The Tender For Law

Volume 1

Mar 26, 2013 8:06 AM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So Scott, I am observing that putting a lien on some/thing/person would exclude becoming a "plaintiff", rather it is a claim of right? And we do not want to be a "plaintiff". Therefore, for some/thing/person must become the "plaintiff" in order to get said lien removed.

On that note, is there not a procedure with liens? A notice, failure notice, etc. that must happen? How did you lien the warrant so quickly in Dean's case?

Read Comments

Adam Thomas

Serious reading now...yawn...im off to Tasmania tomorrow arvo...no sleep last night because of toodays court room shenanigans. ...sneaky fuckers they were.....AMENDABLE INSTRUMENTS do work as the dirty pricks used today against me....Amended the previous Judges order...I sighed deepl......after I got the ORIGINAL ORDER from the new judge today...I had to give it back to her fuckin spewing real bad....All my stamps were in my car ready to do the olde switcheroo...They LOVE taking my NAME TO WAR. IM A CASH COW FOR THEM . BUT IT AINT ME COZ ....I AM!!

Steve Lemieux

Funny, I just finished reading this publication this morning. It can also be found here in its original format - http://www.mind-trek.com/practicl/comliens.htm - Can't help but wonder how the process applies to putting liens on the OWNER of a corporation and all HIS assets, chattels and real property? Is it possible to "suffocate" a debtor with the lien process into compliance? More research on the way... Btw, all input from resident "silver bullets" is much APPRECIATED! :)

Derek Moran

"...corporation is not "owned". It is the "property" of the SHAREHOLDERS."..... Birth Certificate = SHARE? However, seems like it got turned around on us where instead WE are deemed to be the PROPERTY of the Corporation :/

Pete Daoust

The government of QUEBEC is a trust

The NAME they created is held in that trust and its theres

I�m the BENEFICIARY of that NAME

I give VALUE to that NAME

The SURETY of that name is Government of QUEBEC ??

Everytime I use a COUPON, the Government pick the $$ on the SURETY

Coupon can be used in Hospital, Court, School�etc

If a PERSON lien the NAME, I surely have to give my AUTHORIZATION, since I�m the LAWFUL holder in due course of that NAME ??.

When the NAME is liened, the TRUST (Government) can�t take anything on the SURETY no more ??

The Trust, where this PERSON that liened that NAME his kept, has now the DUTY of ADMINISTRATE that NAME�.this is where I get lost�maybe before that :D :D

David Johansen

"The government is a TRUST, not a corporation." ok, wait one second. are you saying that canada incorporated, and the government of canada, and the canadian court system are not all the same thing, or an unseperable amalgam of a sole conglomeration of things? (same question just substitute U.S. for canada)

Stuart Stone

Maybe just focus on public trusts vs private trusts.

If it's a private trust, it's nobody's business except that of the grantor/trustee(s)/beneficiary(ies). Anyone else is not a party and it is literally none of their business.

The only public notice then becomes: The property/person (described by these features), has been liened into a private trust.

This is why ANY questions from any of us about the AQUILAE TRUST are met with 'None of your fucking business', not because Scott Duncan is being a dick about it, but literally because unless we are a party to it, it's none of our business...and it serves as a gentle reminder from him on how to deal with interlopers (policy enforcers etc) who try to meddle in our private affairs ;-)

Pete Daoust

No one....I was trying to find the LOGIC in this....my children definitly have their OWN persons.....but before 18 I, as a parent must have the responsibilities of their NAME hook to my NAME......in other words...its still fuggy as far as children....wish Scott would defug that part

Stuart Stone

As a man, and a father, definitely, but in terms of the person, I'm not so sure...when you register the baby human, they/the govt department create a new name that you (or the mother) are listed merely as informants, so my understanding is that they are created as totally separate persons, and it may not have anything to do with their age, but more to do with when they begin to contract in their own right ie: applying for a SIN, drivers licence, passport etc....but I could be talking out my arse.