What legitimacy is there to this scheme? Research into the matter has probed deeply enough to find that the entire scheme operates under commercial and maritime presumptions based on municipal corporation structures and authority over commercial entities. If and when State or Federal entity, including courts, issues a liability or executes a judgment, the subject, and defendant, is invariable a juristic or corporate entity, i.e., JOHN DOE rather than John Doe. John Doe is presumed to serve in a fiduciary capacity for the juristic JOHN DOE, and by way presumptions described as constructive trusts, is subject to both civil and criminal penalties.

What legitimacy? NONE. Glad I could help. :D

...see my previously stated "you're all ignorant, mindless sheep".

It was a quote from the article...as is this... In the framework of the Uniform Commercial Code, which is the crown jewel of Cooperative Federalism on the State side, courts of the several States operate in a de facto capacity to accommodate and enforce what amounts to private international law; (contracts/claims)

Point being...it may be of benefit to some who presently choose to take the constitutional/rights approach to remedy to consider the option of using contract law instead as that is what is expressed in this treatise and being used globally in commerce.

Here is a NICE contract I have beetween ME and my PERSON... :D I jusr received my NEW "NON-business cards" concerning this by the way NON-NEGOTIABLE I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX I�m the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST I make ALL business decisions for PIERRE DAOUST At least 51% of my blood is ORIGINAL blood I LOVE THE MONTREAL CANADIANS I�m a very NICE guy I am the MASTER or my PERSON Named PIERRE DAOUST And I reserve ALL RIGHTS�.all of them� (sorry, could not resist this morning again !!!)

By all means Joseph...non-negotiate away :-)

will not !!! :D