Why do you redact on a PUBLIC NOTICE? Is that not counter-intuitive to the purpose of a public notice?

Because you, with INTENT struggle to MISS THE POINT. THIS COPY is for educational purposes. Replace "***redacted shit here***" with the PARTY/SUBJECT/VESSEL. Sorry I can't dumb myself down that far. I really thought it was simple. Sorry I didn't get that across. I don't know how to dumb things down further. Sorry.

IT'S AN EXAMPLE. It's not written in Yiddish! It's ENGLISH! I give up. Either you get it or you don't. I'm not pandering to stupidity any longer.

There is the Maxim-of-Law- "He who is silent, admits." So if THE CITY OF TORONTO sends you a By-Law Notice telling you to cut your grass; is it best to just to ignore them, or, to send them back a Notice of your own asking them to provide Proof-of-their-Claim?

Derek Moran - NOTICES NOTIFY! That's what makes it a NOTICE. It's not for ASKING. The purpose is NOT to have a chat, or ask questions. It's a NOTICE.

So if you get a Notice from The City they think you violated a by-law.. and their definition of a 'by-law': "includes a resolution for a local board".. The City's corporation is composed of about 60 local boards, the Notice you'd send back to them is.. "NOT EMPLOYED BY ANY LOCAL BOARD OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TORONTO NOTICE"... ? Dont sign it with your signature, just put: Derek Moran, Grantor, sole-living-Beneficiary, Lawful-Holder-In-Due-Course, tanquam bonus veer, legalis homo, pro domino.....?

Nope. Did you recently read a "No Parking" sign and the sign "followed up" with you?

Why would you need anything else?

In court, if you stated that you did not receive proper notice, you are indicating full disclosure, correct?

PROPER NOTICE IS disclosure. Before the sign "keep off the grass" was put there, no INTENT was disclosed.

The law is about INTENT.

thus correct

Yes, girl-brain. you got it right. :D

He fired me 2 years ago..but while he was building a case against me, my boss had me sign a warning, i said- "Sure..no problem"..took the pen, turned my back to him, and signed it - 'Detrimental Reliance - Derek Moran"...he just stood there stunned...he hated me because he knew i was smarter than him :) :)

what does that mean?

Detrimental Reliance is when you suffer a damage as a result of someone breaking an agreement they had with you, if they had stuck with their word, you wouldnt be in that position..you relied on them to YOUR detriment

the stupidest thing I've acknowledged through all this, is when dealing with humans, "ignore then and they go away" always works... Ignore the law and it never goes away... :(

Maxim-of-Law: "He who is silent, admits"..."It is one thing to conceal, another to be silent"..."Fraud lurks in generalities"

A Fiction-of-Law, based on a Color-of-Right - to be more precise..

Security-guard last night tried to imply i was trespassing on public-property.. i got him to look-up the Trespass to Property Act at his computer.. showed him section 2.1 i think, Color of Right Defence.. he had no clue what it meant, i think he thought i was being racist with him

same stupid answer I got from my accountant when I told her to look up the income tax act, which refers to a "person" and then to look in a law dictionary as to what that was... deerface

in Ontario, your remedy with the Provincial Offences Act is section 80. - COMMON LAW DEFENCE

NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN

LOL - i even have the Provincial case-law, that refers to the Supreme Court case-law, on the definition of INCLUDES.. :)

http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=+definition+of+includes&language=en&searchTitle=Ontario&path=/en/on/onca/doc/2005/2005canlii21094/2005canlii21094.html

So Scott, does a NOTICE point towards something? Or it just makes it "lawful"? As in NOTICE OF INTENT, NOTICE OF RIGHT, etc?

It transfers KNOWLEDGE. When you give notice, the reading party HAS KNOWLEDGE OF whatever the notice says. It is considered a FACT IN LAW beyond that point (If it is written, it is law).

" It is considered a FACT IN LAW beyond that point (If it is written, it is law)."..... the NOTICE you may have received though might be based on bullshit. At that point, technically then, the NOTICE you received i think is a PRIMA FACIE Fact-in-Law, unless, you choose to rebut-and-refute it as i understand...

example: City sends my dad a NOTICE he broke a by-law. I get back from being away and tell him- "If you dont rebut their claim, it will stand that you tacitly-agreed they were right...Well, what do we do then son?...Good question, dad- you need to send back a NOTICE of your own informing them what a by-law is, who by-laws apply too, and get them to tell you if they consider you to be a City employee..."

So lien the item for DOUBLE its face value and notify them. ;) ...then send them a bill for the balance ;)

To date: we've sent the City EIGHT NOTICES of either Proof-of-Claim, Full-Disclosure, Conditional-Acceptance, and not a single peep from out of them..still hasnt stopped them from pushing ahead and increasing the amount of the original fee/fine that we rebutted originally that they havent challenged :/

So lien it.

"...then send them a bill for the balance".... on the basis for being such dicks and harassing us not dealing with this matter, that they owe US now?

Is Dunn&Bradstreet free like Manta?

I have no idea. Bloomberg has lots of features but "free" isn't one of them. That fucker's $1200 a month.

...yes, but I KNOW the guys who built PPSA.CA. I am loyal to those who build for my benefit. I trust their work.

