I still watch in silence every WORD that comes from this group. Some very powerful knowledge is shared and I have learned a small fraction and know I need more daily. It's like a thirst that cannot be quenched.
I search "articles of incorporation" and "charter" and some great knowledge pulls up. However, I have learned rather quickly to skip right over Derek Moran's comments ?
You, Scott Duncan, have changed my life. I am not quite sure how all the puzzle pieces fit together, but I am searching hard for those missing pieces. I cannot ever say in words how grateful I am for what you have given all of us in this group. And may I add that PeteDaoust, you are an inspiration in what you have accomplished with the knowledge Scott pointed out to you. I so wish that my oldest son would and could see how you VOIDED that order by the unauthorized user of your account.
Putting the pieces together is the first step.
Then you are qualified to be mad, because you know WHO to be mad at, and why. However that's just the foundation. Pete Daoust is taking the first step, and ASKING QUESTIONS, as is his RIGHT.
That's the HARDEST part. No one wants to listen to truth. They only have illogical sense and pre-conceived thoughts and refuse even to look at the truth let alone try to see it.
Chris Evan, if I had never met you on Anna's page calling her a FRAUD, I would still be struggling to find a way to get my son released from prison. THANK YOU and Scott for this.
I cannot wait to see where your knowledge takes my son, Gee Randall. He made his first Bitcoin purchase this week, and within the week he had already made his value back. He is pretty excited.
I absolutely love that I make people's lives better, while I strive to collapse the banking system and start a war.
I have such violent and hostile intent, and I do so much good while attaining that lofty goal! :D
Your life is better because I want to hurt people. I know right? Irony :D
To date 12 people have died because I intended it. If I intend to kill you, I do it both LEGALLY and LAWFULLY. ALWAYS.
I have the same "Arts" degree that they do.
...except I am also a scientist with THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING.
I like my odds. I intend to increase my body count.
I like it when lawyers die from stress related illness. I'm ALWAYS the cause of the stress in question. :D
From the "I don't know where the igloos in Ontario are vs the igloos in Quebec" department, one time Beverly called me to visit if she was close. She was in New Jersey. She thought it was a 30 minute drive or something. :D
I've had people on Yonge Street ask me for directions to Winnipeg. I just tell them to "stay on this road and keep driving" (Which is correct directions, BTW) :D
You do not HAVE an incorporated business. There is no joinder, because the CORPORATION is in fact a PERSON.
You can own CONTROLLING (voting) shares but you never own the corporation. It's up to the CORPORATION to protect the name, not you.
So when they come down on you, you just hand them the business license and say, "Here's your guy"... and they shut your doors down and your out of a job-ish...?
If they come to YOU, YOU are just a SHAREHOLDER of the corporation. That corporation JUST HAPPENS to have liened the shit out of your NAME. THEREFORE "Beverly May Braaksma" is PROPERTY held IN TRUST.
Since the corporation (with the shareholder's consent) OWNS "Beverly May Braaksma", then you must maintain/give value to, that name, and the corporation looks after the "asset". You need never engage in commerce again.
Well if they can come in and apparently "auction" some PERSON's home if they haven't paid their property taxes, can they not take away the corporation's assets? Or they need someone to back that up as another PERSON?
So, the $2 coffee i bought with legal tender today..i was engaging in commerce. If i had as someone has mentioned to me before a, 'dummy-corporation,' and i keep the reciept, then i didnt spend the $2 for that coffee..the dummy-corporation did? :/
*psssst* Beverly..somebody was telling me recently on how to fill-out a bill-'note-in-lieu-of-payment'-remittance properly recently, it includes getting a STAMP made for the back of it referencing the sections of the Bills of Exchange Act you want to convey to them in a message- and to the Bank of Canada, ta'boot! ;)
..this PERSON also pointed out to me that, the BANK OF CANADA is the only organization in Canada that is capable of creating MONEY, which, is exactly the definition of what a NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT is in the Financial Administration Act
Scott might be sleeping or making me figure it out on my own... (likely)... but I am concerned to conglomerate with this other company if I should somehow let them down...
Conglomerate legal definition:
A corporation operating in several different and unrelated enterprises, such as the movie industry, baking, and oil refining.
A conglomerate merger is one that brings together two firms with totally different product lines, economic relationships, and functions. Such a merger may violate antitrust acts inasmuch as it may have an adverse effect on competition.
if one has an incorporated business, to protect that name, and a much needed BN number (for import purposes), : I THINK the best would be to establish ANOTHER corporation ..... ??...the ACTUAL corporation you have shares can be easely be put in the trust....but the NAME should be lien by ANOTHER corporation that will be held in the same trust.....I THINK....
So when one "applies" for a corporation, say to "BRITISH COLUMBIA" is the "applicant" now the "grantor" or "settlor". Is the grantor/settlor not liable to joinder now, say for filing, or for for appointing an Executor, or Trustees to File for the corp. This post is thru Cara by boy toy.
