So THAT'S why I can't walk into a bank and ask to buy gold! Not the real stuff anyway. Can "stocks" or "shares" of gold be bought at the Bank of Canada? Maybe if some one wouldn't mind sharing how they know the "stock exchange" exchanges stock, I could understand the world of commerce a little better. Any takers?
You actually posed the best question in the thread;
Joseph Pierre Gilles: got a question here Scott ...what LAw are we talking about ???
Scott Duncan: Whatever law governs the trustee, of course!
Scott Duncan: If you want to buy shit with AQUILAE currency, you can; but the tender for law will be governed by AQUILAE.
Scott Duncan: Governed...like the GOVERNER of the Bank of Canada?
Scott Duncan: Yes Scott. That is why the Bank of Canada has a GOVERNOR.
i like this section:
Grantor may assign personalty to himself and another
54 Any person may assign personal property by law assignable, including chattels real, directly to himself and another person or persons or corporation, by the like means as he may assign the same to another person.
"...himself AND another" ? :/
�every one�, �person� and �owner�
� quiconque �, � individu �, � personne � et � propri�taire �
�every one�, �person� and �owner�, and similar expressions, include Her Majesty and an organization;
�trustee�
� fiduciaire �
�trustee� means a person who is declared by any Act to be a trustee or is, by the law of a province, a trustee, and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, includes a trustee on an express trust created by deed, will or instrument in writing, or by parol;
BY PAROL ????? :/
Beneficiary of the PERSON which is held in the TRUST known as THE GOVERNMENT which is held by the CORPORATION known as (CANADA?)- Not too sure on the corp name...
Uhh- what part of, THIS IS THE MONEY is 'GOLD' thread does anybody NOT understand? NOTICE this does NOT say the, 'WHERE EVERYBODY GETS INTO A PISSING-MATCH DEBATING WHO HAS THE BEST ORAL-TECHNIQUES IN COURT TRYING TO OUTSMART THE JUDGE-thread'...please, by all means, feel free to start that thread. Your OWN thread. *long sigh, beginning to understand why Scott hates us all so much*
GIVING YOU GOLD HERE!,..making ME (The grantor [Sovereign] AND (EVERYBODY GET THAT?) another [an organization]).
Now look up the definition of PERSON in the criminal code.
�every one�, �person� and �owner�
� quiconque �, � individu �, � personne � et � propri�taire �
�every one�, �person� and �owner�, and similar expressions, include Her Majesty and an organization;
Grantor may assign personalty to himself and another
54 Any person may assign personal property by law assignable, including chattels real, directly to himself and another person or persons or corporation, by the like means as he may assign the same to another person.
"...himself AND another" ?
�every one�, �person� and �owner�, and similar expressions, INCLUDE (Which EXCLUDES EVERYTHING ELSE) Her Majesty and an organization;
Now look at what I just said:
,..making ME (The grantor [Sovereign] AND (EVERYBODY GET THAT?) another [an organization]).
What the f**k are we talking about? The sentence was taken out of context it would seem and starts in the middle of it... I'm totally lost... Break time...
Oh fuck I got it Derek Moran......
Pierre in Criminal court....
NON-NEGOTIABLE
I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX
I�m the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST
I make ALL business decisions for PIERRE DAOUST
At least 51% of my blood is ORIGINAL blood
I LOVE THE MONTREAL CANADIANS
I�m a very NICE guy
I am the MASTER or my PERSON Named PIERRE DAOUST
NO FUCKING STRAWMAN IMPLIED/EXPECTED
And I reserve ALL RIGHTS�.all of them�
Is ANYONE have any objections ?????
heir (�r)
n.
1. A person who inherits or is entitled by law or by the terms of a will to inherit the estate of another.
2. A person who succeeds or is in line to succeed to a hereditary rank, title, or office.
3. One who receives or is expected to receive a heritage, as of ideas, from a predecessor
A term of art formerly required to transfer complete title (a fee simple absolute) to real estate � This phrase originated in the translation of a Law French phrase used in medieval grants (a lui et a ses heritiers pour toujours "to him and his heirs forever"). See FEE SIMPLE.
Down here in limbo legal tender notes are brought forward to offer a promise to redeem debt Legally A4V...Up there the "Architect" Creates limbo by means of offering a world made of Equitable Titles and surety accounts...Fuck its time to get a totem.
You're right Derek Moran....this is so deep that I don't get fuckal...and man, when I don't get it, it's because it's deep en tabarnak.....
DESIGNATION, wills. The expression used by a testator, instead of the name of the person or the thing he is desirous to name; for example, a legacy to. the eldest son of such a person, would be a designation of the legatee. Vide 1 Rop. Leg. ch. 2.
2. A bequest of the farm which the testator bought of such a person; or of the picture he owns, painted by such an artist, would be a designation of the thing devised or bequeathed
SYMBOL. A sign; a token; a representation of one thing by another.
2. A symbolical delivery is equivalent, in many cases, in its legal effects, to actual delivery; as, for example, the delivery of the keys of a warehouse in which goods are deposited, is a delivery sufficient to transfer the property
Sorry guys, I have a question, Let say I DELIVER via Canada Post, the KEYS of SFC Inc's warehouse, to TRANSFER all the goods in it, which goods, of course, has no LIEN on it, to ANY other PERSON and/or TRUST.....this would be sufficient to LEGALLY have all this goods transfered....??????? :/
54 Any person may assign personal property by law assignable, including chattels real, directly to himself and another person or persons or corporation, by the like means as he may assign the same to another person.
