The Tender For Law

Volume 1

Feb 25, 2013 2:56 AM

Scott Duncan

THE TENDER FOR LAW � THE UCC FOR IDIOTS (c) 2013 ROGUESUPPORT INC. under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

THIS ALSO SERVES AS PART II of ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD (OPPF)

As promised, I am now going to cover the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE (or UCC, for you idiots who type with your thumbs.)

FUCK! Myths about THIS shit, sure has �done the rounds�, hasn't it? No more myths have been generated, out of a piece of regulation, than the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE!

The dumbed-down, but very accurate, explanation is that the UCC is a standardized LEGAL mechanism, to resolve disputes in commerce, where such commerce utilizes the world reserve currency.

At the moment, the world reserve currency is the US DOLLAR. This doesn't mean it's American law, but it most certainly covers the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and all the US shores and waterways.

ITS DEFAULT ROLE IS TO DETERMINE JURISDICTION

If you watched Money as Debt III, you saw a brief explanation as to WHY gold became a world currency. It was universally accepted, around the world.

The UCC provides this very same function by being the very LAW you TENDERED when you used the US DOLLAR. This effectively means the UCC covers the UNITED STATES and any JURISDICTIONS, real or implied, which can and/or do use the US DOLLAR.

In order to make use of the UCC, you must either be in the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and/or in one of the waters, shores or tributaries of the UNITED STATES, and/or conducting business in US DOLLARS.

I, for one, love the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE. If you have a fleet of ships and you do business in AMERICAN DOLLARS, and don't have any debt, you're pretty much as free as a human being can get in 2013.

If there is anyone that says the UCC is anything else, they are, in fact, lying to you. The purpose behind the UCC is to have COMMON INTERNATIONAL LAW regarding COMMERCE. ABOVE ALL;ITS DEFAULT ROLE IS TO DETERMINE JURISDICTION!

...idiots. (Yes, as a matter of fact I DO have to say that! FUCK OFF!)

The UCC allows certain presumptions regarding accounting that would simply be impractical in a corporate environment. The fact that roles are clearly defined, and MARITIME ADMIRALTY LAW is heavily integrated, makes owning a ship, or even better, a fleet of ships, a very liberating idea, for the UCC protects you. The UCC guarantees that other users of THE TENDER FOR LAW that offered this JURISDICTION, will protect your interests by presumption.

This whole �Dean arrest thing� has distracted me from my larger goal, and now I have to stop and dumb things down. I certainly hope my explanation of the UCC is clear enough.

Now ponder how stupid a CLAIM against such �constructs� actually is. OK, you know what?...you're all too stupid...I'm going to have to explain it.

Let's cover a few fundamentals. I'll try not to use large words so the �BELIEVERS� won't get confused.

A TRUST IS NOT A PERSON.

A GOVERNMENT IS NOT A PERSON, AND A JUDICIARY IS NOT A PERSON.

A human that is registered with the NON-PERSON GOVERNMENT IS A PERSON.

A human, and that stripper they fucked last year and has since squirted out a NEW human, and THEREFORE, said NEW human is registered with the NON-PERSON GOVERNMENT IS A PERSON. (That's what you get for fucking strippers)

A CORPORATION IS A PERSON.

ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD poses as a �TRUST�. A TRUST cannot make a CLAIM. Only a PERSON can make a CLAIM.

The GRANTORS of the TRUST have NO STANDING to make a CLAIM once the TRUST is commissioned. They have no more power to do so than the guy, whose signature is on a Ten Dollar bill, has the AUTHORITY to tell you how to spend it.

ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD, and their ilk, will happily talk as EXPERTS on the UCC, and I'm pretty sure NONE of them has actually used the UCC.

So, let's do a side-by-side comparison as to who is more qualified to speak on this subject:

I, unlike OPPF and �FREELOADERS-ON-THE-LAND�, have actual VALUE. As I type this the general consensus of the LEGAL AND BANKING SYSTEM says that I can, without question, UNDERWRITE half a Billion Dollar's worth of BONDS converted to MONEY OF EXCHANGE. Think about that. On a whim, I could inject half a Billion Dollars into the economy. This means that unless you use those dollars to purchase my value, the entire net worth of the country will drop by half a Billion Dollars.

