran

Jun 03, 2013 7:44 PM
I think the JP might end-up telling you- "Have you exhausted your private-administrative-remedy, before bringing this before the courts...?" - ala, Matthew 18:(or something)- "Go to your brother 3 times, with 2 or 3 witnesses...if you cannot settle your dispute, THEN bring it before the church/court"


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 03, 2013 7:44 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jun 04, 2013 5:22 AM
that was before the 'church' was a registered not for profit corporation, now they are on the other team's side!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2013 5:22 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Sirwade Firsbey

Jun 04, 2013 8:23 AM
David like Scott said this was a evolved process to facilitate greed. The church has been part of the deception for a very very long time. It goes back even before jesus.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2013 8:23 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Sirwade Firsbey

Jun 04, 2013 8:24 AM
As for the reason of the statement "YOU CANT MIX CHURCH AND STATE" That is because you cant mix what is already together.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2013 8:24 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Dean Kory

Jun 05, 2013 12:45 AM
Ontario Judicial Council The Role of the Ontario Judicial Council The Ontario Judicial Council was established by the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, Ch. C.43 to investigate complaints made by the members of the public about conduct of provincially-appointed judges. In addition, it approves the continuing education plan for provincial judges. The Council has approved criteria for continuation in office and standards of conduct developed by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice which are called the Principles of Judicial Office. Any complaint about the conduct of a federally-appointed judge in Ontario should be directed to the Canadian Judicial Council in Ottawa. Composition of the Council and Terms of Appointment The Ontario Judicial Council includes: the Chief Justice of Ontario (or designate from the Court of Appeal) the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice (or designate from the Ontario Court of Justice) the Associate Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice a Regional Senior Judge of the Ontario Court of Justice appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council on the recommendation of the Attorney General two judges of the Ontario Court of Justice appointed by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice the Treasurer of The Law Society of Upper Canada or another bencher of the Law Society who is a lawyer, designated by the Treasurer a lawyer who is not a bencher of The Law Society of Upper Canada, appointed by the Law Society four persons, neither judges nor lawyers, who are appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council on the recommendation of the Attorney General The judges appointed by the Chief Justice, the lawyer appointed by the Law Society of Upper Canada, and the community members appointed by the Lieutenant Governor hold office for four year terms and may not be re-appointed. In the appointment of these members to the Council, the importance of reflecting Ontario�s linguistic duality and the diversity of its population and ensuring overall gender balance on the Council is recognized. Making a Complaint If you have a complaint about the conduct of a provincially-appointed judge, you must state your complaint in a signed letter. The letter of complaint should include the date, time and place of the court hearing and as much detail as possible about why you feel there was misconduct. If your complaint involves an incident outside the courtroom, you will need to provide as much information as you can about what you feel was misconduct on the part of the judge. For more information, see the Council�s brochure, Do you have a complaint?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2013 12:45 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


B-Rad Jibson

Jun 05, 2013 1:32 AM
The JP will tell you to get a lawyer. Speaking from my experience. To which I replied are you telling me I have to pay for justice? To which he responded no I am telling you to get a lawyer. So I left and dealt with it through letters. Then crown said they are taking no action and that was the last I heard of it.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2013 1:32 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Dean Kory

Jun 05, 2013 1:33 AM
she tried that and i put her in her place with my full hour explaination on how thats never gonna happen!lol!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2013 1:33 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Jun 10, 2013 8:02 PM
Private Prosecution A prosecution commenced by a member of the public, as opposed to a peace officer. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/glossary/?id=340


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2013 8:02 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Jun 10, 2013 8:07 PM
"When the information is presented to the court by a private CITIZEN...a private CITIZEN's right to swear an information is always subject to the Crown's right to intervene and take over the prosecution." http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/private_prosecution.asp


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2013 8:07 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Jun 10, 2013 8:13 PM
Interesting is the difference in the wording: my first post = PUBLIC. . . . .second post = CITIZEN, same subject though. . . . .hmmmmmmmm :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2013 8:13 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Michael Webb

Jun 10, 2013 8:26 PM
SHITIZEN = PUBLIC.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2013 8:26 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Jun 10, 2013 9:07 PM
2. In this Regulation, �approved device� means a device for recording sound of a type approved by the Attorney General, as mentioned in subsection 5 (1) of the Act. O. Reg. 158/03, s. 2. Certification of recordings 3. (1) A recording made under subsection 5 (1) of the Act by means of an approved device shall be certified in Form 1 by a person who, (a) is authorized to record evidence and proceedings under subsection 5 (1) of the Act; and (b) is in charge of the approved device while the recording is being made. O. Reg. 158/03, s. 3 (1); O. Reg. 109/11, s. 1. (2) The certificate in Form 1 is admissible in evidence and is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the recording is a recording of evidence and proceedings in the proceeding. O. Reg. 158/03, s. 3 (2); O. Reg. 109/11, s. 1. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_030158_e.htm


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2013 9:07 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Dean Kory

Jun 10, 2013 10:16 PM
Lovely "House Rules!"...I have a few of my own too! lol!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2013 10:16 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Jun 11, 2013 12:30 AM
PUBLIC: 1. "...a term of uncertain import it must be limited in every case by the CONTEXT in which it is used..." Jennings v. Stephens 1936 (U.K.) 3. "...Appropriate to denote those OUTSIDE the immediate circle of those who control the company." Morrisons Holdings Ltd. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, 1966. The Dictionary of Canadian Law, 3rd-edition.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2013 12:30 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Jun 11, 2013 12:40 AM
PUBLIC n. The whole body politic, or the aggregate of citizens of a state, county, or community. In one sense EVERYBODY, and accordingly the body of the PEOPLE at large; the community at large, without reference to the geographical limits of any corporation like a city, town, or country; the PEOPLE. In another sense the word does not mean all the PEOPLE , nor most of the PEOPLE, nor very many of the PEOPLE of a place, but so many of them as contradistinguishes them from a few. Accordingly, it has been defined or employed as meaning the inhabitants of a particular place; all the inhabitants of a particular place; the PEOPLE of the neighborhood. Also, a part of the inhabitants of a community. Black's Law 6th-edition.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2013 12:40 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Sirwade Firsbey

Jun 11, 2013 12:44 AM
what does the 4th ed say?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2013 12:44 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: