The Tender For Law

Volume 1

Feb 22, 2013 5:56 PM

Eamonn O Brien

- Property registered to the PERSON -

I would think that once the property isn't used to cause harm then any interaction between THEM and the PERSON in relation to the property is just an attempt to engage a man/woman as surety for their benefit yes?

i.e. - My car is registered to the PERSON. They own their PERSON but I have control of it. Any contact from them after registration is an offer from them for me to act as trustee and take liability for alleged debts?

Read Comments

James Baal

They don't own it BTW, I recently had a run with The DEPT SOCIAL PROTECTION IN IRELAND......Simply fucking around and trying things, the way I understood it was they SAVE GUARD it for SECURITY REASONS.... the PERSON is LOCKED within their PROPERTY (APPLICATION FORM) which they don't return to you because its theirs....

Pete Daoust

OK....for a Company now: My name is Pierre LBR no. xxxxxx, I'm the MASTER of PIERRE DAOUST, PIERRE DAOUST is the MASTER of ABC Inc., PIERRE DAOUST is the Beneficiaru of ABC Inc., PIERRE DAOUST is the CEO of ABC Inc., PIERRE DAOUST is the only one who can make business decisions for ABC Inc., PIERRE DAOUST is also the ADMINISTRATOR of ABC Inc., ABC Inc. requires a certified check of $350k for opening a file and $1000.00 / hour paid in advance for ANY business request from YOUR ENTERPRISES....

James Baal

But there are two trust's at work here i think because the trust is set up with the Government as administrators, Trustees....but they sent you something back something for you to hold in Trust the PLASTIC CARD with social security etc details on it! Is that PRIVATE and PUBLIC Trust?

Pete Daoust

Well...If, indeed, I worked for them, I dont recall receiving any pay check..????....so my rate is $1000.00 / hour, 1 hour a day minimum, 250 days a year.....so 250k x 30 years would be ok....here is my address

Scott Duncan

James Baal...please shut up about how much your "rate" is. They don't CARE. The SECOND YOU USE THEIR MONEY, you are in THEIR JURISDICTION!

THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER

THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW which says none of your fucking RATES mean shit and you are committing FRAUD.

YOU DID NOT WATCH MONEY AS DEBT III. I TOLD YOU ALL TO SHUT YOUR FUCKING PIE HOLES UNTIL YOU WATCH IT!

Derek Moran

"BC is different. That is a "Valuable Instrument"."..... can it also be considered a "Valuable Security," as defined in section 2. of the Criminal Code?

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-1.html#h-2

Derek Moran

�valuable security� includes

(a) an order, exchequer acquittance or other security that entitles or evidences the title of any person

(i) to a share or interest in a public stock or fund or in any fund of a body corporate, company or society, or

(ii) to a deposit in a financial institution,

(b) any debenture, deed, bond, bill, note, warrant, order or other security for money or for payment of money,

(c) a document of title to lands or goods wherever situated,

(d) a stamp or writing that secures or evidences title to or an interest in a chattel personal, or that evidences delivery of a chattel personal, and

(e) a release, receipt, discharge or other instrument evidencing payment of money;

Derek Moran

"...just an attempt to engage a man/woman as surety for their benefit yes?"

Now......how, is that NOT fraud on their/supposed-to-be-our-PUBLIC SERVANTS part?.....to me, thats what the Birth Certificate represents- "WHOOPS..what??...ohhhhhh, we were GONNA tell you about all this at SOME point- honestly, we were..hey, we did'ya a FAVOUR - do you know how much this things worth??? Here ya'go..all better? Now *shhhhhhhhhh*.....just dont tell anybody else what we did for'ya - if you know whats good for you" ;)

Derek Moran

If as long as we are in THEIR jurisdiction by using THEIR 'This Note Is Legal Tender,' then i think at minute 1:35 of this clip speaks i think to what we all have to do in returning THEIR currency first, in order to be free...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbfkAqd6MAk

Eamonn O Brien

Those Metaphilm articles are very good... I haven't actually seen the movies but the amount of info in them is great.

Mary Croft spoke of the world being bankrupt but didn't I didn't hear her go into the details of bankruptcy... (Maybe she did)

So in bankruptcy the "person" is declared dead so an estate can be established and all goods that are then registered to the "estate" are divided amongst the creditors as debt payment rather than being divided amongst family as benefits to beneficiaries...

I remember Scott saying you don't own anything you register...

Is the article accurate in saying that the estate is created based on the death of the afterbirth Scott, as in order to declare one bankrupt they need to be first declared dead?

Eamonn O Brien

Extract from bankruptcy definition in Black's 9th -

"In a typical Chapter7 liquidation case, the trustee collects the nonexempt, property of the debtor, converts that property to cash, and distributes the cash to the creditors. The debtor gives up all the nonexempt property SHE owns at the time of the filing of the bankruptcy petition, and hopes to obtain a discharge..."

Why is the debtor referred to as SHE? ;)

Stuart Stone

This might help Eamonn O Brien, it's New South Wales statute, but our parents inadvertently declared us dead at birth, they declared their marriage void, thus making us dead bastards, intestate at the time of our death & consequently unable to inherit an estate, so the state claims it...