If you think it's frightening that one privileged man wields the power to do this sort of thing, pat yourself on the back because that is the proper response. Ethics is the only thing that stops me from doing that. But that doesn't really help much in COMMERCE. An ethical guy with a gun, in the end, is still just a guy with a gun....

�.Enter the UCC.

The UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE in COMMERCE, only recognizes whatever currency is the world reserve currency. This of course is the US DOLLAR. This means that every other currency touched by the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND is simply �acting� as a US DOLLAR (or part thereof). Muammar Gaddafi was wiped off the face of the earth, because he dared point out that the world's currencies are propping-up the dead, hollowed-out carcass that is the UNITED STATES. He raised the point that, according to the little, green book that got him into office, He was pretty sure that LIBYA'S economic wealth was to go to its people.

I hear people stating that the war on LIBYA was ILLEGAL. Sadly it wasn't. The UCC made it perfectly LEGAL.

LAW IS A TRUST. According to the TRUST, Gaddafi's attempt to change the currency was a BREACH OF THAT TRUST.

THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE can be viewed as the grand, de facto law that exists where no other de facto law exists.

Therefore according to IMF TREATIES, if there's no law at a particular place, the UCC is DEEMED to be the de facto law.

You will notice that there is nothing to LIEN or FORECLOSE ON in the UCC. UCC is a �legal traffic cop�, directing traffic to its appropriate JURISDICTION.

Treating a TRUST like a PERSON makes any further documents produced as a result, FRAUD. Such documents are OF NO FORCE AND EFFECT.

In short, ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD is, by its very nature, based on an ILLEGAL concept.

...but that's not the worst of it. UCC, like any OTHER TRUST is based on CONSENT. Let's look into LEGAL UTOPIA! We needn't bother with silly things like consent. IT'S LEGAL PARADISE! First we must get into the right �headspace�.

Since all of you like to form uninformed opinions of me, and what a bad man I am, I'll put this next scenario in the context of �me�, because your self-created loathing of me will allow you to accept this concept, in your empty little heads.

SO, Imagine if you will that I, the KEEPER OF THE AQUILAE TRUST, decided that I wanted to do something FOR YOUR OWN GOOD, because you're too stupid to do it yourself. With the arrogant presumption that I even have STANDING to do so, I, without your CONSENT, make a DECLARATION that you get a �chunk of the world's wealth�; and to ENFORCE that I drafted some AWESOME LAWS, as I do not �believe� (belief is the only thing that would cause a rational human being to think this way) you are capable of managing your own affairs...

...hey wait, this is starting to sound familiar. But I'm not like the GOVERNMENT, I know what's best for you! I'm just here to help; and anybody who doesn't want that help is clearly a �hater�, and are jealous... maybe even criminals and psychopaths. Why, anybody who doesn't want my help is mentally ill. That's safe to say! In fact, I'd better amend my awesome laws so that I may lovingly and humanely dispose of these mentally ill.

Got the picture?

GOOD.

Now just replace �me� with those �three guys� in ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD, and that is what is being sold to you. I cannot make this any clearer.

I have just explained what the UCC is. If you think it's anything else, you're �making shit up�.

I use the UCC daily. AQUILAE has points-of-presence in CANADA, THE UNITED STATES, SINGAPORE, SCOTLAND and ICELAND. So anybody who dares say they know more about the UCC is publicly declaring that I am LEGALLY INCOMPETENT TO MANAGE A TRUST, which is DEFAMATORY; and I deal with that in MY JURISDICTION, and there's a nice �legal traffic cop� that says I can. People who want to continue spreading bullshit may find themselves on my �LEGAL AUTOPSY TABLE� where they are used as a live example...

...Because ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD has a lot more than the UCC. I could show mercy right now and let this FRAUD die as it is; and even though I made some grandiose promises about this document's horrible fate, I remind you all that mercy is the mark of a GREAT MAN!

...The problem is, I'm just a GOOD man.

In my next major post I shall cover the procedural FRAUD within the TRUST itself as laid-out in its CHARTER DOCUMENTS.

