Mar 02, 2013 4:23 AM

They left out the part where the DECREE PROROGUING PARLIAMENT was dissolved.

Nobody's noticed. The people's ignorance/apathy lead to This: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/tories-re-brand-government-in-stephen-harpers-name/article569222/

and THIS

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/03/04/pol-harper-govt-brand.html

and THIS

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/06/24/harper-government-rebranding-cost_n_1621875.html

and THIS

http://www.ctvnews.ca/documents-cite-directive-to-rename-harper-government-1.693788

...so it's not like it's a STATE SECRET!

This is a waste of Tax payers money, of paper printed on of Presstitutes time of air time of anyone spending anytime on what so ever. But it was good for the distraction factor of the populace. just my 5 cents worth

These people are SO FULL OF THEMSELVES

To be fair, so am I but I can justify it.

So, Constitutional Parliament of Q.E.II was dissolved and is now OCCUPIED by THE HARPER GOVERNMENT and Q.E.II is cool with that?

Elizabeth Windsor can do NOTHING.

The QUEEN TAKES ORDERS, SHE DOES NOT GIVE THEM!

Who is HER master?

YOU ARE!

People are SUPPOSED to elect people who REPRESENT YOUR INTERESTS, instead the people always elect the person they:

Like the most Hate the least

...with NO understanding of the issues.

This is a self-made mess. Our Grandparents legacy has been shit on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_government

I AM. I have seen this method used to qualify "yourself" when dealing with "government": I, commonly called Kevin of the Jones family, in own right, for KEVIN E JONES for Her Majesty in right of Canada - For example this was from a NOTICE to CRA. Because I AM the MASTER is that about right?

Close, but essentially correct.

Government "claims" loyalty to the QUEEN that has taken an oath to uphold common law to US. Is that closer?

Pretty much, yes.

Well it's a moot point. The government's CURRENT status is "standing by".

So what do we do..contact Governor-General David Johnston with our orders?

*sigh*

..write to The Queen then? :/

Blow up all parliament buildings? In Ireland they would... maybe...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_government

I know, LET'S GATHER UP SOME SIGNATURES, muahaahaa... at'll git em :D

Well, That's it STAND UP to them, but look what happens when you do. Dean Clifford stood up to them and he was locked up! Strength in numbers. Really would anyone who REALLY knew how it works put up with it!? Unless there is MASSIVE pushback against the de facto system there is no reason for it to change.

its not about one Dean, its about a NOTICE maybe not stapled to a door... how bout "your paycheck has been diminished cause we've seized it"

I know what you are saying. But we shouldn't have to do that! Right that's FREEDOM.

my dad says it too, only thing to get their NOTICE... DO SOMETHING

I mean they can handle the few who think they have it all figured out. Once in while stage something to instill fear when too many start figuring it out. Are you saying they don't KNOW their system is a FRAUD?

Nope, they know... I was just in court on wed... got tossled out... they know

but everyone needs to push a button that will really make them listen to us cause petitioning is going so great...

OH THEY KNOW, ESPECIALLY the Judges.

Does mastering how to represent yourself verbally negate the need for any of their paper?

present yourself

control through legal tender

Has our money/legal-tender been PROROGUED also, Scott? If you look at an old $20 bill, the 'CROWN SEAL' can be found on that shiny-strip down the front. On the new PLASTIC $20 bill - NADA, the 'Crown Seal' cant be found anywhere...why is it that this worries me so much?

Beverly, has the correct way to deal with these muppets & that is BLOW UP PARLIAMENT.... Problem solved....just make sure all o them kunts are in it when it goes ok ??

You are worried for the very name of this group. The TENDER FOR LAW that money provides is FRAUD. I play by all the rules, and did NOT get what I was promised.

...now they're not even trying to pretend anymore. These are going to be coupons eventually. Right now, Canadian Tire money is more legitimate.

Scott, TIRE money is what?? Australian $$ are ciupobs are they not ??? What is it before it becomes a coupon in the Evolution of money then ??

Coupons

Or I should say DEVOLUTION of miney ??

After COUPONS then bog roll??

My shit has more INTRINSIC VALUE than Coupons then. At least I can grow food with it naturally...

So Scott, can you finish off the rest of this statement so i know exactly what the consequences of this means?

The omission of 'The Crown Seal' from the new plastic-polymer-legal tender being issued in Canada, exactly equals = ...............? :/

The Queen has never heard of it.

It's 100% Private money now.

So......it has her image on it but not her "signature",?

It never has her signature. It's SUPPOSED to have the royal SEAL.

Take a look at an old-paper-bill. On the front, on the shiny-strip that runs north-south on the left-hand-side, at the bottom if it, almost hiding-in-plain-sight because i never noticed it up until recently, is 'The Crown Seal'- the Lion and The Unicorn-image. The Crown Seal is NOWHERE to be found on our new plastc-polymer-bills. What about you Adam Thomas, are the new plastic-bills in Australia missing the same CROWN SEAL on it, too?

What we covered in my Torts-and-Contracts class textbook regarding UNDER SEAL:

In most circumstances, the courts will not enforce GRATUITOUS PROMISES. Because they lack consideration, gratuitous promises are not contracts. However, there are some exceptions to the rule. A gratuitous promise that is made UNDER SEAL will be ENFORCED even without consideration. A document under seal is called a DEED. A DEED is a written contract, made UNDER SEAL by the PROMISOR(S); also called a formal contract. A promise made UNDER SEAL does not require CONSIDERATION to make it BINDING. The courts have traditionally viewed the seal on a document as an indication that the promisor understands the significance of his or her act and intends to be BOUND by the promise contained in the document.

...and the PROMISE The Queen made UNDER SEAL that she INTENDED to keep to us WAS.................? (does it have anything to do with being THE KEEPER-OF-OUR-TRUSTS-and-THE DEFENDER OF THE FAITH ?)

Sorry, I was using "seal" and "signature" interchangeably, which they are not as pointed out by Derek Moran above. This is why I'm here.

This is a good example of talking "In general" and "In specific", one gets you fucked, the lets you do the fucking.

the other (insert after fucked)

Replace insert with put in place of. Dirty minds on this board like to mistake things