Crap.. no corporation-number given on Dun&Bradstreet for City of Toronto https://www.dnbexpress.ca/search_details.asp?fromBannerLinks=no

When you go to court in GENERAL appearance you are ESPECIALLY dead.. ;)

..are we not more considered to be a 'body corporate,' as designated in section 4. of the Municipal Act? Body corporate 4. (1) The inhabitants of every municipality are incorporated as a body corporate. 2001, c. 25, s. 4. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_01m25_e.htm#BK5

LIGHTBULB just went off! > (PROPER NOTICE because a BILL is a TENDER FOR LAW). As in- how can any CORPORATION deny you the ability to discharge your debt by way of the bill-payment-remittance THEY, sent YOU, in the first place?!?

... a BILL is a TENDER FOR LAW).......did THEY, not TENDER it to me??

Barrons Law, BILL: a PROPOSITION or statement reduced to writing. In commercial law, an "account for goods sold, services rendered and work done."

BILL(LEGISLATION): a draft of a PROPOSED statute submitted to the legislature for enactment.

BILL(NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS): Bills are all forms of paper money. see PROPOSITION, PROPOSED above

You know what- on second thought, someone brought-up a good point..not only do i think the SIN# doesnt have to be on the BILL-payment-remittance, like someone said, i think it would be construed as a tacit-agreement that you're a Government-employee by doing that...maybe Scott can verify that one way or the other

They govern these PAYMENTS OF IGNORANCE through an OUTSOURCED THIRD-PARTY. Douglas Levitt didn't come into my home with a gun. Cowards don't do that, and ALL LAWYERS ARE COWARDS. These are strangers who harm people for money. Only cowards choose such a profession. If they wish to inflict violence, they outsource to a third-party, and pay them... Insert Tax Collector/Collection Agency and Police where apropriate

Scott you know it's what you DON'T say is whats ties everything together. By not saying EVERYTHING you make people think and not MEMORIZE. Koodos to ya.

Thanks for taking the time to see the MECHANICS of your learning, Chad. You are not aware yet of what a powerful skill that is. ...but you will be.

Parked is not the same as stopping while remaining in the car with the motor running

nvm, NO PARKING means you haven't parked yet so DON'T, but if you already are prior to the sign/NOTICE being put up then it would be okay

Good point.. they are not presenting it to Derek Moran.. they are presenting it to DEREK MORAN, they are just trying to get Derek Moran to act as SURETY for it

Its the ending OF the Notice im working on, Beverly.. just trying polish-up the tacit-agreement part which i think is pretty powerful if done correctly

"As I have already noted, a promissory note, by definition, involves an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money, but it is not itself money...there is no liquidation of the debt until it is DISCHARGED..." http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1977/1977canlii36/1977canlii36.html

Scott, question regarding trying to get someone into TACIT-AGREEMENT with the ending of a NOTICE..how does this example im working on read to you? If within the next 30 calendar days, I have not heard back from THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TORONTO to rebut-or-refute this NOTICE in written-form, then it will be agreed-and-understood to be an acquiescence-through-tacit-agreement on the part of THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TORONTO in recognition-and-acknowledgment that it is my de jure-common law-right to discharge any debt presented to DEREK MORAN by THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TORONTO by way of any of the various bill-payment-remittances that it TENDERS to me, and that my public-servants are willing to fulfill their fiduciary-duties owed to me of:*(will polish this up later) whatever is in my best interests within the accordance of the common law, and, provide their duty-of-care owed to me.....

Derek Moran, I would probably insist that it be signed accepting full commercial liability & under penalty of perjury, after 30 days, send them a fault notice & another 10 days to rebut, then default notice them & give them 7 days to rebut...eg: 'If there has been no response within 30 days from the date of this notice, rebutting point for point, signed under full commercial liability & penalty of perjury, that will be accepted as tacit agreement that no contract or obligation exists between the parties in question'.....if they pursue it after you default them, swear up an affidavit stating the facts that there is no controversy as there is agreement between the parties that no contract and hence no obligation exists...that should put it to bed

..i like the rebutting point-for-point, good one

RIGHT idea. WRONG phrasing.

lol - me or Stuart?

Hey Scott, here is the last line i put for the Claim-of-Natural Law-Common Law-Inheritance-Jurisdiction-Right-Notice i just finished for my dad, for the City- can you let me know what you think? "Any future attempts to create joinder with me into statutory-jurisdiction will be considered as committing FRAUD against me." :)

OMG I have SO much to type. Work your way up the ranks. You aren't Nobility. Do not use "will". Your "will" is not a factor. You aren't qualified. *RIGHT ANSWER SMACK-DOWN* "Should YOU or YOUR OFFICE attempt joinder, such attempt SHALL be CONSIDERED an attempt at FRAUD". ...and that's how you do it. * Struts away smugly * (Fuck I have a lot of typing to do...)

1.1 version: "Should YOU or YOUR OFFICE attempt joinder, such attempt SHALL be CONSIDERED an attempt to DEFRAUD".

Look up every word.

What about "this property does not undergo any commercial use and there is no evidence that shows it does."

OO... Look at the big brain on Beverly May Braaksma!

I don't speak yiddish, I speak English. The REALITY is that most of you ASSUME you know the meaning of words, and it turns out you don't. :P

So, bottom line of a NOTICE would be you administering, instead of using their rules of "appeal"

YES.

I don't like being disposable. That;s why I learned to program computers...so I could program women...so I'm LESS disposable than the rest.

When you accused Mr.Makris of fraud-if-i-have-to-tell-you-how-to-do-this-job, i get what you're saying.....but how exactly IS it fraud?

Derek Moran, do OFFICERS take OATHS?

I dunno..is he an officer?

