very good. Did you get a marriage license? If so did you revoke it?

no marriage,we were "common law" lol!

lol, who's common law? You mean the one you just contacted too?

Dean Kory, I am confused. What exactly is that and what is it purpose and the proposed procedure to achieve the intended purpose? I apologize if I am out of the lool as to background in the matter.

loop*

the purpose is to claim your child, you gave up your child to the state via Birth Cert. after seven years the state than claims to be the trustee of the child if not claimed.

this is my claim to my "offspring" look up the act mentioned and youll see that the government makes a salvage claim to your child because you in registering them abandoned them!

Dean , did you revoke your 'common law' statis?

I am a man with inherent rights and jurisdiction (common law)

Is the state not a trustee of your human rights and fundamental freedoms? Does that not make you a beneficiary of said rights and freedoms? Did you not place your trust in your trustee, your trustee having far superior legal knowledge, not to take any action to induce you into any type of contract which would abrograte your human rights and freedoms absent your clearly knowingly and willingly agreeing to such abrogration? Could your conduct now of relying upon a provision of an Act (contract), which I suspect you never knowingly and willingly agreed to enter into at the expense of your human rights and freedoms, not imply that you willingly and knowingly agreed to be bound by that statute?

That is WHY I don't expose myself to freedom-on-the land stuff.....it can fuck my head very good, I just stay away from it for now.

In the witness stand..."Please...does anyone here in this courtroom have the balls to discuss the elephant in the room...or am i the only "MAN" here?

Very good Dean. You sound just like Scott. But youre not Scott! Youre learning... So... as much as for yourself as for others here... Reexplain all this, esp your last posting... In your own words

Thoes are my own words,I am not Scott and i say Scott sounds like me!

This is all balanced on capacity of the NAME as it appears on the information!

yup Definition of MAN: A human being. A person of the male sex. A male of the human species above the age of puberty. In feudal law. A vassal; a tenant or ... thelawdictionary.org/man/

Ls is the flag and the trillium really good things to have on this? I smell alot of problems from doing that. Why don't you use the Coca-Cola symbol? Or....ACME? Or the Queens? Or your own? I think Ill make one and have it aurhorized by The X-Men and the Justice League of America!

The notice is to Ontario Canada.

When i remove and rebut all presumptions,the courts definitions loose strength...I'm demanding an interpreter for the hearing because i dont understand the language they use!

"Laws are not "written" into existence. Rather, laws are discovered�in nature. To write them is only to acknowledge them. Contrast this with legislation. Legislation CAN be written into existence. But legislation is not law. It is something different. Something lesser than law. Indeed, sometimes written legislation runs contrary to law. It is different in another way, too: in order for government-written legislation to be binding on an individual, the individual must consent to being governed. That consent must be voluntarily given. It cannot be coerced or forced or obtained fraudulently in any manner and still remain legitimate. If the individual does not consent, the legislation can have no binding effect on the individual. The people need to realize that legislation is not law, and that the individual does not lose claim to the title of "lawful citizen" or "law-abiding citizen" if they choose to disregard legislation that they do not consent to. For example: some people feel they must register their firearms if they want to be able to say with a straight face that they are a "law-abiding gun owner". But this is not true. They can ignore the patently unjust legislation, and still call themselves law-abiding citizens. It is only the criminally-corrupt government which will conflate law-breaking with legislation-breaking and try to label the gun owner a criminal." - Christopher Sanborn

"Presumptions"...can you give me a few key examples? And defining definitions is critical? What if they tell you that your ignorance of their definitions is not an excuse? Whose definitions matter? And...lose strength? (I asaume you're not saying that they possess wanton power? That the power of their definitions run unabated? Rrue, but ia THAT what youre saying? Loose/Lose...) Either it has atrength...ans validity, or it doesnt. Theres no varying degree! Its either valid or its not, it doeant decrease in validity or applicability....their preaumprions and definitions cant "kinda sorta" apply. They either do or don't. I hope my advocacy with Saitin (metaphor for those ready to jump all stupid on my parables, analogies, and examples. Its not a literal comment, for those that love to get shit off track) proves constructive sparring. Train hard fight eaay right?

They first need you to step into the octagon! Thats the fist presumption! I dont enter,they cant fight!They first have to establish jurisdiction!

Legislature... I get that ok...Now explain how that relates to the identification card in your OP

...and how do they eatablish juriasiction?

Sorry for the typos, cell is freezing BAD and most posts fail to send. Second try at this one

Answer: In international law, the general principle is that the jurisdiction of an international tribunal in contentious matters is based on the consent of the parties to the dispute. Therefore, it is essential that they express their consent to the jurisdiction of the tribunal in order for it to be able to settle the difference that has arisen between them.

