Thanks for that Scott. Are you really from Earth? I pointed out the legal tender printed on the notes that the believers want to use and the fact that the oppt wants to foreclose on the very banks that the believers want their notes deposited into. Since that post there have been no more posts.

And you are correct. THANKS FOR GIVING AWAY THE END OF THE STORY! :P ...oh wait. Contrary to "belief". that's a GOOD thing!

HEY, that sounds like stumbling onto the key to wisdom! (Notice that no belief is required) The ONLY reason to do that is to find out WHY! THAT is what needs to be thought of as a VIRTUE. WHY is the HIGHEST virtue.

I found this in GlobalFact page, The lady at the beginning seems to know her shit. Explains some terms and words pretty well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywzlosmvFuU

I think the dude speaking just around 43 44 minute mark makes a interesting point. Sounds like what Dean Clifford talks about.

Gary reads these things like he reads his bible... he just picks parts he likes and ignores the rest. He'll call you "ignorant" if you point this out... But since I'm so "self indulgent", I thing I shall publicly masturbate by comparing OPPF and BITCOIN in the context of reality. OPPT REALITY IMPACT: *crickets chirping* BITCOIN REALITY IMPACT: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57570925-38/need-bitcoins-this-atm-takes-dollars-and-funds-your-account/ While you are pandering to belief, thousands of smarter people in REALITY are dong REAL things. AND IT ALL SERVES AQUILAE! Self Serving enough? :P

It's more than that. They also feel that THEIR IGNORANCE (BELIEF) has the SAME STANDING as KNOWLEDGE.

They also say: FAITH=TRUST BELIEF=KNOWLEDGE ALCHEMY=CHEMISTRY ASTROLOGY=ASTRONOMY NUMEROLOGY=TRIGONOMETRY This creates a credulous population that 1: VALUES "Belief". 2: WILL COMPLY with that "belief" 3: DOESN'T KNOW/DENIES THEY ARE TOLD WHAT TO BELIEVE.

I have ZERO tolerance for "belief" and I have yet to hear a valid reason for why it should be "tolerated".

Well that puts THEM in the same position the Government puts YOU - No "outside" to go to. They should be on street corners selling pencils in a cup, instead they make POLICY. Ignorance is celebrated, and within the month, they will be declaring "martial law" in the U.S. (Remember I said that...I hope I'm wrong, but I am REALLY good at this sort of thing) and all in the name of "belief". ...and what they steal from you.

Selling pencils causes no harm as long as they don't try to gauge your eyes out with them. And to the Marshall law thing, the US federal zone has been in a state of permanent emergency for quite some time now. https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=33+Suffolk+U.+L.+Rev.+259&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=476112ccd5c3063f9b7e2edc603bb962

I'm receiving emails from strangers who wants me to help them and asking me what I know about laws and government fraud and stuff like that....I answered one so far with the fuck you response, and they still come back with weird stuff.....last one was a guy sending me The OPPF thing and telling me he dont need my help no more..???....do you guys receive that kind of emails ????

ALL the time. If it's a stranger, its probably a cop, or a OPPF scammer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qjp_9nlrBao

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbybeOWZ-Bc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOWoxH-HbVw

Scott Duncan: I ACTUALLY ENDORSE THIS VIDEO! LISTEN to this, They hit on some VERY key points from a FRAUD standpoint. Psychological manipulation is what is also touched on, which I do not cover in THE TENDER FOR LAW. WATCH AND LISTEN. THIS COVERS A LOT OF WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW!

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma: I watched about 15 min of this and (since I've never read this document they speak of)... I right away thought of this NWO and wondered who is behind these OPPT people anyways????

Maxim-of-Law: "Power derived, can never be greater than the Power it was derived FROM." So to answer your question James, about who is the Grantor-of-the-Trust- YOU ARE. These 'persons' are getting paid a job to do to SUPPOSEDLY take care of it for you, supposedly.

Adam Thomas: Hahaha. I rember my conversation with Arthur Christian & he was going through a long list of people he believed to be agent provocateur's & plants. He claimed that Robert Menard & Dean Clifford are agents. I dont BELIEVE they are. Deano is being taught a harsh lesson from a pack of kunts that hate him & others for EDUCATING PEOPLE WITH THE TRUTH. Arthur BELIEVES that if ye cant see it or you haven't seen it then HOW DO YE KNOW ITS REAL OR HAS HAPPENED.He also questioned if we actually revolve around the sun & I answered "yes we do." His reply was "BUT HOW DO YE KNOW THAT?".......SIGH...HO HUM..FUCK ME....

Chad Brodgesell: The video actually clears up a couple other things NOT related to the OPPT. On the face of it though 'The First layer of onion skin' it is still just another bunch of man made rules and regs that unless you agree to them don't bind you. I am reminded of the show 'FireFly' where the Alliance comes in guns drawn saying, "You are bound by Law' I forget which ep. it was. That show really has so many connections with LAW it's as if the director was trying to tell us something. Oh, Wait. They were.

Scott Duncan: Anton Mac Phiarais Re AQUILAE'S standing: ALL private trusts have standing. It's simply "Higher Law". However The House of Windsor Acknowledges it and so does the UK.

Chad Brodgesell: Is that why they get MORE freaky when you start addressing PRIVATE matters in a PUBLIC forum? Do not discuss that it is PRIVATE you NUMBNUT, this is ONLY PUBLIC forum! kinda way? i used forum like a court or chambers not the interz net thing.

Chad Brodgesell: This oath thing is really getting to me. I have never taken an oath (that I know of or can remember), yet it keeps cropping up all the time.

Scott Duncan: Look it up in Blacks.

Chad Brodgesell: I have, many times, but I just realized something. the word 'signifies'. I could construe that as 'If I made it "appear' that I have taken an oath. m,,,

Chad Brodgesell: screw the word Oath. The action or non denial of of appearing to have an oath is enough 'To have an oath'

S�il Eile: Murdochs irish law dictionary describes an Oath as 1. a solemn declaration by which a party calls his God to witness what he is saying is true 2. includes a solemn affirmation & statutory declaration.... ,,,, nice use of the word include

Chad Brodgesell: Blacks fifth Any form of atestation by which a person 'signafies' that he is bound in 'conscience' to perform an act faithfully and truthfully

Chad Brodgesell: includes a solemn affirmation & statutory declaration.... m, this would mean the prior 'oath' to god is moot leaving only the solemn affirmation &wait for it, "STATUTORY" declaration

S�il Eile: lol exactly, to include is to exclude all others, in their eyes it is statutory & thats all there is

Chad Brodgesell: the inclusion of one is at the exclusion of all else

S�il Eile: the whole idea of taking them on in court is to challenge those presumptions & fuck them, if theres law i have recourse remedy if theres no law what the fuck am i worried about lol ... lets see

Antonin Mac Phiarais: bait and switch game , get you to swear to god and switch it on you , well ignorance of the law is no excuse is it

Jason F. LeBlanc: This vid set the dice to rattling in my being. A whole new level of understanding has happened for me in regards to the meaning of the phrase "change your mind". OPPT = Meet the new boss, same as the old boss....... Oh and by the way...... This has been going on for a very long time. Not news to most of us here but the vid led me to a much deeper level of comprehension. My mind has changed...... In many ways.

Scott Duncan: Say what you like about these two, when you're right, you're right. These two have it right. LISTEN. I don't even have to write about One People's Public Fraud. These two have ALL the major points covered. IT'S STILL THE SYSTEM!

ZOMBIE THREAD! :D

Wow

10 years ago I said people couldn't have original thought

This thread should be mandatory reading

...BUMP. Let's push this to the top again.

Awesome Article!!! Thanks Scott Duncan!!!!

Yes.

Yep, agree, Thanks Scott http://files.thumbsupuk.com/product_images/PIMCHEW/low_res/1274_image1_Pimp_Chew_Toy_Pug-2-LR.jpg

I like what Winston Shrout said regarding the OPPF...he asked how they could assert that ithe TRUST represented him when he never gave them permission to act on his behalf. In short, he never signed any documents giving them permission to represent him.

Obviously they can't act on anyone's behalf... My mate was dead keen on it and said this is it, we're free.... I couldn't get my head around who or what it was and what right they had to include me as a man in anything...

So few comments on this masterpiece?

Everyone was correctly afraid to say anything. :D

Now that a couple of years have passed, you can have fun with TIME and the PUBLIC RECORD. As soon as i started calling out the lawyers, suddenly OPPF vanished.

Yes :D

Got to love Creative Commons, then! :D

This This is shit NOBODY can take away, no matter how hard they try. In less than a month, EVERYONE was asking the right questions, and suddenly the lawyers bailed. I claim bragging rights: I killed OPPF. :D

Yep, when we start asking the RIGHT questions, lawyers seems to AVOID us. In everything I have done so far (except these victimless criminal charges), NO LAWYERS SHOWED UP......

These liens, how come no one is coming to arrest me ? ....because if they are FALSE liens, it has to be FRAUD, right ? :/

Our lawyer asked us to allow him to "remove himself from the record" (lawyer speak for he did not want to continue to represent us) after I asked him many specific questions that he would not ackowledge let alone answer. He must be wondering WHIO this VERY SMART MAN i keep referring to is :D

"Asked us to allow him to". This is interesting.

A COURTESY I'm sure :P It was either that or this parasitical sack-of -shit would MOTION the court to be removed which only entails COSTS.

He seeked PERMISSION :/

He was looking for your AUTHORIZATION, right ?

Oui...it is clear that he can't simply choose to remove himself without our CONSENT :D

So tell him NO, tell him you have no idea why you say NO, but it's NO :D

And tell him to STOP asking these freeman on the land type questions :P

Or ask him, ARE YOU ONE OF THESE FUCKING FREEMAN ? :D