Watch how it writhes in pain. * maniacal giggling is permitted *

Read Comments

Icbeonne Senama

I was called a troll because I was trying to tell people they dont understand UCC in the GLOBALFACT forum. Maybe you could go have a look at what I said in there? Tony has suggested a conference call and has asked me to be a part of the OPPT discussion. I use the information you have presented here. I paraphrased your definition of courtesy - that didn't go over well with the believers. Basically my stand is DON'T get involved with UCC because you don't understand it. If you think OPPT is great - GREAT sit back and watch the show and reap any benefits from it.

Scott Duncan

You have no business going to them. I'll call people adults with imaginary friends, and tar and feather those who attempt to counter that position...

...but they came here. OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL, and it's NOT like it's a state secret how I feel on any issue they may have.

...their position isn't a big secret either. I make fun of it constantly. They value BELIEF. I don't. They say I must "respect" belief, I say it should be destroyed.

Nobody's confused.

WHICH IS WHY I DON'T GO INTO CHURCHES TRYING TO DESTROY THEIR DELUSIONS! IT'S THEIR FORUM. NOT MINE.

IT"S NOT MY RIGHT TO IMPOSE IN FORUMS I DO NOT CONTROL/ADMINISTER

...if you were INVITED, then that's different. ;)

Kelleran Holman

you told me the other day that the government is not a person, but if person is defined as a corporation, wouldn't that make it a person....or am i confusing "government" with CANADA trading as a corporation, is the "government" of Canada a separate entity?

Icbeonne Senama

I just don't want anyone to get fucked over Scott. People are not stupid by choice - usually. I was invited by Tony to be a part of a small panel discussion about it. I am not sure why. I am very simple. The lady called Tami Pepperman warned people that sending in even the Courtesy Notice from OPPT will "attach" (word maybe wrong I know) to UCC. That is all I want to say. BEWARE - Sit back and enjoy benefit - but don't fall into the OPPT honey pot trap.

Kelleran Holman

the idea of a group effort is all well and good...but only as support of each individual....individually, not as a group...leaving the individual acting as such, with the support of the group only...the opp"f" isn't doing that by the look of it...and well the ucc stuff is so far from my pay grade i don't care to entertain it,lol

August le Blanc

Holy Shit....

The picture is clearer.

No wonder Spidy Sense was tingling... Once again I thank myself for saving my own life by having the perseverance to stick it out and find this wealth of knowledge. It is simple in a way that is becoming so clear. One must research creating a Trust? Can One recommend some sources?

Derek Moran

In that 25-part series he did, David-Wynn Miller answered somebodys question regarding the UCC with- "Dont forget, its called a CODE for a reason. Its a Code, because the Code is, that the UCC is owned and copyrighted by the Crown Corporation of the City of London England, and anybody using it automatically acquiesces to their jurisdiction(paraphrasing)"... or something like that

Derek Moran

Common law of England

9. The rules of the common law of England, including the law merchant, save in so far as they are inconsistent with the express provisions of this Act, apply to bills, notes and cheques.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-4/page-3.html#docCont

Derek Moran

Thats what i value most about this page without blowing too much smoke up Scott's ass.. it opened my eyes up to what 'THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER' really means.. i always thought NOTE = LEGAL TENDER, LEGAL TENDER = NOTE, not what, LEGAL TENDER really stood for..especially the, LEGAL part

Scott Duncan

THIS IS PART OF THE SCAM!

IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING.

I can put "Fiona Munro is my sex slave" on the Supreme Court record. THEY MUST accept. THAT'S THE DEFAULT POSITION.

FUCK! You are ALL PLAYED SO EASILY!

Seriously. I need to vanish, create a persona, AND CLEAN YOU ALL OUT!

WHY ARE YOU ALL SO CREDULOUS!!!!

Scott Duncan

All the useful UCC shit is in the article. There is not NEARLY enough about how awesome the article is. It's the PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO KNOW how awesome it is, so I reserve THIS DISCUSSION for correcting this blatant violation of YOUR RIGHTS!

Icbeonne Senama

There's the trap. MAKE people BELIEVE it works. THEN a letter Dear so-and-so this the retard that accidentally made an accounting error. Yeah that money we gave, well you are going to give that back or rot in jail for fraud or something.

