Now it's time to read what has happened, because this is more than you think. "Be advised that the Attorney General of Nova Scotia does not accept your notice of understanding..." - DOES NOT ACCEPT. Your NOTICE is an OFFER. Let's look at a simple NO PARKING notice. They are giving you NOTICE NOT to park there, with a notice of what you pay if you DO park there. That's the conditions of NO PARKING. If you don't accept those conditions, don't park there... it's just notice. Same with your NOTICE. They don't ACCEPT THE TERMS. It MAY mean they intend to leave you alone.

so LEGAL TENDER = OFFER... BILL of exchange = OFFER... the same as, any NOTICE we send to the government = an OFFER...? :/

Yes. Sorry YOUR notices don't have superpowers.

It's all contract driven by ACCOUNTING.

"Sorry you"..or "Sorry your"..? Some of us here at THE TENDER FOR LAW are Spelling-Nzasi...we take this stuff somewhat sireous more than others http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4vf8N6GpdM

bETTER? :p

Can they NOT accept this kind of NOTICE ??? NON-NEGOTIABLE FINAL NOTICE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Dear Government of Canada, Government of Quebec and/or all its Agencies. I am Joseph Pierre Gilles, Live Birth Registration Number 11XXXX. I am the Lawful Holder in Due Course of the Person named PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No. 119XXXXXXXX I am the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No. 119XXXXXXX I make ALL business decision for PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No. 119XXXXXXX I am from the Canadian Nation I am a LOYAL subject of HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ELIZABET II I claim and reserve ALL RIGHTS. This NOTICE is NON-NEGOCIABLE God Save the QUEEN See you in jail and/or in Hell ____________________________________ Joseph Pierre Gilles LBR No. 11XXXX Master of PIERRE DAOUST Inscription No. 119XXXXXXX XXXX rue XXXXXXXXX Mirabel (Qu�bec) Canada J7X-XXX

Derek Moran...face palm....spelling NZAIS?? Wtf?? :)

I got a "no such claim known to law" I defaulted & then sent a letter explaining contract made the law & they had already missed their opportunity to disclose. they are holding presumptions over me through an army pension (earned & contributed to) they claim they'll stop payments because new legislation requires me to have a bank account. would Notice of Mistake suffice & ask how they intend remedy,what do you think scott?

Ooops...NZASI

I show Derek Moran the best shit.

They owe the NAME, not you.

SO...what makes a good NOTICE isnt just telling them to STAY OFF THE GRASS.....a good NOTICE must always include clear INSTRUCTIONS on what will happened to someone if they dont heed the NOTICE and they still decide to walk on my grass....INSTRUCTIONS ON WHAT WILL HAPPEN = TERMS AND CONDITIONS, as you just mentioned to Brenda?

NOTICE OF MISTAKE detaches you from the liability of the NAME. You can't then demand things only your NAME is entitled to.

i have no operations through that name any more, the pension check would arrive, i'd sign & lodge in a family members account. then draw the cash .... would i have to lien my person for it?

Yes. But then you are your own creditor. You will quickly see how little monetary value you actually have.

Better to have a corporation lien it on behalf of a trust.

...for which you are a beneficiary...and controlling shareholder in the corporation.

�person� includes a party to a proceeding; http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900194_e.htm..... is this ultimately what our "PERSON" was meant to be/act in this capacity?

Scott, how about you set it all up for us, forms, documents, etc. and we will give you our particuliars, and Tara will give you allthe BJ's you want....all our problems solved. :P

haha i get ye, i'd be writing myself iou's for currency :p you're talking about setting up a trust & appointing myself, the bank account would be in the trusts name & i keep my hands clean?

official capacity clearly distinguishable from my private capacity ?

watch out Leigh OftheHouseof Collins, you SHALL/MUST/MAY end up with the BJ's duty !!!! :D

Sacrifices, sacrifices...:)

Tonight peter and jonathan (jon) will be covering Status, Jurisdiction, Consent & More! peter will also be covering the new changes to the privatis.me website including instructional videos, MS PowerPoint presentations, new templates and coming price changes to the membership area of the site. The latest updates on brother jonathan's claim for his children - Be sure to watch his video - Case Dismissed as the Living Beneficiary http://www.blogtalkradio.com/iamfreewill/2013/04/17/in-the-spirit-of-things http://www.blogtalkradio.com/iamfreewill/

"Dear Dept. of Justice...social workers stealing my kids is not proper procedure."

Brother Johnatan ????....never heard of that guy ?? :/

privatis-Pete is apparently 'THE INFORMANT'..has alotta knowledge regarding this stuff

Is this what you're talking about Derek Moran ???... https://privatis.me/

Tara Duncan does that ANYWAY. How do I benefit? Where is my consideration for my time/labour? I have NO interest in MONEY, so you'd better find something I VALUE that I don't already have.

what about this Scott Duncan ??? :/ https://www.gcsurplus.ca/mn-fra.cfm?snc=wfsav&sc=enc-bid&scn=124638&lcn=269635&lct=L&srchtype=&so=ASC&sf=ferm-clos&lci=&str=1&ltnf=1

Nope. No use for a trailer.

lol...a friend's cottage....lol...

�person� includes a party to a proceeding; is this ultimately what our "PERSON" was meant to be/act in this capacity?"...... so our public servants are MANIPULATING the original intent of the PERSON, by redefining it as a "CORPORATION" in their own statutes, hoping to dupe you into consenting with them as a PERSON/'CORPORATION' when you go into court?

Seriously, stop saying a PERSON is a CORPORATION! FUCK OFF WITH THAT SHIT!

Why do I have to keep repeating this?

this one ???? http://crownassets.pwgsc.gc.ca/mn-fra.cfm?snc=wfsav&sc=ach-shop&vndsld=1&srchtype=&lci=&sr=1&str=41&ltnf=1&lcn=259064&lct=L&sf=ferm-clos

Scott...I, am not saying a person is a COPORATION. They are. Its in their own definitions, is it NOT?

you keep repeeating it cuz yu wont fuking do it for us lol

A CORPORATION IS A PERSON, A PERSON IS NOT A FUCKING CORPORATION. A TEN DOLLAR BILL IS NOT A CORPORATION! A CHEQUE IS NOT A CORPORATION! AND A MUTHERFUCKING PERSON IS NOT A FUCKING CORPORATION AND I WILL PERMANENTLY BAN THE NEXT ASS-WIPE THAT ATTEMPTS TO SPREAD THAT BULLSHIT AGAIN!

They ONLY want us to be the trustee of that NAME they've created...

FOR INSTANCE, the definition of PERSON in the City of Toronto Municipal Code: PERSON � Includes a corporation and the heirs, executors, administrators or other legal representatives of a person to whom the context can apply according to law.

lmfao! xx

Derek fuk....stop this please....if Scott kick you out, we won't have NOTHING to read anymore.....try to find a nice vessel instead.... :D

Yes and I can write a code that says "A PERSON INCLUDES THE NEXT FUCKING BRAINLESS PRAT THAT TRIES TO CONVINCE ANYON THAT A PERSON IS A CORPORATION", and it is valid IN THAT CONTEXT.

Why does PIERRE get this and not you.

Because I'm NOT intelligent....

bahaha gotta luv the testosterone!

I'm just a smart french dude....remember ????

A PERSON IS NEVER A CORPORATION, A CORPORATION CAN ACT AS A PERSON...THAT'S FUCKING IT. CORPORATION HAS NO OTHER CONTEXT WITH PERSON! FUCK! BRAINLESS! FUCKING! PRATS!