BIRTHS, DEATHS AND MARRIAGES REGISTRATION ACT 1995:

4 Definitions

(1) In this Act: "birth" includes a stillbirth. "child" includes a stillborn child.

Status of children Act 1996: "married" includes married under a void marriage and under a voidable marriage that has been annulled by a court.

If we apply the maxim: the inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of the alternate, the mechanics of what has been done to us from a legal perspective starts to make sense...

Stuart Stone

I'm still trying to grasp it in its' entirety, but it then goes on along these sorts of lines:

The Public Trust administers the estate (the consolidated revenue fund being the account I think) until we are 18, at which time we may administer the trust ourselves OR appoint a representative to administer the trust for us (which is why commonwealth governments have a house of representatives, to represent & administer the trust for us)

In other words, by enrolling to vote, we granted power of attorney to have someone else represent us.

The remedy (hidden in the clubhouse statutes) talk about how one can declare their will, but I'm still digging on that one...

I'll find the NZ link & let the video talk you through it because it all gets pretty overwhelming if you're trying to go it alone.

Eamonn O Brien

Usually Scott doesn't comment unless we're going wrong somewhere so I'll take his silence as a good sign...

That said, coming back to the original post, by registering property we are "adding it to the estate" so to speak... Giving the security value...

When I think of registration I always ponder back to Dean Clifford's words, "registration transfers no interest in property"... Yet it clearly does...

Could someone explain titles a bit more clearly... Registration creates a title and it is then split etc... That one still confuses me somewhat...

Carl Dunne

My understanding is that you only ever hold the equitable title to your car house etc entitling you to the revenue of the transfer of ownership and through your licence plate and tax create a presumption you are the person. On your log book you must first fill in block capitols and then signing with your birth cert name adds more weight to this presumption as it now link's to the birth cert and the social security number. They hold the legal tittle which allows them to tax or inforce the policies upon you as that is the tittle of true ownership (as tittle and ownership are confused as being the same thing) people never rebut those presumptions they stand. In a trust, one person may own the legal title, such as the trustees. Another may own the equitable title such as the beneficiary. So it is quite similar to the whole "PERSON" thing if i have this right i am open to correction of course.

Stuart Stone

I'm looking at this from the government/state's/clubhouse rules stance...the fact that you have used the BC/driver's licence/SIN etc fulfils their presumption that YOU are acting as a trustee & everything/anything of value you produce becomes trust property (their trust)...because from their point of view you are acting as a government employee/trustee of a trust of which they are the beneficiary (in their eyes)

So it would be correct in that context that registration transfers no interest because from their point of view, they held the interest all along...

With registration, you are the party who has added value and you hold equitable title, while legal title is retained by the state (or if the name has been liened into a private trust, the private trust would then become the legal title holder)

Stuart Stone

Pete Daoust Who is going to object?...the government can't...

and your 10000000000000000000000000001 maxims, in one line of ' What ever is acquired by the servant is acquired for the master' just trumped my paragraph of verbal diarrhoea ;-)

Pete Daoust

This PERSON has been created for ME to serve ME, is that correct you GOVERNMENT AGENT ?

So, therefore, I am the MASTER of this PERSON, is that correct you GOVERNMENT AGENT ?

So, therefore, What ever is acquired by my PERSONt is acquired for the ME' is that correct you GOVERNMENT AGENT ?

Scott Duncan

Hey, before you snap that screenshot, you might want to include this reminder:

Remember that whole "You think wrong and value the wrong things" thing I was mentioning? See if you can put that together.... Snap away :P

Derek Moran

There was ONE good thing of value that Fukyiro brought to my attention, however: the definition for SYSTEMATIZED DELUSION from Bouvier's 1914 dictionary, as i always automatically go to 'John's' 1856 version

Chad Brodgesell

Some things I get quick and some things elude me till brain fucked. I now yes, only now have I come to understand something of Scott Duncan's mode of communication. Scott speaks from his oath, he cannot speak from any other direction. This is why there are no layman terms/words for us. If we are to learn from Scott it must be from his direction. Sry for the interruption back to reading for me.

Eamonn O Brien

Scott, or anyone, from the accounting point of view, which is the only view relevant really, when property is registered with a particular state dept. how is it accounted for? Is it recorded as an asset on their books?

Pete Daoust

When the PERSON REGISTER the property, The PERSON swing that thing in the big warehouse as INVENTORY assets.

Then when the PERSON receives a BILL-OF-EXCHANGE concerning this thing, there is two options on how to deal this.

1). "ME" , can buy back this debt, and send some bank-notes to the THIRD PARTY who need to balance their books concerning this debt.

2). "ME", can accept this debt for the PERSON, write the PERSON'S account number on it, sign it, date it, and send the BoE to where this PERSON's account number is sitting, which in PIERRE DAOUST's case, the Bank of Canada, and the BOC, which is the Drawee, has to discharge that debt with the third party, so the third party can balance their books....

OUUFFFF!!!!!!!!!.....lots of stuff in my brain :D

From Pierre ALL RIGHTS RESERVED