From 54: Let the person that I am administrating for (through private security agreement between me the man & the person) assign the chattels and or other property to myself (the man) AND a (private) corporation of my choosing...
Isn't that describing the relationship between the 'person' liened into the trust (for example AQUILAE), the grantor of the trust (the man/sovereign/Scott Duncan) & the corporation (Roguesupport Nx) or am I reading more into this (talking out my arse) than is actually there?
no.
Do not add to and/or change what I say.
I choose my words VERY carefully. Do not think you can come up with a "better" answer.
If you think your answers are "better" than mine, you obviously have no use for THIS group...
I pressed the send button at the same time than you.....if I would have seen your answer first, I would have wait before pressing that fucking button :D
Scott Duncan, is that mean when I receive a Bill of Exchange, and I complete it, it is turning that BoE into a remittance ?
So when I finish my duty, we now have a remittance ? (remise)
And would it be fair to say we now have a PAYMENT ? (paiement)
Thanks
Pete.
So far, I never called it a payment, on the six remittances I have made for PIERRE DAOUST, I used DEBT administrative procedures, or in French, Processus administratif concernant cette dette....
Making ME the grantor (soveriegn) and EVERYBODY another organisation...then the criminal codes definition of person (notice - not what it INCLUUDES but what it EXCLUDES)...the key is jurisdiction and title. Gold indeed...its like a new BERTH....:)
So when you use legal tender you are presumed a trustee under the trust law of that particular legal tender...which makes pulling yourself and the person out of the public in place of other buffer/firewall type vessels good sense. The law is determined by the jurisdiction...the jurisdiction is determined by the contract...law=contract.
If you are an Admiral, you have captains with surly crews that have severe emotional issues, looking to "let off some steam", protecting you.
It's lonely and depressing at the top, but it DOES have its perks :D
RE: Bouvier's definition of "REMITTANCE":
1: What is listed is not "money" (As Derek Moran would gladly point out).
2: Payment is not legal.
Remittance is defined in ACTS now. Look for it there.
Actually- i just did a search on the province's 'e-LAWS' website, and as much as Scott got my hopes up to find it in their Clubhouse Rules, there is NO definition for REMITTANCE that they provide.....but- there was THIS:
Tax payment, NON-LEGAL TENDER
21.(1)A debt due to the Crown under section 8.1 of the Financial Administration Act in respect of a payment OR REMITTANCE under this Act shall be deemed, when the Minister so assesses, to be tax payable under this Act by the taxpayer from whom the payment OR REMITTANCE, and may be collected and enforced as tax under the provisions of this Act, except that the provisions under sections 24 and 25 do not apply to this tax. 1994, c. 13, s. 16.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90r31_e.htm
REMITTANCE is a tricky-word, here is what The Dictionary of Canadian Law 4th-edition has to say:
REMIT: v. To send back.
REMITTANCE: n. MONEY which one person sends to another.
I can't find remittance in any of their acts so far, but I did find this definition in the Bank Act interesting; �person�
� personne �
�person� means a natural person, an entity or a personal representative;
I specifically remember being told in grade-school, that adding an adjective does NOT change the root-meaning of a word; it may make it a COMPOUND-word, but, the root-meaning of a word is NOT changed by adding an ADJECTIVE to it
Here's what Black's Law 9th-edition's definition for REMITTANCE says:
1. A sum of money SENT to another as payment for goods or services
2. An INSTRUMENT (such as a check) used for SENDING money
3. The ACTION or process of SENDING money to another person or place
..this definition seems to deal with BOTH the whole noun AND verb/adverb aspect of this term all-in-one with this definition
In a system where it is literally illegal to PAY, the one who creates a liability must provide the remedy...therefore the remittance (forgiveness). Only thing is they are used to unlawfully demanding money of exchange and in specific specie. Yes, you can accept them (indorse) and return them for discharge BUT you MAY in most cases get some salty spray over the ships bow.
Hey Blake Gardner, what would happen if 10% of Man and Woman stop buying back these debts a.d start discharging them ?
Do you think it would have an effect on something ?
10% more sweat equity would be retained - 10% of the particular national debt would in theory be zeroed. Hypothetically yes but mankind is too far gone imo...they only have one last card to play. And most can see how that is being structured.
I don`t know if this has been stated here in this group yet but gold is no different then money. A value is assigned to both and we accept it with out question . In times where economic uncertainty abound like now days people are told directed to buy gold to preserve their wealth ................Nothing could be further from the truth ........when you buy gold you preserve the class system already in place you ensure that those with more gold will always make the decisions that will effect your life in the future
I bet he will end-up either 1- Working as a government agent, and/or 2- He will start talking copyrighted secret stuff, and call undesirable attention.
The only things that make this shit "secret" is programming people to be Piece-of-Shit Christians/Muslims/Jews and thinking imaginary friends are real.
EVERYONE ELSE CAN SEE IT CLEARLY!