Im busting an ovary!

yark gross :(

Not trying to convince anyone...trying to make the distinction, since i saw the definition of PERSON in the Rules of Civil Procedure

Are you REALLY going to try to tell me A PERSON IS A CORPORATION there? Are you REALLY saying that the Rules SAY THAT A PERSON IS A CORPORATION? REALLY?

YOUR PERSON IS NOT A CORPORATION. FIND OUT WHAT MAKES A CORPORATION AND NOTICE THAT YOUR PERSON HAS NONE OF THESE THINGS.

STOP READING THE FUCKING CLUBHOUSE RULES! YOU AREN'T IN THE FUCKING CLUB!

Derek Moran, please, find a nice vessel for sale....stop reading for 15 minutes.... :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0

WHO'S YOUR PERSON'S DULY ELECTED FIRST DIRECTOR? WHO'S YOUR PERSON'S SHAREHOLDERS? WHEN ARE YOUR ANNUAL MEETINGS HELD FOR THIS CORPORATION-PERSON? CAN YOU SELL THESE SHARES? IF SO, FOR HOW MUCH? Who's the CEO? Oh, wait, that's right, YOUR PERSON ISN'T A FUCKING CORPORATION!

ok, SO...what is this definition from the City of Toronto's Municipal Code REALLY saying then- how about that? PERSON � Includes a corporation and the heirs, executors, administrators or other legal representatives of a person to whom the context can apply according to law.

Seriously Derek, why does peter get this and not you?

HAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA

Because I'm the CEO of 2 CORPORATIONS....

I'm the shareholder of 3 CORPORATIONS

Of which your PERSON is one of those things in that list, and only in the context of that code.

I KNOW the NAME is not a CORPORATION and I KNOW they want to see me as a TRUSTEE for this NAME and I KNOW I'ON-NEGOCIABLE I'm Pete and/or Peter and/or Pierre and/or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and/or BELLIGERENT and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST Social Insurance no. 26X-XXX-XXX, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX I�m the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST I make ALL business decisions for PIERRE DAOUST At least 51% of my blood is ORIGINAL blood I LOVE THE MONTREAL CANADIANS I�m a very NICE guy I am the MASTER or my PERSON Named PIERRE DAOUST And I reserve ALL RIGHTS�.all of them� Is ANYONE have any objections ?????

SCOTT...this is ALL fucking NEWS, to, the FUCKING City of Toronto! I have sent TWELVE MOTHERFUCKINGCOCKSUCKING NOTICES TO THESE GODDAMMED PIECES OF SHIT. I KNOW, what you're saying.....im just trying to figure out the best way to convey to THEM, what you are saying! Is THAT the way i should've posed my question?

Because that makes us surety?

fuk the soprano's tonight again :/

Unless you have corporations acting as persons, then corporation needs to NEVER exit your mouth again. PERIOD. The whole "Your name (person) is a corporation that Lou Manotti made" stops here. Today. NOW. YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! In case you missed it: YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION! YOUR NAME (PERSON) IS NOT A CORPORATION!

"ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A VERY BORING BOY"

chuckles

Can I say my NAME is a COUPON ??? :D

well, can he?

Only on NEW names where there is ONLY ONE signature on the birth certificate.

Of course I can :P

Yes, a B.C. with only ONE signature is, in fact, a coupon.

Wise-man once said, however: "THEY, make the legal-presumption that you already know the definitions for all the legalese they use..."

...so stop making new ones. YOUR PERSON IS NOT A CORPORATION.

Thats exactly what I have, a COUPON signed by Reno Bernier

a BC with one signature? there are some with 2?

Yes. Ontario, for one.

forgive me...if one signature is a coupon , what does two signatures make it?

a PERSON... :D

Me I have a COUPON you, you have a PERSON

You've already said, that PERSON = legal-term for EQUITY, and/or the PERSON = the SECURITY

Yes, SO NOW you UNDERSTAND WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER SAY THINGS LIKE:"so our public servants are MANIPULATING the original intent of the PERSON, by redefining it as a "CORPORATION" in their own statutes" - THEY DO NO SUCH THING!