In admiralty law it is a military closed tribunal,hence ,(no jury trial)thats why the crown is proceeding summery conviction,to keep this in statute court!

I am bringing this to a higher"competent court of proper jurisdiction!"

Summary conviction (Summery conviction is a product of Calvin Klein) :p

There is a thread on here somewhere explaining how this is done!

The higher up the courts the more your rights are recognised I think...

....so dont ask Scott...he dont like repeating himself!lol!

I can appeal to the high court to stop the lower court!

All this brings me ALWAYS to these 4 questions 1). Who is ME ? 2). Who are they ? 3). What do they want. 4). What is this place where they OBLIGE you to be in.

i,ll search for the correct info on it and repost it!

Here are the facts. One, if you don't show up for court a warrant will be issued for your arrest will be issued. Two, if you do show up, and you know how to deny jurisdiction, they will likely proceed with scheduling a trail regardless. Three, the facts of the matter will largely determine their ability to properly gain jurisdiction regardless whether you subsequently deny it at court. Four, if you do not show for that trial they will proceed in your absence and a warrant may very well be issued for your arrest. So what do you do when the facts of the matter establish that your rights have been violated and they are proceeding against the person regardless?

you pinned the tail on the servant!

What exactly does that mean?

I dont care what they do,dont care if they rail road me or convict me,all i care is that i tried my best,keep good records and go after them like a mad man in civil court afterwards!

Go after them for what? And why would you go after them afterwards?

Im not gonna cry about them ganging up on me! I,M A MAN...i,l get up dust myself off and go after the suns of bitches one by one!

For violating my human rights James...know what thoes are?

PRINCIPALS IN LAW WORTH DYING FOR!

What about "indictable" convictions? Ia a Canasian court an "international tribunal"? And if so, how? And how can one party not consent to "contentious matter" if one is brought up? Is it..ah...a conflict of interest then if the court thats residing over mattee the one making the accusations. Like id I said hou kixked my cat rhen determine somehow rhat I have the power to determine hour guilt without a higher authority? That authority, according to you, is who? Certainly not the same party againat you? So who then...Admiralty court? But...who do they reside over....tribunal (judge/jury) Courts? And what legialatures or natural laws do THEY follow? Under what premises. And now you bring in this Admiralty law stuff...how does THAT aply to...ah....your kid and that I.d. above? ?

Dean, what human rights specifically? Where are those human rights enunciated? And, why are you not going after them now if they are violating your human rights?

YOU ALL HAVE LOTS OF GOOD QUESTIONS....I WILL DO MY BEsT TO GET THE ANSWERS!

shit...caps were stuck on!lol!

Some do not ask questions to which they do not already know the answers.

No Dean I don't want you to look up one damn thing. I dont want Scott repeating himself. I don't want you repeating what Scott said...or what anyone said...

Shit this cell

I only want what YOU remember, what YOU have learned from (primarily) Scott et al

In Canada is the common law informed by Canada's international obligations?

Closed book quiz time brother! Many queations yes, but I want anawers delevant to you, what you know, and how it all relates to your OP. And why what youre TRYING to do is important to THIS GROUP.

All i know for sure is that everyone here has helped me exercize my mind and prepare me to go into the belly of the beast,we can play intellectual tug of war on here for days...on the day that counts i will be alone and thats what the court wants,no witnesses.we have to show the court that the public is loosing confidence in the administration of justice because of the corruption!

SUPPORT EACHOTHER!

Hey remember what we used to do to Billy Ritchey? We'd beat him up every day, and not because we didn't know how to fight, but make sure he did!

Have you read the Court of Justice Act (Ontario) whereby the jurisdiction/authority of each court is detailed?

YES! IM INTO THAT DRY READ SINCE YESTERDAY!

Are you near section 11 yet?

So bring me then fuck, I'm a country boy at heart and I'm comfy around piles of shit

I really dont care why they do what they do,thats there rules and procedures not mine.

ill drop these parisites and go before a high court judge and jury!

Well, shouldn't you know which court can hear and provide remedy respecting the rights you claim are violated?

Superior Court of Justice

:)

That is NOT the family court branch which is often at the same court house.

I know!

Have you filed an action their respecting the alleged violation of your rights?

working on it as we "type"...talked to a friendly JP who gave me direction on that very topic!

The government (corp) Does this with our consent. Once I take away my consent they lose jurisdiction. They cant deal with the LAWFUL MAN because they no longer have a contract with the person. Statues or nothing more then company by-laws. if I am no longer a company employee I don't fall under them. When I quit a job at lets say McDonald's can McDonald's come after me for going to work for burger king? No this is foolish and they would look foolish filling claim. Only by fear do they keep us thinking we have to stay on board, if we don't we will get into a lot of trouble. This is what the notice of mistake does it removes this presumption that we still work for them it end's the contract we was tricked into.