No. The GRANTOR'S job is FINISHED.
Your parents and the Government were the GRANTORS of the name on YOUR birth certificate. They are no longer parties with standing. A PERSON is responsible for their OWN debts.
Scott - " Since the corporation (with the shareholder's consent) OWNS "Beverly May Braaksma", then you must maintain/give value to, that name, and the corporation looks after the "asset". You need never engage in commerce again."
How would one give value to the NAME once it's held in trust? Would that be determined by the TRUSTS t's & c's?
Like the government's determinations at present?
"The term corporation comes from the Latin corpus, which means body. A corporation is a body--it is a legal person in the eyes of the law. It can bring lawsuits, can buy and sell property, contract, be taxed, and even commit crimes. It's most notable feature: a corporation protects its owners from personal liability for corporate debts and obligations--within limits."
"Remember, aside from tax reasons, the most common motivation for incurring the cost of setting up a corporation is the recognition that the shareholder is not legally liable for the actions of the corporation. This is because the corporation has its own separate existence wholly apart from those who run it"
(May as well start from scratch with regards to what a corporation even is etc...)
Liening the NAME means the CORPORATION is presumed to have the value, not the name. The name OWES the corporation, so the name is responsible for the DEBT to the corporation, and nothing else. That's all the name DOES anymore...owe the corporation.
So starting from scratch...
I apply to Incorporate a business. I and a friend, for instance, are the appointed shareholders. We outline that the business is one that supplies entertainment for events. "GOOD TIMES INC"
We appoint ourselves as directors and appoint a talented young chap as a performer and agent of the corporation...
We prepare our articles of incorporation and send them off. We then receive the certificate of incorporation.
The name "GOOD TIMES INC" is now a PERSON in law.
As possessor of the person EAMONN O BRIEN I then give it to "GOOD TIMES INC" for dispositioning/transferring ownership. "GOOD TIMES INC" then lien that PERSON and place it in a TRUST within the corporation...
Am I understanding it so far? :p
Lets say this SAME CORPORATION decide to invest in REAL ESTATE, and it happen to buy the NAME�S house, than, the NAME decide to LEND the $$ to the corporation to buy this HOUSE, can the NAME also lien the CORPORATION for that loan ???....of course all the accounting is done properly and the books match perfectly�.and then the corporation RENT the house to the NAME�.the way I see it, the HOUSE would now be IN TRUST �????
Now, the CORPORATION have a lien on the NAME, and the NAME have a lien on the corporation�
if one has already applied for a corp but it was labelled a ltd. can one simply correct the label or would one have to apply for new corp correctly (inc.) then lien the ltd. corp?
As far as the Inc company is concerned, the stockholders, directors and officers are not questionable for the debts and other obligations of the company. Ltd companies do not have these same rules.
Read more: Difference Between Inc and Ltd | Difference Between | Inc vs Ltd http://www.differencebetween.net/business/difference-between-inc-and-ltd/#ixzz2QpsL7zQ2
Registering a NAME just separates liability... so when your candy store fails and you haven't paid your suppliers, they cannot take the shareholder's homes... or BMW's
What living representative dictates what microsoft does though? The Directors? What if as shareholder you appoint yourself director also... Are you "in the shit" then if corporate law is broken?
Obviously he was... I'm not eating lies I'm starting from scratch here... I didn't know the first thing about incorporating until an hour ago...
As shareholder one can appoint themselves as acting Director/President...
But Scott does that make sens ????....It does for me but ...you know :D
Lets say this SAME CORPORATION decide to invest in REAL ESTATE, and it happen to buy the NAME�S house, than, the NAME decide to LEND the $$ to the corporation to buy this HOUSE, can the NAME also lien the CORPORATION for that loan ???....of course all the accounting is done properly and the books match perfectly�.and then the corporation RENT the house to the NAME�.the way I see it, the HOUSE would now be IN TRUST �????
Now, the CORPORATION have a lien on the NAME, and the NAME have a lien on the corporation�
It dosen't matter WHO form the corporation....it could be my WIFE doing it....whats matter is WHO ARE the shareholders and WHO ARE the administrators....
You don't Apply for a corporation, you REGISTER it. The GOVERNMENT is the one ENDORSING (and is therefore surety) the registration (Perfecting). Liability is not even a factor in this exchange.
Been reading the appropriate forms for company registration in Ireland... The "presenter" is the one who submits the forms on behalf of the individual who is registering the company's name...
When you're signing the end of the registration form you sign it and print your NAME as the individual or grantor... Once the certificate of incorporation is delivered the grantor's job is done... The corporation/ new PERSON looks after itself...
to me, its like Hockey, if you Watch it from the stands, you'll NEVER be qualified to play it....you have to jump on the ice...no choice....but, I may be wrong, I just say this from my personal exp�riences....