..you might wanna message Martin Sutton and ask him if they ended-up submitting a PRAECIPE for Dean in the end, im not sure if they did

It SHOULD be a writ. The Justice issues the Praecipe.

...in response to the writ, that is.

So the Judge ended-up issuing a PRAECIPE for Dean, as a result of whatever WRIT Martin handed in to the Judge?

..im guessing it was a WRIT OF MANDAMUS (making-an-order) ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQLSXwDMA5g

These Writs/Praecipes are interesting. My question, being familiar with the Rules of Civil Procedure, is how do we get them filed with the Court? Has anyone done so successfully?

I'm not sure but these Writs/Praecipes seems to be useful in CRIMINALs proc�dures.... :/

164. Fair hearing (4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), that subsection does not preserve the validity of the proceeding if the failure to comply with the agreement results in PREJUDICE to the DEFENDANT'S RIGHT to a FAIR HEARING. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90p33_e.htm#BK207

If it is a Club (and we ain't in it!), in a civil case as "defendant", if one does not have the protection of the isolation of Admiralty (liened the NAME), what should one use: Praecipe, Writ, Petition? But most importantly to me is not the HOW , but rather the WHY. If we are not part of the Club, how can one "defend" the person in a civil case, if the game is rigged ?

For example: Vampires Bank and Trust VS. YouBetterPay Pal. If it's all about surety, and ACCOUNTING, how can anyone "defend" succesfully the person, if your person is not "protected", and the game is rigged?

One can ALWAYS say: NON-NEGOCIABLE I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX I�m the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST I make ALL business decisions for PIERRE DAOUST At least 51% of my blood is ORIGINAL blood I LOVE THE MONTREAL CANADIANS I�m a very NICE guy I am the MASTER or my PERSON Named PIERRE DAOUST And I reserve ALL RIGHTS�.all of them� Is ANYONE have any objections ????? CASE DISSMISS

Thank you, Pierre. Assuming you are correct, for purposes of this discussion, still for me, most importantly is not the HOW , but rather the WHY you can do it. Also, my questions are still pending. I don't think you answered to the questions, Pierre, but I would lie if I say I do not appreciate your gesture.

Maximiliano P�rez, the Notice of Mistake should deal with the issue of surety, then the writ would deal with instructing the court how you wish to proceed/dismiss the case. The praecipe from the judge then orders it so. It's my understanding that a motion grants jurisdiction by making a request, which in turn recognises the court's authority...that's my take on it.

Your take on it is correct, Stuart.

Thank you, Stuart! :) So, if one gets a "summons" in the mail for a civil matter, for example: <<Vampires Bank and Trust VS. YouBetterPay Pal>> inviting one to a "hearing" in such date, one should: (?) 1- Void the "summons" across in red, marked "No contract" "I do not consent to these proceedings". Write at the top NON-NEGOTIABLE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Via registered mail to the Clerk of the Court, and/or all concerning parties. 2- Send NOTICE OF MISTAKE via registered mail to concerning parties. 3- Summit a Writ with instructions to Dismiss the case, via registered mail. 4- Have a stand by ticket to the Amazon?

..so it would be INSIDE the wording/written-body for the Writ-of-whatever we are seeking from the court to enforce, where we would say to the court/judge that we are seeking him/it to enforce the Writ by way of a PRAECIPE; so the title of the document at the top of the page would read WRIT-OF-WHATEVER, and not PRAECIPE. The term PRAECIPE, would only be mentioned in the wording within the document? :/

WTF?...why does the Province of SASKATCHEWAN cover PRAECIPE but NOT Ontario? http://www.lawsociety.sk.ca/media/17916/form37.pdf

ONTARIO is a BANKRUPT ADMINISTRATIVE ZONE ( DuuuH)

Ok.. whats the co-relation, though?

Eamonn O Brien: If a writ is an order of the court on behalf of one party to the other how do you file for the court to issue one? Am I understanding it properly even...?

Scott Duncan: Praecipe.

Eamonn O Brien: 1. At common law, a writ ordering a defendant to do some act or to explain why inaction is appropriate. - Also termed writ of praecipe. 2. A written motion or request seeking some court action, esp. a trial setting or an entry of judgment... So praecipe is a request for the court to issue a writ...?

Scott Duncan: YES, and it's a DEMAND. Praecipe= ORDER FROM THE KING

Pete Daoust: [Latin, Give an order.] An original writ, one of the forms of legal process used to commence an action. A praecipe was drawn up in the alternative and commanded the defendant to do what was ordered or to appear and show why he or she had not done it. An order that commands the clerk of a court to issue a formal writ of execution directing the enforcement of a judgment already rendered and commanding a public officer to seize the defendant's property in order to satisfy the debt.

Daniel J Wentz: Scott wrote Praecipe's in the 90's that fucked a LOT of people up. He IS the best source for this.

Scott Duncan: ...Yes.

Derek Moran: The RIGHT WAY would be to say- "Your Honour, i PRAECIPE for you to Strike/ I PRAECIPE for you to Quash this matter"- is the way we SHOULD be phrasing these statements (instead of using the term "MOTION"), but is the way THEY would prefer us NEVER find out about?

Scott Duncan: No.

Scott Duncan: Praecipe is WRITTEN, because it's LAW, and the WHOLE PURPOSE is to NOT be in a court!

Derek Moran: If Praecipe= ORDER FROM THE KING... what does MOTION equal?

Scott Duncan: FROM WIKIFUCKINGPEDIA! "In Canada it is used in place of a notice of motion as an application for a desk order that is granted in the court registry without a hearing before a judge". ...oh Derek, you miss the little things...LIKE NOT GOING TO FUCKING COURT!

Pete Daoust: beggin from a slave

Derek Moran: "...oh Derek, you miss the little things...LIKE NOT GOING TO FUCKING COURT!"..... no argument here. I just lack experience. Ummm..when will you be showcasing your talents in a courtroom again next?

Daniel J Wentz: Oh crap. Scott's makeing a drone army I see. Oh well. I hear AQUILAE trustees always end up doing pretty well for themselves, so no worries. Things must be going to shit if `Liz has let you off her leash, Scott Duncan!

Derek Moran: Ok, so to review: you would NEVER verbally use the term PRAECIPE in court, in terms of say- "Your Honour, i PRAECIPE for you to Strike/Quash this matter.."..... PRAECIPE, is STRICTLY, to be used, in WRITTEN form ONLY...?

Scott Duncan: ONLY WRITTEN FORM. NOTHING ELSE.

Scott Duncan: Re:"what does MOTION equal?" It means, "BEND OVER AND TAKE IT DRY, BECAUSE YOU LITERALLY ASKED FOR IT! JOINDER, BABY"!

So you make a writ of habeus for kidnapping, attach the kidnapping charge, they hear the writ and they issue a praecipe Now, to get that kidnapping charge where does it come from?

Daniel J Wentz: If a JUSTICE cautions you about the "dangers" of MOTIONING, he's HELPING you. Judges are ELECTED, and JUSTICES are APPOINTED. [Scott-like emphaisis added] Since you are in CANADA, then you should not be concerned about JUDGES, because you will never be before one. March at 5:56pm Scott Duncan ...What he said.

Scott Duncan: Only public servants can MOTION. Even then, only as a PARTY. I would have locked him up for contempt.

Scott Duncan: Criminal. I would have witnessed FRAUD against the petitioner. Dean claimed he was not the name, but by MOTIONING he was acting as a PARTY, and was INTERFERING WITH THE LEGAL COMMERCIAL INTERESTS of the petitioner. You are either a PARTY or you are NOT. You don't get to say you are NOT a party, and than ACT as one. It's FRAUD

Scott Duncan: Derek: ONTARIO ANNUAL PRACTICE has all the rules. Who else BUT a party can even APPEAR? You are trying to "prove" something you already KNOW!