Scott Duncan

"Everything you do in Canada taxes banking ends up in the US" - I think the bank of Canada might have a few things to say about that, because that Birth Certificate is YOUR SHARE in it.

The Money's YOURS not Washington's.

Can you please stop talking out of your ass now fiona?

Derek Moran

were you referring to this section of the Bank of Canada Act?.. Distinction

(6) Notes of the Bank are neither promissory notes nor bills of exchange within the meaning of the Bills of Exchange Act.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-2/page-10.html#h-11

Derek Moran

NEGOTIATE is much like BELLIGERENT. Does not have anything to do with what we think it does, in legal-land. NEGOTIATE = transfers the value, that would be to the banks, upon our INDORSEMENT, and that would be done by our SIGNATURES

Derek Moran

Consumer bill or note to be marked

190. (1) Every consumer bill or consumer note shall be prominently and legibly marked on its face with the words �Consumer Purchase� before or at the time when the instrument is signed by the purchaser or by any person signing to accommodate the purchaser.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-4/page-39.html#docCont

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

I just think there needs to be a union of many, treasonists or whatever you wanna call it... a united "fuck this shit" to support each other... it has to be all. I told my father, "Everyone in Canada should just not pay taxes for this year." He said, "YES, but you have to get everyone to do it."

Scott Duncan

Beverly May Braaksma stop wasting your life trying to "fix the system. It's 2013 and you can spawn your own COMPETING system with ease.

THAT is what you aren't supposed to find out, and that's what I mean by "mean to misbehave" which is WHY THE TENDER FOR LAW Group exists, really.

THE TENDER FOR LAW - WE AIM TO MISBEHAVE

Derek Moran

As i understand it, during your Allocution, you are supposed to say to the Judge- "Your Honour, with all due respect, i do not agree, i do not acceede, i do not attorn, and i do not consent to the court's sentence."

Icbeonne Senama

I've always had a gut feeling that the system is fucked. Maybe I took an easier road in my youth and left CANADA. I left shortly after the infamous 9-11 and have been back once for a visit. When I have enough crumbs collected and can put them into something useful I'd like to return

Chad Brodgesell

m, Regarding this 'What to say when appearing in court before the bar. and most matters also. I still come to the question of, "If the common man (A typical guy/woman ya know, cruizing through life) cannot simple ask those people (who are forcing him/her to do things such as appear before court and or serve time and/or hand over some hard earned money for a 'fine') "What BUSINESS do 'They' have with 'Him' ?.

My understanding of this is If the common man cannot understand what's going on or being said/spoken to then it has no force or effect and the jp/judge is supposed to dismiss the matter.

I keep trying to make simple the complicated.

Chad Brodgesell

The UCC is an interesting read. Um, er, ahhhh, mmmmm,,,if I could understand it, it would be I mean. I would 'Like' it but I just don't comprehend, can't 'wrap' my head around it. :( I am going to back pedal to something I can sorta get.

Chad Brodgesell

I'm going to post this here. Not sure if Scott wants it here then move/delete it.

I have a basic problem with virtually everything I've learned in the last 2 years. Dean, in seminars/videos has repeatedly said you can be the Administrator of the PERSON. "CHAD BRODGESELL"

Almost everything is based off that. Now. I 'DID NOT' create this PERSON. Some one else did, or a party of some one elses did. It is NOW my understanding that I can only have the BENEFIT and/or the LIABILITY (I presume as a TRUSTEE) of it.

So far I have come up with; 1) ADMINISTRATE it? Not bloody likely as I don't even really know what the PERSON 'really' is in real world. I am therefor NOT QUALIFIED to administrate the PERSON.

2) Be the BENEFICIARY of the PERSON? Yes I am perfectly capable of RECEIVING whatever is BENEFICIAL from the PERSON. I am a monkey, I can do that.

3 ) ACT in the capacity of the TRUSTEE to the PERSON? Not sure if I could as I don't know the duties (I haven't been trained in the capacity of TRUSTEE) I am not QUALIFIED to act as the TRUSTEE of said account. I would also like to see a check soon for performing a TRUSTEE's duties too if I have.

This is no reflection on Dean Clifford. Just a rant as to a CORE element of the understanding of LAW that is conflicting. Until I get this straightened out I can't continue farther.