Derek Moran are you being deliberatly obtuse?

I dont really know what that guys does...

http://www.infogo.gov.on.ca/infogo/office.do?actionType=telephonedirectory&infoType=telephone&unitId=UNT0029535&locale=en

Now you do.

He's a COP!

Ahhh... what about the public-servant that does not reply to your email, your letter, your phone-calls, your faxes, that DIDNT take an oath?

David-Wynn Miller in his latest 25-part series talked about how public-servants commit fraud every time they dont respond to your/any communications..

I KNOW that he is right on some level. But thats an awfully strong accusation to throw around

And none of those people were in that call to Makris.

I think he mentioned it was- Misappropriation-of-Funds..

He's LUCKY I didn't send a couple of my girls out to beat the crap out of him. (Safe crime - NO cop would report that he was beaten up by girls)

Just got here, first thread I read. Interesting group. I'll be patient with you. I am learned... so I ask... When I notice you and you notice me back, what's the next logical progression of this exchange? Another notice. And after that... another notice. And a notice begets another and another and another. Until the never ending myriad of circle jerk noticing, ends. Right? Or is there some other definitive means, to stop the simple REPLY from being the "stall tactic"?

Did you catch where I used the term: Exchange? Welcome to commerce.

NON NEGOTIABLE. Think about those words. ;)

Petitioning the Court... think about those words.

No.

Women should not petition their rapists either.

Jason, we DO NOT DO CRYPTIC HERE! Stop that. I'm being serious here.

But that is what the group is. If you aren't willing to be clear, be silent.

I will not acquiesce. I shall merely ask questions. Ok?

FOR THE RECORD: You don't get to dictate terms in my domain. You don't get to NEGOTIATE in my domain. ...and now, you don't get to speak in my domain.

Member for 20 minutes. That has to be a new record.

Let's see if I am ready to engage here with the big boys and girls.. ..Notice = valuable instrument = bill of exchange, exchange of what? Value .. Value=promissionary note, bond.... well debt! Gov Notices are notifying of outstanding Value? Its up to me here how to tackle it "its an offer"? I can Accept it for value jus create another promissionary note, or assume liabilty and act as surety and offer banknotes...or coupons...???? Please destroy me without mercy i really want to get it once and for all

James, One suggest reading the bills of Exchange act and the Bank act. Empower yourself. ;)

Yeah Jim. Do what jason says mate. Then it'll all fall into place. NEVER EVER PAY WITH MONEY ( legal tender) IN THEIR COURTS. Use a BoE instead PERFECT.

James, There are threads named accepted for value internet meme. Bill of exchange, The money ones is good as well as that long one with over 600 comments.... Ppsa is covered too. Cut and paste create a reference. Just saying.

ORDERS also come under BOE. Judge ORDERS ye to no longer bend over & clutch ankles. YOU AMEND THE ORDER YOURSELF. Fuck this stuff is sooo POWERFUL.... I wonder what would happen if it actually fell into the wrong persons hands ??? Hahahahaha.... GUESS WHAT FUCKERS........ I HAVE THAT KNOWLEDGE NOW..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....REAMING TIME :)

I 'Notice' (pun intended) you spell Authorize with an 's,' Scott (as in, Authorise)..why is this? :/

the suffix ise and ize are interchangeable. One is the "American" form. Z and S USED to be the same letter in the Hindu-Arabic writing that ENGLISH is based on. ...Now you know. And Knowing is half the battle! :D

Stuart Stone would you be kind enough to stick that Notice in a word document and put your sig(of)nature on it and message it to me so I may see how it would look? There's much debate about safe signing in stuff I read in the past which I don't trust.

That's Jason F. LeBlanc's notice Maximus Legis, I merely tidied up a bit of ambiguity/grammar ;-)

Okay Understood, would anyone like to show me how to sign safely for the PERSON?

Maximus- as i recall, this is how Scott showed how to sign your name for the PERSON properly... By:____________NON ASSUMPSIT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ALL RIGHTS RESRVED Maximus Legis, Grantor, sole-living-Beneficiary, Lawful-Holder-In-Due-Course, de jure pro domino(i added that last one) ;)

Question: If I lien my NAME, and so my WIFE's NAME....does it automatically lien our children NAMES...??...to the private trust...???....so the WHOLE gang gets rreeeeaaallllyyyy PRIVATE ???

"COURTESY" - yep, that's why old timers used to reply, "MUCH OBLIGED" (offer and acceptance/it's all contract) C/A

Notice 3. (1) For the purposes of this Act, a person has notice of a fact if, (a) the person has knowledge of it; (b) the person has received a notice of it; or (c) information comes to the person�s attention under circumstances in which a reasonable person would take cognizance of it. 2006, c. 8, s. 3 (1). Giving a notice (2) A person gives a notice to another person by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other person in the ordinary course, whether or not the other person comes to know of it. 2006, c. 8, s. 3 (2). Receiving a notice (3) A person receives a notice when, (a) the notice comes to the person�s attention; (b) in the case of a notice under a contract, the notice is duly delivered to the place of business through which the contract was made; or (c) the notice is duly delivered to any other place held out by that person as the place for receipt of those notices. 2006, c. 8, s. 3 (3). http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_06s08_e.htm

Notice..???....just NOTARIZE and put it in the news paper... :D

That works too ;-) I'm looking to see if the lien registration via a site like PPSA is the same/sufficient as public notice???

