You've been CHARGED with something? Interesting, because i was under the impression that you are charged with offences under the Criminal Code, which is an ACT, comprised of STATUTES. As i understand it, the STATUTES in that ACT, only apply to "every one" "person" or "owner;" and the definition for all those is either a HER MAJESTY, or, an ORGANIZATION. You should ask them- "I dont wanna accuse anyone of MISREPRESENTATION, because Misrepresentation is FRAUD. But could you please tell me, which one am i- HER MAJESTY, or an ORGANIZATION?" :/
�every one�, �person� and �owner�, and similar expressions, include Her Majesty and an organization;
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-1.html#h-2
Thanks! ive been reading that and also have recieved good information on going to the Supirior court genneral division to seek and order to stop the lower court from acting against the "man"
Peter Hogg... his Constitutional Law of Canada text... determining who Acts-and-Statutes only apply to... "Government Actors; Government Actions; or performing-a-public-function-of-Government"..... then you might wanna ask someone- "Well who exactly does this so-called COMMON LAW apply to anyways.. its gotta apply to SOMEONE, right?"
Scott Duncan, is there a difference between "includes" and "include"? Derek's above post could have easily used "includes"...and I would think the difference could be important?
164. Fair hearing
(4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), that subsection does not preserve the validity of the proceeding if the failure to comply with the agreement results in PREJUDICE to the DEFENDANT'S RIGHT to a FAIR HEARING.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90p33_e.htm#BK207