The Tender For Law

Volume 1

Mar 29, 2013 2:13 PM

Philip Laforet

Just wondering, if you are charge with a "crime" that is statutory in nature, why don't you bring a charge against the police or crown in their court, that's what it's there for, employees of the government. For example, someone on this page had said that their family and or witnesses were not allowed in court. At that point why would you go to see the Justice of the peace and lay a charge of obstruction. At a court hearing I was at, a buddy who has some knowledge of this type of stuff got into an argument with the crown, both in and outside of the court room. He went to the JP and had a peace bond taken out against the crown, simple! Of course there was no financial compensation at that point, but it is using their words (criminal code) against them, like the do to us! Simple or not? I am considering charging the crown with conspiracy in my case, they have CONspired with the police to do harm to me. Just putting it out there! Any comments?

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

I have a funny feeling that these COURTS are PRIVATE places....and, again, its like going to HA bunkers trying to target one of THEIR members.....you might suceed, but good luck and don't miss 1 single coma in your sentences....this is the way I see it for now...:(

Philip Laforet

Hmm, I have the balls to do it no problem. What is the difference if you take a cop or crown into their court or you put a lein on their property, you are still open to retribution! Honestly when my buddy got into it with the crown outside of the court room,the guy RAN like a little bitch! I have observed one thing and I have been in court many times, they are more afraid of you than you should be of them, snakes are like that!!! If the statutes apply to them, then I say apply them. Scott the tickets are FREE and so am I!!!

Philip Laforet

Wondering... when I meet with a Justice of the Peace and I immediatly reserve all rights as per Scott's great instruction, what choice will they have? I believe they will have to ask how I wish to proceed as all meetings are court, courtROOM or not and they have no standing so....it's worth a shot.

Philip Laforet

Scott doing something "stupid" if often how great things are accomplished. Thanks for not putting a comma after the word something! It is a live and learn deal, what's the worst than can happen? Jail been there done that, had a great time, really everyone should try it, at least to get over your fear of it. Also was an embalmer for 20 years and survived cancer for the last 22. What have I got worry about? NOTHING!! lets roll!!!

Philip Laforet

It's only stupid if a) a train is comming and b) if you don't want to die. I suspect that all of this comes down to power, if the Justice or Justice of the Peace, perceives that you are more powerful (spiritually speaking) then they are you win. It cannot just be about paper and what's written on it, it's the delivery! These people in the "justice system" know they have to walk out on the street, they don't live in the Ivory tower called the court house. I ran into the Judge who sentenced me in the grocery store one day, he literally froze in his footsteps, I just walked by pretending not to notice him. If I had said boo, he would have crapped his pants. I have no fear (ego) or anything to lose. According to Janis Joplin, that's my friend is FREEDOM!!

Bobby Sludds

one of the main things in my opinion is to remove all presumtions, assumtions and implied jurisdiction. and remember never accept the assumtion that I the one who am me is you If the YOU is being charged or the YOU is in some sort of trouble we can not be the you because I Am me, and we need to all start acting like it. some might disagree but its only my opinion

Philip Laforet

I like that thinking Bobby, it's the old who's on first skit. If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit!! Use any means to accomplish your goal!! I am beginging to wonder how many will have to courage to stand in front of a tank when they start rolling into Nathan Phillips square, like the one man who did so in China, not many, if any!!

Tara Duncan

I don't think we have to wonder much about that. We could wonder, perhaps, about how many people will be running behind the tanks cheering and waving flags, with the absolute certainty they are being saved from "insert ridiculous politically-motivated threat" here.

Tara Duncan

Now that I think about, we probably don't need to wonder about that either. There may be a few people watching the event on the news deciding if the tanks might interfere with their ability to navigate rush-hour traffic in their luxury vehicles.

Derek Moran

This just came to me..how about just walking into a court with an Affidavit affirming that- "...just like Peter Hogg says; i am not a Government Actor, performing a Government Action, or performing-a-public-function-of-Government. If anyone here thought i was, then that would be a MISTAKE, and i forgive YOU. Proceeding with this matter against me any further SHALL be CONSIDERED to be INTENT to DEFRAUD." :/

Philip Laforet

That is what Scott Duncan's notice of mistake is, less the intent to defraud part. Hopwever someone on this page said at his hearing or pretrial they would not accept the notice. I guess it depends if you bare your teeth or not!! I am going to use the notice, try charging the crown, get a Peace bond against the cop, I am going to be a force to be delt with!! Hope you are too!!

Philip Laforet

Yes, that is my plan I will go this week and give them to the crown, try to get one in the court file. Although here the clerks "say" they give them to the judge, which is bullshit because if the Judge got it he would have to recuse himself, I believe. So I will go to the Judges offices and be sure he gets one. I have had a few Judges recuse themselves already. If anything, wasting their time equals wasting their money also!! There is more than one way to skin a skin a cat/snake! Thanks for the advice!!

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

this is happening to me right now in the STATE OF MICHIGAN; a police and prosecutor conspiracy; they have no victims, no witnesses, only a complaining witness who is a special resources officer that didn't see shit nor have any involvement and probably strips on a stage at night...the case is misdemeanor and based on reasonable cause ok but the judge found probable cause to order a warrant, sound right? i think not....its a scam to waste time and pressure a guilty plea but i want to get it thrown out immediately. its been difficult.

Scott Duncan

Clubhouse rules. They ignore them on a whim. What are you going to do? SUE THEM?

It's all about SURETY! "YOU"=SURETY Your "Name"=SURETY!

I'll never quite grasp how attached all of you are to your NAME. It's not YOURS! It (and SURETY) were given to you.

Philip Laforet

Derek, go for it, charged with fraud, that was before I knew anything of the stuff we learn here. I have also been on the front page 3 times for that and a number of times for helping a friend go to Dr. Kevorkian for his special treatment and bringing the body across the boarder before they even knew what happened, I ain"t no shy guy!! That was when I owned a Funeral home so I knew all the ins and outs of getting a body over the boarder. Never met Dr K. he didn't want to implicate me in the "murder"!!

Derek Moran

this is my favourite quote- "The letters also referenced Laforet's belief in an antigovernment movement known as Freemen on the Land. The movement, which argues laws don't apply to citizens, has been PICKING UP MOMENTUM across Canada." ;)

Philip Laforet

Btw Scott the first time I was in front of Of a J.P. for bail and said POINT OF ORDER, I WISH TO RESSERVE ALL RIGHTS, they immediatly took a recess (like good little school kids) came back and decided that it was too hot for them. They decidied to bring in an out of town J.P. and crown. So On Monday last week I went before them, they were from london. Did the point of order thing etc, didn't work. However I crossed examined their expert bail cop witness, got him right riled up. The out of town crown fought like hell to keep me in custody. We were in there from10:00 a.m. until 6:30 P.M. and I won! Wanted to just walk out but got bail. A small victory, used the Notice of mistake, to no avail, yet. The J.P. was a nice lady who said I had a very argueable case, but she was only there for bail purposes. She put the crown in his place a few times, especially when he said she (J.P.) had to put me on the stand! She gave it to him!! I was ambushed off the street (Stalked) no warrant, and one cop threatened to kick me in the head! I told him I would own his fucking house!! No one wanted to deal with me, no finger prints no signing anything except the bail papers!! Scott you have unleashed a fucking Tiger!! Thank you so much Sir!! Anyone who is able is welcomed to link thE Windsor Star Article, I don't know how, it was on Thursday I think. Back to court on the 24th for some more fun and games!!

Philip Laforet

There was video with that story and it was the front page headline, the video is on you tube PHILIP Laforet discusses charges, you can link that also if you wish. Oddly enough the same day in the Star there was a story of a cop being charged with fraud, it hit the bottom corner of page 2!

Philip Laforet

BTW, at the time of the fraud stuff I was trying to expose the bullshit that happens in the Funeral homes, taking advantage of widows and orphans, shame, I took the fall, but it put the heat on the industry, you think the cops are bad, funeral director's make them look like fucking Boyscouts!! I should know at one time I owned 4 funeral homes, then I woke up!!

Derek Moran

Im not even quite sure what thats alluding too.. i assume what you're asking for is- "Where is my employment-contract with the government proving that im a Government Actor or performing a public-function-of-government, performing a Government Action?"