Also, DAMN!, I love to be able to add line breaks in to make it more readable.

Chad Brodgesell

Hmmmmm. sry...have to add to No. 1) The ADMINISTRATOR is also a TRUSTEE just with the title 'ADMINISTRATOR'. And an after thought, ----If I am acting as a TRUSTEE but with "WHAT TITLE" as a TRUSTEE. Kinda like a TITLE with in a TITLE so to speak. Or a TITLE "UNDER" a POSITION of TRUSTEE. nah, I like the TITLE with in a TITLE better.

Cara Small

i am so with you on the ucc chad. I know who i am. then i get completely lost in commerce. I know I do not want to be surety for anything i don't understand. that is one reason i live where i do and how i do (off grid).

Geoffrey Franklin El Rex

My bad. Right the proxy. If I reclaimed it myself I would be confessing into their jurisdiction. I figured I would put the bond into a trust as settlor provided I can find someone I can trust and make myself beneficiary. Then open a non-interest bearing trust account at a bank and the trustee would get the check book. I may have some more work to do yet. What do you think. I am going to slam that asshole captain tonight.

Geoffrey Franklin El Rex

I think the trustee would have to be somewhat competent. At least competent enough to sign a check. And if folks are too dam lazy to look in the code for a definition well...I.C. 6-3-1-14 says �The term �person� means an individual, trust or estate: Provided, That no corporation shall be considered to be a person. Whoever wrote this law only got it half right.

Pete Daoust

A relationship created at the direction of an individual, in which one or more persons hold the individual's property subject to certain duties to use and protect it for the benefit of others.

PRIVATE TRUST....

Pete Daoust

Individuals may control the distribution of their property during their lives or after their deaths through the use of a trust. There are many types of trusts and many purposes for their creation. A trust may be created for the financial benefit of the person creating the trust, a surviving spouse or minor children, or a charitable purpose. Though a variety of trusts are permitted by law, trust arrangements that are attempts to evade creditors or lawful responsibilities will be declared void by the courts.

Pete Daoust

The person who creates the trust is the settlor. The person who holds the property for another's benefit is the trustee. The person who is benefited by the trust is the beneficiary, or cestui que trust. The property that comprises the trust is the trust res, corpus, principal, or subject matter. For example, a parent signs over certain stock to a bank to manage for a child, with instructions to give the dividend checks to him each year until he becomes 21 years of age, at which time he is to receive all the stock. The parent is the settlor, the bank is the trustee, the stock is the trust res, and the child is the beneficiary.

Pete Daoust

A fiduciary relationship exists in the law of trusts whenever the settlor relies on the trustee and places special confidence in her. The trustee must act in Good Faith with strict honesty and due regard to protect and serve the interests of the beneficiaries. The trustee also has a fiduciary relationship with the beneficiaries of the trust.

Pete Daoust

A trustee takes legal title to the trust res, which means that the trustee's interest in the property appears to be one of complete ownership and possession, but the trustee does not have the right to receive any benefits from the property. The right to benefit from the property, known as EQUITABLE title, belongs to the beneficiary

Pete Daoust

Every private trust consists of four distinct elements: an intention of the settlor to create the trust, a res or subject matter, a trustee, and a beneficiary. Unless these elements are present, a court cannot enforce an arrangement as a trust.

Pete Daoust

INTENTION: The settlor must intend to impose enforceable duties on a trustee to deal with the property for the benefit of another. Intent can be demonstrated by words, conduct, or both. It is immaterial whether the word trust is used in the trust document. Sometimes, however, the words used by the settlor are equivocal and there is doubt whether the settlor intended to create a trust. If the settlor uses words that express merely the desire to do something, such as the terms desire, wish, or hope, these precatory words (words expressing a wish) may create a moral obligation, but they do not create a legal one. In this situation a court will consider the entire document and the circumstances of the person who attempted to create the trust to determine whether a trust should be established.

Cara Small

you said TRUST law is the highest law. Is the only reason to put a trust into a corporation with its own charter, because you say we have not the knowledge to operate the trust but are able to learn (only because of the experience we DO have) to operate a corpoation?

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

If you use the cite (UCC _ - _ _ _ or __ USC � _ _ _ _), you have reverted back to being a citizen taking a benefit from the statutes. If you demonstrate the principle in the code section without citing it, you maintain your separation. The person you represent in the public acquires the commercial rights, but you interject your rights through the natural order of things, and maintain your unalienable rights.

Scott Duncan

OMFG, you are such a girl-brain.

For the MILLIONTH time: A CORPORATION is a PERSON. THAT PERSON LIENS YOUR PERSON! FUCK!

Any MORE OF YOU ASSHATS WANT TO CALL ME NAMES AND SAY WHAT A BAD PERON I AM BECAUSE I POINT OUT THE REALITY THAT YOU ARE ALL TOO STUPID TO GRASP EVEN THE SIMPLEST THINGS?

Why do I have to repeat this shit? do you people not know how to connect this stuff?

Pete Daoust

hey hey...all I know rigth now is: I'm Pete or Peter or Pierre or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST Social Insurance no. 26X-XXX-XXX, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX

I'm the MASTER of PIERRE DAOUST, I make ALL BUSINESS DECISIONS for PIERRE DAOUST..... ANY OBJECTIONS ?????????????

Pete Daoust

So as long as I wont grasp this: 1: Establish a trust

2: Establish a corporation - In the Charter, assign the role of the corporation to HOLD the trust, and establish the "Law" guidelines (You get to make your own up) as regards keeping the trust.

3: Get ANY accountant to manage the books of the corporation. You direct the corporation as FIRST DIRECTOR, and establish roles (President/CEO Vice President, etc) which is how the UNITED STATES was formed.

Side Note: EVER NOTICE that when the US "Liberates" a country, they NEVER install their form of government? It's always a PARLIAMENT they install. Figure out why that is, and things will be clearer. USE THE U.S. AS A MODEL FOR YOUR CORPORATION.

No YOU do that. The accountant EXECUTES YOUR TASKS within the framework. To establish a trust, write it down, and have it witnessed and notarized. The end. Only shareholders of your corporation are recognized by the trust.

Pete Daoust

I will stick to this: I'm Pete or Peter or Pierre or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST Social Insurance no. 26X-XXX-XXX, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX

I'm the MASTER of PIERRE DAOUST, I make ALL BUSINESS DECISIONS for PIERRE DAOUST..... ANY OBJECTIONS ?????????????

Derek Moran

If the Government IS a Trust; why cant i just say- "YOU GUYS take care of this Trust-shit for me. Except, we're gonna be doing things a little bit differently around here. I will be the EXECUTOR calling the shots, and especially I will be the Beneficiary NOW..and you guys will start being what you were intended to be all along, the TRUSTEE now for a change. And considering how much this "valuable instrument/security" is supposed to be worth, i will have NO PROBLEM with paying you guys you're administrative-fee for doing your job in the form of INCOME TAXES from the value/credit derived from the Trust-account you guys set-up but NEVER had any intention of telling me about until i BROUGHT IT UP, thank you very much!!" :)

Derek Moran

Beverly- wouldnt you at least like to know the whereabouts of your original LFSOLBR is?.. i think the path for that will be 3 NOTICES sent by registered-mail.. DEFAULT NOTICE by Affidavit.. Court of Equity.. and making(not quite sure what the proper phrasing is here)for a Writ of Mandamus getting the Judge to make the ORDER, and enforce the ORDER, getting the Registrar General's office to spill-the-beans on at least that one question, if not more - that would be a start, get them to admit they've at least been CONCEALING from us, tsk-tsk, not very nice of our TRUSTEES now is it? ;)

Cara Small

i think you are talking to me. i am a girl yes. yes i understand the corporation leins the person. I am not sure how to accomplish that yet. working on understanding as much as i can and producing accurate documentation. i mostly was trying to find out why it is necessary to go thru these steps to protect ones equity (assuming of course one knows who one is)

Shawn Folkes

Sigh..... I am a big fan of ALL of this...and I've been following all that's been said. But.....at one point I realized that Scott's not joking when he insults peoples intelligence. Some here....are NOT suppose....just trying to wrap their brains around so many ideas that go against the grain.... So.....Im a Freeman yes.......but not everyone is buying into this. Me...because of ...pompous comments.... I'm gonna play the little goat...and go get the big goat...who hasn't bought into "this"... And have him read ALL this (he doesn't use Facebook)...and have him dissect everything that is being said here. The good news is...that he might see our side...the bad news....he's smarter than anyone here hands down, and just might make mincemeat out of everything Scott...or anyone of us....has to say. And then I'll have him tell everyone how stupid they are for not keeping up...