I guess you do everything that need to be done, then you notarize everything, and then you put a NOTICE on the news paper....that sounds about right to me...Scott could correct this..??...

after an intial informal-greeting-letter, 3 Notices for Full-Disclosure (all which went unanswered by the way by my public-servant-trustee), and now a Notice for Default, now gearing-up to place my first Public Notice; preliminary cost is $300 at this point to put one in the paper:

ppsa Canada, which as far as I can tell is the same as the PPSR in Australia & New Zealand, is where you create a public record of an event....the cost is approximately $5 AUD and it serves as public notice, sounds like a more fun/less expensive than the Public Notices section of a newspaper

scott mentioned several times that judges dont exist since 1982. Was it because the charter was created. Why.

Stuart- maybe Scott could elaborate more on this, but i got this from the very conversation i had with him on how often he has used PUBLIC NOTICE in the Legal Notice of the newspaper-classifieds to create a PUBLIC RECORD...it emanated out of a question i had for him initially regarding- "The concept of ESTOPPEL sounds pretty promising...but how do you actually go about ENFORCING it?"

What is EVENT? In reference to judicial and quasi judicial proceedings, the �event� meansthe conclusion, end, or final outcome or result of a litigation; as, in the phrase �abidethe event,� speaking of costs or of an agreement that one suit shall be governed by thedetermination in another. Reeves v. McGregor, 9 Adol. & El. 576; Benjamin v. Ver Nooy.16.S N. Y. 578, 61 N. E. 971; Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. Scammon, 35 111. App.660.Eventus est qui ex causa sequitur; et dicitur eventus quia ex causis evenit.9 Coke, 81. An event is that which follows from the cause, and is called an �event�because it eventuates from causesEventus varios res nova semper ha- bet. Co. Litt 379. A new matter always producesvarious events. Law Dictionary: What is EVENT? definition of EVENT (Black's Law Dictionary) http://thelawdictionary.org/event/#ixzz2Vwkpzdsv

An EVENT..!!!...let me do some reasoning here..hum hum... At 46, I discovered all this LEGAL aspect of who I am, I discovered the a PERSON has been created for ME, and this PERSON's creation, was to serve ME, as I am the ONLY one who can give VALUE to this PERSON. No one EVER taught me anything about this, I had to VIRTUALY meet this stranger, named Scott, to REALIZE all this, after some researches and readings about Scott's KNOWLEDGE, I came to this REASONABLE conclusion that I am the MASTER of this PERSOn, so, if I follow the same reasoning, I have no choice to qualify this DISCOVERY about me as an EVENT ?.....that makes lots of sense to me, should I PUBLICALY annonce this EVENT ?

NOTICE OF EVENT. Dear whoever, Just to notice you that I am the MASTER of the PERSON'S named PIERRE DAOUST, inscription number 119XXXXXXXX, Thank You ! Joseph-Pierre-Gilles Life Birth Registration XXXXXX Master of PIERRE DAOUST, Inscription No. 119XXXXXXXX ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

In the US, what is the equivalent of that "inscription" #.

rough draft: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that I Derek, have an AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFAULT RESULTING IN TACIT-AGREEMENT-BY-ACQUIESCENCE with my public servant Ms.*** employed by the City of Toronto. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING JUNE *, 2013, I Derek have a TACIT-AGREEMENT-BY-ACQUIESCENCE with Ms. * on the proper way to fill-out a bill-payment-remittance for proper presentment-and-acceptance for the DISCHARGE-OF-A-DEBT to a biller. The biller in this case being, the City of Toronto. PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO DISHONOUR A BILL-PAYMENT-REMITTANCE THAT HAS BEEN TENDERED, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR DISCHARGING-THE-DEBT AND SETTLING-THE-ACCOUNT-TO-ZERO, IMMEDIATELY AND THEREUPON. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to (email-address) for DOCUMENTATION purposes.

Article 3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ ;)

Article 4. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. :D

ALL THEIR FORMS !!!!!....all of them :D

Article 3 Tout individu a droit � la vie, � la libert� et � la s�ret� de sa personne

Why do they use SURETY in French ??

..i think only Scott could translate this mess of a definition �security� and �sureties� � caution � ou � cautionnement � �security� means sufficient security, and �sureties� means sufficient sureties, and when those words are used one person is sufficient therefor, unless otherwise expressly required; http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-21/page-10.html#h-30

Scott- you have made a point of explaining the significance of making something PUBLIC RECORD. However, in the case of posting PUBLIC NOTICE on the internet or a classifieds-section, why would THEY (lets take the City of Toronto for example) give a shit. What is it about PUBLIC NOTICE exactly that would even make the City blink and possibly go- "UH-OH, he posted a PUBLIC NOTICE, we're in for it now..." Just WHAT exactly makes PUBLIC NOTICE so effective, and why would ANY government-agency fear it from us? Thank you.

Its all accounting

Public notice makes them accountable for you either missing it are not missing it

Law is public record a public notice un-rebutted would stand as fact no ?

Any doubt of what David Johansen?? Proof = Moon = pink floyd front row seats on the dark side of the Moon playing tonight = GET THERE.

I just posted PROOF as to what happens when you DON'T ARGUE. SILENCE = CONSENT. HE WHO LEAVES THE BATTLEFIELD HAS ADMITTED DEFEAT. MAXIM.

Conditional acceptance upon proof does take away the controversey. You're not arguing. You're accepting. The condition is the PROOF!!