In fact they tend to give corporations a HIGHER standing than your PERSON.

Joseph Pierre Gilles, if i had two signatures, without prejudice, what's the difference between your coupon and my person?

As a CEO, you can make all the terms and conditions you may like....and your job is to PROTECT the interest of the CORPORATION.... :D

I have BEAUTIFUL terms & conditions here....thanks Scott !!!! :D

GI Joe with the Kung Fu Grip.

it doesnt help in this definition that "INCLUDES" is a comprehensive/exhaustive one: PERSON � Includes a corporation and the heirs, executors, administrators or other legal representatives of a person to whom the context can apply according to law.

I like better Rocky with the Rambo machine gun but hey...personal opinion

:(

I'm out for 3 cigarettes.....see you later...if GOD wants.. :D

No: It INCLUDES "a corporation and the heirs, executors, administrators" OR "other legal representatives of a person to whom the context can apply according to law". ONE OR THE OTHER.

OHHHHHH, ok- so how about this! What if the definition just read THIS: PERSON � Includes a corporation and the heirs, executors, administrators

but there is an OR.

Ask which context they BELIEVE you are. QUESTIONS NEGATE UNDERSTANDING (or there wouldn't be questions).

Where is this person definition?

This is referring to the original post, a funny maxim of law, he who denies admits, i think that is how it goes :P. So if they are denying the notice wouldnt they be secretly admitting ?

Corporations are afforded the ability to be recognised as a PERSON for legal matters... That's how I understand it...

YES, and that is the only time a CORPORATION falls into the context of PERSON. In case others missed it... YOUR PERSON IS NOT A CORPORATION. it never has been, and it never will be.

ChiefRock Sino General, are you able to translate this for me ???...If you want of course... :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTsBdH3Dohw

Your PERSON "is allowed" to act in commerce (like a corporation) under that FICTION TITLE... otherwise you can't get a loan, mortgage... you can't BE PROVIDED any source of commerce, bank account...

its "like a corporation" whom is also "allowed" to function in commerce

Derek... that definition of PERSON i used came from the Shitty of Toronto's Municipal Code

Derek Moran honestly... QUIT READING THEIR ADVICE...

Scott, here is the definition of PERSON from the Ontario Legislation Act, 2006: �person� includes a corporation; ..how does that basically translate to you? :/ http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=person&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/on/laws/stat/so-2006-c-21-sch-f/latest/so-2006-c-21-sch-f.html&searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAGcGVyc29uAAAAAAAAAQ

its jut defacto... a let down...

something you thought was real... and is not

INCLUDES a corporation, partnership

Beverly May..let me see a picture of you wearing a bikini :P

um, I don't think I can post one right here unless its on a web page

:`(

..until then - ill keep reading Act definitions ;)

Nooooooo, GAWD

stop it now

there should be some on my FB page...

oh, hafta just throw out some gossip, the "guywiththedickinhismouth" just put out some blather regarding his "hurt feeler" report #2 regarding Dean's HUGE inappropriatness and some context about Scott, being an assault on their "game" GEEZE

Fine, snoop then

Derek Moran

got a link handy?

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/globalfactradio/2013/04/20/full-disclosure-the-dean-clifford-files-episode-2-of-3

I'm not interested in throwing out gossip, but this is truly a "HURT FEELER" report...

isn't a "hurt feeler" a DEBTOR? gimme a break...

who cares about feelings

Well sure, how much PUBLIC NOTICE needs to be before you just become a jackass?

Hence why its like fucking in public... you're either really making a show... or FAIL...

