I think she got you at "I wish to REPRESENT myself." How can you RE-present yourself? I listened up to minute 7, but good job just trying to explain yourself and not going off-the-handle like most Freemen do. But Eamonn is right..you've come to the right group.
Ah the chap in the video wasn't very clued in I don't think. Not that I'd be any better but he didn't seem to understand his relationship with the PERSON... The JP even asked him "Is it your birth cert?"... Testing him there in my opinion...
"No. It is not MY birth certificate, but...i am the Lawful-Holder-In-Due-Course and sole-living-Beneficiary of it"..... think Scott said the Birth Certificate is PROOF of the security-of-the-person..and that the PERSON, is the legal-name to the SECURITY. Where the Government tries to trip us up, is when they re-define for themselves the definition of CORPORATION to become a PERSON, in order to create joinder with us through the obfuscation with the meaning of the words. The LAW, is all about INTENT. And their INTENT, is to DECEIVE us...their masters, btw ;)
Birth cert is evidence of the security of the PERSON yup... Ah I left a couple comments for the guy in the vid based on Scott's posts etc...
Article 3. (UDHR)
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and SECURITY OF PERSON
164. Fair hearing
(4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), that subsection does not preserve the validity of the proceeding if the failure to comply with the agreement results in PREJUDICE to the DEFENDANT'S RIGHT to a FAIR HEARING.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90p33_e.htm#BK207