Fiona Munro
Mar 06, 2013 6:53 AMThis was the reason I made a Tenant's agreement with the Queen.back in 2010.........From: David Butterfield
Date: May112009 6:20:19
Subject: Re: SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS
To all:
I've been advising people of the denial of any "right to one's own property" for many, many years. As you can read for yourself in the attached "Request for Remedial Action", composition of which I completed, three days before the date of the ruling shown below.
This is a denial of everyone's 3rd Natural Right to "one's own property" was given us by our Creator, it has nothing to do with any of "man's laws", corporate or otherwise.
This is also exactly why I have been telling people that there is no avenue of domestic resolve available to end this violation of our Natural Rights and must be taken
before an International Human Rights Tribunal. Attempting any other means to resolve this issue and restore this Natural Human Right will surely fail, especially in light of the unlawful ruling below. Mind you, after duly serving "Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority" to both, no evidence has ever been presented by either the Attorney General of Canada or British Columbia that "Canada" is comprised of any geographic areas commonly called "provinces" (small "p") having names such as "British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan...etc". It has though been confirmed to me in writing by Legal Counsel for Justice Canada, that no statutory instrument exists
to confirm that Canada is comprised of "provinces" with names as mentioned above. You cannot read something into a "law" that is not in fact written there, in other words, you cannot just assume or presume that we are actually in a country called "Canada".
David Butterfield
Educator and Defender of Natural and Universally Recognized Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms
----- Original Message -----
From: FMNP
To: F P
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 5:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Norris Barnes <vancouverpropertyrights@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Subject: SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS
unknown.jpg �NEWS RELEASE
July 29, 2003 For Immediate Release
SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS
�Anything you own can be expropriated without due process and without compensation say the Supremes.�
Yorkton � Today, Garry Breitkreuz, Official Opposition Critic for Firearms and Property Rights, denounced a Supreme Court decision saying that the government has the power to take anyone�s property without due process and without compensation simply by passing an �unambiguous� law. �We have just lost one of our most important freedoms necessary for the existence of a truly free and democratic society. The right to life and the right to property go hand-in-hand � you can�t have one without the other. When Parliament resumes sitting in September, Canadian Alliance will be introducing a motion calling for property rights to be entrenched in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,� promised Breitkreuz.
What got Breitkreuz so riled was the Supreme Court�s July 17th judgment in the class-action suit Authorson v. Canada in which the Supremes ruled in favour of the federal government and against mentally disabled war veterans (see supporting documentation). The government amended the Veteran Affairs Act to avoid paying hundreds of millions in interest on pension benefits the government had held in trust for about 30,000 veterans. The Supreme Court ruled: �Parliament has the right to expropriate property, even without compensation, if it has made its intention clear and, in s. 5.1(4), Parliament's expropriative intent is clear and unambiguous.�
The Supreme Court ruling also stated: �Lastly, while substantive rights may stem from due process, the Bill of Rights does not protect against the expropriation of property by the passage of unambiguous legislation.� Breitkreuz asked, �So if the property rights guarantees in the Canadian Bill of Rights don�t protect an individual�s fundamental property rights, what good are they? They even ruled that the Bill of Rights �does not impose on Parliament the duty to provide a hearing before the enactment of legislation.� Once again, we have a court ruling � this one by the highest court in the land - that demonstrates an urgent need for my Private Members� Bill C-313 (see supporting documentation) calling for amendments to strengthen the property rights protection in the Canadian Bill of Rights. If my bill were law, at least the Liberals would have to get a two-thirds majority in the House to pass any law that runs roughshod over our property rights,� explained Breitkreuz. �This first step in property rights protection in federal law is required while we are trying to convince seven provinces with 50% of the population to approve our proposed constitutional amendment to entrench property rights in the Charter.�
�This Supreme Court ruling means that the Liberals can simply ram a law through Parliament giving themselves the right and the power to confiscate each and every bit of Canadian-owned property falling under federal law without paying a dime in compensation to the legal owners,� warned Breitkreuz. �This Supreme Court ruling should raise concerns for all Canadians over their ability to enjoy their own property including the fruits of their labour. What more evidence do you need that Liberals are undoing everything our ancestors fought for, for hundreds of years?"
�This wasn�t just another bad ruling by the Supreme Court. A free and democratic society needs to have the best protection of property rights or else all is at risk. We must entrench property rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as the Canadian Alliance has repeatedly called for.�
-30-
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT
Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General) - July 17, 2003
Neutral citation: 2003 SCC 39 - File No.: 29207
ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2003/2003scc39.html
BREITKREUZ BILL C-313 - An Act to amend An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and to amend the Constitution Act, 1867:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/bills_individual.asp?Language=E&Parl=37&Ses=2&Bill=C-313&BillType=public
Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 06, 2013 6:53 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: