Essentially we are paying TRIBUTE for the use of Foreign Money, which is why it is an OFFER...?

For the use of someone else's property

right. well, for the use of public property. all the land is 'public', owned by the commonwealth. which is titled, buy GBritian, which pays the vatican because they lost allodial title to them for violating the treaty with the magna carta.

our Legal Tender is not our property...

who's name is on it?

Bank of Canada, indorsed by some chump... (used to be 2 chumps)

issued promissory note, promis to pay. so basically it is the same as a casino marker. only worth any value at that casino...

But being an OFFER OF LAW, the acceptance of that offer would be benefits and privileges, tributes, etc...

and the agreement to comply with all their laws, whether enforceable or otherwise, and against an officer that can lie under oath as the plaintiff's witness.

yah, and a SIN # means you'r their employee and have to pay them a fee from your paycheck because they allow you to work.

your point is what most of us are looking to scott for, which ofcourse he's allready told us. NOTICE OF MISTAKE!!! LOL

that and inc. and lein the BC...

No, the fact that our signatures create these promises, its better off not to sign anything to continue contributing to this OFFER...

Communism is as what mussollini, said twas. "From the STATE OWNING THE CORPORATION TO THE CORPORATION OWNING THE STATE". CAPITALISM IN DISGUISE!!

FaScIsM. Led Zeppelin iv. Album cover art work.

I have read the new bills that I have and I saw 2 signatures. What are you referring to when you say one chump instead of two? Am I missing something?

2nd is WITNESS ??

not sure but their titles have not changed......deputy gov and gov

governor that is