I was told by Dean Kory that this was the spot for intellectual exercise....not a diatribe from some dude who thinks he's holier than thou. I ain't been here long.....and I DO like many posts made...but...nah.... I don't need some know-it-all who thinks he's smarter than everyone "educate" the ignorant by insulting them. Not cool. So...after My big brain big gun tears a few new assholes... I'm out. Lots if GREAT info....but I don't like the tone and don't need someone who in all likelihood can't hold a flame to ME in the real world....act like he's God and insult people who are simply.on the path of Truth and Enlightenment

Pete Daoust

Me Shawn Ofthefamily Folkes, I like it so much here that I stopped watching the SOPRANO'S....I REALLY like Scott's style...I'm not here for making NICE friends that will be NICE with me...I have PLENTY of those....unfortunatly, these NICE friends of mine dont tell me the truth ALL THE TIME, not because they don't want to, but because they don't KNOW the truth....I don't recall Scott being INSULTING with me....oh he is ruff once in a while, but I don't give a shit...some say he has a bad ATTITUDE....well, thats none of my business and I don't give a shit on this as well.....so far, he never lied to me....and if I get STUPID, I hope he will tell me, because, Unfortunatly, I've been raised and educate by STUPID people....I've learned more in here than in the past 46 years about who I am and what to do to KNOW the truth....what Scott thinks about himself....I don't give a shit....none of my business...I like better someone ruff that teach me something than someone ruff that steal stuff from me...:D

Dean Kory

Scott does have his own way about him...I like the info and straight up,in your face reality and honesty of his delivery,its not for everyone but i, for one, am greatfull and look forward to learning through him and the rest of you...where else can you go to exchange real ideas that have substance,meaning,and truth even if it is in its ruff draft eairly stages of development?Look past our differences and suck it up for the sake of knowledge,we have a huge battle on our hands here!

James Baal

Thank you Scott & Tara for your time.. ..I am grateful to be treated like an idiot.. otherwise I wouldn't understand what you are saying. ... :-) By only being in this group my understanding went up by 200% and this is not exaggerated. ....

Shawn Folkes

Great...my post just disappered. Forget it. Never mind. Just be advised. Referring to ME as an idiot...for not grasping something...or because I'm a very active dude that cybers with his THUMBS (on hands big enough to crush your head) on thus Note (the biggest they got and it ain't big enough) and used Acronyms...don't do.org. You all like your masochistic ways of.learning? Fine. Chaucon son gout. Just don't think that shit will fly with me.

I get Scots style...to some degree. Not my preferred way of rightwing...but hey...maybe that's how you guys roll... I just know that I lose interest quick...with OPS like this...where the intended audience is already insulted before.anything useful is even rendered. Doesn't matter what's in the book if it's wrapped in dog shit...people ain't gonna read it. Not newbies...unless your interests lie in only educating and sharing with yourselves.

I mean... I could have posted.MY wall post by calling all people who use banks fucking idiots...or call anyone.anything I like...because I can say it to their face...and they can't do shit about it. But...having the real world power to say things to people without fear ain't the same as insulting cyber audiences...and if I don't flesh in people in the real world...and I CAN...I stray cyber bullies and those that appear to have that mentality with great disdain. If your way of educating is by insulting....well...I can tell you're not an educator in real life. You might insult a student like me in your class...and wake up eating from a straw for the rest of four life. So see...I get cheesed when I Snell bullies and those who think they are above others. If you know something intellectual and I don't...it sure doesn't mean you're SMARTER...and doesn't give you the right to talk down to me...cuz I can trump that...and talk back down to you....and say I can...because on more dangerous than you. Does the fact that I can kick in any of your faces give me the right to talk to you like you're dogs? If anything...that gives me more right to do so...than the Guy who "thinks" he's smarter than me...that can be debated....or the Guy who can end you...no debate.

Ok. Im done. Take this rant as my disclaimer that I'm personally not going to call anyone here anything and expect the same... And I do not condone belittling shit....no matter who it's from, or what they "Know"

Shawn Folkes

Man I can't wait to get into shit with you guys!

Like...this one Guy I know...became friends with a real deal illuminati..who told him shit. Dude moved from Ottawa (where he was a PhD in biomechanical engineering or some shit, and has pi memorized to 50 decimal places) to...the middle of nowhere.

I too changed my life...got rid of the TIE for the HARDHAT. Get me? So I NEED to know all about this...more about the UCC (seeing that I sign shit all the time....with STAMPS) and more about...well....above!

So..back to topic... Without calling me a name, can anyone tell me some shit? See...a Freeman was nailed by a judge for tax evasion...the judge saying that ya gotta still pay tax to SOMEONE...that someone being the Queen. Now.... I see a shitload of holes in that judges statement...but id like to get your guys input...esp how this "convict" could have used the UCC(Universal Commerce Code, just so my big assed thumbs aren't accused of being lazy lol) to his advantage in his arguments to the judge.

And maybe you all can advise me on family matters...like how my Dad got raped hard by the tax man AND the Canadian courts for hundreds of thousands of dollars...all due to international royalties.

He, fyi is my big gun. And Hahahahaha a major reason why McGuinty resigned! Dude didn't get his ROE....or SIX YEARS from his GOVERNMENT employer...

So yeah... I got reasons to lament what government has made of US! AND HAHAHA yo...tall can research right? Won't be hard to figure out who my Dad is HISTORICALLY...or hahahahahahaaa fuck...who my sister is. And who she rolls with. You'll all be glad to know that people on the highest security clearances...like...I dunno.....Corrections Canada? How's about CSIS? Their respective heads... (not ministers fyi) are huge conspiracy theorists...so we have much to discuss!

Pete Daoust

Shawn Ofthefamily Folkes....I will start by INTRODUCING myself NON-NEGOCIABLE

I'm Pete and/or Peter and/or Pierre and/or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and/or BELLIGERENT and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST Social Insurance no. 26X-XXX-XXX, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX

I�m the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST

I make ALL business decisions for PIERRE DAOUST

At least 51% of my blood is ORIGINAL blood

I LOVE WAL-MART COUPONS

I�m a very NICE guy

I am the MASTER or my PERSON Named PIERRE DAOUST

And I reserve ALL RIGHTS�.all of them�

Is ANYONE have any objections ?????

Shawn Folkes

Nope She's not nice at all You don't get that far being nice A woman whose a Ministry Director...double masters before she turned 24 with an American GPA dinal grade of 3.98 that's almost 6'3" and owns almost every local record for her track and field discipline.. with a 150ish IQ..? If you know really really smart people that tower over everyone, then you know they ain't generally nice.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: YES it's ADMIRALTY. It regulates INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE within the jurisdiction of the WORLD RESERVE CURRENCY (Currently the U.S. Dollar).

That's the funny thing: If you owned a fleet of ships and a Port, in the country holding the RESERVE currency, that crap they spew with ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD, might work...might.

But you'd have ships and ports to foreclose on.

David Johansen

who jesse? who's skippy?

nice revival there Admiral. thas a post i thought was a gonner. some time earlier i read/heard someone say a trust was a person, and i skipped arguing against that.

why do we think wrong, because were to stupid to question what were told without considering the other party might not know or knows and is lying...

all adults lie.

Tracie Dugas

I'm really STUPID I guess, so I'm putting in a couple cents here, to keep up on this convo, thanks to you all for the information, confusing as it is to me as I am STUPID, LOL, my aim is to become less STUPID in the process.

David Johansen

um, i think that would be my fault. quoting scottizms on other places. hi tracy, i see you found your way.

just be careful, and do way more reading than talking. i suggest you go all the way back as far as you can, and also since a lot of people have been stripped from the group, some conversations might read odd if there posts are also stripped.

there are a lot of notes in that section aswell as a few gold nugget doc's of compiled threads. you will get lost, but you will never be alone.