Pete Daoust: You are either a PARTY or you are NOT. You don't get to say you are NOT a party, and than ACT as one. It's FRAUD: wow...thats solid stuff ???.....is it me or I focus on the wrong stuff..???

"Your Justice...is the CROWN/DA a PARTY in this matter.....?"

Daniel J Wentz: Derek Moran, Only a PERSON can be a PARTY. Do you really need "proof" of this? Why do you looking for "validation from your rapist" (as Scott says)?

Eamonn O Brien: Would saying" for and on the record I am filing a praecipe in the court wishing for the JP to dismiss the case" be considered "filing with the court"? I'd imagine you just need to get your praecipe on record...?

Scott Duncan: Praecipe is never IN the court! EVER. OMG I'm sorry I ever mentioned it!

Jason F. LeBlanc Watch this it explains praecipe: http://robcourtofrecord.wordpress.com/2013/01/31/video-praecipe-act-of-the-king/

So, Scott Duncan- IF one were to attempt to draft a PRAECIPE...what would be the TITLE of it? PRAECIPE ? or WRIT OF PRAECIPE ?

Thanks Derek Moran..... I watched it back in Feb... many times... The Praecipe was one of the first things I learned about. Problem was I did not know enough about how everything ( LAW, Bills of exchange, and accounting knowledge) tied together. From what I have gathered we AS-KING go the the court registry File a praecipe for a writ of action... Many types.. including but not limited to mandamus, replevin... etc. From my investigation we go to the court registry and file it AS-KING...

: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : OF ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : : : NO. : : : PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF SUMMONS TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Issue writ of summons in the above case. Writ of Summons shall be issued and forwarded to Attorney / Sheriff. (Please circle choice) ?Date: ________________ ____________________________________ Signature of Attorney Print Name: _________________________ Address: ____________________________ ____________________________________ Telephone: __________________________ Supreme Court ID No. _________________

Praecipe in Alberta has to be filed physically at the court registry... the court that oversees the other courts.

documents were not online and it took me a while to sort thru the process from knowledge gleaned from the video above... it was very helpful.... still has taken me months to come to a comprehension of all this.

wait wtf. writ of praecipe is what justices issue not you. you put in a writ of habeus

As-KIng, we file at the registry, correct Scott Duncan?

awaiting Scott Duncan to blast you.

We are KING of our trust enabling us to file on our own behalf.... Hoping not to get blasted...

its like a pre-emptive strike, keeping it out of court ... the back door..

praecipe is NOT a WRIT... the writ comes from the praecipe.... The Praecipe COMMANDS AN ACTION it is where the Writ comes from..

As DIRECTOR of the trust, having issued A BILL OF EXCHANGE, ONCE PROPER NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN and The invoice has been defaulted, As Director go to the COURT REGISTRY File a PRAECIPE with the court registry to ISSUE A WRIT OF ENFORCEMENT to collect the debt...

circumventing the need to actually attend COURT... WE BECOME our own JUSTICE, As KEEPERS OF OUR OWN TRUST.

Is it (sic) simple just a matter of challenging their authority to bring you into their jurisdiction to begin with as you are NOT one of THEM.? This is the point of, "You should not be in Their court to begin with." PRAECIPE, an order, written out and signed, addressed to the clerk of the court, and requesting him to issue a particular writ. Mmm, so this would be the request for the clerk of the court to.......issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus???

Like if your asking for the body. Could be a Writ of anything really.

AS-KING It is MY trust, THe invoice establishes JOINDER TO THE TRUST.... THEY agreed to terms, they have defaulted, they are bound by THE TRUSTS BY LAWS. ( what are what ever the fuck I say they are...in honour) . Chad Brodgesell : YES

They have the same right to not contract. Once they get your fee schedule and properly filed paperwork it becomes a competitive game of high stakes chicken.

Say fee schedule around them and they get all silent...

TOO LATE... They already have agreed by the contract... an invoice is evidence.. the property created by the contract is proof... silence is consent, the notice of default address's that...

To Quote the ADMIRAL " IF IT IS NOT SIMPLE, YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG"

ChiefRock Sino General also listed and described a number of writs here https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/536549606380976/

It (PRAECIPE) is kinda like going to a restaurant and placing an ORDER...

Derek Moran: The City sent my dad 2 Notices about a by-law violation, i get home from living in Windsor a year, send them a Notice for Proof-of-Claim, they send a 3rd, i send a 2nd.. they stopped with prosecution-talk, but never reversed THE INSPECTION FEE.. after having sent 8 Notices, now its on my dads property-tax to be paid FIRST on March 1st.. so these Writs and/or Praecipe might come in handy (Scott clicked LIKE)

Scott Duncan: Yes.

Derek Moran: CERTIORARI: allows the court to quash a final decision of an agency, usually for errors of jurisdiction. i.e. BY-LAWS As for Praecipe..it seems like you waltz into the court acting as if you're the King and asking a Court of Equity Chancellor to issue an ORDER based on your COMMAND, within reason and that you are in the right i suspect (Scott clicked LIKE) So i would say.......PRAECIPE trumps CERTIORARI

Scott Duncan: Oh Derek Moran. THANK you for not being...well everyone else. (ahhhh- the good ole days *sniffle*) ;)

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma: Its your authority... how do you do that on someone else's behalf?

Derek Moran: Good point..my dad is old-school and still views the Government above, as i view them as public-servants and below.....guess id just have to school-him on a PRAECIPE

Derek Moran: Interesting concept PRAECIPE...much like ESTOPPEL, thats another one ill dig into deeper one day (Scott clicked LIKE)

Would that be something good to have ? a seal ? :/ The Inscription Number Pierre. Sole Authorized Administrator

It makes everything signed or sealed with it: a specially contract :-D it seals your own law and makes it recognized in other clubhouses.

So it would be a good thing to use one of these ?? :)

the best thing. :-D

except you may want a corporate one to handle the affairs of the thing in your back pocket, it is deposited to hold in a trust, so your own law will be recognized, your definitions are great but the clubhouse cannot see them cause it issued by the slave� the slave has to be given to hold by the corporate person( duly authorized trustee corporation = corporate person) we have granted to admin the trust. As the slave in the back pocket ( the last thing the slave does; he is then an officer of the corporate person). This is the most important thing to be recognized, and the only way to do that is to recognize them. It is a two way street.

The corporation holds surety and protects all assets and property.

This is a case of keeping surety, It is advantageous to have that now�

As a dully authorized trustee corporation.

Hellos? Is your head spinning :-D

Don't worry that happens just before a break through. It will be ok.

:-)

I just ordered that seal near your place Bobis Youruncle :D http://www.orderstamps.ca/

Good people at this place. :-D

thanks for the link Pete Daoust!

I got this one: http://www.printystamp.com/seals/index.php The small one I can carry in my front pocket. :-D

I ordered the STANDARD DESK SEAL 1 5/8 INCH

uhoh..Pete Daoust is going to need a new wardrobe...front pocket!!

It seals the private law and makes it recognizable, the most important thing

You will need a big pocket.

maybe someone could create a seal holder for your pants..like they have for cell phones

Are you ever going to crate a corporate person you can trust? Pete Daoust

I know none of my business�

Done :P

*

I TRUST 9111-1111 Quebec Inc, this thing already HOLDS stuff for me :P

Since 2006...

*STANDING OVATION, with frog like, jumping around * Did you make an agreement with this person to hold something for safe keeping ?

Yet?

Yes, it holds some shares of another company....

Good. Well done. Serious�

Ok, now I can have a nap� This stuff is very good, but to be able to rest with a clear mind is a thing I value, I never slept much for about 30 years, now I can finally, again. I know I know�. go ahead�

Haa....shu..... :D

I Like�. :-)

Booobies :-D

And you my friend