David Johansen

May 13, 2013 1:39 AM
oh?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 1:39 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 3:54 AM
Scott, doesn't this make you SURETY if you apply to OWN the fictitious name?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 3:54 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

May 13, 2013 3:58 AM
Yes.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 3:58 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 4:01 AM
I would think if you claim anything... BC vs SIN = NOT DEAD


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 4:01 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

May 13, 2013 4:09 AM
SIN is NOT yours to claim.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 4:09 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 4:11 AM
No, claiming your not dead, you have to be what 14 to get a SIN?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 4:11 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 4:12 AM
or better yet, claim your BC is a SECURITY INTEREST of yours...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 4:12 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 5:53 AM
A claim right is a right which entails that another person has a duty to the right-holder.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 5:53 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

May 13, 2013 5:58 AM
..i coulda swore seeing a post where Scott told Jason LeBlanc that he would cover the SIN in a future article :) :)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 5:58 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 6:02 AM
There's probably a SIN Act out there...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:02 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 6:05 AM
Uh, these are agreements?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:05 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 6:05 AM
http://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Texts/canada.html


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:05 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 6:07 AM
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/E-5.6.pdf


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:07 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

May 13, 2013 6:08 AM
I think they have folded/hid the SIN ACT in along with the Unemployment Insurance Act


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:08 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 6:09 AM
There seems to be many Social Insurance Agreements out there...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:09 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

May 13, 2013 6:12 AM
consolidated?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:12 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

May 13, 2013 6:12 AM
Check the back of your SIN-card, those tiny letters-and-numbers have some sort of relevance..i think its your 'Exemption-number' for the 'private-side' of the card


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 6:12 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Jinny Freeman

May 13, 2013 1:38 PM
Checkout #2 and #4. http://www.truthaboutlloyds.com/litigation/candva.html


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 1:38 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Jinny Freeman

May 13, 2013 1:41 PM
Writing to let you know of our two victories- among others. These are two cases won in AZ courts. Maricopa County Superior Courts Superior Court - Maricopa County www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/ View shared post 1. Harold Bruce Hyden CR2008-158369-001 2. Peter M. Pilat, Sheilla Pilat CV2010-016616 The first case was a felony case. It was bonded using GSA forms based on the SSN as a FEDERAL CONTRACTOR and the oaths of the judge, DA, public defender were accepted. All PUBLIC OFFICERS were appointed Fiduciary Trustee to settle the matter to -0- and erase all records. Dismissed without prejudice. The second case was a foreclosure case. The Pilats had lost the case after fighting and hiring lawyers for almost three years. The judge had ordered the writ to the sherriff to foreclosure. The case was closed and ended, The Pilats had nothing to lose. They filed the appointments the judge, lawyers in the case-the case that was closed and over with. They did not bond the case. The judge gave the lawyers, bank fifteen days to answer. After 15 days the bank did not answer. The lawyers did not answer. The judge reversed her order and found for the Pilats and dismissed without prejudice. We have th evidence and the who, what,where and why's for both cases. You can enter the identifiers in the case history on the courts web site to verify our victories. It was short and sweet. In other cases we had a IRS judge abandon the court. This is powerfull and it works. We do not argue we act in peace Would be great to share all the info. Mike Mason Rialto,CA http://robcourtofrecord.wordpress.com/2013/05/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2013 1:41 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Phillip Prater

May 17, 2013 7:28 PM
If you own the name, you become surety but if you put it away and no longer use it, you may/might own it and be surety but, since you don't use it, where are the draw backs?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 17, 2013 7:28 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jun 05, 2013 1:44 PM
What if I decide to use the NAME the same way I use my kitchen table :/ ? .....when I need it....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2013 1:44 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: