Thank you Scott Duncan.

The honour is mine. Glad you like it :)

I was called a troll because I was trying to tell people they dont understand UCC in the GLOBALFACT forum. Maybe you could go have a look at what I said in there? Tony has suggested a conference call and has asked me to be a part of the OPPT discussion. I use the information you have presented here. I paraphrased your definition of courtesy - that didn't go over well with the believers. Basically my stand is DON'T get involved with UCC because you don't understand it. If you think OPPT is great - GREAT sit back and watch the show and reap any benefits from it.

You have no business going to them. I'll call people adults with imaginary friends, and tar and feather those who attempt to counter that position... ...but they came here. OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL, and it's NOT like it's a state secret how I feel on any issue they may have. ...their position isn't a big secret either. I make fun of it constantly. They value BELIEF. I don't. They say I must "respect" belief, I say it should be destroyed. Nobody's confused. WHICH IS WHY I DON'T GO INTO CHURCHES TRYING TO DESTROY THEIR DELUSIONS! IT'S THEIR FORUM. NOT MINE. IT"S NOT MY RIGHT TO IMPOSE IN FORUMS I DO NOT CONTROL/ADMINISTER ...if you were INVITED, then that's different. ;)

you told me the other day that the government is not a person, but if person is defined as a corporation, wouldn't that make it a person....or am i confusing "government" with CANADA trading as a corporation, is the "government" of Canada a separate entity?

I just don't want anyone to get fucked over Scott. People are not stupid by choice - usually. I was invited by Tony to be a part of a small panel discussion about it. I am not sure why. I am very simple. The lady called Tami Pepperman warned people that sending in even the Courtesy Notice from OPPT will "attach" (word maybe wrong I know) to UCC. That is all I want to say. BEWARE - Sit back and enjoy benefit - but don't fall into the OPPT honey pot trap.

I get that. There's nothing you can do. You can't afford the resources/time anyway. Leave them to their fate.

Yes Kelleran, it is.

REMEMBER: IT'S ALL ACCOUNTING

GOVERNMENT is a DIFFERENT TYPE OF ACCOUNT than CORPORATION

ah ok, that makes sense...that seems to be where i am getting confused, because i am not seeing where the one ends and the other begins

In fact the only thing I can do is try to warn others. After that it is on them. I have free time and I don't mind trying to help others. We want a better world after all - do we not?

Then point them to the right PLACES. That helps more than anything.

Occam's Razor. Not a place. But I think the solution to the OPPT problem is simple

I don't want a "better world". It's NOT MY PLACE TO SAY. I just want people to be able to choose for themselves without the threat of violence. Believers are ALREADY OWNED. Let their masters guide them.

I will point them to this article for the dumbed down UCC interpretation

the idea of a group effort is all well and good...but only as support of each individual....individually, not as a group...leaving the individual acting as such, with the support of the group only...the opp"f" isn't doing that by the look of it...and well the ucc stuff is so far from my pay grade i don't care to entertain it,lol

So you believe people CAN'T change?

Some people Scott, but not ALL.

ALL THOSE WHO VALUE BELIEF CANNOT CHANGE.

It really is that simple.

The concept of valuing belief was PROGRAMMED INTO YOU.

Why do they VALUE such things - ignorance? I think so.

Yes, programming too, but because they don't have a good bullshit detecting daemon running to warn them of malicious program!

I "believe" I have learned much from this page...and i also believe I will learn more, my belief in invisible guys in the sky...meh not so much

IMPOSED ignorance, attached to BELIEF, and BELIEF given the VALUE of TRUST, is a self-supporting program.

Its only byproduct...imposed ignorance.

ALL BELIEF is created so you will use this method. It's easy, automatic, and feels good.

it has surely caused an awful lot of grief in the world! "fact"

Holy Shit.... The picture is clearer. No wonder Spidy Sense was tingling... Once again I thank myself for saving my own life by having the perseverance to stick it out and find this wealth of knowledge. It is simple in a way that is becoming so clear. One must research creating a Trust? Can One recommend some sources?

and thank you Scott Duncan

So, it turns out no one but myself accepted Tony's invitation to discuss OPPT. Go figure.

A TRUST IS NOT A PERSON, but..... A TRUST IS AN "INDIVIDUAL"

That's a different type of ACCOUNT, sir. Please check down the hall and to the left. Someone will help you there...

In that 25-part series he did, David-Wynn Miller answered somebodys question regarding the UCC with- "Dont forget, its called a CODE for a reason. Its a Code, because the Code is, that the UCC is owned and copyrighted by the Crown Corporation of the City of London England, and anybody using it automatically acquiesces to their jurisdiction(paraphrasing)"... or something like that

Yeah, If I understand Scott correctly, using any national currency today attaches us to that jurisdiction?

Curious.. who does the Naughty-by-Nature OPPT say or recommend, to return your BILL OF LADING too.....?

Common law of England 9. The rules of the common law of England, including the law merchant, save in so far as they are inconsistent with the express provisions of this Act, apply to bills, notes and cheques. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-4/page-3.html#docCont

This shit practically writes itself :D Thanks Derek!

Thats what i value most about this page without blowing too much smoke up Scott's ass.. it opened my eyes up to what 'THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER' really means.. i always thought NOTE = LEGAL TENDER, LEGAL TENDER = NOTE, not what, LEGAL TENDER really stood for..especially the, LEGAL part

" Palm Slap to Forehead" cool,

http://shiftshaper.org/freeatlast/2013/02/12/oppt-on-record-in-canada-supreme-court-foreclosure-case/

Well now its on record in the Canadian Court , a ruling will be made ;) interesting !

UCC applies to them. I want it to work. It could all be a big trap....

If I showed you "bigfoot" and "stupid cunt" on the supreme court record, will you people stop posting NON NEWS here?

Yes. lol

Oh, Bigfoot DNA story is out already, so something else?

THIS IS PART OF THE SCAM! IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING. I can put "Fiona Munro is my sex slave" on the Supreme Court record. THEY MUST accept. THAT'S THE DEFAULT POSITION. FUCK! You are ALL PLAYED SO EASILY! Seriously. I need to vanish, create a persona, AND CLEAN YOU ALL OUT! WHY ARE YOU ALL SO CREDULOUS!!!!

..i wonder what the Judge(so-called) in Meads v. Meads has to say about all this?

I just posted it for infotainment purposes

Yes, but the viewers here are credulous dolts who will believe ANYTHING. That means I have to STOP and KILL THE ZOMBIE YOU LET LOOSE ON THEIR "BRAINS".

Well personally i dont care about what Scott Duncan has to say about this..I for one, am definitely down with the OPP! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFTBG1sae0M

I see your point of view Scott. I will respectfully delete the post before it causes any more problems.

Too late NOW. It's part of the content.

...much like Derek Moran's crappy taste in music :D

2nd-year, University of Windsor, Cody Hall.........come ta'think of it, i never did find out whether they offered a course in Trust Law :/

News Flash "The topic here is UCC, right !

Actually it's about how awesome my UCC article is. :P

Well then- does the UCC have anything to do with Canada WHATSOEVER?

Yes it is awesome Scott :) I know people that have filed the UCC and are having there bill paid by the Treasury !

All the useful UCC shit is in the article. There is not NEARLY enough about how awesome the article is. It's the PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO KNOW how awesome it is, so I reserve THIS DISCUSSION for correcting this blatant violation of YOUR RIGHTS!

UCC is world wide !

I can see how that's a trap Fiona.

So you know a guy who knows a guy (no names) and he's gonna ring that register ANY TIME?

Its been done

Just because they pay you doesn't mean they can't say there was a mistake and ask for it back in the future!

:p

True ! same with taxes !

NO IT HASN'T BECAUSE THERE IS NO "TREASURY" IN THE UCC.

ANYONE who say they got money out of the UCC is a LYING SACK OF SHIT

No your right Scott, you file your B.C plus a bond to the UCC

ANYONE WHO SAYS THEY GOT A BILL PAYED BY THE UCC IS A LYING SACK OF SHIT.

Then you send the B.C to the Treasury

Which treasury is that?

USA

Joel- there's several Maxims-of-Law against doing that..

There's the trap. MAKE people BELIEVE it works. THEN a letter Dear so-and-so this the retard that accidentally made an accounting error. Yeah that money we gave, well you are going to give that back or rot in jail for fraud or something.

OK, so... Just so I have this straight... MY ONTARIO birth certificate goes into... THE US TREASURY! Do I deposit my Canadian Tire money into my CIBC Savings account too, while I'm at it?

Do they follow the law? Isn't the whole system is based on fraud? So until you tell them, they are working on the assumption that you are ok with fraud. No?

You cant pay debt with debt, they want people to do this to bring down the deficit !

Do you even know what a Deficit is?

It has nothing to DO with debt.

Debt is the BYPRODUCT

Everything you do in Canada taxes banking ends up in the US

They tell us deficit is added to the debt

Yes we are bankrupt there is no money !

City of Toronto says they're $5 Billion in debt.. so why in 2011 do they have $7.5 Billion hiding, in their Sinking Fund?

"Everything you do in Canada taxes banking ends up in the US" - I think the bank of Canada might have a few things to say about that, because that Birth Certificate is YOUR SHARE in it. The Money's YOURS not Washington's. Can you please stop talking out of your ass now fiona?

All of this shit, is crap you are PARROTING. Have you READ the BANK OF CANADA ACT?

Every time we make a promissory note or bond, and deposit it to the Banks your bring down the debt !

NOWHERE does it say it goes to LOU MANOTTI in the US

OMG FIONA, WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THIS?

PLEASE. Shut up.

You dont agree then :)p

were you referring to this section of the Bank of Canada Act?.. Distinction (6) Notes of the Bank are neither promissory notes nor bills of exchange within the meaning of the Bills of Exchange Act. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-2/page-10.html#h-11

Oh Derek. THANK YOU!

Fiona Munro, please assume that I do not agree with ANY of the non-reality in your head.

You are right though, Fiona. There is no Money. Only Debt and Credit. We get the Debt. They get the Credit. And its our signatures that gift-wrap it to them...

YES. SO STOP TRYING TO "GAME THE SYSTEM".

You mean to tell me Scott that you did not know we are all part of the same system !!!

Fiona... please be silent. PLEASE? I don't want to muzzle you.

;)p

K

NEGOTIATE is much like BELLIGERENT. Does not have anything to do with what we think it does, in legal-land. NEGOTIATE = transfers the value, that would be to the banks, upon our INDORSEMENT, and that would be done by our SIGNATURES

As i understand it.. isnt the UCC the U.S's equivalent to our Bills of Exchange Act, basically?

UCC isn't US law...

Yes, but it is also the WORLD reserve currency, so it's INTERNATIONAL LAW

The US dollar isn't US money either.

since all currencies are peggd to the dollar then there are no national currencies?

Not really, no

HJR 192 talks about how debt is to be discharged in the u.s. of A.. would be nice to see that same LAW here in Canada :(

OH WAIT.. we do have that

It's fraud anyway. If you didn't want to follow the terms, DON'T SIGN. You will be DEBT FREE IN NO TIME (Literally!) using this method.

Consumer bill or note to be marked 190. (1) Every consumer bill or consumer note shall be prominently and legibly marked on its face with the words �Consumer Purchase� before or at the time when the instrument is signed by the purchaser or by any person signing to accommodate the purchaser. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-4/page-39.html#docCont

Since I am outside Canada now where can I find out what exactly a PASSPORT is?

"It's fraud anyway"... you are referring to HJR 192?

Why do certain dubious individuals want to pay a lot of "money" for them?

Why did you block me Scott :(

Because this is a bullshit-free environment.

*pssst* Fiona..why dont you ask him to illustrate how to properly draw a 'promissory note?'

Winston Shrout talks about that too, I just figured it only had to do with the US...

This all just makes me wanna work on a CLAIM OF RIGHT to send to Jim Flaherty claiming the right to discharge any debts per the Bills of Exchange Act 1985, as the common law says its my right too... :/

I just think there needs to be a union of many, treasonists or whatever you wanna call it... a united "fuck this shit" to support each other... it has to be all. I told my father, "Everyone in Canada should just not pay taxes for this year." He said, "YES, but you have to get everyone to do it."

Better yet, Beverly- DISCHARGE whatever taxes they feel you owe them by filling out their bill-payment-remittance they send to you and sending it back into them registered-mail.. ;)

PERSON must pay tax not you!

Beverly May Braaksma stop wasting your life trying to "fix the system. It's 2013 and you can spawn your own COMPETING system with ease. THAT is what you aren't supposed to find out, and that's what I mean by "mean to misbehave" which is WHY THE TENDER FOR LAW Group exists, really. THE TENDER FOR LAW - WE AIM TO MISBEHAVE

No, I would like to see everyone just not pay... for one year... see what happens... wouldn't the government have to lay some people off?

I believe that would be "misbehavin"

By misbehave do you mean become a trustee of your trust Scott?

No, I show you how to build your OWN BANK

I'm personally not interested in having my home taken away, get thrown in jail... I would rather stand with many people than give up the rest of my life by myself

THAT'S MISBEHAVIN

..didnt Roger Hayes get thrown in jail for trying to do that in England?

ok go...

I AM. I started this GROUP, GIRL-BRAIN

wunderbar!

Thats right..May Croft did say in her book that it only took $250,000 to start-up your own bank - or something like that

I emailed her and she said to me "none of this shit works"

LOL

OR... you can step out of your rapist's home and start over.

I know a girl whose friend took the Government to court over her BC. Didnt wanna talk about it though even to her friend out of fear for her safety.

my friend went to court on a stupid photo radar, refused to say his name and they were going to arrest him...

He actually would have continued but he's moving and didn't need his life disrupted... so how can you avoid that through fighting?

I asked him, if the Judge at the end asked him- "Now..do you agree and understand the sentence the court has laid against you?(or however they word it)

the judge and crown both said "that freeman shit isn't going to work here"

http://bitcoinatm.com/ - The MONEY-OF-EXCHANGE-VACCUUM

Pull it OUT of jurisdiction. Move it ANYWHERE.

Ideally everyone becomes their OWN BANK then...?

Or groups of people.

The back-end currency regulates itself

Did you see my earlier post on the bitcoin?

Fuck the Freeman/a4v shit! They want money GIVE IT TO THEM

As i understand it, during your Allocution, you are supposed to say to the Judge- "Your Honour, with all due respect, i do not agree, i do not acceede, i do not attorn, and i do not consent to the court's sentence."

Why is it even that far?

yes, I saw that post... girl-brain needed a break with a 53' truck offload...

do not understand do not recognize any of this ... as who is SURETY in this matter?

Would you like to start another thread, called DEREK TRIES TO ENJOIN SCOTT INTO A TRAFFIC TICKET?

I see a good read :P

YES! go

Joel Kinmond's such a keener. He watches for the gold crumbs. ;)

crumbs can be collected and melted down into something bigger eventually

So it SEEMS :D

Will i be playing the Cop-at-you-car-window, or Judge-trying-to-railroad-you-in-court..?

ENJOIN = fancy-new-term for Joinder?

I've always had a gut feeling that the system is fucked. Maybe I took an easier road in my youth and left CANADA. I left shortly after the infamous 9-11 and have been back once for a visit. When I have enough crumbs collected and can put them into something useful I'd like to return

When are you going to show me how to build my own bank? Actually I like the idea of a group bank better - strength in numbers - symbiotic relationships and all that!

Derek, Roger Hayes was imprisoned for 21 days for non-payment of council tax. His "Lawful Bank" is still going ahead or at least where it was before he went to jail.

Yes Scott Duncan, and Derek Moran, I for one would welcome a traffic ticket thread!! lol...(like that wasn't obvious, ha ha)

SEEMS=the impression of being

m, Regarding this 'What to say when appearing in court before the bar. and most matters also. I still come to the question of, "If the common man (A typical guy/woman ya know, cruizing through life) cannot simple ask those people (who are forcing him/her to do things such as appear before court and or serve time and/or hand over some hard earned money for a 'fine') "What BUSINESS do 'They' have with 'Him' ?. My understanding of this is If the common man cannot understand what's going on or being said/spoken to then it has no force or effect and the jp/judge is supposed to dismiss the matter. I keep trying to make simple the complicated.

Still Flu struck so only dipping in and out of Fuckbook. Not read all of this thread yet but must say. Scott, something tells me your intellect is not of this planet.

I am with Maximus Legis on that!!!!

The UCC is an interesting read. Um, er, ahhhh, mmmmm,,,if I could understand it, it would be I mean. I would 'Like' it but I just don't comprehend, can't 'wrap' my head around it. :( I am going to back pedal to something I can sorta get.

I'm going to post this here. Not sure if Scott wants it here then move/delete it. I have a basic problem with virtually everything I've learned in the last 2 years. Dean, in seminars/videos has repeatedly said you can be the Administrator of the PERSON. "CHAD BRODGESELL" Almost everything is based off that. Now. I 'DID NOT' create this PERSON. Some one else did, or a party of some one elses did. It is NOW my understanding that I can only have the BENEFIT and/or the LIABILITY (I presume as a TRUSTEE) of it. So far I have come up with; 1) ADMINISTRATE it? Not bloody likely as I don't even really know what the PERSON 'really' is in real world. I am therefor NOT QUALIFIED to administrate the PERSON. 2) Be the BENEFICIARY of the PERSON? Yes I am perfectly capable of RECEIVING whatever is BENEFICIAL from the PERSON. I am a monkey, I can do that. 3 ) ACT in the capacity of the TRUSTEE to the PERSON? Not sure if I could as I don't know the duties (I haven't been trained in the capacity of TRUSTEE) I am not QUALIFIED to act as the TRUSTEE of said account. I would also like to see a check soon for performing a TRUSTEE's duties too if I have. This is no reflection on Dean Clifford. Just a rant as to a CORE element of the understanding of LAW that is conflicting. Until I get this straightened out I can't continue farther. Also, DAMN!, I love to be able to add line breaks in to make it more readable.

Hmmmmm. sry...have to add to No. 1) The ADMINISTRATOR is also a TRUSTEE just with the title 'ADMINISTRATOR'. And an after thought, ----If I am acting as a TRUSTEE but with "WHAT TITLE" as a TRUSTEE. Kinda like a TITLE with in a TITLE so to speak. Or a TITLE "UNDER" a POSITION of TRUSTEE. nah, I like the TITLE with in a TITLE better.

would you say marriage is a form of joinder where both parties are accepting surety for eachother (and the fruits of that "marriage"?

i am so with you on the ucc chad. I know who i am. then i get completely lost in commerce. I know I do not want to be surety for anything i don't understand. that is one reason i live where i do and how i do (off grid).

Charles I just burst a gut just LOOKING at that never mind trying to understand it lol

Just read the post now..brilliant. Thank you Scott Duncan

Thanks for helping me too innerstand the UCC better. I am almost ready to reclaim my estate.

No you aren't. You don't get to. MAKE ANOTHER PERSON, and have THAT person claim it.

MAKE ANOTHER PERSON ???...company ???

My bad. Right the proxy. If I reclaimed it myself I would be confessing into their jurisdiction. I figured I would put the bond into a trust as settlor provided I can find someone I can trust and make myself beneficiary. Then open a non-interest bearing trust account at a bank and the trustee would get the check book. I may have some more work to do yet. What do you think. I am going to slam that asshole captain tonight.

THAT is MUCH closer. ;)

find someone I can trust : Can that be ANYONE ????...wife, children, brother....???

A CORPORATION is a PERSON. Why do I have to repeat this shit? do you people not know how to connect this stuff?

John Doe ...Pierre ... ;(

All I can do from now on is rage against the stupidity. :(

yeah...Billy Bob Gratton....I get it....slowly but surely....no rage needed...<(")

Im a fukin Quebecer...not my fault..??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZS7sOOpELI

LMAO

Hey Fiona Munro, guess who is Scott and who is ME in that scene...:) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lsj3yxlzC0

I think the trustee would have to be somewhat competent. At least competent enough to sign a check. And if folks are too dam lazy to look in the code for a definition well...I.C. 6-3-1-14 says �The term �person� means an individual, trust or estate: Provided, That no corporation shall be considered to be a person. Whoever wrote this law only got it half right.

A relationship created at the direction of an individual, in which one or more persons hold the individual's property subject to certain duties to use and protect it for the benefit of others. PRIVATE TRUST....

Individuals may control the distribution of their property during their lives or after their deaths through the use of a trust. There are many types of trusts and many purposes for their creation. A trust may be created for the financial benefit of the person creating the trust, a surviving spouse or minor children, or a charitable purpose. Though a variety of trusts are permitted by law, trust arrangements that are attempts to evade creditors or lawful responsibilities will be declared void by the courts.

The person who creates the trust is the settlor. The person who holds the property for another's benefit is the trustee. The person who is benefited by the trust is the beneficiary, or cestui que trust. The property that comprises the trust is the trust res, corpus, principal, or subject matter. For example, a parent signs over certain stock to a bank to manage for a child, with instructions to give the dividend checks to him each year until he becomes 21 years of age, at which time he is to receive all the stock. The parent is the settlor, the bank is the trustee, the stock is the trust res, and the child is the beneficiary.

A fiduciary relationship exists in the law of trusts whenever the settlor relies on the trustee and places special confidence in her. The trustee must act in Good Faith with strict honesty and due regard to protect and serve the interests of the beneficiaries. The trustee also has a fiduciary relationship with the beneficiaries of the trust.

????....WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BEETWEEN fIDUCIARY AND TRUSTEE..??....FUK...GGGRRRR

A trustee takes legal title to the trust res, which means that the trustee's interest in the property appears to be one of complete ownership and possession, but the trustee does not have the right to receive any benefits from the property. The right to benefit from the property, known as EQUITABLE title, belongs to the beneficiary

Every private trust consists of four distinct elements: an intention of the settlor to create the trust, a res or subject matter, a trustee, and a beneficiary. Unless these elements are present, a court cannot enforce an arrangement as a trust.

INTENTION: The settlor must intend to impose enforceable duties on a trustee to deal with the property for the benefit of another. Intent can be demonstrated by words, conduct, or both. It is immaterial whether the word trust is used in the trust document. Sometimes, however, the words used by the settlor are equivocal and there is doubt whether the settlor intended to create a trust. If the settlor uses words that express merely the desire to do something, such as the terms desire, wish, or hope, these precatory words (words expressing a wish) may create a moral obligation, but they do not create a legal one. In this situation a court will consider the entire document and the circumstances of the person who attempted to create the trust to determine whether a trust should be established.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Private+Trusts

you said TRUST law is the highest law. Is the only reason to put a trust into a corporation with its own charter, because you say we have not the knowledge to operate the trust but are able to learn (only because of the experience we DO have) to operate a corpoation?

Pierre ; Re your comment { guess who is Scott and who is ME in that scene...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lsj3yxlzC0 that's an easy one !!!!! Scott is the one cutting the tree 0:)

HAHA....I'm not the only one missing some points in here...HAHAHAHA!!!!..........:D

If you use the cite (UCC _ - _ _ _ or __ USC � _ _ _ _), you have reverted back to being a citizen taking a benefit from the statutes. If you demonstrate the principle in the code section without citing it, you maintain your separation. The person you represent in the public acquires the commercial rights, but you interject your rights through the natural order of things, and maintain your unalienable rights.

The person you represent in the public: I DONT DO THAT ?????...I have a person in my pocket with bill of exchange, but I dont represent neither one of them....????....did I missed something somewhere..???

OMFG, you are such a girl-brain. For the MILLIONTH time: A CORPORATION is a PERSON. THAT PERSON LIENS YOUR PERSON! FUCK! Any MORE OF YOU ASSHATS WANT TO CALL ME NAMES AND SAY WHAT A BAD PERON I AM BECAUSE I POINT OUT THE REALITY THAT YOU ARE ALL TOO STUPID TO GRASP EVEN THE SIMPLEST THINGS? Why do I have to repeat this shit? do you people not know how to connect this stuff?

hey hey...all I know rigth now is: I'm Pete or Peter or Pierre or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST Social Insurance no. 26X-XXX-XXX, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX I'm the MASTER of PIERRE DAOUST, I make ALL BUSINESS DECISIONS for PIERRE DAOUST..... ANY OBJECTIONS ?????????????

and I have no problem LIEN that PIERRE DAOUST to another person...

So as long as I wont grasp this: 1: Establish a trust 2: Establish a corporation - In the Charter, assign the role of the corporation to HOLD the trust, and establish the "Law" guidelines (You get to make your own up) as regards keeping the trust. 3: Get ANY accountant to manage the books of the corporation. You direct the corporation as FIRST DIRECTOR, and establish roles (President/CEO Vice President, etc) which is how the UNITED STATES was formed. Side Note: EVER NOTICE that when the US "Liberates" a country, they NEVER install their form of government? It's always a PARLIAMENT they install. Figure out why that is, and things will be clearer. USE THE U.S. AS A MODEL FOR YOUR CORPORATION. No YOU do that. The accountant EXECUTES YOUR TASKS within the framework. To establish a trust, write it down, and have it witnessed and notarized. The end. Only shareholders of your corporation are recognized by the trust.

I will stick to this: I'm Pete or Peter or Pierre or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST Social Insurance no. 26X-XXX-XXX, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX I'm the MASTER of PIERRE DAOUST, I make ALL BUSINESS DECISIONS for PIERRE DAOUST..... ANY OBJECTIONS ?????????????

I have HOPE.....I have HOPE...!!!! :D

If the Government IS a Trust; why cant i just say- "YOU GUYS take care of this Trust-shit for me. Except, we're gonna be doing things a little bit differently around here. I will be the EXECUTOR calling the shots, and especially I will be the Beneficiary NOW..and you guys will start being what you were intended to be all along, the TRUSTEE now for a change. And considering how much this "valuable instrument/security" is supposed to be worth, i will have NO PROBLEM with paying you guys you're administrative-fee for doing your job in the form of INCOME TAXES from the value/credit derived from the Trust-account you guys set-up but NEVER had any intention of telling me about until i BROUGHT IT UP, thank you very much!!" :)

Beverly- wouldnt you at least like to know the whereabouts of your original LFSOLBR is?.. i think the path for that will be 3 NOTICES sent by registered-mail.. DEFAULT NOTICE by Affidavit.. Court of Equity.. and making(not quite sure what the proper phrasing is here)for a Writ of Mandamus getting the Judge to make the ORDER, and enforce the ORDER, getting the Registrar General's office to spill-the-beans on at least that one question, if not more - that would be a start, get them to admit they've at least been CONCEALING from us, tsk-tsk, not very nice of our TRUSTEES now is it? ;)

or, a simple method, show up with a tank.....

yes scott, our minds are so brainwashed we cant grasp their are dots... [ hansel & grettle crumbs!]

i think you are talking to me. i am a girl yes. yes i understand the corporation leins the person. I am not sure how to accomplish that yet. working on understanding as much as i can and producing accurate documentation. i mostly was trying to find out why it is necessary to go thru these steps to protect ones equity (assuming of course one knows who one is)

i'm reading this, have a look; http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/comliens.shtml

Sigh..... I am a big fan of ALL of this...and I've been following all that's been said. But.....at one point I realized that Scott's not joking when he insults peoples intelligence. Some here....are NOT suppose....just trying to wrap their brains around so many ideas that go against the grain.... So.....Im a Freeman yes.......but not everyone is buying into this. Me...because of ...pompous comments.... I'm gonna play the little goat...and go get the big goat...who hasn't bought into "this"... And have him read ALL this (he doesn't use Facebook)...and have him dissect everything that is being said here. The good news is...that he might see our side...the bad news....he's smarter than anyone here hands down, and just might make mincemeat out of everything Scott...or anyone of us....has to say. And then I'll have him tell everyone how stupid they are for not keeping up... I was told by Dean Kory that this was the spot for intellectual exercise....not a diatribe from some dude who thinks he's holier than thou. I ain't been here long.....and I DO like many posts made...but...nah.... I don't need some know-it-all who thinks he's smarter than everyone "educate" the ignorant by insulting them. Not cool. So...after My big brain big gun tears a few new assholes... I'm out. Lots if GREAT info....but I don't like the tone and don't need someone who in all likelihood can't hold a flame to ME in the real world....act like he's God and insult people who are simply.on the path of Truth and Enlightenment

Me Shawn Ofthefamily Folkes, I like it so much here that I stopped watching the SOPRANO'S....I REALLY like Scott's style...I'm not here for making NICE friends that will be NICE with me...I have PLENTY of those....unfortunatly, these NICE friends of mine dont tell me the truth ALL THE TIME, not because they don't want to, but because they don't KNOW the truth....I don't recall Scott being INSULTING with me....oh he is ruff once in a while, but I don't give a shit...some say he has a bad ATTITUDE....well, thats none of my business and I don't give a shit on this as well.....so far, he never lied to me....and if I get STUPID, I hope he will tell me, because, Unfortunatly, I've been raised and educate by STUPID people....I've learned more in here than in the past 46 years about who I am and what to do to KNOW the truth....what Scott thinks about himself....I don't give a shit....none of my business...I like better someone ruff that teach me something than someone ruff that steal stuff from me...:D

Scott does have his own way about him...I like the info and straight up,in your face reality and honesty of his delivery,its not for everyone but i, for one, am greatfull and look forward to learning through him and the rest of you...where else can you go to exchange real ideas that have substance,meaning,and truth even if it is in its ruff draft eairly stages of development?Look past our differences and suck it up for the sake of knowledge,we have a huge battle on our hands here!

Thank you Scott & Tara for your time.. ..I am grateful to be treated like an idiot.. otherwise I wouldn't understand what you are saying. ... :-) By only being in this group my understanding went up by 200% and this is not exaggerated. ....

Great...my post just disappered. Forget it. Never mind. Just be advised. Referring to ME as an idiot...for not grasping something...or because I'm a very active dude that cybers with his THUMBS (on hands big enough to crush your head) on thus Note (the biggest they got and it ain't big enough) and used Acronyms...don't do.org. You all like your masochistic ways of.learning? Fine. Chaucon son gout. Just don't think that shit will fly with me. I get Scots style...to some degree. Not my preferred way of rightwing...but hey...maybe that's how you guys roll... I just know that I lose interest quick...with OPS like this...where the intended audience is already insulted before.anything useful is even rendered. Doesn't matter what's in the book if it's wrapped in dog shit...people ain't gonna read it. Not newbies...unless your interests lie in only educating and sharing with yourselves. I mean... I could have posted.MY wall post by calling all people who use banks fucking idiots...or call anyone.anything I like...because I can say it to their face...and they can't do shit about it. But...having the real world power to say things to people without fear ain't the same as insulting cyber audiences...and if I don't flesh in people in the real world...and I CAN...I stray cyber bullies and those that appear to have that mentality with great disdain. If your way of educating is by insulting....well...I can tell you're not an educator in real life. You might insult a student like me in your class...and wake up eating from a straw for the rest of four life. So see...I get cheesed when I Snell bullies and those who think they are above others. If you know something intellectual and I don't...it sure doesn't mean you're SMARTER...and doesn't give you the right to talk down to me...cuz I can trump that...and talk back down to you....and say I can...because on more dangerous than you. Does the fact that I can kick in any of your faces give me the right to talk to you like you're dogs? If anything...that gives me more right to do so...than the Guy who "thinks" he's smarter than me...that can be debated....or the Guy who can end you...no debate. Ok. Im done. Take this rant as my disclaimer that I'm personally not going to call anyone here anything and expect the same... And I do not condone belittling shit....no matter who it's from, or what they "Know"

I'm on a moving bus and will edit my autotype errors later. I'm sure you're not idiots and can get the gist

I like that Shawn Ofthefamily Folkes....in fact, we need MORE BELLIGERENT in here....stay around Man... :D :D :D (I'm having fun and laughin now)....

Man I can't wait to get into shit with you guys! Like...this one Guy I know...became friends with a real deal illuminati..who told him shit. Dude moved from Ottawa (where he was a PhD in biomechanical engineering or some shit, and has pi memorized to 50 decimal places) to...the middle of nowhere. I too changed my life...got rid of the TIE for the HARDHAT. Get me? So I NEED to know all about this...more about the UCC (seeing that I sign shit all the time....with STAMPS) and more about...well....above! So..back to topic... Without calling me a name, can anyone tell me some shit? See...a Freeman was nailed by a judge for tax evasion...the judge saying that ya gotta still pay tax to SOMEONE...that someone being the Queen. Now.... I see a shitload of holes in that judges statement...but id like to get your guys input...esp how this "convict" could have used the UCC(Universal Commerce Code, just so my big assed thumbs aren't accused of being lazy lol) to his advantage in his arguments to the judge. And maybe you all can advise me on family matters...like how my Dad got raped hard by the tax man AND the Canadian courts for hundreds of thousands of dollars...all due to international royalties. He, fyi is my big gun. And Hahahahaha a major reason why McGuinty resigned! Dude didn't get his ROE....or SIX YEARS from his GOVERNMENT employer... So yeah... I got reasons to lament what government has made of US! AND HAHAHA yo...tall can research right? Won't be hard to figure out who my Dad is HISTORICALLY...or hahahahahahaaa fuck...who my sister is. And who she rolls with. You'll all be glad to know that people on the highest security clearances...like...I dunno.....Corrections Canada? How's about CSIS? Their respective heads... (not ministers fyi) are huge conspiracy theorists...so we have much to discuss!

Shawn Ofthefamily Folkes....I will start by INTRODUCING myself NON-NEGOCIABLE I'm Pete and/or Peter and/or Pierre and/or Babe (I reserve this one for my wife) I'm also Dad (I reserve this one for my children) and/or BELLIGERENT and I'm the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF PIERRE DAOUST Social Insurance no. 26X-XXX-XXX, Inscription No.119XXXXXXXX I�m the SOLE beneficiary of PIERRE DAOUST I make ALL business decisions for PIERRE DAOUST At least 51% of my blood is ORIGINAL blood I LOVE WAL-MART COUPONS I�m a very NICE guy I am the MASTER or my PERSON Named PIERRE DAOUST And I reserve ALL RIGHTS�.all of them� Is ANYONE have any objections ?????

Glad to see you all are getin past the male bravaudo crap and sniffin asses,buttin heads and all...NOW LETS GET DOWN TO THE REAL REASON WERE ALL HERE!

:D :D....

:D

The real REASONS I'm here...mmmhh...???? 1). WHY 2). WHY 3). HOW thats it for me...!!

Shawn Ofthefamily Folkes, you got a sistah? is she nice?

lol

Nope She's not nice at all You don't get that far being nice A woman whose a Ministry Director...double masters before she turned 24 with an American GPA dinal grade of 3.98 that's almost 6'3" and owns almost every local record for her track and field discipline.. with a 150ish IQ..? If you know really really smart people that tower over everyone, then you know they ain't generally nice.

I could handle that !!! :D

Her husband barely can lol You'd probably like them Pete and/or Peter and/or Pierre, esp when they get into speed talking French lol

Joel Kinmond: UCC is ADMIRALTY isn't it? It only applies to PERSONS or comercial shit.?

Scott Duncan: YES it's ADMIRALTY. It regulates INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE within the jurisdiction of the WORLD RESERVE CURRENCY (Currently the U.S. Dollar). That's the funny thing: If you owned a fleet of ships and a Port, in the country holding the RESERVE currency, that crap they spew with ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD, might work...might. But you'd have ships and ports to foreclose on.

wow, alotta info there...was there ever a part three to this article as you mention at the end, Scott?

Shit how did I miss this one! Great stuff here.

Best explanation I've seen so far. :D

Hey !! :D

Hellos?

Oh man !!!..... :/

I know, right! ZOMBIE THREAD!

He must of skipped this part. I say toss him......

They have 72 hours. then I enforce ;) http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Days+of+grace

Is Derek Moran is back in here ?

I am... its been about 5-6 months

who jesse? who's skippy? nice revival there Admiral. thas a post i thought was a gonner. some time earlier i read/heard someone say a trust was a person, and i skipped arguing against that. why do we think wrong, because were to stupid to question what were told without considering the other party might not know or knows and is lying... all adults lie.

Wtf??? I didn't comment on this yet? How the fuck did this happen?

Your comments has been deleted Chris Evan, too stupid :P

And gay :D

Must be.

:D

as judged by pierre!

When is the moment Scott, a trust has been completely constituted?

Upon evidence of the transfer of the corpus Chip Douglas

I'm really STUPID I guess, so I'm putting in a couple cents here, to keep up on this convo, thanks to you all for the information, confusing as it is to me as I am STUPID, LOL, my aim is to become less STUPID in the process.

If you read this group. you're certainly not that stupid, you may be IGNORANT, but not stupid.......but I guess it's up to you to decide, Tracie Dugas :)

I like ignorant much better, but I couldn't help myself.

You're all stupid, but I'm grading on a curve.

:D

Tracie Dugas has been totally like-raping all my posts. That's how groupies are born. It's beautiful! *sniff* *sigh* The circle of lust...

Lmao, I can't help it, if I like it I click it?

um, i think that would be my fault. quoting scottizms on other places. hi tracy, i see you found your way. just be careful, and do way more reading than talking. i suggest you go all the way back as far as you can, and also since a lot of people have been stripped from the group, some conversations might read odd if there posts are also stripped. there are a lot of notes in that section aswell as a few gold nugget doc's of compiled threads. you will get lost, but you will never be alone.

and try to leave your belief's at the door. no one here will believe you. we have learned to know/think better than that.

Bumping these to the top for the newbies.

:)

.