I just came across a letter we received from the City of Toronto in January, i had forgotten this- "This overdue notice is provided as a COURTESY to alert property owners of prior year balances which remain unpaid." - LOL Thankfully- they have received to this point, THIRTEEN various NOTICES of our own, rebutting-their-presumptions to varying degrees... ;)

Why don't you use Chiefrock's settlement contract? Write a cheque for $20 with "to settle account to $0 and close" in the memo?

My dad is 73. He actually doesnt get mad at me anymore when i tell him this stuff, because he has noticed how it has been somewhat effective. Next step is to get an Affidavit done, my first one- woohoo! :)

What ChiefRock really got through to me, and i think Gail, was when he recounted the time in court he said to the Justice about how, public jurisdiction doesnt have any authority over private agreements; and the Justice simply said to him- "You're right." That, and Kate Butler's story with her Affidavit of Status... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0qm0KUPeD8

Well, Rule #1 in Affidavit-Club first-and-foremost i think would be- DONT, LIE, in your AFFIDAVIT....thats a pretty easy guide-post to follow

"...siezed the value..." - reminds me of how Rona Ambrose used to 'seize the value' for me, for my BENEFIT WARRANT aka. what an UNEMPLOYMENT CHEQUE is really called ;)

..is there a way to PETITION the TYCHO-BRAHE, with the Honourable Judge Tara Duncan presiding, to get the court/Tycho-Brahe, to release the Affidavit-article that has been seized?

Jeff Roggers- since you brought it up- its not the Affidavit, but here is the rough-draft of the PUBLIC RECORD im planning on making at some point: rough draft: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that I Derek, have an AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFAULT RESULTING IN TACIT-AGREEMENT-BY-ACQUIESCENCE with my public servant Ms.*** employed by the City of Toronto. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING JUNE *, 2013, I Derek have a TACIT-AGREEMENT-BY-ACQUIESCENCE with Ms. * on the proper way to fill-out a bill-payment-remittance for proper presentment-and-acceptance for the DISCHARGE-OF-A-DEBT to a biller. The biller in this case being, the City of Toronto. PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO DISHONOUR A BILL-PAYMENT-REMITTANCE THAT HAS BEEN TENDERED, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR DISCHARGING-THE-DEBT AND SETTLING-THE-ACCOUNT-TO-ZERO, IMMEDIATELY AND THEREUPON. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to (email-address) for DOCUMENTATION purposes.

Here's an instructional audio-clip i just came across, that either deals with trying to receive a transcript for the PUBLIC RECORD and/or, phone-etiquette- "How are you today, sir?". . ."Uhhh- none of your BUSINESS" - LMAO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8nkSnP1AZk

See? These people work for us... and Scott's just showing how completely incapable they can be... It seems people BELIEVE in their given titles but when there are duties to the public... they choke and cannot answer? They are dumb, we are dumb for listening to the dumb... its so dumb.

http://www.youtube.com/user/spyder666111

Point �these people are supposed to work for US. They use their TITLES as an excuse to what? Be our authority? I had a business matter wherein a freight company dropped my freight. If I called them and said, "Ok, you have damaged my property, I need to be reimbursed...." Would they not come up with an answer and if not, would me calling as Scott did not require an immediate answer? I have done this and they do want to get to a resolve with you... why does this not work with government? They want to wallow away? Seriously?

City of Toronto Act: Liability for torts (2) Subsection (1) does not relieve the City of liability to which it would otherwise be subject in respect of a tort committed by a member of city council, an officer, employee or agent of the City or a person acting under the instructions of such an officer, employee or agent. ;)

You're skipping a few steps...my documents were sent in a very specific order, at very specific times. You have everything lumped together in one Notice. Slow down a little, and work on your chess game...

The timing and the order are EXTREMELY important.

Listen to Kate Butler. She had the BEST teacher. Yes Andrew is the best teacher. He has experience, and the SECOND he's asked a question he does not know the answer to, he finds out. Above all, he knows when to drag me in to help. :D So yes. Listen To Kate. ...she sort of feels like Hitler in Munich right now. She was prepared for a huge fight, in a conflict where she was not in the wrong... and the pussies caved! Just like Munich! :D

Yep, you have to be the honorable one, and give them proper chance to settle the matter first.

rough draft: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that I Derek, have an AFFIDAVIT FOR EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL and/or ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT and/or ESTOPPEL BY REPRESENTATION and/or ESTOPPEL IN PAIS ARISING FROM City of Toronto employee MS. Eletta Purdy, who is a public servant of mine. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING JULY * 2013, I Derek have placed the ESTOPPELS of EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL and/or ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT and/or ESTOPPEL BY REPRESENTATION and/or ESTOPPEL IN PAIS against City of Toronto employee public servant MS. Eletta Purdy. PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO CLAIM THAT I HAVE PERJURED MYSELF IN ANY WAY WITH REGARDS TO THE AFFIDAVIT AND/OR ESTOPPELS I HAVE AFFIRMED, ARE OF THEIR OWN FREE-WILL TO START AN ACTION AGAINST ME IN A COURT OF EQUITY, AS THIS IS THE JURISDICTION THAT I WOULD ONLY END-UP CLAIMING FOR MYSELF ANYWAYS. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to (email-address) for DOCUMENTATION purposes.

Public notice = Bill of exchange= a tender to contract, in regards to post above in the thread a ways back.... you post the notice and if someone unauthorized does something and engages in what the notice says .. you have cause for action.

rough draft: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that I Derek, have an AFFIDAVIT FOR EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL and/or ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT and/or ESTOPPEL BY REPRESENTATION and/or ESTOPPEL IN PAIS ARISING FROM City of Toronto employee MS. Eletta Purdy, who is a public servant of mine. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING JULY * 2013, I Derek have placed the ESTOPPELS of EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL and/or ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT and/or ESTOPPEL BY REPRESENTATION and/or ESTOPPEL IN PAIS against City of Toronto employee public servant MS. Eletta Purdy. PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO CLAIM THAT I HAVE PERJURED MYSELF IN ANY WAY WITH REGARDS TO THE AFFIDAVIT AND/OR ESTOPPELS I HAVE AFFIRMED, ARE OF THEIR OWN FREE-WILL TO START AN ACTION AGAINST ME IN A COURT OF EQUITY, AS THIS IS THE JURISDICTION THAT I WOULD ONLY END-UP CLAIMING FOR MYSELF ANYWAYS. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to (email-address) for DOCUMENTATION purposes.

tenor, n. 1. An exact copy of an instrument. 2. The exact words of a legal document, esp. as cited in a pleading. 3. The meaning of a legal document. Black's 9th.

'Wise-man' once told me: "The purpose of making something Public RECORD, is for the PROOF of an EVENT, in CONVEYING a FACT-in-LAW" and/or that a FACT-in-LAW has indeed been CONVEYED

writes that one down and tacks it to the wall with others.

wise man once told me that's a perfected lien

Scott Duncan: The GOVERNMENT is not a PERSON. The COURT is not a PERSON. I won't say I believe you Scott, because we all know how believers are misguided. I will say, because you have continuously demonstrated your authority in these matters, that I TRUST you are correct (ALL RIGHTS RESPECTFULLY RESERVED). However, I have, with my own very own eyes seen the registration of CANADA as a corporation (PERSON), and, I have also seen courts registered as PERSONS. Please help us understand how these entities which are registered as PERSONS are not persons. Thanks in advance! PS Please don't ban me because I questioned your statements. Thanks again! Signed...Curious with Bleeding Shins

A corporation is responsible to it's shareholders. do not mean to be cryptic... There is no one from the gov't that is a person... no one to stand for rebuttal...they are trustees if the paperwork is proper.

I understand that Jason. Yet, as I have said, I have seen these entities registered as PERSONS. And, we all know of corporations that are LAWFULLY and LEGALLY obliged to shareholders, yet, do the exact opposite. :D

It's a mindfuck reach around... Think about why they insulate themselves. and how is simple... person=corporation=proxy=limited liability... They are all operating as something... Operating as Justice for Province of ... Or more accurately Acting as...

I am guessing (educated guess) that Scott Duncan will be an INFORMANT and inform us that CANADA is a TRUST governed by a CORPORATION of the same name.

or administrated by...

Your questions practically answer themselves, Robert. :D

Eamonn O Brien: As I understand this REALM of REALITY, if Scott Duncan likes a comment, it is because it contains TRUTH. If I use my powers of reasoning, I am able to therefore deduce, that IRELAND IS A TRUST MANGED BY A CORPORATION KNOWN AS IRELAND. Because (my English teacher is turning in her grave) TRUST LAW Trumps all others, Scott actually spoiled us, saved us from the long story, and lead us directly to the heart of the matter. I suspect (SPOILER ALERT) he is preparing us to be as powerful and AUTONOMOUS as COUNTRIES. We may even be able (if Scott is willing to bestow the power upon us) to be regarded as PERSONS who have DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY. :D

rough draft: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that I Derek, have an AFFIDAVIT FOR ESTOPPEL BY LACHES and/or ESTOPPEL IN PAIS PLACED AGAINST City of Toronto-employee-public servant MISTER Stephen Franceschini ARISING FROM DETRIMENTAL RELIANCE RAISED by City of Toronto-employee-public servant MS. Eletta Purdy. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING AUGUST 3 2013, I Derek have placed the ESTOPPELS of ESTOPPEL BY LACHES and/or ESTOPPEL IN PAIS against City of Toronto-employee-public servant MISTER Stephen Franceschini. PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE and/or SEIZE and/or STEAL and SELL at a PUBLIC AUCTION ANY GOODS-and-CHATTELS from off of the ANGLO-SAXON-JUTE-COMMON LAW-JURISDICTION KNOWN AS and/or LOCATED AT ** Main Street, SHALL WILLINGLY ACCEPT THE LIABILITY FOR THEIR TORTIOUS CONDUCT and/or CRIMINAL CONDUCT and/or RESULT IN THE FORFEITURE OF THEIR PERFORMANCE and/or HAZARD and/or SURETY BOND. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to (email-address) for DOCUMENTATION purposes.

LACHES. This word, derived from the French lecher, is nearly synonymous with negligence. 2. In general, when a party has been guilty of laches in enforcing his right by great delay and lapse of time, this circumstance will at common law pre-judice, and sometimes operate in bar of a remedy which it is discretionary and not compulsory in the court to afford. In courts of equity, also delay will generally prejudice. 1 Chit. Pr. 786, and the cases there cited; 8 Com. Dig. 684; 6 Johns. Ch. R. 360. 3. But laches may be excused from, ignorance of the party's rights; 2 Mer. R. 362; 2 Ball & Beat. 104; from the obscurity of the transaction; 2 Sch. & Lef. 487; by the pendency of a suit; 1 Sch. & Lef. 413; and where the party labors under a legal disability, as insanity, coverture, infancy, and the like. And no laches can be imputed to the public. 4 Mass. Rep. 522; 3 Serg. & Rawle, 291; 4 Henn. & Munf. 57; 1 Penna. R. 476. Vide 1 Supp. to Ves. Jr. 436; 2 Id. 170; Dane's Ab. Index, h. t.; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3911.

rough draft: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that I Derek, have sent an 'AFFIDAVIT THAT the INSPECTION-FEE City of Toronto-employee-Municipal-By-Law officer-public servant MISTER Sacha Franjic wanted MY FATHER to act as SURETY for was ISSUED ULTRA VIRES AB INITIO,' to MISTER Sacha Franjic in-care-of the City Solicitor Ms. Anna Kinastowski by registered-mail. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING AUGUST * 2013, my PUBLIC SERVANT MISTER Sacha Franjic does not have the authority and/or power to go around ARBITRARILY issuing Inspection-Fees to the PEOPLE of Toronto he is meant to SERVE, and that the Inspection-Fee that MISTER Sacha Franjic issued initially, was ISSUED ULTRA VIRES AB INITIO and is therefore NULL-and-VOID. PARTIES WHO DISAGREE WITH ANYTHING IN THIS AFFIDAVIT ARE FREE TO RESPOND AND REBUT IT, POINT-BY-POINT, WITH THEIR OWN AFFIDAVIT. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to (email-address) for DOCUMENTATION purposes.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=148198215381146&set=gm.484902174933993&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf

Dude put your father's name in there.....try to not write in ego /singular/unitary language...Reverse the roles as you are 'US', 'OUR", 'WE'.......They are YOU......SURETY....

Hi guys been away for a while dealing with the "law" just a wee question...when signing legal documents I always sign Sui Juris, but have been told that there is also another term you can add "cv" cannot find any reference to this abbreviation so is it wrong if it is what should it be..appreciate any suggestions, am filing a Notice of Mistake and want to sign it correctly.

Adam- as i recall, Scott said to leave out any names lest they presume SURETY. "Has a NO PARKING SIGN, or, KEEP OFF THE GRASS NOTICE ever told you who it was from??," i recall him writing. In fact i deliberately NOT use his first-name, and DO use MY first-name.

Interesting definition for COUNSEL in The Dictionary of Canadian Law: "An adviser, whether or NOT he is a lawyer..." And EVERYONE has the RIGHT-to-COUNSEL, right? ;)

Joseph Davia, if it was me signing a legal document, I try to avoid it at all times, unless is completely to "MY" benefit. If signing a contract, I use<<Authorized BY: (seal/signature here) "All Rights Reserved" "Non-Assumpsit.">> If I should be forced to sign anything (by inmates, and gardas punching my legs, in some crazy initiation, perhaps? lol), or forced to sign a traffic ticket (and/or ANY contracts in which I don't want to act as surety) I JUST SIGN VOID. In what respects to the "cv" you mentioned, perhaps you are referring to V.C., short for Vi Coactus. <<Vi coactus is a Latin term, abbreviated as V.C., and means: 'under constraint'. It is used to indicate an agreement made under duress. An example of its usage is that of the Dutch 17th century statesman Cornelius de Witt, who was forced to sign the act for restoration of Stadholderate. After all the entreaties by his wife, though he signed the contract but only before adding V.C. to his signature. [1] In the early chapters of his historically-set novel The Black Tulip, Alexandre Dumas describes the episode in detail, along with the role and meaning of the two letters V.C.>> If one DOES NOT know WHY is using all these when signing, it's completely useless then. Hope this helps!

Maximiliano P�rez, you have to be one of thr most attentive readers here. Of all the people on here, you are the one I NEVER have to worry about missing my points. You covered that well.

now I want to go read the black tulip

Whats wrong with stating Derek: Moran?? Or Dad : Moran ?

Why not just usea NoM Derek? ? Sounds very complicated writing to & fro & creating joinder.....

Just Buck - 0 - FIVE them kunts Derek Moran.....certified Mail....

Or make a bigger claim against theirs by using fee schedule. ..

don't you mean superior claim Adam Thomas?

They've gotten the Notice of Mistake Adam, my dad sent that one. Then, i made up a slightly different version along the same lines, and sent that one in to them myself.

I suppose i could spell my name :Derek-Evan:Moran:, but thats that David Wynn Miller stuff. And i dont really know WHY i would be doing it.

And to be honest, Adam- ive never really grasped that whole Buck-O-Five thing, only because, Scott Duncan himself has told me- "...Admiralty doesnt deal in FRACTIONS..." So while i could understand why putting a $1 stamp in the Teller-Box would make sense on any bill-payment-remittance, i dont understand what would be with the extra 5-cent stamp :/

S I G H........ .5c with stamp duty paid creates joinder for the Crown & yourself to ACT on their ACTS.....There is a correct way to do it but the best thing about BoE is if ye make a mistake just apologize to the judge & ASK for forgiveness. ...them ASK again where the mistake was made & HE WILL STFU.....BEAUTIFUL. .THERE REALLY IS NO WRONG WAY THAT WILL NOT WORK WITH BoE BOMBS.....

if we were to pay with legal tender that's an equity to the bill of exchange. equity is our Federal Reserve notes

through equity of or labour is within the Federal Reserve's notes that we earn

everything is accounting. so everything is a tender for law. which in layman's terms mean a tender for contract. when we hold the payment coupon holder in due course.