They dont realize this but i have more than half the court house seceretly rooting for me!

Who are the defendants? What are your causes of action? Where are your rights you are claiming were violated enunciated?

waite...i might just be a fool if they are just encouraging me to run into a brick wall for their entertainment!lol!

The right to make or break contract

John, the notice of mistake helps to establish facts of the matter and rebut certain presumptions. However, and also depending upon other facts of the matter, that doesn't mean that they will withdraw the charges notwithstanding your subsquently expressed "non-consent".

i dont want a withdraw at all...i acually want to proceed to a trial ,use this situation as a catalist to expose all the crap the police and CAS and family court have done to me and my child!

the presumptions are the contract James. Their contract is with the "PERSON" not with the "MAN".

its fucking up there attempt to label and accuse me of trying to buck a claim!

Dean they wont let it get that far if you do it correctly.

If I do it correctly...I WILL TAKE IT THAT FAR AND JAM IT UP ALL THERE ASSES!

They will dismiss the case.

They wont dismiss me!

Dean, if you want to proceed to trial know that you ARE then in there as a class of person having it rights/privileges and duties conferred upon it by Her Majesty. You WILL NOT and CANNOT be recognized in there as a living man. There is a reason the Crown prosecutor has a 96% success rate.

Okay so how then will you do this become part of their club?

Who are you Dean ? The person or the man?

I know who and what i am,the MAN,and i will keep my identity throughout!

The court cant /wont acknoledge the man Dean

The court is part of the company.

Well sit back with a bag of popcorn and watch the show cuz i intend to change all that!

Every court is a company court

Do you think that they may perhaps deem you to be operating under the designation of a legal person and then trying to cllaim rights (human rights) which that legal person cannot enjoy?

...at least thats gonna be my attitude going in there! lol!

Why do you wish to keep giving them power over you?

Did we not just talk about where YOUR court was???

Every "COURT" on this planet is a court for the company

Thats not my wish at all...im keeping in the identity of MAN and yes im bringing this to the higher court!

is that court a company court?

You/I cant win on thier play ground they hold all the cards

Dean didn't you state you state you are a "man with inherent rights and jurisdiction (common law)?

The only way to win is to not play the game

And doesn't section 11 of the Courts of Justice Act appear to accomodate such rights and jurisdiction whereby it state: Superior Court of Justice 11.(1)The Ontario Court (General Division) is continued as a superior court of record under the name Superior Court of Justice in English and Cour sup�rieure de justice in French. 1996, c. 25, s. 9 (3). Idem (2)The Superior Court of Justice has all the jurisdiction, power and authority historically exercised by courts of common law and equity in England and Ontario. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 11 (2); 1996, c. 25, s. 9 (17).

Just more club rules

Do you think so? Where would you go to have your common law rights heard and remedy sought?

Civil!

That appears to be what section 11 is expressly stating - Superior Court of Justice.

I can still make contract with other and have that clime seteled in a court but be weary because now your entering thier club house

you can almost hear the spooky music in the background when you say that!lol

I have no fear of them!

Every corporation's charter is given by the big government corp so watch out who you do business with

If indeed your human rights have been violated, and the facts will show that, then would you not perhaps want to file an action at the Superior Court of Justice, where common law and equity CAN BE HEARD, and seek, inter alia, an order quashing the illegal proceedings at the lower court?

thats the info i read on here in another thread! thanks!

i have it saved!

np - it took us a while to get there, but instilling questions in another as opposed to merely giving answers seems to assist in the comprehension. I suggest you review a few of the other questions I posed to you. You will also need to understand the Rules of Civil Procedure which are promulgated under the Courts of Justice Act. Good luck.

i have a hard copy on civil procedure!

So how can you find remedy if they can only protect the "person " not the man?

James Allan makes a lots of sense here....and it brings me back to this :D 1). Who is ME ? 2). Who are they ? 3). What do they want. 4). What is this place where they OBLIGE ME to be in.

you have to admit it though Pete...it is fun dancing around the ring!

The club rules only are set up to protect the "person" they are not set up to protect the man.

some times he get it right

IT'S ALL ABOUT SURETY AND ACCOUNTING :D

Dean Kory, I HATE dancing, I really do, serious... :(

so if all else fails...MAKE IT COST THEM A FORTUNE!

Removing your self cost them money Dean Clifford

Your "person is worth 145 million

Which they no longer have access too.

even if everyone going to court plead NOT GUILTY and took it judge and jury all the way...the system would collaps!

