Hi Chris Evan, I am still acting as Administrator for the name & finalising a Bill of Exchange (meaning that the other party has been invited to attend to receive payment this Friday, then the matter will be resolved and/or a certificate of protest will be issued).
Then I will complete the process (register the lien/caveat & resign).
Here (Australia), the caveat/lien is registered via the Personal Property Securities Register, the relevant legislation being the Personal Property Securities Act (I think the name is the same for Canada).
I attempt to be as honourable as you Pete Daoust ;)
But they don't want to play/show up/ attend meetings, so when they don't show, it needs to be recorded so they have no recourse for their dishonour.
Didn't find it there. Norway is a version of the Soviet Union,-cannot use national registers or file a public claim. And I got the impression you don't file it with UCC? I understood that I should create a common law trust (is that right),- but also that I should lien the birth certificate. Would be happy for answer,-I sorry if I am a slow learner.
Did you make it in Denmark? It doesn't seem to be possible here, - "jTinglysing" is the same as entering judicial information into a registry or public record, and the information then acquires "legal" value within the system. That should be the obvious way of reversing the trust/trustee/beneficiary situation as well as liening the BC, BUT this process has been bound by legislation which prohibits entering anything into the public record except if it is in accordance with very specific terms. Spent all day calling of all the national registries. A lawful way of doing it would be to proclaim it yourself, in writing or in local newspapers, but not so sure about the real-life effect of it.
You can create a maritime lien, which does not need to be publicly registered.
It is liened into a private trust (which also does not need to be publicly registered because it is private).
You then issue a public notice (newspaper notice, notice to government etc) that the above processes have taken place ie: The BC with details ??? has been liened into a private trust.
Any further details are private, which is the beauty of the process...only parties to the BC and or trust have any standing...anyone else, it's none of their business because it's private...
To paraphrase from a previous thread:
1: Establish a trust
2: Establish a corporation - In the Charter, assign the role of the corporation to HOLD the trust, and establish the "Law" guidelines (You get to make your own up) as regards keeping the trust.
3: Get ANY accountant to manage the books of the corporation. You direct the corporation as FIRST DIRECTOR, and establish roles (President/CEO Vice President, etc) which is how the UNITED STATES was formed.
The accountant EXECUTES YOUR TASKS within the framework. To establish a trust, write it down, and have it witnessed and notarized. The end. Only shareholders of your corporation are recognized by the trust.
run this by Scott Duncan for confirmation/ to clarify details.
Start with a google search on maritime liens...then start a thread to get the details sorted...or, as you are liening it into a private trust & you are the party that gives the BC value, ie: a party, and the government is not a person, thereby not able to act as a party and or rebut your claim/lien, then as I understand it, dotting the 'i's & crossing the 't's becomes less important...after all, who is going to challenge you on it?
So Scott, you know how the gov't always seems to access your bank account when they figure you owe them and they just take what they want? Does this lien remove that possibility?Therefore, if you had a functioning business would you also lien that with said Holding Company for the same reasons?
Stuart, I think the holding company liens the BC, the Trust would then claim OWNERSHIP of the name... Jinny started a thread on claiming ownership of the name (for yourself) but I think the idea is the TRUST owns it? Scott?
A trust is not a person, thus the oppt scam / ucc claim...re; strawman, it's a benefit unless you reverse your capacity status to trustee and start settling its accounts/public debts with your indorsement...or the less ambiguous method previously mentioned above, of creating a new vessel to operate in commerce with...express trust/private investment fund - corp.
You CREATE a corporation, then grant ONE SHARE. You are now the SOLE SHAREHOLDER (not an "owner"). You then ORDER (from the corporation, for which you are the CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER to LIEN your BIRTH CERTIFICATE. The corporation can then hold that asset IN TRUST - Scott
So many ways...it is interesting how many are focused on the BC as if it is wealth in and of itself or a definitive answer...it's just a certificate...learning to use what it symbolizes is substance...
Blake, my friend just got back from Portland for the last Creditors In Commerce gig... he hasn't explained much to me but Gordon Hall learned everything from Brandon (and is in jail right now with his son for being the PERSON)
CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER means a shareholder who owns more than half of the shares or majority of the outstanding shares in a company. A controlling shareholder generally controls the composition of the board of directors and influences the corporation�s activities...
Pete
Actionnaires MAJORITAIRE in French, = Majority Shareholder in English ?
I'm just saying that Controlling Shareholders makes no sense to me, but you may be right and I may be wrong....you know, like the song :D
The way I get it, ADMINISTRATORS control a corporation, as I AM the administrator of SFC Inc, and the CEO of SFC Inc, and I'm NOT the Majority shareholder, come and try to move me from my spot :D, you better have your check book ready :D
Eamonn O Brien - we are the lawful holder...it's just that most let the public play trustee with account.
Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma - not quite, he and his son got involved with a scetchy client as trustees for his assets and became implied in the customers prior dealings, plus the Feds were already gunning for an opportunity:-) He's been in this sitch before...should be alright...definitely a prolonged test though...
'Stuart, I think the holding company liens the BC, the Trust would then claim OWNERSHIP of the name...'...you're right Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma, my mistake...apologies if I misled anyone.
The central trust holds all assets and is generally inactive not ever operating in public. The corp or outer trusts that do operate in public assign/convey their interests to the holding trust creating a buffer.
I am like the bum on the side of the road and I ask for it all Scott I want it all don't hold any thing back tell me all you know. so that I can become free a grow up man please.