..for you and Dean Kory, from the guy Scott recommended
Teaser: Karl once spoke of the time he was in court for a traffic violation. He asked the prosecutor and judge if he broke "the law" - both said yes. He then proceeded to point out that "codes" are not law and asked them if they just perjured themselves and if so... should they be recused?
http://www.dailypaul.com/278436/karl-lentz-do-you-know-the-difference-between-common-law-and-statutes
Bump! I found this nugget quite by accident but require more information. I have found other references to the case online and found this transcript http://globalfact2012.com/radio/stan/20130610/Regina-ex-rel.pdf but have no idea about it's authenticity and wish to verify.
Will you point me to where I can find/order an official transcript/copy of this decision of Justice Egbert of the Supreme Court of Alberta,1959 {28 WWR, 36 R v Minister of Highways} Admiral Scott or tell me what I should read?
I must refresh on how to read legal references because this has to be one of the longer ones I've seen
R. v. Min. of Highways reflex, (1959), 28 W.W.R. 36, 30 C.R. 181, 123 C.C.C. 275, Egbert J., of the Supreme Court of Alberta.
W.W.R. = Western Weekly Reports
C.R. = Criminal Reports, Canada
C.C.C. = Canadian Criminal Cases
Ha ha ha...so this is cited in three different publications :D
Ex rel is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase "ex relatione" (meaning "[arising] out of the narration" [of the relator]). The term is a legal phrase most commonly used when a government brings a cause of action upon the request of a private party who has some interest in the matter.
A word of caution:
Karl Lentz charges money. This is something you all know I have a very serious issue with.
Karl Lentz does not grasp AGENCY. This will burn him in the ass sometime.
Yes I was a little leary when I saw Derek Moran's name and yet I am planning to appeal a conviction entered against the person I have resulting in the suspension of the Driver's License.
It really aggravates me that this fucktard Tom McKeogh referred to "Meads v Meads" like some fucking holy grail and then contradicts himself by having the NAME paged.
Notice of Claim:
It really aggravates me that this fucktard Tom McKeogh referred to "Meads v Meads" like some fucking holy grail and then contradicts himself by having the NAME paged
$2 millions.
Anything else ?? :/
:D Right following the same process you outlined in a previous thread somewhere. I can't recall all the steps but I think there were five steps ending with a Notice of default and then the lien.
Okay fuck...can you outline those steps here Capitaine Pete since I can't remember and I don't want folks thinking it's a good idea to "circle jerk" to club house rules
Notice of Claim (what you're claiming and why)
Invoice w/account statement
Notice (because no chack has been received)
Final Notice (not obligated but good faith)
Default Notice
Lien.
Hey Pete show him where to find a "Fiscal Agency Agreement" that way when he is tired of going to the club house he can have someone he trusts lien the economic zone he lives in. :)
Last week, I've sent a Notice of Claim to the City of Montreal, a claim of $4.1 millions, I told them WHY, and gave them ALL the opportunities to tell me that I CAN'T claim.....
I want them to tell me I am WRONG, and WHY is it......I want them to tell me that they did NOT violated my rights, and that I can't claim these two Bills of Exchange they are SAVING.....
I even tell them, if they respond to me and tell me I am WRONG, I will right on the spot cancel the claim.... :D
From the "We get fucking private mail" dept. :-o
Cedar Pine
Hello man there! I am seeking someone in the local area Quebec, near Montreal to be a witness to my process, meaning that I need someone to swear under oath, or as a man, that they witness no response to my process. I probably would need to have the return address be yours as you would be witness to the none response. I will exchange likewise, as a 3rd party witness to anything you might need providing it is by mail process. Transportation is a problem with me. my offer....how say you?
Statement of Claim coming soon :D In a separate matter I have a "meeting" on April 1st with a "screener" regarding a PENALTY NOTICE. It's a new system to keep folks away from court lol!
:/ I don't think I understand the question Pete. My first reply would be "Sole Authorized Administrator for DAVID PAUL SIP" or from the PERSON I trust?