law = contract by any name they want to call it

rough draft: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that I Derek, have sent a NOTICE FOR NON-RESPONSE AND/OR FAILURE TO COMPLY AND/OR NON-COMPLIANCE RESULTING IN A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST MY CITY OF TORONTO-PUBLIC SERVANT MISTER STEPHEN FRANCESCHINI, to MISTER Stephen Franceschini in-care-of the City Solicitor Ms. Anna Kinastowski by registered-mail. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING AUGUST * 2013, my PUBLIC SERVANT MISTER Stephen Franceschini, DID NOT respond to any of the 3 (THREE) NOTICES I sent to him, and that I MORE THAN EXHAUSTED my use of the private-administrative-remedy-NOTICE-process trying to RESOLVE this matter through offering DISCUSSION to avoid conflict, while HE and/or the City of Toronto have CHOSEN to act in DISHONOUR-and-MALA FIDE throughout the process. THEREFORE: I SHALL take HIS SILENCE as HIS IMPLIED CONSENT that MISTER Stephen Franceschini has, through TACIT-AGREEMENT-BY-HIS-ACQUIESCENCE, conceded to the FACTS-IN-LAW that I made through HIS NON-CONTENTION of the 3 (THREE) NOTICES I sent to HIM previously, that HE has CHOSEN NOT to REBUT, that in-fact, NO SOLE-LIVING-BENEFICIARIES LIVING inside the home at * * * owe Sterling Bailiffs Inc. and/or the FICTIONAL �THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TORONTO� ANY �money� and/or ANYTHING ELSE, WHATSOEVER. PARTIES IN DISAGREEMENT WITH THIS DEFAULT JUDGMENT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO ANY OF THE 3 (THREE) NOTICES SENT, AND NOW SHALL BE BOUND BY THE TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS AS SET-OUT IN THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to (email-address) for DOCUMENTATION purposes.

Derek Moran in my opinion that sounds very well put together.

Thanks- it needs to be...the City of Toronto violates their OWN 'laws'/by-laws, at this point

Scott Duncan: "PROPER NOTICE IS disclosure. Before the sign "keep off the grass" was put there, no INTENT was disclosed." I think I get it (at least a bit). Without PUBLIC disclosure of my SOUL�S INTENT, through the POST OFFICE, any *&^%$#@ ***redacted shit here*** asshole, can assume my VESSEL is available to contract and may even be abandoned and ready to be salvaged, or, worse yet, disassembled and PRONOUNCED DEAD/KILLED on their log? It is time for me to read the TRUST thread several more times. And then again and again. I am starting to feel like a Swashbuckler that can finally put down the sword and win the battle on land through my WORD/LAW and my PROPER NOTICE. And how simply and beautifully easy it is; by using the POST I can create my LAW. LOL This is fun! Thanks for breaking that down Scott Duncan. PS Swashbucklers on land look a little dumb/silly (especially with their odd garb) if you ask me. Pick up thy mighty pen and CREATE YOUR LAW, as the possibilities abound.

Time to end some presumptions. :P

LAW=CONTRACT (the agreement between the parties) Key - All facts are on the moon (unprovable in a fiction system), therefore he who holds the burden of proof loses...unless otherwise agreed.

:-)

Lets send PROPER NOTICE to idiots :D

Bumping these to the top for the newbies.

Thanks for the bump.

:-D Good read AGAIN!!!

My prose is truly the gift that keeps on giving! ...kind of like the clap. :D

doesnt burn any more when i read it...

"malignant dumb"... ...Oh I really like that! I'm totally stealing that. :D

here Gail Marie

For the record: I fucking hate Derek Moran.

Redux: PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that the VESSEL known as JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC ET AL, is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of a PRIVATE TRUST per the wishes of the CREATOR and GRANTOR. Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING FEBRUARY 27, 2013, THE VESSEL KNOWN AS JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC ET AL, MUST BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE VESSEL WITH NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED. PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO USE JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC ET AL; FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES MAY BE FINED AT THE RATE OF TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($250,000) OR Equivalent of PER AND OR ANY PART THEREOF, WILL BE DEEMED TO BE UNAUTHORIZED USE. Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to the DULY AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE CORPORATION; at turtleislandone@gmail.com By: {The Le Blanc Family of Turtle Island Trust} CC-NC-ND-4.0

Why would you add to a Scott Duncan masterpiece?

It was actually an exercise on some thread, done with the Admirals approval at the time. A fill in the blanks for understanding and critical thinking kind of thing - I could not find or it was bull shit and deleted. If you will notice the date on the original post it was very early in tt4l. I simply did not know then, what I know now. Some One I trusted via agency liened the name. Stuart Stone Helped with some grammatical stuff, Scott laid out the basics Stuart and I worked to get it to a stage where then: It was Perfected By The Admiral. It was actually an exercise on some thread, done with the Admirals approval at the time. A fill in the blanks for understanding and critical thinking kind of thing - I could not find or it was bullshit and deleted. If you will notice the date on the original post, it was very early in tt4l. I simply did not know then, what I know now.

pardon the repeats browser add on issues

Do You Remember Scott Ever Saying, writing, telling us � I gave away the answers at the beginning�? The Article Number on this 001. It is the first Article. HELLOS? Feck. It might be worth further review since invoice, accounting and surety seem to be coming up. Me I rather have some one I trust create a Bill instead of an Invoice.

only 84 views, no wonder doom is in the air.

I just re-read the comments. I SO want to kick Derek Moran in the face. Holy shit I was so blind when this was written. If I had banned him RIGHT HERE, I could have saved a LOT of headaches.