what is really interesting is I introduced section 52 of the 1981 constitution into court yesterday and the book the judge had only went to section 34,,,,, wtf was that all about?
what I was also told, is that if we are summoned to statute court and want to contest the charge based on a constitution violation we have to file it to the courts at least 15 days prior to the court date for it to go to provincial court.
the prosecutor got mad at me and I am thinking she accidentally told me info she shouldn't have, it was also clarified more by the judge as well, it got me thinking instead of claim of rights and all that stuff, if we came across with , constitutional violations will be dealt with in this manor,,, 10 million dollars for each offense, as they laugh at us with claim of rights,,,, this way we use their own words back at them,,, what do you guys think?
Other rights and freedoms not affected by Charter
26. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada.
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html
You know what struck me most about this article?- "...clerk of the privy council, Canada�s top civil servant..." - somethings always told me there is more to The Privy Council of Canada than meets the eye..hmmmmmmmm :/
Look at the Aral Sea. Find out why it's gone.
Look at the great lakes, and look at their water levels.
Now look at the NAWAPA and you will see the Aral Sea play out here. The tributaries are diverted to pipelines to California. Why do you think Arnold the Guvunatorrr dropped in to see Dalton "Norman Bates" Mcguinty?
Your question reveals your ignorance. SOMEWHERE WAY BACK you lied about understanding something. The only person being lied to is YOU. You don't even know the roles yet.
SPOILER ALERT: ACCOUNTANTS... or did you lie about understanding who makes policy?