Philip Laforet

Didn't do the barring any... part, thought why give them the chance to object. I asked both the J.P.'s if the understood and the said yes!! Where is this "All rise in the court" thread? my computer skills are minimal at best, as you can tell, but I do have a big mouth!! Don't get any idea's Scott!!

Derek Moran

On entering the court, you aggressively make the first motion, that being, the RESERVATION OF YOUR RIGHTS. But since you're the only one in the courtroom with ACTUAL STANDING, you can be a total dick about it. You don't RESERVE YOUR RIGHTS, you RESERVE ALL RIGHTS! Not just yours, EVERYONE's. You remove everyone else's rights and give them to yourself. WHY? Because "Fuck off that's WHY!" You're the only one with STANDING.

If you HOLD the power, WIELD it...don't be such a pussy! If you're entitled to ALL RIGHTS, CLAIM THEM. This is how you do it.

When the "justice" starts speaking, interrupt them. Say, "Point of order!" They will immediately be silent. At that point, state "I believe I am the only party with standing, so barring objection from the court, I wish to RESERVE ALL RIGHTS now, and henceforth. Are there any objections from the court?" As the court has no standing to respond, simply speak to the record as such, "Let the record show that I have reserved all rights, and the court has not objected." At this point if they say anything to you, you simply say, "Objection. The record shows that I have reserved all rights, and I have not granted you leave to speak. Why are you speaking?"

Do the same when opposing counsel attempts to speak. You will then be posed the question, "How do you wish to proceed in this matter?" for that is the one question a slave has the right to ask. What is their master's wish?

Derek Moran

*judge begins to speak at his trial* "Point of order!" *judge goes silent* "BARRING ANY OBJECTION FROM THE COURT, at this time I WISH to reserve ALLl rights. Is there ANY objection from the court?

*Jeopardy Music*

Any objections?

*Clock Ticking*

....Lookin' for OBJECTIONS FROM THE COURT! Going Once... (repeat second and third time)

As the court has NOT objected I have , IN FACT, reserved ALL rights. (It is a FACT that's ON RECORD, and I wish the court to SHUT ITS FUCKING PIE-HOLE!) (...be silent).

QUESTION: if you have RESERVED ALL RIGHTS, and they don't understand what you are referring to, when you speak of the PUBLIC RECORD, ASK your BITCH SLAVE, WHAT THE FUCK? ...like so:

"Point of ORDER! It is MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS, IN FACT, A COURT OF THE PUBLIC RECORD. Am I MISTAKEN?

As I, myself have, IN FACT, RESERVED ALL RIGHTS (Not YOUR rights, ALL rights. The rights of everyone in the court have been surrendered to you!) I wish to convene a COURT OF THE PUBLIC RECORD (Barring ANY objections from the court).

You'll recall in other articles and comments, the levels of the caste system and how they give instructions.

NOBILITY (KINGS AND QUEENS) EXPRESS THEIR "WISHES".

ADMIRALTY ISSUES INSTRUCTIONS BY REQUESTING, ADDRESSING THEIR SUBORDINATES AS "MR".

GENERALS GIVE ORDERS.

The fact that if you have all the rights, and everybody else has none, you are CLEARLY the KING. So you are going to have to learn to give instruction by expressing your wishes. This is why they are asking how you "wish to proceed". Courts grant and test your SOVEREIGNTY all the time. You simply have to listen to the words they are using. At this time you may respond, "I wish to prove to some ass-wipe who sounds like he's got a dick in his mouth, the things I know, so I wish to go to trial PRO SE. But I wouldn't recommend this...I would simply wish the case to be dismissed.

If they say anything else besides "I agree, case dismissed", you exercise your AUTHORITY by questioning. MASTERS QUESTION, SLAVES ANSWER. For instance if a "justice" said anything except "I agree. Case dismissed," you question why they are even speaking. "I'm sure you'll recall Mr. (insert justice's name here) that at the beginning of these proceedings I explicitly reserved all rights, including yours. Have I not made my wishes clear?"

Always remember to respond in the form of a question. A question serves the dual-purpose of establishing your authority, and negating the possibility of UNDERSTANDING; because if you UNDERSTAND, you accept SURETY.

As stated before, the most powerful of these questions is, "Who are you?" UNDERSTANDING cannot be presumed until that question is answered.