..do you speak from experience? :/

what are you asking, if she banged in public and failed?

banged in public AND/OR failed.....ive given her OPTIONS ;)

hot.

um, if you google the Whale in WEM... that mighta been public... I'm not sure

where is it where they talk about scott

oh, might be about half way through...

not seeing it

well hearing it

its just a cheap blather... not much, I just find this Hurt Feeler Report retarded in every way... I don't understand why to make such a PUBLIC THROWUP... not like that guy is busy studying and could even remotely HELP ANYONE..

bold and sassy it seems

Geez, where are you Northern Hemisphere guys n gals at? Have any of you tried putting things together from Robert Menard's work on this. Your NAME is not a Corporation. The government treats your all caps fictional entity as a corporate entity in process only. This is how they attempt to get you to admit a joiner with your all caps and upper and lower case entities. The point is to make you the trustee and not the beneficiary in your government operated 'situs trust'. remember, in any trust its always the Trustee who pays. They want YOU to pay. Here in NZ we have a guy named Bill Turner who teaches different ways of achieving the same ends which is a little different to the Freeman on the Land mode. please check his Youtube videos... search youtube for Bill Turner New Zealand, he has approx 11 video's there.

What the fuck ye doing Gerry cardinalli ?? This is NOT ROBERT MENARD FB PAGE? ? Opposition. .... He's got value to some extent.....not much but he's having a crack

Yeah...Bill Turner now..!!!...is there one of these in each Country ???...

Check him out, I will, can never get too much knowledge!!

Adam Thomas... Buddy, why in opposition? Philip Laforet has the right idea. When dealing with issues of sovereignty, becomming free of the oligarchal enemy, then all information is valid. Its only when we share info together, all with the same aim can we arrive at the truth much faster. There is no particularly good information and no bad information. just information, which, until it is validated and tested, will avail us all to seek our true goal... to be free ourselves, and assist those who also wish to attain that goal.

Yeah....ok...fair enuff Gerry. ...just saying that Scott D might have something to say...heads up Bud :-)

I cannot imagine that Scott would oppose at least listening to anyone, he is open minded. There are always new ways to look at old things.

So far...this Tender for LAW thing is a nice place for truth....maybe I'm the only one like that but I can't get my head all around...I get fuked up if I do...maybe it has to do with my low IQ level....or is it because I'm a dumb ass smart french dude ???...I don't know....but I hate having a pinball machine in my brain Scott seems to have a good grasp at what is LAW....reading EVERYTHING in here and get it takes time....and I only have 168 hours per week....I still not UNDERSTAND money very well at this time....anyway, my 2 cents on it....

Yep pierre me old mate...its a head fuck allright...but ye do get it when ye get it.

Its basically all about words, Pierre. We speak one language and the legal language 'looks' similar, but the meanings have changed to suit those 'in the club'. Once you can differentiate between what we have learned and what 'they' are meaning then you are on your way to unravelling their bullshit. Hang in there, you eventually start putting it together.

Here is what I get so far :D ....anything else I need to know ??? I'm Pete and/or Peter and/or Pierre and/or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and/or BELLIGERENT and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX I�m the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST I make ALL business decisions for PIERRE DAOUST At least 51% of my blood is ORIGINAL blood I LOVE THE MONTREAL CANADIANS I�m a very NICE guy I am the MASTER or my PERSON Named PIERRE DAOUST And I reserve ALL RIGHTS�.all of them� Is ANYONE have any objections ?????

"There is no particularly good information and no bad information"... There is only good information from the main source here Gerry. And there is alot of bad information around in my opinion...

They way I did it in court last week, it was like fishing, threw out a bunch of lines, was confident in my speach and I got a few bites. "Even if your voices shakes, speak the truth" Remember and remind the TRUSTEEs, just who is who. You can tell by the way Scott speaks, he don't take no shit, and neither do you. Don't be afraid to make a mistake, JUST DO IT!!!

In all things Eamonn, delving into ALL the available info will soon reveal that which is either good or bad. ALL roads eventually lead to the truth. It becomes the ability to sort through what is available to realise the true path... to freedom and beyond. Its not necessarily bad info, its just a bum steer and helps remove the 'veils' that 'they' want to remain over us.