Hey guys, I don't want to fuck up all these beautiful freem dumb-ass on the land theories but here is what I think :D :D :D 1). Who is ME ? 2). Who are they ? 3). What do they want. 4). What is this place where they OBLIGE ME to be in.

FOCUS on the major !, fuck the rest :D

Nothing gets past the reality of who you are ,who they are,where you are and why!

I THINK, maybe I'm wrong on this but I really think that if I masterize 1). Who is ME ? 2). Who are they ? 3). What do they want. 4). What is this place where they OBLIGE ME to be in. I can be very powerfull But hey, you know how dumb I can be, so verify this before you listen to me :D :D

One more time Pete...for the ones way in the back!

nahh!!!...I will feel I'm disturbing :D

1). Who is ME ? I�m the lawful Holder in due course of the accused PERSON, I�m the SOLE beneficiary of this PERSON, I reserve all rights. 2). Who are they ? So far, I see NOBODY, or maybe a Corporation of some types :/ but, no PERSONS has been showed up yet :/ 3). What do they want. They seems to want to fuck around with MY person�s surety, and since I�m the SOLE beneficiary of this PERSON, I may want to set things straight, maybe a NOTICE OF MISTAKE will help. 4). What is this place where they OBLIGE ME to be in. A BUNKER :/ :D

Look, I know that what I say, it's always said in a PRIMITIVE type of ways, I can't find SEXY long story to express these thoughts, and after all, I'm a fucling TOKEN in here :D

dont sell yourself short...your a MAN!

act like it!

you're :D

grammar natzi!

Token who would like to graduate :D

I am cargo that need to be filled with truth.

You're an idiot :D

honesty hurts sometimes! lol!

Oppsss...sorry, I have to stay CIVIL :/

Scott said i was cargo so go look up "cargo"

Sorry, no time for that :/

So, if I get arrested and bring to jail, of course, I have no INTENTIONS on doing this, but, we never know what can happen� If I REALLY have done something UNLAWFUL and I REALLY know it, I may plea guilty�.. in ANY other circumstances�I will shut up and keep my HANDS away from ANY pen or pencils I will eventually have to tell them WHO I AM, and I will wait until I�m in front of a guy/woman with a balck robe, who is suppose to be competent and fair. 1). Who is ME ? I�m the lawful Holder in due course of the accused PERSON, I�m the SOLE beneficiary of this PERSON, I reserve all rights. They will have to tell me WHO THEY ARE 2). Who are they ? So far, I see NOBODY, or maybe a Corporation of some types :/ Where is the INJURED party ? Which CONTRACT that I breached ? They may want to ask me if I am a belligerent ? :D , if they ask this question 3 times, they are offering me FULL sovereignty ?, so by what authority they declare war on MY person ? They will have to tell me what they want� 3). What do they want. They seems to want to fuck around with MY person�s surety, and since I�m the SOLE beneficiary of this PERSON, I may want to set things straight, maybe a NOTICE OF MISTAKE will help, or, they will have to point me WHERE is the SURETY of my PERSON. Without surety, what do we have ? NOTHING ? Oh, and everything they may say that seems to be some STRANGERS�s rules or regulations, I will ALAWAYS say the same thing: I DON�T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALIKING ABOUT. 4). What is this place where they OBLIGE ME to be in. A BUNKER ? OK, CAN I GO HOME NOW ? But then again, verify ALL this with someone COMPETANT :D

Competent, sorry... :/

Great thread! Not all of my questions were necessarily answered but I did ask a lot of questions!

Lol I was just gonna say Pete... So Dean, how does your OP pic tie into all this? What is the purpose of it?

I,m not avoiding the question just that my explanation should be private ...i,ll tell ya! just not here!

Remember...the police took my laptop and home PC so they have my passwords (now changed) and all my info! I will just talk to you soon on this,ok?

Dean Kory, You really think I'm a TOKEN don't you ? :D :D

Valuable Token!

Certified even!

:D

...and every identity thief west of Poland has this info now :P

The biggest thief of them all...GOVERNMENT!

Government CREATES them, they do not STEAL them :D

By our consent we gave them legal authority to do it on our behalf. So it is those that still give consent that are stealing our rights.

What conscent ?, What legal authority, who are THOSE that you're talking aboout ?, :/

And we miss shit because we foxus in individual words and not the ENTIRE meaning of what was said. Scott just said something I found interesting, and I wonser if it was missed... West of...WHERE? hmmmm And...who is the "thief" he refers to? You idebtifed and docuses on ONE ...are there potentially others? And...what is potentially being revealed HERE (that hasnt been before) that could possibly be stolen.and misued? What identity?

Nice pic btw. Cute kid. Natasha huh

Me I thought immediately RUSSIA :/