Above all, questioning deflects SURETY.

Scott Duncan MAKE A PAD of "NOTICE of MISTAKE", and MAKE them ANSWER the QUESTIONS, and if they are NOT answered, then you "CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS".

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

I've spent 30 days in the dunk tank for contempt because i know made a few mistakes; that's the only way to end up there..traffic court is easy but the county district court seems tougher; they put on more pressure, they gang up on you real quick, even the public pretender defenders got involved yelling out in court from behind me, it was an all out assault and now they want to force a public pretender on my case, i need to figure out to block it and start fresh, court is scheduled Monday again.

Scott Duncan

Why did you consent to a CONTEMPT Charge?

...what? you think it was without consent?

What KIND of "charge" is "contempt"? Civil, or Criminal?

Civil? Produce the contract. Criminal? Who's the injured party?

So... there's 30 days that made some strangers some money! :D

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

they wont they cant it will be thrown out, they will try to supeona a witness who has explicitly told them nothing happened and that they dont want to press charges...but these assholes chose to harass me anyways this is why im so pissed.

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

Michigan contempt powers derive from statutes MCL 765.15(12), MCL 769.1k, MCL 769.16a, MCL 775.22, MCL 780.766, MCL 780.826 and MCR 6.427....... its nuts look at all this crap lol and I've never done the Lien process because i dont know how actually and I've been skeptical because I've heard some people have got in big trouble for some reason is that possible?

Derek Moran

In hindsight, you should've started asking from everybody yelling at you for the name of the Underwriter of their Hazard-Bonds, the Bonding-number of their Hazard-Bond, where you can go to see a copy of their Hazard-Bond to see what the terms-and-conditions for the execution of their duties of their employment are, the location of their Risk Management company, and oh by the way- "..do you have your Bonds present with you in court today to produce them for my INSPECTION...?" ;)

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

doing anything wrong makes people look like idiots and wackos to these public crooks and since we have all the enlightenment taking place about the corruption going on it seems it has produced a lot of idiots in the way, making it look bad upon others and im not trying to be in that category, when i take the steps i want to take some good steps forward that make sense and are logical. Some people just throw out heaps of shit and look insane however i don't blame them for the trial and error which gains experience, its just how will you really know what works when you throw at em everything possible to get a positive result.

Derek Moran

"How do you wish to proceed in this matter?" for that is the one question a slave has the right to ask. What is their master's wish?"........ what exactly IS the proper response to this- "I WISH at this time for the court to....?" What- quash this matter, strike this matter, discharge, dismiss, withdraw the charges.. which is the proper way of saying it, Scott? :/

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

i knew i just asked a question back and delayed the process to bring up a different topic about the invalid complaint...check this out http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Articles/CommercialLienStrategy.htm

Derek Moran

*answering my own question* SCOTT DUNCAN:

"I would simply wish the case to be dismissed.

If they say anything else besides "I agree, case dismissed", you exercise your AUTHORITY by questioning. MASTERS QUESTION, SLAVES ANSWER. For instance if a "justice" said anything except "I agree. Case dismissed," you question why they are even speaking. "I'm sure you'll recall Mr. (insert justice's name here) that at the beginning of these proceedings I explicitly reserved all rights, including yours. Have I not made my wishes clear?"

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

Derek Moran when he asked that question i stated "i demand the case be terminated" he remained silent for a few seconds ignored that move and then brought up other issues, then that's when I then i asked questions about the complaint, its like he couldn't hear my demand for some reason, maybe i should of said discharge; i was testing the non motion, non dismiss angle really, I wasn't scared of contempt although i lost ten pounds for the food being nutritious near the brink of starvation.

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

exactly, motions are what the attorney profession does and pro se is joining their world playing by those rules and if people suck at being a fake attorney the Esquires make people pay for it.

J.c. Of-the Family-Pearson

once you enter a plea and make an appearance in court per Michigan statutes annotated; the validity can no longer be challenged (this must mean it can be challenged prior to arrest and or entering a plea for the warrant/charges), however, I never entered a plea, I took exception to the rule and the prick in the black robe entered "stood mute" and put what he wanted in the "court register of actions" and not what actually happened because I didn't invoke the proper reservations of rights in the process.